PLEASE ADDRESS ALL LETTERS, NEWS ARTICLES,  CORRESPONDENCE anything having to do with Under Lock & Key to our new address:

MIM Distributors P.O. Box 29670 Los Angeles, CA 90029-0670
 
 

URGENT ALERT! NOW IS THE TIME TO ACT TO SAVE THE LIFE OF ZIYON YISRAYAH (TOMMIE SMITH)

Ajamu Nassor (slave name (s/n) Gregory Resnover)  was unjustly executed by the State of Indiana on  December 8, 1994. This was documented by a special  investigation of the U.N. Commission on Human  Rights. If we do not act now, Ziyon Yisrayah (s/n  Tommie Smith) will be unjustly executed as well,  for he has an execution date set for June 14, 1996.

On December 11, 1980, a pre-dawn raid on the home  of Ziyon, Ajamu and Kondo Nassor (s/n Earl  Resnover), left one man wounded and one man dead.  The wounded man was Ziyon, who along with Ajamu and  Kondo were politically active. The three had a  history of exchanges with the local police because  of their stand against social injustices  perpetrated against Blacks in the community. The  dead man was a police officer who had participated  in the raid.

It was determined at the time that the police  officer had been shot in the back, and that the  bullet that killed him did not come from one of the  two guns within the house, which were fired in  self-defense. Until he was shot, the officer had  been facing the defendants. Clearly he was killed  by someone behind him, and only the police were in  that position.

The men and women in the house were asleep when the  police kicked in their door, threw tear gas inside,  and set the couch in the corner of the front room  on fire--Rambo-ing and Waco-ing their way in,  indiscriminately firing on anything inside with the  obvious intent to kill. A No-Knock-Murder-Plan that  failed.

Due to the state public defenders assigned to the  defendants misrepresenting them at trial, Ziyon and  Ajamu were condemned to be executed. The evidence  that would have absolved them of this death was  either suppressed, ignored, or overlooked by the  parties bent on malice and wrongful revenge. This  whole event was clearly a police cover-up. The  evidence that was presented at their appeals trials  was ruled inadmissible, since under Indiana law,  any evidence which was obtainable by using "due  diligence" before the original trial cannot be used  at a later date. These men had one public defender  who was an alcoholic, and an appeals lawyer who  never even bothered to go to meet her client.

Necessary willing witnesses were not called to  testify, lies were made and accepted in the court  room, and the holes in the prosecution's case were  never questioned. The court, by following its  letter-of-the-law rules in the technical aspects of  the case, overrode the consciences and moral duty  of the people who had administered the death....A  horrifying barbaric death blow yielded in the most  possible bloodthirsty way through execution...by a  cold-blooded system which has the blood of an  innocent man on its hands.

Many individuals and organizations waited until the  last minute to attempt to save the life of Ajamu  Nassor. And there were others who fought to the  end, and are continuing to fight to help save the  life of Ziyon Yisrayah. This is the legacy Ajamu  left to all of us...and it must be done now! Send  donations for legal fees in care of Paula Resnover- Terry, P.O. Box 191, Indianapolis, IN 46206.

Write letters to Governor Bayh and demand that he  exercise his authority to provide Ziyon (Tommie  Smith) with a fair new trial, so the evidence which  will exonerate him can be introduced and accepted.  Tell Governor Bayh that he was responsible for the  death of an innocent man. Tell him to stop the  legal lynching now or to resign from office. Tell  him to either use his power of clemency or forfeit  it...

WRITE TO:

Governor Evan Bayh, Office of the Governor, The  State House, Indianapolis, IN 46204. Phone: 317- 232-4567. Fax: 317-232- 3443

Clemency Board: Raymond Justak (Chairman), Thomas  McKenna (Vice Chair), Patricia Ravinet, Thor  Miller, Miguel Rivera, RE21, IGCS, 302 W.  Washington St., Indianapolis, IN 46204

Sincerely, --Kondo Nassor/Resnover, May 16, 1996
 
 

THIS JUST IN--ZIYON YISRAYAH WINS TEMPORARY  VICTORY: As MIM Notes goes to press (June 13), we are  pleased to have just received the following note:

Ziyon Yisrayah has been granted a temporary stay of  execution from the U.S. Supreme Court. I don't know  all the details just yet, but from what I  understand it goes like this:

1. The Court will either take Ziyon's case or  decide to allow Indiana to go ahead with their  wicked plans.

2. This decision could take from 48 hours to 2  months to come down.

That's all I know at the moment ....

A temporary stay is nothing but a temporary  victory--let's get Ziyon's name in the media--there  shouldn't be a "revolutionary" paper out there that  doesn't carry this courageous man's name.

--BCAC, June 13, 1996
 
 

TEN INDIANA STATE PRISON COMRADES SHIPPED TO MCC  CONTROL UNIT

 An Indiana prisoner is back inside the hole for an  investigation of "engaging in or encouraging others  to demonstrate." It's a bogus fishing expedition.  He and two others were arrested. One of the others  was listed as being under an investigation for  "threatening bodily harm towards another."

