from MIM NOTES 123 OCTOBER 1, 1996 U.$. ATTACKS TO INCREASE GULF OIL CONTROL President Clinton ordered two sets of cruise missile strikes at Iraq at the beginning of September, intended to increase Amerikan military control over southern Iraq, and control over the Persian Gulf region in general. After the attacks, which were supposed to weaken Iraqi air defenses, Amerika expanded its zone of air-based occupation by about 100 miles north into Iraq, almost all the way to Baghdad. The public reason for the attacks was to penalize the Iraqi government led by Saddam Hussein for its military strike into southern Kurdistan, which lies within Iraq's northern borders and within Amerika's imposed northern "no-fly" zone of air-based occupation. "When you abuse your people, or threaten your neighbors, you must pay a price," Clinton said.(1) Clinton was careful to direct the comment at Iraq only - but that did nothing to cover up the obvious hypocrisy of the Amerikan position. Bourgeois analysts were quite willing to give the real reasons for the Amerikan attack because Amerikans would never support military intervention just to help an oppressed nation such as the Kurds. So Defense Secretary William Perry made a point of saying Iraq posed a "clear and present danger" to nearby countries and to "the flow of oil in the world." And the ABC News military expert talking heads admitted the strikes on air-defense systems were long-intended, with the Kurdistan incident providing a justification.(2) Protecting the flow of oil is not really Amerika's goal, the goal is really to control that flow for Amerikan imperialist interests. Why else would the attacks have come just as Iraq was ready to implement a food-for-oil exchange that would have reintroduced Iraqi oil to the world market? That deal is now on hold. AMERIKA IS NOT PROTECTING KURDS The imperialists will not protect the oppressed nations of the world. Imperialism is the cause of the oppression and exploitation of these nations. The Kurdish people and all other oppressed peoples will only achieve self-determination through struggle against the imperialists. But even Clinton's high principle is revealed as meaningless rhetoric by the large Turkish invasion of that same Kurdish region within Iraq , against the Kurdish Workers Party (PKK), which is fighting for Kurdish liberation in Turkey.(3) This happened the same week Klinton ordered the air strike of Iraq. Turkey's bombing of Kurdish territory in Iraq doesn't offend Clinton's important humanitarian principles. The U.S. State Department said the Turkish incursion was OK, but Iraq's was not.(4) This is particularly revealing of the hypocrisy of the imperialists since Turkey crossed a recognized national border while Iraq acted within its own borders (a distinction which does not matter to MIM when we are talking about borders used to oppress people and enforce the imperialist world order.) In fact, Turkey has announced it will annex a strip of land on the Iraqi side of the border between the two countries as a "security zone," like Israel has in Lebanon.(3) This all fits the U.S. pattern of supporting Turkey's genocide of the Kurdish people, as in March 1995 when Turkey launched a major attack across Iraq's border. In that attack they struck mostly civilian targets, although they claimed to be after the "terrorist" PKK. The U.S. military cooperated by removing its patrolling aircraft from the area. As we wrote at the time: "The U.S. only cares for the Kurdish people when they are available for use as political pawns."(5) The U.S. government portrays itself as the would-be agent of Kurdish liberation, valiantly trying to get the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK) and the Kurdish Democratic Party (KDP) together to oppose Iraq's government. In the latest dispute, the KDP has gone to Iraq for help against the PUK, which was getting help from Iran. U.S. government sources have been telling the press that the KDP was working with the CIA to oppose the Iraqi government, and the KDP's invitation to Iraq to intervene against the PUK has undermined U.S. efforts there. One group getting money from the CIA is the Iraqi National Congress, which includes the KDP.(6) By some accounts the KDP's Massoud Barzani was the CIA's main contact there.(7) When MIM covered the Kurdish uprising in 1991 in an interview with a representative of the KDP, we warned of the dangers of accepting aid from the imperialists,(8) but at the same time it's not for us to say who they should or should not accept help from as long as they do not compromise the armed struggle against imperialism. If they are successfully manipulating the opposing powers of Iraq and Amerika for the benefit of Kurdish liberation - which we do not have evidence of at the present - then more power to them. At the moment it is hard to see how Kurdish liberation has benefited from the latest developments. Amerika has no problem with Iraq hampering Iran's attempts to gain influence within Iraq. Amerika does not want to see Iraq fall apart -- Amerika just wants to control Iraq itself. Still, government officials told the press that they were upset that Iraq disturbed their covert operations based in the north. Iraq's military assault on Erbil, in Kurdistan, undermined a CIA operation to overthrow the Iraqi government, Clinton administration officials told the New York Times. That operation had grown since January, when Clinton signed a secret order for increased CIA efforts, which went up to about $20 million this year from about $6 million the year before. The CIA operatives supposedly fled the country when Iraq attacked, leaving behind their Iraqi accomplices.(6) OPPOSE AMERIKAN IMPERIALISM While Saddam Hussein is no friend of the oppressed, MIM opposes all attacks by Amerikan imperialism. The terror inflicted on the Kurds by Saddam Hussein is nothing new, back when Amerikan imperialism was funding Hussein he was attacking the Kurds and Amerika did not mind that this was done with Amerikan weapons. The suffering of the Kurdish people must end, but this end will be brought about by the people themselves, not by imperialists who pretend support for the oppressed when it serves political interests while at the same time attacking oppressed nations around the world. In typical chauvinist reporting, Amerikan radio and press echoed the white house's joy that no Amerikan lives had been lost. No one tried to count the Iraqi lives lost in this "successful" air strike. The kind face Klinton tries to put on imperialism is just a cover for political maneuvering. The real message from this attack is that nations should not attempt to resist imperialist domination. But when imperialism means suffering and death for the majority of the world's people, another imperialist offensive in World War III is nothing new. This war is being fought in the Third World where the imperialists and their lackeys carry out constant low intensity warfare against the proletariat and peasants. These attacks don't make it into the news very often but they wreck constant genocide on the oppressed nations of the world. One more overt attack will not stop the oppressed from resisting imperialist domination and the majority of the world's people will eventually defeat the dictatorship by the minority and stop them from abusing all people. NOTES: 1. ABC New, 9/3/96. 2. Nightline, 9/3/96. 3. The New York Times, 9/7/96, p. A6. 4. The New York Times, 9/6/96, p. A1. 5. MIM Notes 100, May 1995. 6. The New York Times, 9/7/9696, p. A1. 7. Jim Hoagland in the Washington Post, 9/6/96, p. A23. 8. MIM Notes 51, April 1991.