REBELLIONS AND VIOLENCE IN PRISONS


This issue of Under Lock & Key is a collection of  letters around the role of violence in prisons.  Instead of responding to each letter separately, we  print MIM's position on violence in prisons up  front.

First of all, prisons themselves are organized  violence. They are tools of social control for the  ruling class. In Amerika, this means violence  against oppressed nations. Prisons deprive  oppressed nationals of their freedom -- and lives - - at a rate many times that of the dominant white  nation.

Furthermore, as prisoners and readers of Under Lock  and Key know too well, pig violence against  prisoners is common. Any prisoner resistance,  organized or unorganized, big or small, runs the  risk of provoking a beating. The pigs also provoke  prisoner on prisoner violence, as even mainstream  news stories coming out of Corcoran state prison in  California confirm.

Thus, the Amerikan prison system is a concrete  example of why MIM believes violence is justified  and necessary to overthrow the oppressive,  imperialist Amerikan state. The oppressors  consistently use violence, terror, and brutality to  prop up their festering, evil system, and the  oppressed must defend themselves by any means  necessary. Anybody who advocates "turning the other  cheek" as a strategy is not serving the interests  of the oppressed.

That said, we should be clear that revolutionaries  do not engage in armed struggle in order to feel  good about themselves. Revolutionaries engage in  armed struggle to win. To paraphrase Fred Hampton:   'Kill one pig, get a little satisfaction. Overthrow  this entire fucking system, get complete  satisfaction.' All of our efforts are geared  towards speeding up the impending victory of the  people over u.s. imperialism.

This is why violence against pigs and prisoncrats  is a difficult question. Prisoners often find  themselves in lose-lose situations. If they don't  defend themselves, they die;  if they do defend  themselves, they die. Prisoners involved in  rebellions are abused, lose privileges, face severe  retaliation, and are often murdered.

Still, there are situations where a stout but  losing battle is better than nothing. The Attica  Prison Rebellion is one case in point. MIM supports  the Attica Prison Rebellion as an organized attempt  to improve conditions for prisoners. It brought  media attention to the problem and inspiration and  hope to other prisoners (See MT5, "Losing Battles,"  p. 51). Note that one of the reasons the Attica  rebellion was so effective was that prisoners were  organized and united to some extent around a  political line. This organization and unity was  forged before the rebellion.

MIM advocates that prisoners actively organize and  educate themselves to determine the best way to  struggle in prisons. Practice dialectical  materialism and let theory lead your practice.  Write to Under Lock and Key to expose the  conditions of your struggle. Even in prison there  is much room for nitty gritty legal struggle.

But the bottom line is prisoners are in the  trenches and it is they who will lead the struggle  in prisons.

 MICHIGAN PRISONER WANTS TO BE TREATED LIKE A HUMAN  BEING

 An Article was written on June 29, 1996 entitled:   Call for prisoner to become politically motivated,  and was printed in the Under Lock & Key's section  of MIM Notes 121. RCG1 agreed with most of the  article but was in disagreement with the article  stating that prisoners ought to stop the violence  among ourselves and become violent with our  captors. Comrade RCG1 felt this was wrong and  suggest that prisoners look at historically  revolutionary figures such as George Jackson, and  El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz (a.k.a.: Malcolm X) and  learn from the COINTELPRO war against the Black  Panther Party (BPP). We agree with the historical  look but we vehemently disagree with passivity. We  have seen for too long how oppressors will not stop  oppressing unless and until one stand up and be  counted. No one is going to stop oppression by  passive low-toned conversations. It is not going to  happen.

Comrade RCG1 is not in the death camps and thus,  not experiencing the hardships comrades within the  death kkkamps are experiencing. In fact, when the  pigs slam a brotha against the wall and call in  goon squad friends to help him bash a brothas head  in, what are you suggesting one to do? Accept it?  Are you saying that we should lick the boots of  these racist pigs and not defend ourselves? Are you  suggesting that we sit and wait for you or some  other outside group to come and stop our heads from  being bashed in? How do you figure? Even a dog has  the right to defend itself from attach and we are  saying is no different. We are saying that we  should and must defend ourselves against the  brutality that aggresses us. We are saying that we  have a right to be treated as human being  regardless of us being prisoners.

