I N T E R N E T ' S M A O I S T BI-M O N T H L Y = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = XX XX XXX XX XX X X XXX XXX XXX XXX X X X X X X X XX X X X X X X X V X X X V X X X X X X X XX XXX X X X X X X XX X X X X X X X XXX X X X V XXX X XXX XXX = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = THE MAOIST INTERNATIONALIST MOVEMENT MIM Notes 149 NOVEMBER 1, 1997 MIM Notes speaks to and from the viewpoint of the world's oppressed majority, and against the imperialist-patriarchy. Pick it up and wield it in the service of the people. support it, struggle with it and write for it. IN THIS ISSUE: 1. PUERTO RICAN MASSES ORGANIZE NATIONWIDE STRIKE 2. PIGS USE WAR ON DRUGS AND GANGS AS EXCUSE FOR MASS ROUND-UP 3. LETTERS 4. NATIONAL LIBERATION STRUGGLE IN THE PHILIPPINES: MIM/RAIL AND ALLIES LAUNCH LECTURE AND DISCUSSION SERIES 5. AMNESTY ON KOREA: RAISING HEGEMONISM TO A LEVEL OF PRINCIPLE 6. ANN ARBOR STUDENTS CELEBRATE INDIGENOUS PEOPLE'S DAY -- NOT COLUMBUS DAY 7. TEXAS GOV. BUSH BACKS DOWN ON LYNCHING IN FACE OF PRESSURE 8. CLINTON REJECTS LANDMINE TREATY 9. ANOTHER PRISONER DIES AFTER BRUTAL BEATING BY GUARDS 10. IMPERIALISTS EXPERIMENT USING THIRD WORLD WIMMIN 11. PATRIARCHY CONTINUES CONTROL OVER WIMMIN: NEW ABORTION BAN PASSES U$ HOUSE OF REPS 12. ORGANIZE TO END THE AMERIKAN LOCKDOWN 13. REPUDIATE CHARITY: PROMOTE REVOLUTION 14. AMERIKA GRABS FOR PUERTO RICAN PENAL SYSTEM 15. MARXISM-LENINISM-MAOISM ONLINE 16. UNDER LOCK AND KEY 17. U$ INEQUALITY GROWS; WORLD INEQUALITY STILL MUCH GREATER * * * WHAT IS MIM? The Maoist Internationalist Movement (MIM) is a revolutionary communist party that upholds Marxism-Leninism-Maoism, comprising the collection of existing or emerging Maoist internationalist parties in the English-speaking imperialist countries and their English-speaking internal semi-colonies, as well as the existing or emerging Spanish-speaking Maoist internationalist parties of Aztlan, Puerto Rico and other territories of the U.S. Empire. MIM Notes is the newspaper of MIM. Notas Rojas is the newspaper of the Spanish- speaking parties or emerging parties of MIM. MIM is an internationalist organization that works from the vantage point of the Third World proletariat; thus, its members are not Amerikans, but world citizens. MIM struggles to end the oppression of all groups over other groups: classes, genders, nations. MIM knows this is only possible by building public opinion to seize power through armed struggle. Revolution is a reality for North America as the military becomes over-extended in the government's attempts to maintain world hegemony. MIM differs from other communist parties on three main questions: (1) MIM holds that after the proletariat seizes power in socialist revolution, the potential exists for capitalist restoration under the leadership of a new bourgeoisie within the communist party itself. In the case of the USSR, the bourgeoisie seized power after the death of Stalin in 1953; in China, it was after Mao's death and the overthrow of the "Gang of Four" in 1976. (2) MIM upholds the Chinese Cultural Revolution as the farthest advance of communism in human history. (3) MIM believes the North American white-working-class is primarily a non- revolutionary worker-elite at this time; thus, it is not the principal vehicle to advance Maoism in this country. MIM accepts people as members who agree on these basic principles and accept democratic centralism, the system of majority rule, on other questions of party line. "The theory of Marx, Engels, Lenin and Stalin is universally applicable. We should regard it not as dogma, but as a guide to action. Studying it is not merely a matter of learning terms and phrases, but of learning Marxism-Leninism as the science of revolution." -- Mao Zedong, Selected Works, Vol. II, p. 208 * * * PUERTO RICAN MASSES ORGANIZE NATIONWIDE STRIKE On October 1st the entire country of Puerto Rico was shut down by a nationwide strike which drew hundreds of thousands of people to protest activities and a large rally in San Juan. The purpose of the strike, known by both its organizers and opponents as El Paro Nacional, was to protest Governor Pedro Rossello's plans to privatize state agencies, in particular the Puerto Rico Telephone Company. The Telephone Company is currently owned by the lackey colonial government of Puerto Rico but the strike did not represent support for the government. This strike was called for by over forty labor unions representing over 80,000 workers, and over a dozen non-governmental organizations representing environmentalist, nationalist, religious, cultural and civic sectors.(1) It was observed by workers and students alike. Many students took over universities while workers took to the streets. In a country of less than four million people, the number of people who participated in this strike is tremendous. In response to the strike, Governor Rossello announced in Washington that he would go ahead with the selling of the Telephone company. The Telephone workers union and other union leaders responded that they would strike for as long as it takes to stop this privatization. Alfonso Beni'tez Rosa, president of the Independent Union of Telephone Workers said "If we have to stay in the streets for a week we will stay because the people have spoken and Governor Rossello has to obey."(2) Public hospitals have also been privatized recently and the people are suffering as a result as they find health care services closed at night and diagnostic services closed completely. The government sold ten health care institutions for 26.9 million dollars and they hope to sell more of the public health system this year.(2) There is currently a campaign in Puerto Rico backed by the New Progressive Party (PNP) to sell the telephone company, public schools, hospitals, prisons, and public housing to private investors. EDUCATING THE WORKERS Many Puerto Rican activists supporting the strike drew parallels between the privatization of various public services like electricity, education and health. The importance of guaranteed services to the people was a strong theme in the literature and articles leading up to the strike. As the Central General de Trabajadores put it: "It is known that the [public] Telephone has resulted in great progress if one compares it with the past telephone in private hands. The same can be said about the Electrical Energy if one compares it with the private businesses before 1942. And before there was public school? Simply put, there was no school for the vast majority. For the users, when a service is privatized what happens is what always happens in the market: there will be good services for those who can pay. The rest will receive the minimum, or nothing. And what will happen with the workers? Privatization brings hardship and great job insecurity. In sum, privatization is the path of a society towards more insecurity and more inequality. Instead of privatizing we must make the public businesses more open, more democratic, more transparent and more participatory. The government of Rosello is not going down this path. The reason is simple: they are interested in private gain for a few and not the collective good or guaranteed services for the people."(3) This strike served a valuable educational role by raising the issue of public services being run for profit. Many articles discussed the failure of private services in other countries which brought in profit for a few but did not serve the needs of the people. This underscores the need for a government of the people, run in the interests of the people not in the interests of profit for a few who run and own the private corporations. REACTIONARY GOVERNMENT RESPONSE Attempts to quell the public outcry by making participation in the strike punishable or even illegal were common as the government began to realize how widespread the support for this action was. Prior to the strike, the government warned public employees that participation in the strike would be regarded as an unjustified absence. Some government agencies, such as the Aqueducts and Sewers Authority, the phone company and the Department of Education notified their employees that disciplinary sanctions would be imposed on those who did not show up for work on the first of October. Education secretary Victor Fajardo, earlier this year threatened with jail sentences those parents of public school students that protest the Education Department's policies.(1) As if this weren't enough, on September 19, Puerto Rican House representative Lissette Díaz submitted a bill that would classify as child abusers those parents that allow their children to become involved in labor union activities. The Department of Family Affairs actually announced that it supported the bill in principle. This ridiculous measure was not approved by the House of Representatives.(1) STUDENTS & MASSES OPPOSE IMPERIALISM Students took over the San Juan campus of the University of Puerto Rico(UPR) on October 1st. This campus has been the center of much activism in recent months. An unannounced visit by the governor caused a rebellion on September 16. Rossello' went to the school with some outside agitators to make a public show of support for his privatization plans. According to some accounts, Rossello' brought 80 armed policemen and six police vehicles with him that day.(1) The campus does not have armed police because of student protests in the 1970s after a campus cop murdered a student. On September 10, an assembly of several thousand students had approved a resolution in support of El Paro National and against the privatization of state functions. The assembly led to the formation of the University Front Against Privatization(FUCP) composed of students, professors and non-teaching employees.(1) El Nuevo Di'a, a reactionary daily newspaper in Puerto Rico, conducted a public opinion poll and found that a majority of Puerto Ricans oppose privatization.(4) This is in spite of a tremendous amount of government propaganda including bumper stickers, t-shirts and baseball caps with pro- privatization and pro-Rossello slogans, and full page ads in major newspapers and ads in radio and television. Even after spending all this money Rossello is unable to win the support of even a majority of Puerto Ricans for his plan to sell the country to the highest bidder. This is because the workers recognize that capitalism is not in their interests. In 1989, the median family income in Puerto Rico was $9,988 and in 1990 unemployment was at 20.4%. Compare this with the median family income in the u.s. in 1989 of $35,225 with unemployment of 6.3% in 1990(5). We don't even need to compare the oppressed nation workers to the imperialist bourgeoisie to see that capitalism does not work for the majority of Puerto Ricans. While the proletariat will not immediately be conscious that it is the system of capitalism that leads to their exploitation and oppression, demands such as those put forward by the striking Puerto Rican workers lead to a more systematic understanding of the problem. In Puerto Rico, the working class is majority proletarian (unlike the u.s. where it is majority labor aristocracy), and their economic demands can be the basis for this expanded understanding and organizing. It is the revolutionary leadership, coming from a Maoist vanguard party, that will provide the information and analysis that the proletariat can use to learn from and educate and organize around. As the Puerto Rican people began organizing around 1998 which will mark the 100th anniversary of colonialism in Puerto Rico, their fight for national liberation will only grow stronger. PUERTO RICO NO SE VENDE! NO A LA PRIVATIZACIO'N DE PUERTO RICO! NOTES: 1. PUERTO RICO NEWS written by Carmelo Ruiz-Marrero Issue #15 Monday, September 29, 1997 2. Oct2, p4 http://www.notiaccess.com/notiaccess/jueves.htm 3. http://www.utier.org/solidaridad.htm 4. El Nuevo Di'a August 13 1997. 