Supposedly someone sent this prisoner a kite  internally that was intercepted. The message  allegedly mentioned brother Ziyon Yisrayah who is  set to be executed June 14 and as a result the  prison staff panicked. This Indiana prisoner was  arrested Tuesday, May 28 at approximately 1:30 p.m.

On Memorial Day [Monday, May 27 --MIM], the other  half of D Cell House, which is about 150 people,  went to the kitchen and no one spoke a word! 100%  participation! Of course the staff panicked. The  protest was to show support for Ziyon and to  protest the conditions in D Cell House.

The assumption is that [the prisoncrats] are  reacting to the protest, which was not organized by  any of the accused. All of [the accused prisoners']  property was sent to the investigator and is being  gone through with a fine tooth comb. Once that is  complete, ain't no telling what kind of evidence  they will manufacture. This Indiana prisoner  believes that even though they ain't got anything  on him, he may be shipped out soon. The only place  they can rotate him is deep south or to the Maximum  Control Complex in Westville.

An investigation can last up to 45 days, and  because they are refusing to be interviewed by the  investigator it will probably drag out the full 45.  This Indiana prisoner is currently in IDU....

June 7, 1996 Update: Based on investigation they  shipped ten prisoners including the three mentioned  above. The prison officials are already in  violation because there is not supposed to be any  temporary "warehousing" of prisoners at MCC. The  prison administration is panicking over their  upcoming assassination of Ziyon Yisrayah who  remains of death row at ISP. The original lawsuit  stipulated that prisoners who were part of the  class action against MCC would not be shipped back  there.

Commissioner Debrun oversees the entire Indiana  prison system. There is a request for folks to call  and/or write Commissioner Debrun and demand that  this bogus investigation be discontinued, that all  the prisoners' personal property be released, and  more specifically that the prisoners be given all  their legal materials, personal hygiene items and  reading and writing material and underclothes.  Several of the ten shipped have already served time  at MCC and should not be back there. The  investigators have nothing on the ten shipped--it  is strictly their panic-ridden conscience gone  wild.

Write to Commissioner Debrun at: Indiana DOC, E 334  Indiana Government Center, 302 W. Washington St.,  Indianapolis, IN 46204, or call him at: 317-232- 5715

Ask for Commissioner Debrun. You will most likely  just be asked to leave a message for him--so please  ask for a response.

Send copies of letters, faxes or phone call  transcripts to Lawyer Kashani Hamid who represented  the original class action at MCC: 445 N.  Pennsylvania St. Suite 800, Indianapolis, IN 46204,  FAX: 317-632-5520

--Three Indiana prisoners, June 7, 1996
 
 

KHALFANI KHALDUN'S MURDER TRIAL APPROACHES

 Greetings Editors/Comrades,

I am writing to thank you for spreading and  allowing the word to come out on my case. I'm  Khalfani X Khaldun, the political prisoner here in  Indiana who was accused of the murder of a prison  neo-colonialist pig at the state prison back in  Dec. 1994. [The guard was allegedly killed in  retaliation for Indiana's execution of Ajamu  Nassor. --MIM]...

My trial for this murder begins July 8, 1996....

--Khalfani X Khaldun, Apr. 23, 1996

 On July 8, 1996 the murder trial of comrade  Khalfani X Khaldun (s/n Leonard McQuay) begins in  St. Joseph County. This is after being changed from  Laporte County in Michigan City due to a hostile  prisoncrat strike picketing the prison for safer  work conditions and calling for the my immediate  execution.

The actions of such a move caused fear and emotions  in the guards and eventually 17 guards resigned  from their jobs. Political prisoner Khalfani has  been under constant harassment including attacks on  his life and character from corrupt prison  investigators and ranking officials in Indiana. But  he has continued his work even at MCC. He has  published two pamphlets and a selection of poems  that will be in circulation through advertisement  on revolutionary circuits.

He has through his collective support of the  comrades at MCC, come forward with a national  prison front called the National Prisoners Legal  Front (NPLF). NPLF is geared toward furthering  legal and political awareness at MCC, in an attempt  to solidify the unity and responsibility of all men  at the facility.

In recent months, rumors have surfaced about the  Department of Corrections [sic] wanting Khalfani  dead for what he is accused of doing. Which is no  real surprise.

We just want the people to know what's going on and  to ask that you participate in exposing the case  and write letters of support to our brother. He's  got a heavy load on his plate, yet he remains  diligent and studious in his responsibilities and  commitments.

Letters of support should be sent to: Brother  Khalfani X Khaldun Freedom Committee, P.O. Box  1513, Gary, IN 46402.

Justice for Khalfani is Justice for us all.

--an Indiana prisoner, Apr. 23, 1996
 
 

WOMEN FORCIBLY DRUGGED IN JAIL BEFORE TRIAL

 Every person accused of a crime in America has the  right to be present at every stage of the  proceedings free from the influence of mind- altering drugs. Yet, many California inmates have  been heavily, illegally, and forcibly medicated  with drugs that they did not want or need. Many of  these were women who accepted plea bargains not in  their own best interests while under the influence  of mind-altering drugs.

