"Golf War" director speaks, gives filmmaking workshop BOSTON, MA -- MIM and RAIL hosted a film workshop led by "Golf War" director Jen Schradie on January 20th and 21st. Jen is a good model for activists want to get information out to a broad audience in a creative manner. She gave up a stable job in order to go to the Philippines for three months to make the "Golf War" and now works full time promoting and distributing it. Her presentation demystified independent documentary filmmaking, since she taught herself the necessary skills. The aspiring activist filmmakers who attended the workshop got a lot out of it. Jen stressed that would-be activist filmmakers should find something they are passionate about and "take Nike to task -- Just Do It!" She pointed out that political organizing skills can translate into producing skills. The workshop included some useful information about how to get money to support the production and distribution of independent films. Jen discussed the importance of not letting a film with an important political message sit on a shelf. MIM and RAIL activists in attendance were inspired to use this newfound information to work on political movies to support our organizing work. What we lack is money for a camera. The good news is that the costs of producing films have dropped dramatically in recent years. It is now possible to purchase a digital camera for a few thousand dollars and edit the film on a personal computer. Anyone interested in helping out with this project by donating money, time, or equipment should contact us. Post-film discussion focused on self-determination, filmmaking On the 21st, Boston University Friends of RAIL (FoRAIL) screened "The Golf War" with Jen Schradie in attendance. FoRAIL gave Jen an honorarium (from university funds allocated to student groups) to help promote "The Golf War" around the country. The event succeeded in drawing a wide variety of participants, some of whom also attended the workshop. It brought together activists, Filipino students, and artists to support this revolutionary movie. After the moving viewing, a comrade "passed the bucket" asking people to donate money to ensure future viewings. Jen again emphasized the importance of grassroots organizing fundraising -- activist filmmakers don't have a blank check from Dreamworks SKG to travel around and promote their movie! We agree that people need to put their money where their mouths and hearts are. Much of the discussion revolved around the question of "development." Currently, the Philippines is largely controlled by foreign interests, mainly the United $tates, who suck huge profits and resources from the Filipino people. These interests dictate what kind of "development" takes place, not the Filipino people themselves. True national self-determination requires that the Filipino people can decide for themselves -- without imperialist and military coercion -- what development should mean for the Philippines. Development, industry and agriculture should serve the long-term interests of the vast majority of Filipinos, not imperialist-backed, corrupt lackeys. Another audience member asked about the difficult role of the documentary filmmaker. The question came from a scene where village participants were being bribed by government officials with food and music and duped into signing and accepting phony documents that would serve the land developers interests. The participant wanted to know where the director should draw the line between being "objective" and getting involved in a situation on the people's behalf. Jen said that she makes a policy of getting involved and not pretending to be objective. She correctly pointed out that the act of filming is subjective. A filmmaker makes qualitative changes to a situation by her mere presence. We agree that filmmakers must take sides. In his "Talks at the Yenan Forum on Art and Literature," Mao Zedong emphasized that the fundamental question facing artists is, "For whom?" Some artists blatantly admit to making art for themselves; some consciously hire their talents out to bourgeois propagandists; others delude themselves into thinking they are making "art for art's sake," when in reality such activity only props up the status quo. Revolutionaries, though, clearly choose the side of the oppressed masses, and view their artwork as a contribution to (and subordinate to) the revolutionary struggle. ITAL Edited by MC206 END