5. Statistical Abstract of the United States, 1996. * * * PIGS USE WAR ON DRUGS AND GANGS AS EXCUSE FOR MASS ROUND-UP by MC53 The Zoo Crew, a group that has been organizing against police brutality in New Jersey, was raided by police recently. Thirteen locations related to the organization and four businesses run by the Zoo Crew were raided by 200 federal, state and county pigs during the end of August and beginning of September. The raids along with the arrests of twenty-three members were conducted under the pretense of the war on drugs. Various community organizations maintain that Newark's round-up of Zoo Crew members was intended to subvert the organization's protests against police brutality.(1) This invasion came on the tail of mass organizing by the Zoo Crew against a police murder in June. Following the murder, 300 pigs organized by the Fraternal Order of Police demonstrated to support the pig who shot Dannette Daniels, a 31 year old pregnant womyn. The Zoo Crew worked to expose this murder and is regarded by some community masses as young Black entrepreneurs "who were a positive force in the community."(2) Beside anti-police brutality work, the Zoo Crew has built Black community businesses in poor areas and has donated money for basketball clinics for community children.(2) MIM does not have enough contact with the Zoo Crew or the people it organizes to determine whether the organization is truly one which serves the masses. We do, however, have enough information about the mainstream media to understand that its interests are not in serving the people through relaying the truth. Because of this, we are skeptical of the information it presents as the truth. We also know from history that the pigs cannot be trusted to treat Black organizations justly. And most importantly, we understand the Amerikan history of framing Black nationalist activists and organizations to subvert leadership essential in mobilizing the masses against the oppressor. We must fight for the power of the people to control their communities. The white nation's police use its guns and warrants to perpetuate the power of an illegitimate government which represents an oppressor nation. Only when the people have seized this power will justice be possible. Organizations like the Zoo Crew must be judged by the masses. Because the purpose of the current judicial system is to inflict damage against and control oppressed nations, it cannot be trusted to draw just conclusions about groups like the Zoo Crew. In another recent round-up, New York city pigs rounded up 167 people they suspect of being members of the Bloods.(3)The pigs justified the round up by saying that it was conducted to subvert drug infiltration and recruiting in schools opening up in the fall. The pigs and the mainstream media portray the Bloods as a murdering organization selling drugs and indiscriminately killing random people whereas MIM has worked with youth from the Bloods who are interested in stopping brutality by the police and working toward the end of all oppression. At this point, the principal battle in the united snakes is against the domination by the white settler nation over oppressed nations. We work with individuals and organizations which genuinely oppose imperialism and settler neo-colonialism. MIM does not advocate the use of drugs or even illegal activities to make money for our revolutionary work at this stage in our organizing. We urge all working against settler imperialism to understand the Amerikan history of using any justification to infiltrate and smash revolutionary or nationalist organizations. Until the time when the masses are able to decide who is arrested and what sentences are handed down it is important that the oppressed stay away from breaking the oppressors laws. The sentences for members of oppressed groups will not be the same as it is for the oppressor. Three alleged gang members in Los Angeles were sentenced to 54 years in prison each for allegedly committing a murder.(4) The police officers who have murdered oppressed nationals receive no such punishments. The marines who killed a young Latino have not been punished. Bush was not held responsible for the deaths of over 150,000 masses of Iraq who died from Napalm, starvation and massive bombings. Clinton has not been held responsible for the deaths of the oppressed under his regime. So while MIM does not support the use of violence against the masses by anyone, we understand that the current system is one in which the laws are not applied equally. As long and hard as civil rights activists have tried, equal justice will not happen under the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie which serves the interests of the settler nation. Revolution is necessary for the people to obtain power over their economic, political, judicial, educational and military systems. Only with this power can we achieve justice and equality for all people. NOTES: 1. The New York Times. 3 September 1997 p.A 20. 2. The New York Times 29 August 1997 p. A12. 3. The New York Times 28 August 1997 p. A17. 4. The New York Times 3 August 1997 p. A16. * * * LETTERS PACIFISTS: JOIN THE ANTI-IMPERIALIST UNITED FRONT Dear MIM, We have your letter saying we've had our last issue of MIM Notes unless you hear from me. First, we would exchange with the Nonviolent Activist, if you have any interest in getting a pacifist, counter-revolutionary, bourgeois publication. On most points we are, as you realize, sharply at variance. However, disagreements should not prevent dialogue in fact they should be the basis of it. I enclose some of our material so you can have a better idea. (Including a copy of NVA.) I note your page four discussion on the Death Penalty you are, in a sense, trapped by Chinas actions, somewhat as the old CP used to be trapped by Soviet actions. Since the Revolution in China has had nearly fifty years, shouldn't it be time for the death penalty to be abandoned? Actually on that point I'm being unfair to you because you don't see the current leadership of China as revolutionary. I do personally respect Mao's role in history and in freeing China from Western domination and still question his logic in elevating Stalin (or even Lenin) to the position of infallibility. Clearly you are struggling for a new and better world and almost certainly represent at least as many men and women behind bars as we do, and probably have contacts within the communities of color we might envy. Peace, -- a member War Resisters League staff War Resisters League 339 Lafayette St. New York, NY 10012 (212) 228-0450 e-mail: wrl@igc.apc.org MIM RESPONDS: We agree with this member of the War Resisters League staff that it is worthwhile for us to exchange literature. We can both learn from the information the other has and we can also advance our work through theoretical struggle. While we have strong disagreements with pacifism because it means turning the other cheek and allowing the imperialists to go on murdering the people, this does not mean we can not benefit from an exchange of publications with this organization. In particular, pacifists can contribute to the spread of information exposing u.s. militarism which is something that MIM consistently opposes in our Maoist organizing to end oppression. One point that we'd like to take up in this letter response is the question of elevating Lenin or Stalin to infallibility. The idea that Mao held such a line is the product of bourgeois education but is not based in reality. In fact, if you read Mao's writings you will find that he considered Stalin 70% correct (certainly this could not be mistaken for infallibility. Similarly, Mao had some disagreements with Lenin. But Mao upheld the correct revolutionary Marxist-Leninist line that is based in dialectical materialism, a way of analyzing the world, not dogmatism. The view that all things said by these individuals must be correct and infallible for all time is not a result of materialist analysis, but rather a myth that the imperialists use in their characterization of communists to discredit the struggles of the masses. Mao was able to lead the Chinese people in their successful revolutionary struggle because of this correct political line. It was only by understanding that political line is a method of evaluating the world and the problems we face that he could come up with effective strategies. The dogmatists in China got themselves killed while the Maoist movement grew into the successful revolution that overthrew Japanese imperialism and established socialism in a country that constitutes a quarter of the world's population. THE COLOR BLACK DEAR MIM, i'm writing this article , to shed some light on the issue, which was discussed on the color Black, in your March (MN 134) issue of MIM Notes. i'm not disagreeing with anyone, but i just think that when We dialogue on that subject We must not leave out nationality. So in short, i'm attempting to elevate the discussion to NATIONALITY. We as a people need to start redirecting Our thinking. We have been trained to denote the color black (e.g. reference to black in the american Heritage dictionary blackball, black market, blackmail, blacklist) just to name a few. It shows by the dialect between MIM and the brotha who wrote the article concerning Black, that We're starting to recognize the need for change. We're overcoming a lot of the negativity taught to Us through the mis-education system of amerika. i applaud the brotha for elevating his thought. Now that We are no longer allowing Our oppressors to dictate to Us what to think and how to think, let's focus on NATIONALITY. What is the name of your Nation? What term do you use to identify your nationality. "We should disregard the words black & white immediately, because they serve as obstacles to clarity when an excavation of nationality is needed. In short this one over simplification of people works to Our detriment, by obscuring nationality." - Sanyika Shakur We know that "each nationality receives a collective name & accumulates elements of common culture". Our nationality is formulated on these shores of amerika. Through colonialism, the nationalities of Ibo, Ashanti, Ewe, Fante, & Akan, among other, came the fundamental consolidation/fusion of who We are today: New Afrikans. We are not black people, We're African people, and Our nationality is New Afrikan. We're not amerikans nor are we Afrikan americans. Amerika is what We're struggling to rid Ourselves of. There's no way would could possible be amerikans. WE ARE NEW AFRIKANS. We as a people are in an ideological battle (war of words) and We must focus Our attention on nationality and the struggle for an independent Nation; a New Afrikan Nation. Let's continue to struggle against the crime of GENOCIDE and america (imperialism). UHURU SASA!! - A Missouri Prisoner, 5 March 1997 (1) What's In A Name - Sayika Shakur (2) No We're Not Amerikkkans - Crossroad Collective (3) Fade From Black - Owusu Yaki Yakuba (aka Atiba Shanna) MIM RESPONDS: We welcome this opportunity to clarify why we do not use the term New Afrikan. This comrade is correct that we need to be talking about nation rather than just color or race. And to do this we need to be naming the nations within u.s. borders that share