Now more than 40 women imprisoned in California are  trying to overturn their convictions, claiming that  powerful anti-psychotic drugs impaired their  judgment, interfered with their ability to defend  themselves in court, and made a negative impression  on jurors. Nearly half of the women in the group  say they were medicated without reason in Los  Angeles County jails, and the other half say they  were wrongfully medicated in jails and detention  centers in Indio, San Diego, Auburn, Bakersfield,  Milpitas, Modesto, Clear Lake, Santee, and  Riverside. I would also like to point out that  these medications were prescribed by nurses. This  is against the law, as only a medical doctor can  prescribe drugs. I have cases pending with the  medical and registered nurses board.

I am one of those women. Currently incarcerated at  the California Institution for Women, serving a  life sentence for the accidental shooting of a  friend. I was deprived of a fair trial by the  administration of both excessive and mind-altering  medications without a doctor's orders, without  informed consent, and without due process of law. I  had no previous mental condition or arrest record.

One hour after I was booked into the county jail, I  was approached by a nurse who told me to get a cup  of water. She then handed me a paper cup full of  pills and said, "This will calm you down." I had  not requested any medical attention, nor had I been  examined or evaluated by medical personnel. I was  not hysterical or out of control, but rather  sitting off to the side of the cell weeping  quietly. Within the hour, I became nauseated,  agitated, frightened and confused. My vision  blurred, my muscles began to twitch, and I began to  rock back and forth uncontrollably.

The first cup of pills was the beginning of a  nightmare that haunts me even now, five years  later. My jail medical records disclosed that I  received massive amounts of drugs throughout the  period of time that I was in custody, although I  did not see a doctor for the first eight months. On  the occasions that I refused to take the  medication, I was stripped of all my clothing and  placed naked in the "rubber room," where I remained  until I agreed to take the medication. In the  coercive and frightening jail atmosphere, I quickly  learned to do as I was told.

I began suffering severe and terrifying side- effects from all the medication I was ingesting,  such as audio and visual hallucinations, tremors,  drooling, loss of coordination and memory,  disorientation, anxiety, confusion, restlessness,  paranoia, hives and headaches. My behavior in the  courtroom was completely inappropriate for the  situation and the jury was adversely impacted by  it. I did not understand much of what was  happening, and I spent the days crying  uncontrollably or rocking back and forth. On the  day that I took the witness stand, I thought that  the jurors' faces were melting, and that the  District Attorney had animals crawling on him. I  was unable to assist in my own defense and no  defense was presented for me. The jury quickly  reached the predictable verdict.

When I arrived at the state penitentiary, I went  into withdrawal, and it took two years for me to  completely recover from the massive amounts of  drugs that had been forcibly administered to me. I  also learned that I was not the only pretrial  detainee who had be forcibly medicated with  unnecessary mind-altering medications. We formed an  ad hoc group for which I am currently the  spokesperson, and many of the women now have their  medical records that document this illegal and  unnecessary drugging.

None of us are seeking to avoid responsibility for  the underlying acts for which we were originally  arrested. What we are seeking is the fair trial to  which all Americans are entitled and which was  denied to us by the involuntary drugging we were  subjected to. If you don't think this is happening  in your county and your state, just check the  invoices of drugs ordered at your jail!

Every American accused of crime has the right to a  full, fair, drug-free trial and to be able to be  present during all proceedings and at all stages of  their trial, to defend themselves against their  accusers and to call witnesses in their own  defense--without the State of California drugging  them for an easy and wrongful conviction.

--a California woman prisoner, June 1994.

MIM replies: Your letter of course shows that what  "rights" Amerikkka gives you on paper and what  "rights" you have in practice are entirely  different matters. Since such "rights" are not  always there when you need them, MIM talks in terms  of power struggles instead of in terms of "rights."  Between "rights" in the abstract and power in the  concrete, there is no comparison. Thanks for  writing, and please keep us posted.

SURVEY: "GETTING HIGH IN JAIL": LEGAL VS. ILLEGAL  DRUGS

Can you answer yes to any of the following  questions?

1. Did you swallow, or were you injected with any  kind of drug (medication) after you were taken into  custody by the police, through the time you were  sentenced for your current commitment?

2. Was this a "mind-altering" drug? Did it make you  feel different from the way you normally feel?

3. Was this drug given to you before or without  your signing a written "informed consent" form?

4. Was this drug(s) given to you by a medical  doctor or a psychiatrist?

5. Before being arrested, were you taking these  same medications or just after you were arrested?

If you answered yes to any of the above questions,  please write to the two addresses below and state  who you are, what state and county you're from, and  what drug(s) were administered to you in jail.

It is illegal to take a defendant to court under  the effects of mind-altering drugs without due  process of U.S. and state laws.

Write to: B. Buechler, 825 Battery St., 1st Floor,  San Francisco, CA 94111 or B. Yaley, 1606 Milvia  Ave, Berkeley, CA 94709.

Thank you for your help and participation in this  survey.