Mexican police invade UNAM campus by MC17 On February 6, Mexican President Ernesto Zedillo blatantly violated Mexican law and ordered a military raid on the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) campus in Mexico City in an attempt to end the 10 month student strike. Under Mexican law UNAM is self-governing and supposed to be off-limits to security forces.(1) The proletariat needs to hold state power to best serve oppressed interests; the Mexican government has demonstrated that its own laws are only applied when convenient. Out of fear for the public outcry that would result from a bloody confrontation, Zedillo sent in the 2500 member goon squad without firearms. 632 students were arrested and student-occupied buildings were returned to the administration. Most arrested in the raid were freed within a few days, but at least 200 were being charged at press time.(2) On February 2, 400 Mexican police and other hired goons raided a preparatory school, a part of the UNAM, that was also occupied by students. The government ordered the retaking of the school and arrested 248 students. The students fought back with rocks and Molotov cocktails but were overwhelmed by the police. On February 2nd, live television footage showed students being beaten by the police as they were being arrested. 171 of the students arrested are being charged with terrorism and could face 40 years in prison if convicted.(1) In response to the raids by police, 210 students who were arrested began a hunger strike demanding their freedom and "in repudiation of the violation of the University autonomy with the invasion of the Federal Preventive Police at the UNAM campuses."(3) Relatives of the arrested students gathered outside prisons chanting "Freedom" and protesting the government's refusal to allow arrests confirmation and prisoner contact with relatives or lawyers. In the February 6th raid, people unaffiliated with the strike were arrested because they were found in the area. Some were released and described the prison conditions. One man stated: "They left me naked and isolated for many hours; for the youth they were tortured psychologically; including inside there are children from 8 to 12 years old. This represents a violation of our individual rights!"(3) The government has continued arrests off campus. It has tracked down supportive students and accused them of crimes; many student activists have gone into hiding.(3) Despite repression, the strike general council(CGH) declared that the strike would continue and protests demanding the freedom of those arrested were immediately organized. Students have been on strike at UNAM since April 1999 in what began as a protest of a tuition increase. As the strike progressed, students expanded their demands to include greater economic equality, student control of the University, and greater access to the school. The arrested students enjoy widespread support. In northwest Mexico City on another campus, the Metropolitan Autonomous University, students staged a one-day strike insisting on freedom of the arrested activists. Students on other campuses were voting on joining the demonstrations at press time. The UNAM strike committee pledged to continue the strike.(2) The January 21st government/administration-run referendum resulted in a vote to end the strike. Strikers state that the results were rigged.(1) Ballots cast only represent half the student body, even if the results were not rigged. Students supporting the strike refused to participate because the process did not include them. The results clearly represent what the administration wanted to convey, not a democratic expression of the people. Attacks on striking students grew increasingly violent in the days before the February 6th raid. In response, the CGH called for dialogue with the government.(4) But as one striking student pointed out: "We cannot have a dialogue with the police in our classrooms, with hundreds of our comrades under arrest."(5) It was inevitable that the UNAM strike would lead to violent confrontation with the Mexican government. Economic equality is fundamentally opposed to the basic structure of Mexican society. As we pointed out in MIM Notes on February 1st: "At root this strike attacks the increasing privatization of public institutions going on in Mexico. The World Bank and other imperialist institutions are pushing for privatization in Mexico as this increases the potential for imperialist countries to steal resources and exploit laborers. A 1997 memorandum signed with the World Bank requires Mexico to modify its offer of a free university education to all of its citizens in exchange for $180 million in educational credits from the bank." As the CGH said in a statement shortly after the raid on the Mexico City campus, "the struggles of our people are a consequence of the odious political, social and economic conditions that exist in the country."(2) The Mexican government, a good lackey to U.$. imperialism, will not turn over power to Mexican masses without a fight. Those who expect to win this battle through negotiations with the administration can only hope to gain small reforms while leaving the underlying capitalist system intact. MIM stands firmly behind the striking students in their fight against Mexican government repression and in their demands for greater equality and control of education in Mexico. MIM supports the battle for these reforms which can make the people's lives a little better while also illustrating clearly the nature of the system that does not serve the peoples interests. We are clear that this must be part of a revolutionary struggle to ultimately overthrow the imperialist system which controls Mexico and the rest of the world. It is this system which keeps the majority of the world's people poor and restricts access to education so that a minority, mostly concentrated in the imperialist countries, can enjoy enormous wealth. Notes: 1. Reuters Wednesday, 2 February 2000 2. The News, Mexico City, 9 February 2000. 3. La Jornada, 6 February 2000. 4. Strike General Council bulletin, University City, 26 January 2000. 5. CNN.com, 2 February 2000.