a common language, territory, culture and economy. We also agree with this comrade that using the term African American is incorrect because we are not talking about a group of people who have become a part of Amerika nor are we talking about a struggle of integration into the imperialist white nation. The term New Afrikan has the advantage of distinguishing the nation within u.s. borders from Africa while focusing on the issue of nationality. But the problem with the term is its heavily cultural nationalist origins and usage. It is important that we steer the national liberation struggle away from cultural nationalism. Cultural nationalism is the false ideology of liberation that misleads many whose sentiments for national liberation should put them in the revolutionary camp. Cultural nationalism tells people that it is their culture that will liberate them and so the important thing is what you wear, how you talk, how you do your hair, and what leisure time activities you engage in. Rather than teaching people that we need to systematically organize to overthrow imperialism in order to gain national liberation, cultural nationalism serves the bourgeoisie by encouraging pacifism and minor cultural changes. We share this comrade's focus on nationality and on fighting imperialism and we hope that discussions like this one will help elevate the ideological understanding of our readers while we stress the unity we have with this comrade and others who may not agree with our language. This language is not decisive, anti-imperialism is decisive and we must unite around this struggle, even while we are debating our disagreements over various political line and tactics. * * * NATIONAL LIBERATION STRUGGLE IN THE PHILIPPINES In conjunction with the Revolutionary Anti- Imperialist League, BAYAN - International - USA, and many other friends and allies, the Maoist Internationalist Movement is proud to present a series of lectures and discussions with RAFAEL BAYLOSIS Political Consultant to Bagong Alyansang Makabayan (BAYAN, or New Patriotic Alliance), and consultant to the National Democratic Front of the Philippines' panel for socio-economic reforms in its peace negotiations with the Government of the Republic of the Philippines: Tuesday, November 11, 7:30 p.m. All Souls Church Unitarian 16th & Harvard Streets N.W. Washington, D.C. Sunday Nov 16 7pm Hampshire College, Amherst MA Franklin Patterson Hall Check signs by door for room number. Monday Nov 17 7pm University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA Campus Center Check at info desk for room number. Wednesday November 19 7pm Boston University Room TBA Thursday November 18 7pm Brandeis University Room TBA Thursday, November 20 2pm UMass, Boston Room TBA Friday, November 21 6pm Boston Community Church of Boston 565 Boylston St. Near the Copley Square T stop [For more information, write to your local distributor or go to http://www.prisoncensorship.info/archive/etext/ on the World Wide Web] Rafael Baylosis is an experienced activist and political consultant in the national democratic struggle, as well as a former political prisoner. In his youth, he participated in the "First Quarter Storm," which mobilized thousands of Filipino young people in the wake of Ferdinand Marcos' "re- election" in 1969. He later joined the revolutionary movement in the countryside. He served as consultant and observer in the 1987 peace negotiations between the Aquino government and the National Democratic Front of the Philippines (NDFP). Since his release from imprisonment in 1992, he has been helping to give political and theoretical education to mass leaders and members of progressive people's organizations. He is a consultant to the National Democratic Front of the Philippines' (NDFP's) panel for socio-economic reforms agenda in the on-going peace talks between the NDFP and the GRP (Government of the Republic of the Philippines). His talk is part of a national educational tour to teach the campus and community about the national democratic struggle uniting the Filipino people, indigenous communities, peasants, and wimmin on issues of social justice, democracy, environmental integrity and equality. Specifically, the national democratic movement struggles against what it considers the three main enemies of the people of the Philippines: imperialism, feudalism , and bureaucrat capitalism. The national democratic movement sprang from the militant student and worker movement in Manila in the mid-sixties and quickly spread to all sectors of Philippine society. It encompasses both underground organizations such as the Communist Party of the Philippines and the NDFP, which engage in armed struggle, and independent legal organizations such as BAYAN. ADMISSION FREE; DONATION REQUESTED * * * AMNESTY ON KOREA: RAISING HEGEMONISM TO A LEVEL OF PRINCIPLE Amnesty International(AI), the so-called human rights organization which decries "politics" in the name of supposedly valueless moral standards, has given new meaning to the hypocrisy of this line with its position on the famine in north Korea. The October, 1997 issue of Amnesty's Human Rights Bulletin includes an article called "Politics First: Starvation in North Korea." True to Amnesty's masthead claim that it is "Nonpolitical, Nonprofit, Impartial," one-half of the article is devoted to detailing the north Korean famine. Completely blowing any claims to ignore politics, the article goes on to lambast Kim Jong Il and the north Korean government for "hold[ing] [their] own people hostage as if 22 million starving North Koreans [sic] were no more than negotiating chips." MIM does not criticize AI for making politics the issue here -- clearly under capitalism if people are starving and enough food exists in the world to feed them, politics can be the only thing between starving people and food. But Amnesty is way out of line hiding behind the banner of a supposedly "non- political" organization while it upholds Amerikan violence against the oppressed in Korea. Amnesty argues that "North Korea is trying to use its citizens' hunger as a bargaining chip, arguing that Washington should either deliver massive food aid before the two Koreas, China and the U.S. sit down for serious negotiations to end the state of war that has existed on the Korean Peninsula since 1950." But where is the righteous anger that should be directed at the United Snakes, which caused and now perpetuates this "state of war," first by operating a so-called "civil war" in Korea, and now by occupying south Korea? If the north Korean government is truly the only party bargaining for food here, why hasn't Amerika simply turned over the required aid rather than attempting to starve out the north Korean government and force it to submit to unequal negotiations with a government which has occupied half of Korea for almost fifty years? To a limited extent, AI is right that "two years of flood and two months of severe drought" are causing the famine. The deeper cause is "an economy crippled by the U.$. military-enforced division between north and south Korea. MIM does not recognize the imperialist proclamation that Korea is two separate nations: south Korea was carved out by Amerikan occupiers immediately following World War Two. Amerikan occupiers keep the north and south separate," as MIM Notes wrote in July. Just as it ignores the U.$. role in causing north Korea's troubles, AI ignores the fact that "north Korea was able to manage its food production and distribution effectively over the past two years by applying Kim Il Sung's strong notion of the self- reliance of peoples -- Juche." Even non-communist human rights observers have admitted that strong self-reliant policies forestalled the famine. Understanding the Amerikan historical role in Korea is very important to understanding the current situation. While MIM does not uphold north Korea as socialist or communist, we agree with the Koreans that the U.$. occupation is ample proof that Amerika is not to be bargained with. A country should not be criticized for failing to enter so-called negotiations under the condition of military occupation. AI has more political handicaps than its incorrect adherence to a "nonpolitical" position on political issues. It is a general rule for Amnesty chapters to focus on issues outside the countries in which they organize, which explains why this issue of Human Rights Bulletin focuses on hunger internationally but directs more venom at the north Korean government -- which is suffering from hunger, than at the U.$. government -- which is enforcing hunger. MIM takes responsibility first for organizing around conditions in the United Snakes; and when we do work abroad, we focus first on the role of the U.$. government overseas. We do this because organizing within the belly of the beast, we have more access to information about Amerika's exploits, and we have the ability to test our line in practice. Similarly, we show our respect for our comrades in other countries by acknowledging their analysis of their own material conditions. The U.$. government and military have committed uncounted crimes against the people of the world. We call on all people who oppose imperialism and the starvation it imposes on the Third World to work with MIM Notes researching and exposing the Amerikan reign of terror. Work with us to help more Amerikans see that their government is not worth their support. NOTES: Human Rights Bulletin October 1997, p. 9; MIM Notes 142 July 15, 1997. * * * ANN ARBOR STUDENTS CELEBRATE INDIGENOUS PEOPLE'S DAY -- NOT COLUMBUS DAY Over 200 people gathered on the University of Michigan campus to celebrate Indigenous People's Day on October 13. Settler Amerikans have long celebrated Columbus Day along with oppressor's holidays like Thanksgiving Day as a way to culturally perpetuate the myth that European settlers came to North America and developed the current empire through hard work. The rally successfully exposed this myth and spread the truth of the people. European settlers conquered North America and the First Nations through massacres and widespread genocide. The wealth accumulated by the settlers came from plundering the resources of the First Nations and later taking the resources of oppressed nations internationally. This wealth is a result of massive enslavement of Africans and First Nation peoples and the exploitation of oppressed nation labor across the globe. As many of the speakers echoed: the wealth of Amerika has been built on the backs of the oppressed. The celebration recognized those who have died at the hands of the oppressors and those who have fought against oppression. The rally and march were led by the Native American Student Association, the Black Student Union, Alianza, La Voz Mexicana and the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. Starting out the rally, the Treetown Singers, a group of First Nation men performing and drumming indigenous songs, gathered the people. The group performed songs which honored ancestors and struggles fought in the past. The group also helped lead the march. Many students echoed the message that oppression must be stopped, some talked about the need to strengthen the struggles of the oppressed against attacks on Affirmative Action, others talked about the need to mobilize more students and some read progressive poems. One rally sign read "No more genocide." One womyn read a poem which MIM and RAIL liked a lot because of its progressive and anti- colonial content: Oh say can you see, in this land of the free and the home of our braves, We are "Indians" We are here