The days of We Shall Overcome and accept being  beaten, kicked, knocked down, spit upon and abused  is over. Sure, we agree that conversation is always  good but there comes a time when there is no room  for talk, and that is all we are saying. We are not  suggesting that comrades go crazy and start  attacking pigs. However, we do say that if a pig  assaults you or your brotha to defend yourselves by  all and every means. Meantime, comrade RCG1, if you  want to accept someone smashing you head in, then  by all means accept it, but we aren't buying it.

In the trenches
--A Michigan Prisoner, 6 Dec. 96

 AN EYE FOR AN EYE? A PIG FOR A PRISONER?

 More information about this situation in Texas can  be found in MIM Notes, 131 "Texas Prison Activist  Launches Hunger Strike" and MIM 135 in ULK , "Texas  Prisoner exposes the Murder and Brutality in  Prison."

 Sirs, I was very surprised to see in [MIM Notes]  No. 131, page 10, The Texas Prison Activist Article  because I was there in the fields less than 50  yards away Daniel was shot, in the head. Don't you  know that boy's hands were raised in surrender when  the bullet tore though his brain. That incident  totally fucked me up. I saw a puff of red mist pop  out of that dudes head and he hit the ground and  did not move. And to top it off the Sergeant rides  over with his horse, gets down and flips Daniel  over and handcuffs him. How do we know that wasn't  the move that killed Daniel.

Now again 6 weeks ago, give or take some, an inmate  by the name of Gary Crenshaw, had a major use of  force done against him. At which time the pigs  broke his neck. He is also dead. Both officers [who  killed Gary] are still at work. Daniel's killer is  also at work here still. Four or five weeks ago  about 50 inmates stormed the front desk from the  rec. yard and smashed down on seven pigs. (Good for  us) I did get to be involved. Wish I could have  seen how now I am suffering a major lockdown of all  of us closed custody inmates. We should have killed  two of theirs like they killed two of ours.

Well Again, Thanx. In Struggle,
--A Texas Prisoner, 12 Mar, 97

 RACISM CAUSES REBELLION IN UTAH'S MAXIMUM SECURITY

 The Maximum Security wing of the Utah State Prison  explodes with pent-up aggression and ugly hatred as  the guards run for shields and gather  reinforcements.

This latest battle was small-scale and nothing new  to the pigs who place racist skin heads and  minority gang members on the same tier, knowing  without a doubt that blood will be spilled as a  result of the intolerance and stupidity of both  parties involved.

Instead of joining forces to make a stand against  the murderous pig oppressors, the various hostage  groups held captive inside of this hate factory  would rather fight amongst themselves for their  racist ideology.

By word of mouth and whatever literature I receive  it is my intention to open minds up to the ideology  of the Communist beliefs. I struggle to spread the  word and to gather comrades together to stand equal  in unity.

The goose-stepping pigs who keep us under lock and  key spread hate, fear, and terrorize the people. It  is because of Mr. and Mrs. Pig that the hate and  intolerance level is at an all time high here in  this facility.

The pigs will not prevail! Comrades world-wide held hostage in dirty piss  boxes will not be silenced. From sea to polluted  sea we shall rise and revolt. With mass assistance  from our Brothers and Sisters in the Anarchist,  Green and other Anti-Pig movements, we will be  victorious in our struggle. These Utah pigs are  totally out of control. This Utah state Prison  (KKKlansville) is so out of line that it's even  taking verbal heat from the big pigs at the state's  capital.

You are not forgotten. We shall not be silenced.

--A Utah Prisoner, 8 Mar. 97

MIM NOTES: Many anarchists are indeed allies in the  struggle against imperialism. But we have strong  disagreements with them about how to make  revolution. For more information check out MIM  Theory #8, "The Anarchist Ideal and Communist  Revolution."

 VIRGINIA REBELLION

 Dear MIM: On December 26, 1996, an inmate stabbed a  Warden. Thereafter, at least 200 inmates gathered  on the recreation yard in unity. All the staff  members exited, for safety, into the watch  commander's office. The law library was destroyed,  regular library, gym and grievance division  damaged, and the commissary looted, during the  incident.