and alive We are not what you see on F-Troop, or John Wayne's target practice We can no longer accept the legislative castration which controls our future We cannot handle more schooling which cuts our hair and beats us if we speak our language, the only language I know at nine years old. We see our black bothers and sisters trying to improve their lives. We should too. This revolution will not be televised either. We are the American Indian Movement. If we have to occupy Alcatraz and Washington offices to get you to listen to our pain, we'll do it. The economy is growing and the government wants the resources on our land. We need to manage our tribe's new income. We need to train our people. We need to serve our sister on the far end of the rez. Mr. Nixon, Mr. Reagan, Mr. Bush, Mr. Clinton, we need the government to stop putting the power and funding of us into everyone's hands but us. Stop being a parent because we are not children. We are reaching across the rez to serve We are going to law school and medical school We are able to grow our hair long again. We are self-determining. We are Native Americans. MIM and RAIL support all struggles to stop oppression. Principally we support struggles for national liberation to overthrow settler colonialism and imperialism in this stage of struggle. We have in the past organized events and rallies on Indigenous People's Day and it is good to see this banner being taken up by an increasing number of students and organizations. As we are turning the corner on 1998 -- the 100th anniversary of the u.s. invasion of Puerto Rico and the Philippines and the 25th anniversary of the second u.s. invasion of Wounded Knee, there are many struggles of the people to commemorate. The Amerikan schools don't teach the history of the masses and it is up to us to celebrate the struggles of the people and the true nature of imperialism and settler colonialism. It is essential that the people educate and promote the histories of the oppressed because the oppressor only wants the mythical versions presented. The people must spread the history of struggle and continue the fight against the continuing genocide committed through imperialism and settler colonialism. NOTE: For a good account of the real history of Amerika, check out Settlers: the mythology of the white proletariat by J. Sakai. Available from MIM for $15. And Agents of Repression available for $25 from the address on page two. * * * TEXAS GOV. BUSH BACKS DOWN ON LYNCHING IN FACE OF PRESSURE by MC53 On October 8, Texas Governor George W. Bush announced he would finally issue a pardon to James Byrd, a Black man who spent 12 years in prison for being convicted in the white nation's courts of the rape of a white woman. In MIM Notes #147, we reported that Gov. Bush of Texas refused to pardon Byrd, despite the fact that DNA tests showed he did not commit the crime for which he was facing the death penalty. Bush stepped down from this position because of public pressure and a court ruling which stated the DNA tests were valid. MIM congratulates those who struggled for Byrd's life and we encourage Byrd and his supporters to continue the struggle against all facets of national oppression and the imperialist system as a whole. We reported on Bush's planned lynching to build opposition to it and opposition to the use of Amerika's prisons to oppress the masses. As there are now over 1.6 million people languishing the Amerika's prisons, there is much work to be done. Bush and other settler nation pigs jump at whatever chance they can to lynch a Black man. Out of 14 previous pardons by Bush not one of them had been of a Black person. Police beatings and tremendously disproportionate arrests, convictions and incarcerations of oppressed nationals are all part of the continued genocide committed by the white nation. If it were not for agitation against the lynching, another Black man would be killed. And the longer it takes to end national oppression, patriarchy and capitalism, the higher the death toll from imperialism. Byrd's situation supports MIM's argument that the death penalty under imperialism must be opposed. With the oppressors standing at the switch drooling over the possibility of legal murders of the masses, the death penalty will only be used as a tool to support the current oppressive system. It is only in the hands of the people that the death penalty and other punishments can be used toward the goal of ending all oppression and eliminating the need for any punishments at all. Work with MIM to end the Amerikan lockdown of the oppressed and to build independent institutions of the oppressed. NOTE: The New York Times. 9 October 1997, p. A17. * * * CLINTON REJECTS LANDMINE TREATY by MC234 Amerika has once again demonstrated its strongly militarist foreign policy agenda by rejecting the organized efforts of other imperialist nations, principally Kanada, to ban the production and use of landmines. MIM Notes 146, 15 September 1997, reported that Clinton was dragging his feet on endorsing the treaty, and planned to argue that Amerika be allowed to continue the use of landmines in Korea. At the Geneva talks, the Amerikan negotiators also tried to push back the deadline for the ban nine years. The other imperialists rejected these Amerikan efforts to water down the effort to ban landmines and have continued to bash Amerikan policy on landmines in the media. Of course, the imperialists have not suddenly become peaceful, they are just responding to public pressure by putting a prettier face on their military exploits. The elimination of landmines will not reduce the militarism of the imperialist countries that is focused on the Third World peoples. On 10 October, an Amerikan womyn, Jody Williams, and her organization, the International Campaign to Ban Landmines, won the Nobel Peace Prize. The Norwegian Nobel Committee said that Williams "had transformed a ban on anti-personnel mines from a vision to a feasible reality." This award has focused more attention to the landmine issue, with Russia responding by pledging to support the treaty. As MIM Notes reported, the only major powers who had not yet endorsed the treaty were Amerika, Russia and China. MIM sees the banning of landmines as a progressive act that will keep from escalating an already horrible toll on the people. We have no false hopes that the imperialists want to stop their bloody oppression of the people; they merely want to do it more effectively and with a kinder gentler face. (And a weapon being illegal has never stopped the imperialists from using it when they needed it, anyway.) Even if landmines are banned today, there will still be 112 million landmines sown in 71 nations. According to the International Committee of the Red Cross, landmines kill or maim 24,000 people a year, most of them civilians and often children. Mines from World War I and II still injure or kill scores of people a year.(2) NOTES: 1. Springfield Union-News 11 October 1997, p. A1, A8. 2. Boston Globe, 15 August 1997, p. A2 * * * ANOTHER PRISONER DIES AFTER BRUTAL BEATING BY GUARDS by a RAIL comrade Abel Remy was beaten to unconsciousness inside his cell at Walpole prison in Massachusetts on August 1, 1997. When he regained consciousness, he began screaming uncontrollably. He was then attacked by four or five guards in riot gear. Next he was taken to a segregation unit. Abel Remy never returned to his cell. He died on August 12 of a heart attack caused by a blood clot in his leg. Abel Remy was a thirty-six year old man from Haiti. He was convicted in the white nation's courts of aggravated assault charges which he repeatedly denied. In March, he was transferred to Walpole prison, where he was inhumanely locked up for twenty-two and a half hours each day. When Abel's family was told he had died, they were not told about the beatings. Anthony Carnevale, spokesperson for the Department of Corrections, claimed that state laws barred him from revealing disciplinary or medical reports on Remy while he was incarcerated. The fact that such laws exist demonstrates, once again, that what goes on behind prison walls is not meant to be revealed to the public. Abel Remy kept fairly close contact with his family despite the rigid structure of maximum security prisons, which was created, in part, to discourage prisoner/family ties. Remy complained on several occasions throughout his time in Walpole of beatings he had received from guards. He reported that he had found feces in his food. These are the kinds of secrets which the D.O.C. hides. Evidence has shown that Abel Remy was severely dehydrated when he died. Authorities are claiming that his dehydrated state could have caused the blood clot which lead to his heart attack. They have suggested that Remy was on hunger strike, therefore proposing his death was his own fault. On September 17 the family of Able Remy held a press conference where they called for a full investigation into his death. As of this date, more than a month after his death, the family still have not been given access to the autopsy results. Whether the clot developed as a result of severe beatings or as a result of the hunger-strike dehydration the authorities at Walpole prison are to blame for his death. We argue that the Amerikan prison system which only serves the interests of the settler nation is at fault for his death and the death of pervious victims killed by murderous prison guards. Oppressed nationals do not get a just and fair trial in the white nation's courts; they do not get adequate medical care and are subjected to inhumane conditions, slave labor and brutality. The Amerikan government and the DOC cannot pawn off the responsibility deaths of the oppressed caused by imperialism: it is the Amerikan prison system which the people find guilty. * * * IMPERIALISTS EXPERIMENT USING THIRD WORLD WIMMIN by MC53 Just three months ago, president Clinton held a token ceremony to apologize to the men of Tuskegee who were used in human experimentation. Just three weeks ago, federal officials justified human experimentation on wimmin of seven nations in Africa, Asia and Latin America and the Caribbean. In both cases, members of nations oppressed by imperialism were told they were receiving treatment when in actuality, imperialists used these people's bodies for experimentation. Experimenting on oppressed nationals has been justified to improve drugs. But the oppressed have limited or non- existent access to drug treatments or health care in general. This kind of human experimentation only improves the quality of life of the oppressor and frequently endangers the lives of the people used in the experiments. 12,211 pregnant, HIV positive wimmin have been part of an experiment for two years in which they were told they were receiving treatment that can prevent the transmission of HIV to their children. Studies showed previously that HIV positive wimmin taking AZT during pregnancy could cut the risk of transmitting the virus to their children by two- thirds. The experimentation allegedly was trying to find less expensive drug treatment than AZT, which currently costs $1000 per womyn. Some wimmin in the experiment received placebo pills while others received varying levels of AZT - - levels that are different from what has been demonstrated to deter transmission. Besides using these Third World wimmin as guinea pigs, 1,000 infants will contract the virus because their mothers, who were in the study, were not given AZT. The National Institutes of Health and the Centers for Disease Control financed this experimentation on the wimmin. Run by the imperialists in the interests of First World nations, institutes with resources that could greatly improve the lives of the masses, instead only further First World hegemonism. This is one reason why Maoists argue that technology and resources are not principal, but rather, correct political line and power in the hands of the masses are most decisive in the battle toward liberation of the world's people from oppression. Federal officials justified denying treatment to the wimmin and their children by saying that they would not otherwise have access to the treatment anyway. This type of logic put forward by the bourgeois imperialist pigs does not surprise Maoists. Because Amerika needed to test weapons, Amerika has killed millions in the Third World. The same bourgeois logic is used to justify those murders: since millions in the Third World are starving anyway, Amerika should not hold back from killing Third World peoples en masse. Though this is one aspect of the justification for First World genocide committed against the oppressed, the imperialists will use any reasoning available to justify the murder of the masses to advance the standard of living in the imperialist nations. Whereas the wimmin and children from the Third World nations were used as laboratory tools, current HIV research in the United Snakes includes treatment and has eliminated placebo-controlled experiments according to The New England Journal of Medicine. (The point of eliminating placebo-control experiments is that in these, the human being tested does not receive treatment at all.) Whether or not HIV positive Amerikans are truly exempt from experimentation is not something that MIM can independently confirm, but it is enough to note that this is the direction of the experiments in the imperialist nations, and is not the goal of experiments conducted on the oppressed nation masses. Maoists push for a people's government which will use resources to liberate the masses whether it is liberation from slavery or liberation from disease. Fight with us for equal access to medical care, research and treatment for all the world's people. * * * PATRIARCHY CONTINUES CONTROL OVER WIMMIN: NEW ABORTION BAN PASSES U$ HOUSE OF REPS by MC53 The so-called u.$. House of Representatives approved a ban of late term abortions on October 8. The ban passed with enough votes to withstand the expected presidential veto. This ban will increase the imperialist state's control of wimmin. Proponents of the ban are using the late-term abortion procedure in order to build public support for state control of wimmin general. By highlighting a type of abortion which has more opposition, the anti-choice faction of the bourgeoisie hopes to isolate the pro-choice faction of the bourgeoisie before the upcoming 1998 elections. Moreover, the promoters of the ban are using their raunchy accounts of the procedure to build opposition to all abortion procedures. President Clinton has played to both bourgeois factions on this issue, as he usually does. On the one hand, Clinton previously vetoed this legislation, saying that it did not protect pregnant wimmin. On the other, he opposes late-term abortions generally. MIM is not surprised by Clinton's behavior, and MIM certainly does not join the chorus of social democrats who wish that Clinton would just "get a spine" and stand up for what he supposedly believes in. This is because MIM recognizes that the existing state can not implement reforms that would eliminate the oppression of all wimmin or in this case, the let wimmin completely control their own bodies. The fundamental role of existing state is to preserve patriarchy and imperialism. The Amerikan "pro-choice" movement is a good example of this axiom. On the one hand, the u.$. did concede an individual womyn's "right" to an abortion. But on the other, poor wimmin and wimmin from oppressed nationalities still do not have the opportunity to make this abstract "right" a reality. And wimmin of oppressed nations still suffer a large number of restrictions on their reproductive freedom, such as forced sterilization. The mainstream "pro-choice" movement has not taken a stand on such issues, in order to remain "respectable" and be able to "work within the system." Forced sterilization is often justified with the rhetoric of "choice." The mainstream "pro-choice" movement in the united snakes has objectively worked in the interests of white nation wimmin only. But the majority of the world's wimmin are Third World wimmin. Third World wimmin not only fight for access to abortion, but also against patriarchal control through imperialism. Wimmin of oppressed nations are subjected to the economic and political control of imperialism. Movements in the First World must not ignore the struggles of the majority of the worlds wimmin. Instead, First World movements must be anti-imperialist at their core. When wimmin's movements do this, they will truly be working to end patriarchy which is necessary to truly end gender oppression and the flip flopping on issues like abortion. MIM recognizes that patriarchy and imperialism are systems which restrict and determine individual's choices. Indeed, because patriarchy robs wimmin of their ability to freely consent to sex in the first place, it robs them of reproductive freedom. To smash patriarchy as a system we work for the liberation of the oppressed nations and the establishment of a consciously feminist dictatorship of the proletariat. Gender oppression cannot be demolished by piecemeal reforms which are constantly revised by the dictatorship of the patriarchal bourgeoisie. If you are sick of hitting your head against a wall only to find that you are not working in the interests of the majority of the worlds people and you are not achieving and sustaining your own goal of wimmin's control over their bodies, work with MIM and RAIL. Start revolutionary feminist study groups, work to support the struggles of wimmin in prison, wimmin of oppressed nations and work against gender oppression in its totality. NOTES: The New York Times. 9 October 1997. p. A1 and A13. * * * ORGANIZE TO END THE AMERIKKKAN LOCKDOWN Ann Arbor, MI -- Nightly events held during the first full week in October were organized by the Revolutionary Anti-Imperialist League and the Maoist Internationalist Movement to expose the Amerikkkan prison system as a tool for national oppression and social control. The week of agitation was one part of our organizing to build support for national liberation and opposition to the current oppressive hegemonic control by the white settler nation over the Black, Latino and First nations and other oppressed nationals held captive in the United Snakes. In recent months, a young Black man was shot in the back by a Detroit pig for no reason; a Mexican youth was shot and murdered by Marines patrolling the illegitimate u.s. border; a Haitian man was assaulted and seriously injured by pigs still on the payroll in Brooklyn; a Black man in Ann Arbor was shot and killed needlessly by the University of Michigan campus cops; a Michigan prisoner was raped and brutalized by prison guards; another Michigan prisoner was transferred because of his political activities and the prison pigs have denied him access to his books, typewriter, legal paperwork, money, and other belongings. The above are merely a few of many examples of the injustice perpetrated against oppressed nationals within the United Snakes. Never have reformist or pacifist struggles liberated the peoples of oppressed nations from imperialist claws. Only national liberation struggles have truly liberated the people. For this reason, RAIL under the leadership of the Maoist Internationalist Movement held events to build support for genuine liberation of the oppressed. FIGHT THE CRIMINAL INJUSTICE SYSTEM After the first event of the series, showing of Framed: the story of Geronimo Pratt, the audience discussed methods to address the oppressive Amerikan injustice system. One African man discussed his frustration with the current system and various past failures of attempts to change the system. He suggested that we organize people to stop paying taxes to the oppressor nation government. Another Black man echoed frustration with the system and pointed out that in 1973 Michigan had five prisons and currently that number is up to 40 prisons. The organizers talked about the need for academics, students and radicals in the primarily affluent area of Ann Arbor to engage in mass work. Led by MIM, RAIL's work is to agitate against oppression and to build independent institutions of the oppressed which create the necessary foundations to build new societies run in the interests of the people. The facilitator pointed out that much can be learned by activists in affluent areas from the revolution in the Philippines. Leaders of the national democratic movement do not ignore the oppressed masses in their organizing work, instead they send organizers from the urban areas to work with the masses in the countryside. Through consistent and genuine mass work and mass organizing, the national democratic movement has been able to organize the people of the Philippines in a successful and growing revolutionary movement. Another member of the audience said that what needs to be done is exposure of the atrocities committed by the oppressor. We wholeheartedly agree. That's why MIM Notes and RAIL Notes are essential tools in our fight to stop oppression. Similarly, it is important to fight against agitation which opportunistically mixes the goals of the settler nation with the goals of the oppressed. Pimping off the backs of the oppressed is a regular strategy of the imperialists. This same strategy is employed by the white left and liberals in Amerikan saying that the white nation has an economic interest in revolution. We also discussed how the proliferation of prisons benefits the white nation middle classes. The labor aristocracy would rather fight to have higher wages as oppressive security guards, occupying police or prison guards than struggle to end the massive imprisonment of oppressed nationals. SYSTEMATIC NATIONAL OPPRESSION During another night of the series, audience members elaborated on the fact that the prison system and the police forces are oppressive tools; it is not just a few pigs gone bad or just one crumbling, freezing in the winter prison that we should mobilize opposition against. We showed End of the Nightstick which is about systematic police brutality against Blacks in Chicago. The film only shows a small proportion of the brutality committed by Amerikan pigs against Blacks but is extremely useful in demonstrating that the brutality committed is done in the interests of protecting white settler nation hegemony. Another event during the series focused on the torture of three political wimmin imprisoned in Lexington. After showing Through the Wire we talked about the inhumane treatment of prisoners in Amerika. We compared this with the ways in which the Amerikan government engages in its trade wars with other nations under the guise of opposing human abuse. BRUTALITY IN MICHIGAN PRISONS A activist working with RAIL gave a talk about "Slavery and Brutality in Michigan Prisons", discussing the fact that Michigan prisoners work for as little as 24 cents per hour under threat of disciplinary action if they refuse this work. We pointed out that while the justification for paying prisoners so little is that all of prisoners' expenses are taken care of while they are in prison, even this is no longer true as the state of Michigan recently began enforcing legislation which makes prisoners pay for their own health care. These economic conditions are backed by the constant threat of brutality in the form of beatings, torture, bad food, punitive segregation, censorship and gratuitous transfers of so-called "unmanageable" prisoners. RAIL relied principally on prisoner letters to MIM and RAIL in giving this presentation because events like this are one of the few opportunities we have to help prisoners have their voices heard. MIM Notes publishes Under Lock & Key as a means of giving prisoners access to people on the outside, and we saw this event as a chance to let prisoners speak for themselves about the conditions inside Michigan prisons. The audience was very friendly to RAIL and MIM's work around prisons and agreed with us that all violations of prisoners' rights -- from censorship to murder -- constitute brutality against prisoners and should be opposed by all people who have a progressive stance on prison. One person at the event pointed out that the state violates its own laws to violate prisoners' rights. It is illegal for the DOC to mention the name and the conviction of a prisoner in public. There is enough of a stigma against people who have been convicted of crimes and served prison terms. But it has become common practice for Kenneth McGinnis, head of the MDOC, to state prisoners' names and convictions in public. This audience member said McGinnis practice in this regard amounts to pushing the law as far as he can as a means of taking away every little bit of freedom prisoners still have. BUILD NATIONAL LIBERATION STRUGGLES The final event of the series educated those attending about the struggle for Puerto Rican national liberation. We showed Palante, Siempre Palante which documents the history of the Young Lord's Party/Puerto Rican Revolutionary Workers Organization and discusses the colonization of Puerto Rico and how the Puerto Rican nation outside of the island is oppressed. One of the important points of the film was the way in which the people took over institutions that were not serving their needs. From discussion of this, many of the audience members were interested in working with RAIL and MIM to expand ongoing projects and build other independent institutions of the oppressed. RAIL and MIM in the Michigan area continue to expose the ways in which the prison system is a tool for national oppression and social control. We do this work as part of the agitation to oppose national oppression in general. As a result of organizing for this week of events, some organizations and individuals will be working with us to develop further our Serve the People Books for Prisoners program. One Black sorority has offered to help fund raise. Some individuals have since helped to correspond with prisoners and agitate against prisons in Michigan. Other organizations have asked RAIL to give presentations to educate the members about prisons. If you would like to help, we need money to fund our work and people to get involved in many aspects of educational and organizing work. UPCOMING ANN ARBOR EVENTS: Deadly Deception The story of experimentation on Black men in Tuskegee November 6th 7pm Trotter House 1443 Washtenaw Incident at Oglala The story of Leonard Peltier and Amerika's invasion of Pine Ridge. November 20th 7pm Trotter House * * * REPUDIATE "CHARITY" PROMOTE REVOLUTION! MIM has discontinued its Serve the People Food Program (STPFP), which was launched on December 26, 1996. The STPFP distributed sandwiches to homeless men and wimmin on an irregular and limited basis. MIM stopped the STPFP because it was objectively a charity program, and outside of the context of an already vibrant political movement it would not jump out of the bounds of charity work. As the article announcing the STPFP itself said, "MIM does not believe that handing out a few sandwiches is enough. Ultimately, for the world's masses to receive proper food, health care, clothing, and education, the people need socialism." That article went on to argue that the STPFP was useful because although "[h]anding out small amounts of food is not enough... propaganda work alone is not enough either." It is true that propaganda work is not enough to make revolution. We also need a party, an army, and a united front. These three weapons are not only or even principally tools of propaganda and agitation, rather they are tools for political struggle. The Chinese Communist Party and the Red Army did not go to the countryside to hand out PB&J sandwiches, they want there to mobilize the peasantry to solve their pressing political needs themselves. In particular, the CPC organized the peasants into the armed struggle to seize state power. It was within the context of that struggle that Mao developed the slogan "pay attention to the well-being of the masses." The political line behind the STPFP was a combination of "left" adventurism (running ahead of our current strength) and rightism (objectively downplaying the importance of revolutionary political struggle.) Responsible comrades in MIM allowed the STPFP to be launched because they had a muddled grasp of the true line behind the program, and they failed to resolutely struggle against the line behind the program. MIM seeks to rectify these errors in part by running this announcement. We will continue to struggle against errors of ultra- leftist or rightist political line and practice through vigilance and attention to organizing conditions. Of course, MIM is concerned with the well-being of the masses. That is why MIM mobilizes the proletariat of the oppressed nations within u.$. borders and its allies to seize state power and build socialism. MIM and MIM-led mass organizations like RAIL spend large amounts educating and organizing people against u.$. imperialism and for revolution. Indeed, there is more work to be done in this area than MIM and RAIL can handle right now. So we need to pick our battles carefully and wage them resolutely. MIM is concerned with the masses' practical problems, that is why it started the free books for prisoners program and is building prisoner re-lease programs. But a program such as the STPFP is admittedly beyond our reach right now -- both in the sense that we lack the resources to mobilize a program that would make a concrete impact on the well-being of homeless people, and in the sense that the program would take place in a political vacuum. Currently, the Party, the army, and the united front are small and their influence is weak. MIM encourages its comrades and allies to spend their energy building these three weapons. As these tools grow in size and experience, so will their ability to take on new forms of work and use them to revolutionary political ends. * * * AMERIKA GRABS FOR PUERTO RICAN PENAL SYSTEM by MC53 A court monitor has recommended that Puerto Rico's penal system be placed under Amerikan receivership and in typical comprador reaction, Puerto Rico's puppets of imperialism have vowed to increase repression against prisoners as a way to thwart losing their power. Officials claim that Puerto Rican prisons are controlled by members of Neta and that they have taken over administrative tasks of the prisons and heavily influence things such as punishments and transfers. The claim is that because of the power of the Netas, three prison rebellions occurred to stop prisoner transfers within a 48 hour period last month. The Puerto Rican Commonwealths Corrections Administrator, Zoe Laboy, said that the puppet government is taking charge against the control of the Netas. The Puerto Rican government had increased the kkkorrections budget from $188 million in 1992 to $292 million this year and has announced plans to separate members of different organizations and gangs. As in the United Snakes, Puerto Rico's penal system exists to control the masses and does not represent the masses through justly imprisoning individuals guilty of crimes against the people. If that were the case, such compradors as Laboy would be serving sentences for the crime of compliance with and benefiting from imperialism against the masses. The main stream media portrays the Netas as murderous drug traffickers. But the Netas recently started a non-profit as an umbrella organization for programs they run which include rehabilitation and work to improve living conditions. Now the courts and the compradors say that this non-profit was only to funnel money from the legislature to permit inmate leaders to meet and communicate with each other in violation of security practices. Maoists question the truth that is presented by the oppressors. Part of understanding the current power structure is understanding how the media is used to manipulate public opinion to support repression against the masses. Whether the Netas are working in the interests of the masses or not, the masses are the ones who should have the power to decide. This power should not be in the hands of the imperialists or in the hands of the imperialist lackeys. The United Snakes continues to control the Puerto Rican nation economically, politically and militarily as one of its many neo-colonies. However, its status as a Commonwealth leaves Puerto Rico open to more overt forms of control by the Amerikan settler government. MIM organizes for Marxist-Leninist-Maoist led revolution which will liberate oppressed nations from the throngs of Amerikan imperialism. While waging wars of national liberation, the masses set up proletarian controlled judicial processes which lay the foundations for the justice system after liberation. A true justice system stems from the economic and political power in the hands of the masses. NOTE: The New York Times 10 September 1997. p. A14. * * * MARXISM-LENINISM-MAOISM ONLINE CONCENTRATION OF CAPITAL IN COMMUNICATIONS: MONOPOLY_CAPITAL@AOL.WORLDCOM.COMPUSERVE.UUNET.ANS When WorldCom -- the fourth-largest long-distance telecommunications company in the United Snakes -- bought CompuServe in September, the deal accelerated the existing trend of capital concentration in the communications industry by strengthening some very big players. As a result of the recent deal, WorldCom is now a much bigger private data network, and Amerikkka Online (AOL) -- which was already far and away number one among commercial Internet account providers -- is now even bigger. In the long-run, this concentration of capital means that imperialism is digging its own grave. In the short and medium term, however, ever-increasing privatization and ever-shrinking "public" Internet space means that the supposed government value of free speech is replaced by "legitimate" corporate censorship through customer policies. MIM expects this trend to win allies for revolution in the fight for our relative freedoms to organize legally and openly against imperialism. In this recent deal, WorldCom bought CompuServe, AOL's largest competitor in the commercial Internet services industry, for $1.2 billion, and then turned around and sold CompuServe's 2.6 million U.S. Internet account business to AOL, in exchange for AOL's network services company(ANS) and $175 million in cash. A new company will form with the merger of ANS, CompuServe Network Services and WorldCom's subsidiary company UUNet.(1) Finally, part of the deal includes "a long-term strategic relationship with WorldCom providing AOL with significantly expanded network capacity for its service at favorable prices."(2) And just to seal the corporate family, AOL chairman Steve Chase will join WorldCom's board of directors. According to WebCrawler News, "the deal will ... strengthen the dominant position of WorldCom's UUNET subsidiary as the leading provider of communications services on the Internet."(3) "Within the USA, the new company will be one of the two leading providers of Internet access into the Business Week 1000. It will be the overall industry leader in the US with 19% of the market for corporate Internet connectivity."(1) And that's just the domestic news. WebCrawler News also reported that: "The deal also helps AOL on the international front. It creates a closer link between AOL and its European partner Bertelsmann AG that will accelerate AOL's global presence. In an expansion of an existing joint venture, Bertelsmann AG will pay AOL $75 million and each company will invest another $25 million as they add CompuServe to their existing online service in Europe."(3) ANS, the now AOL-owned (soon to be WorldCom-owned) company, was initially a government project turned private enterprise. According to the company's web site, ANS, Inc. "the former parent company of ANS CO+RE Systems, Inc. (ANS), was established as a not-for-profit company in 1990 by IBM, MCI and Merit [which is a consortium of Michigan universities]. Its mission was to advance high-speed networking technology and use. ... As the principal architect of the National Science Foundation Backbone network service, ANS developed proprietary expertise in the design, development and deployment of large-scale, high- performance, wide area data networks."(4) When the government created and controlled the Internet, there was greater potential for struggle over democratic rights and access, because it was more like a "public" space legally. Now, with the Internet in corporate, or corporate-government, hands, the people's use is regulated by "customer policy" instead. It is the equivalent of moving from the "public square" to a shopping mall, with private security pigs enforcing private rules. Battles for free speech in shopping malls have been won in the courts and MIM expects to have to fight these battles again in order to retain access to public cyberspace. And WorldCom's expansion did not stop at ANS. On October 1, "WorldCom ... announced ... that it will be commencing an exchange offer to acquire all of the outstanding shares of MCI Communications Corporation ... for $41.50 of WorldCom common stock per MCI share. Following consummation of the exchange offer, WorldCom will effect a second-step merger with all remaining MCI stockholders receiving the same per share consideration."(5) A WorldCom press release continued, "WorldCom's combination with MCI will create one of the world's premier communications companies with over $30 billion in revenues. The combination will enhance WorldCom's position as a leading provider of one- stop-shopping communication services -- offering a full range of local, long distance, Internet and international services."(5) The press release went on to say that the new combination will be better positioned to compete against "incumbent carriers", fulfilling the supposed intent of the 1996 Telecommunications Act to "enhance competition." Actually, they are living up to the legislation, but not by enhancing competition. Rather, they are fulfilling the government's intention to privatize the telecommunications industry by allowing cable and telephone companies to cash in on the rapidly- expanding Internet. Although there was some initial grumbling that the Department of Justice might oppose WorldCom-AOL deal for anti-trust reasons (principally AOL's new market position with 12 million subscribers), that concern seems to have passed. In any case, it is easier for the government to deal with a compliant, law-enforcement friendly Internet Service Provider like AOL anyway. This way, the state can piggy-back on private surveillance techniques already in place to detect speech AOL finds offensive. According to the web site www.aolsucks.com, AOL, armed with lengthy and draconian "Terms of Service" (TOS) policies, polices its account holders by routinely checking for "vulgar" language. Vulgar language by AOL's rules includes words like masturbation, genitalia, transsexual and transvestite, and submissive. So much for any serious discussion of gender oppression. "AOL's TOS applies to private communication such as 'Instant Messages,' e-mail, and private rooms (even beyond the above)," the www.aolsucks.com site reads. "While AOL does not have staff randomly reading e-mail, AOL routinely discloses e-mail to the FBI on request, and will search your mail if a member reports to the Community Action Team that you've been misbehaving." And company policy reads, "AOL Inc. will not intentionally monitor or disclose any private electronic communication unless permitted or required by law. AOL Inc. may terminate immediately without notice any member who misuses or fails to abide by the TOS, including, without limitation, misuse of the software libraries, discussion boards, E-Mail, or conference areas."(6) On the heels of the AOL mergers, smaller companies are looking for mergers to shore up their endangered positions. On Oct. 13, IGC, a local phone company, and Netcom, an Internet service provider, announced a merger, which they say will give the combined new company $420 million a year in revenue. The relative weakling Netcom has 550,000 Internet customers. If they're lucky they'll be worth more now when they get gobbled up by a bigger conglomerate.(7) Because colleges and universities are less directly affected by privatization, students in the United Snakes probably enjoy the freest, most protected areas of the Internet. They should watch Internet privatization trends with alarm and resolve to use their valuable resources to the fullest, working with MIM to serve the international proletariat. For those without academic Internet access, MIM recommends interviewing Internet service providers about their policies regarding turning over information about users, and we strongly recommend that all communication over the Internet use the free encryption technology that makes it impossible to monitor. NOTES: 1. http://www.ans.net/WhatsNew/ 2. AOL Press Release, Sept. 8, 1997 3. WebCrawler News, 9/8/97 4. http://www.ans.net/WhyChooseANS/Overview/History.ht ml 5. http://www.wcom.com/press/100197_2.html 6. www.aolsucks.com 7. Press release from www.netcom.com * * * UNDER LOCK & KEY TEXAS PRISONER BATTLES CHEMICAL AGENTS ...Here at the Michaels Unit in Tennessee Colony, Texas, prison officials are using chemical agents in an oppressive, malicious and sadistic manner on inmates in Administrative Segregation who are confined in their cells. At no time is their an imminent threat to officers, inmates, or others. Nor is there a riot, major disturbance or a threat to the security of the institution when these dangerous chemical agents are released. At all times inmates are confined to their cells, and the Michael Unit prison officials are aware of the effects chemical agents have on us inmates. Furthermore prison officials do not attempt to decontaminate the area, and walk around with gas masks on, as inmates suffer from the chemical agents. No medical assistance is available, even upon request. I have a lawsuit filed ... I hope you can refer me to an organization who has [information about] the effects chemical agents have on humans -- both long and short term effects. ... -- A Texas Prisoner, 22 July 97 MIM RESPONDS:Below are some facts about the chemical agents in pepper spray that may help your case. "Pepper spray instantly induces choking, gasping, gagging and the sensation of suffocation. Eyes burn swell and involuntarily shut. Many individuals automatically collapse after exposure. There is no federal or state agency that checks the contents or strength of pepper spray."(1) "Nationwide, over 70 people have died after being pepper sprayed and restrained by police."(1) Capsicum, the main ingredient of pepper spray, is a chemical weapon. Its use was outlawed in 1972 by the United Nations Biological Weapons Convention.(1) Although research on pepper spray is far from comprehensive, it does indicate that pepper spray exposure poses serious risks for various populations of people. These populations include people with: asthma, epilepsy, gastrointestinal conditions, sickle cell anemia, psychiatric conditions, heart, eye and/or lung conditions, and various physical disabilities.(1) In August 1993, the California EPA warned that in each pepper spray death, this chemical agent "exacerbated underlying conditions ... to cause cardiac or respiratory failure."(1) In October 1993, the US Army study of pepper spray concluded that pepper spray is capable of producing, "mutagenic effect, carcinogenic effects, sensitization, cardiovascular toxicity, pulmonary toxicity, neurotoxity and human fatalities."(1) In April 1997, The Medical Implications of Pepper Spray report was released. "The warnings and concerns from the scientific community can no longer be ignored. With the death toll on in- custody suspects rising and the growing list of injuries to officers in training, it is time to stop speculating and guessing about the hazards of OC [Oleoresin Capsicum] spray. The hazards are real and the evidence is there to support it."(1) An FBI study of OC revealed that the physical effects of OC are more severe when individuals are exposed to a greater percent solution of OC and when they remain inside the enclosed contaminated area for a longer period of time. But in the population they studied the longest period of time a person was expose to OC, was 45 seconds.(2) Thus it is probably much worse for prisoners who are trapped for hours in contaminated areas. The FBI also claims that the most effective way to decontaminate a person is to take them outside for fresh air. Soap and water; and fresh air, until contaminated clothing is dry -- needs to be done to decontaminate a person who was sprayed directly. Opening of windows and airing out the rooms sprayed, is all that is needed to decontaminate the physical environment.(2) So decontamination would be easy for the pigs, yet instead they torture prisoners. There are 1993 and 1995 reports on OC available from ACLU of Southern California. They may charge around $10 per report. There address is 1616 Beverly Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90026. NOTES: 1. "Join the Campaign to Ban Police use of Pepper Spray In Berkeley," pamphlet , published by COPWATCH, 2022 Blake Street, Berkeley, CA 94704, June 1997. 2. U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Chemical Agent Research, Oleoresin Capsicum, http.//www.dalewom.com/d139.htm ARIZONA LAW LIBRARIES REMOVED ...As of August 4, 1997, we, almost all inmates in the Arizona Department of Corrections [ADOC] will be loosing access to our Law Libraries. The ADOC will be taking them out. There jurisdiction for this, is in the recent Supreme Court decision Casey v. Lewis. It is pretty gloomy on the legal battle field. The ACLU and Middle Ground, brought the case back before the Federal District Court who refused to hear it. They dismissed it. With this decision, comes a new policy governing access to the courts, hiring of outside paralegals by DOC, and abolishing Inmate Legal Assistant. Violation of this new policy will result in disciplinary action. ... Sincerely and struggling, -- An Arizona Prisoner, Tucson, AZ 18 July 1997 ...On August 4, 1997, the Arizona Department of Corrections [ADOC] will close all law libraries in its system except for the law library in Central Unit in Florence, AZ, which houses death row convicts. This is ADOC'9s solution to the US Supreme Court decision in Lewis v. Casey. Arizona has acted very uncharacteristically... Arizona usually waits until another state has implemented a tentative policy and discerns the prisoners' reactions in that state and the results of any legal ramifications from enactment of the said policy. I guess since this case was remanded back to the district court of Arizona, the district court gave ADOC the opportunity to construct an adequate solution for inmate's access to court. ...A class action suit was filed in the district court of Arizona. Judge Carl A. Muecke, and advocate for human rights, ruled in favor of the inmates and enjoined a wide array of reforms for access to court. The ninth circuit, basically affirmed the district court's order with very few modifications. The US Supreme Court reversed the district court's decision and ruled Judge Muecke went too far. An individual most show actual damage, and Judge Muecke should have given the state an opportunity to construct its own plan to rectify any discrepancies in their system for access to court. Judge Muecke excused himself [from the case] upon remand and Judge Strand, (the same judge who is currently presiding over Governor Symington's criminal trial), is presiding over this case now. Ostensibly, the district court has given ADOC the opportunity to come up with their own plan. Thus do a 902. As predicted by Judge Muecke, in his original decision in this case, ADOC will go overboard if given the opportunity to construct its own policy. This is exactly what to do a 902 has done. The law library will close with ADOC contracting a paralegal service to assist prisoners. Convicts like myself will not be able to assist another convicts, even though I am more proficient than the average paralegal. I have assisted in freeing a number of convicts and may even eventually free myself. A prison complex which houses two to seven different prisons, will have access to a paralegal once every week. This paralegal and a monitor, an ADOC employee, will determine whether an issue has merit, whether one may have access to photocopies, how many copies one may have, etc. I will not go into the intricacies of this policy but as you can imagine, we will catch hell and be denied. The irony of this situation is the state claims the reason they avidly pursued this case was to save the taxpayers millions of their tax dollars. Actually the law books and up-keep of the library is funded by the Inmate's Arts and Recreation Fund, which is profit ADOC collects from the inmates store and other profits they procure through prisoners. They spent millions alone litigating this case. The real reason they litigated this case is to undermine the adversarial process. Donna Hamm, president of the prisoner's rights organization, Middle Ground Prison Reform, constructed an excellent letter depicting all the improprieties of doing a 902. This letter was addressed to Judge Strand and distributed throughout the entire system. Hopefully Judge Strand will stay the implementation of a 902, because if they do not, I fear there will be bloodshed throughout the system. Fellow convicts, be on guard. Department of corrections across the land will be watching the results of our misery. ... Always a Soldier, -- An Arizona Prisoner, Goodyear, AZ, 28 July 1997 MIM NOTES BANNED FROM YARD ... The day after i received my notes i decide to take it to the yard. I am in a michigan maximum security prison... When i made it to the yard i was shaken down. i had one Ebony magazine and MIM Notes #X, which contained an article i submitted... Please send me Notes #X again because the pigs took it... Now I see why you protect the names and identity of each prisoner that submits an article, because obviously i see that just being seen with MIM Notes can add to the repression i already face. So i can imagine the repression it can cause if these civil servants for the system same my name printed in your notes. Thanks for not printing my name with the articles I've submitted and thanks for protecting my identity. Because these civil servants did take the notes from me and told me i wasn't allowed to bring a newspaper to the yard. They told me because i brought it to the yard i [could] forget my yard period. I observed the sergeant. censoring it. It is possible that it was also reported to the administration head. Because ever since i arrived on this slave plantation i have been oppressed, harassed, tired, tested and monitored. Even my activities and the few prisoners i associate with are monitored. I keep my associations down to a minimum as much as i possibly can because they have labeled me and documented in my files that i cannot be controlled in a population group setting. (A smooth way of saying that i have the potential and ability to influence and unify prisoners to challenge against the injustice and oppressions of the system in a sophisticated (intelligent) and any other means necessary manner!) ... -- A Michigan Prisoner, 17 August 1997 ALABAMA DEATH PENALTY NO JUSTICE -- JUST US I'm a young black in his late 20's and have been on Alabama's death row for six years. I think the people should know just how sorry this so called justice system is. There are about 148 people on Alabama's death row. 65 percent of the people here are black men. And 58 percent of the black me range from the age of 16 to 31. For most of them it is their first time in prison. The death penalty was reinstated in 1977. Since then there have been 16 executions. There have only been two white men executed from Alabama and 6 white men executed all together. The rest is black. The average black man on death row is accused of killing a white person. The average black man on death row has little or no education at all and is poor. That shows me, that if you are a black man with no education and no money then you get screwed. The state gives the state appointed lawyer $2,000.00 to fight a death penalty case. The average capital murder trial lasts five days or less. Execute Justice, Not People. -- An Alabama Prisoner, 11 August 1997 CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERIKA IN TENNESSEE ...In Tennessee they use "Behavior Modification Units" -- Administrative Segregation Units as a tool to further oppress and manipulate those who would dare stand up and speak out. Yet the voice of Truth will not be silenced! In the issue of MIM Theory that was sent, ``Amerikkkan prisons on trial'', the article on CCA -- Corrections Corporation of Amerika was very well written. CCA is now attempting to place a bid to take control of all the prisons within the state of Tennessee, even though it is against the law. The rules can be changed for the invading nation. The Capitalists only seek to further strangle the oppressed nations. Today during my one hour recreation time, myself and a fellow captive were speaking on the coincidence that many mental hospitals around the kountry closed down for lack of funds, and during that same period of time prisons started to Boom! Then the alleged War on Drugs, is just a war on the Oppressed Nations. ... -- A Tennessee Prisoner, 21 July 1997 PIGS COVER-UP ABUSES AND POOR CONDITIONS ...I am writing to inform you matters here at Clinton Correctional Facility that took place on July 24, 1997. There was a shooting in the big yard behind two Brothers fighting each other with knifes. And the administration is blowing it out of control here, on the news, and so on. Now the real problem is that most of the so-called officers come to work drunk. They have problems with their family life and take it out on the prisoners here at the facility. If you were to have any of the officers take a urine test, breathalizer or blood test for other drugs you would be especially unhappy with what you find. The officers at Clinton Correctional Facility are racist, abusive, threatening and unprofessional. More than ever, there are attacks on prisoners by officers and the administration covers up the actions of the officers. There are beatings, set- ups, threats and killings -- all by the officers here, that are justified by someone in [public relations] who knows nothing about what's going on at the facility at all. However, none of this is new cause it is happening in all New York state prison facilities. Most of the staff at these facilities, mainly Clinton, have the attitude that they are dealing with animals not human beings and they call these facilities: "The Department of Correctional services." There is nothing correctional about these places. None of the programs are up to date and there is nothing healthy about this place. Birds fly inside the mess hall while you're eating. The health services here are a joke. ...the Inspector General should have an agent planted here as a prisoner to see exactly what's taking place being these walls ... 'cause they keep people who care about what really happens, from seeing the truth about how prisoners are being treated. ... -- A New York Prisoner, 25 July 1997 * * * MIM ON PRISONS AND PRISONERS MIM seeks to build public opinion against Amerika's criminal injustice system, and to eventually replace the bourgeois injustice system with proletarian justice. The bourgeois injustice system imprisons and executes a disproportionately large and growing number of oppressed people while letting the biggest mass murderers - the imperialists and their lackeys - roam free. Imperialism is not opposed to murder or theft, it only insists that these crimes be committed in the interests of the bourgeoisie. MIM does not advocate that all prisoners go free today; we have a more effective program for fighting crime as was demonstrated in China prior to the restoration of capitalism there in 1976. We say that all prisoners are political prisoners because under the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie, all imprisonment is substantively political. It is our responsibility to exert revolutionary leadership and conduct political agitation and organization among prisoners ñ whose material conditions make them an overwhelmingly revolutionary group. Some prisoners should and will work on self-criticism under a future dictatorship of the proletariat in those cases in which prisoners really did do something wrong by proletarian standards. ***WHAT NON-PRISONERS CAN DO TO SUPPORT PRISONERS*** *1. Struggle with, work with, finance and join MIM. The best way to support prisoners is to overthrow the system under which capitalists profit from the exploitation of prisoners. History shows that the best way to do this is to build a Marxist- Leninist-Maoist party. The oppressors will not give up their power without a fight. *2. Finance MIM's prison work. Our biggest bill each month is postage. Most of the prison comrades who read MIM Notes have no way of paying for it. So if you have money, send what you can afford. Every cent helps, and stamps are as good as cash to us. *3. Distribute MIM Notes and Notas Rojas. Bring the voices of prisoners and their supporters to as large and wide an audience of people as possible. Contact MIM for bulk rates and distribution tips. *4. Start or join a prison support group. MIM can provide advice and resources to help you build public opinion for prisoners and their struggles. *5. Fight censorship, beatings, torture and other fascist outrages. Under Lock and Key often features the addresses of prisoners' friends and enemies. Work with the friends and let the enemies know you're watching. (Don't expect to win the fascists to the side of humanity, however. See #1 in this list). *6. Stay in touch. Keep us informed of pro- prisoner work you do. Our readers might find it educational or inspirational