In the front entrance to the dining hall, the  officer in the master control room deliberately and  intentionally pushed the control button opening the  gate. The officer attempted to shut it. As inmates  stopped him, the racist H. Ponton directly shot 4  inmates, wounding them in the hand, torso, back and  chest. These were 2 officers armed, 2 dogs and  other members standing and controlling the entrance  area. As the inmates asked for medical attention,  he forced them to lay on the ground and then  handcuffed them. He directed the medical staff out  of the facility.

The process taken:  no visitation, no telephone  calls, tampering of out- going mail and legal mail,  [and] no money orders. Prisoners receiving money  orders in the mail as of Dec. 20, 1996 have not  received a receipt.

Two inmates must be separately handcuffed in the  cells as one can leave while the other remain to  take a shower under 3 officers [supervision]. it  was required that under the new Federal Court  hearing, the facility must comply with issuing  balanced meal, but to no avail have they acted.  Armed officers with dogs escort prisoners to other  sections in the facility.

No cleaning supplies for cells, no inmate workers,  unsanitary conditions remain. Staff makes walk-bys  or security checks every 2-3 hours. the regular  housing block, 950 total, built for 500. There was  no violence before the uprising.

Within his 5 months as Warden there have been 3  lockdowns. Staff act highly disrespectful and no  disciplinary action is taken. Inmates served  institution warrants do not have the right to ask  for witnesses. On October 15, 1996, an officer  claimed that inmates attempted to hang him and  robbed him. It was false.

-- A Virginia Prisoner, 3 Jan. 97

 ACTS OF VIOLENCE IN VIRGINIA

 Greetings Comrades: I write you from Buckingham  prison camp where there was cause to celebrate. The  overseer warden being served his daily bread on  Dec. 26, 1996. Prisoners reacted to this situation:  burned the library which took five hours to put  out, and the commissary was expropriated (looted  and vandalized). Prison guards were attacked -  prison flunkies didn't [expect] this - Virginia's  prisoners reacting to their oppression.

On May 4, 1996, a prisoner at Maklenburg  Correctional Center stabbed a guard in apparent  retaliation for the stun gunning days earlier, of a  prisoner in the yard. In July 1996, two more guards  were stabbed about nine times at Greenville  Correctional Center. On July 6, 1996, there was a  fracas between prisoners and prison guards at the  prison's segregation unit recreation yard at the  Nottoway Correctional Center. During which time it  is alleged several guards suffered superficial  wounds, and a number of prisoners say they were  cornered and beaten. On Aug. 9, 1996, two guards  were stabbed at Nottoway and four hostages were  taken. More than 250 prisoners rioted. One day  later, prisoners set fire to a building forcing the  evacuation of 56. Only one of these Aug. 9,  incidents, the hostage standoff, was reported to  the public.

Since Dec. 26, 1996, prisoners have been given very  small portions of food. No telephone calls until  Jan. 9, 1997. Visitation has been suspended since  Dec. 26, 97. The Department of Incorrections had  its strike force and canine units within the  compound for intimidation. If prisoners had to be  escorted to the prison infirmary, the dogs were  used to escort prisoners along with prison guards.  The canine units were discontinued on or about Jan.  18, 97.

The restrictions of what prisoners cannot have,  beginning 1-1997, concerning property: no  typewriters, 1 pair of tennis shoes, state clothing  exclusively, 5 inch TV sets, no more 12 inch  screens. This is a concept that has been in  planning stages along with social cutbacks.

Solidarity,
--A Virginia Prisoner, 18 Jan. 97

 AFTERMATH OF OCTOBER 1995 REBELLIONS THROUGH-OUT  THE FED BOP

 As you may be aware on or around Oct. 18th, 1995  the U.S. Congress shot down passage of a bill that  would have balanced out the disparity in the  sentencing laws for Crack-Cocaine, a bias law that  has victimized an extremely large portion of  minorities, mainly African-Americans and Latinos.  Whereas, all the whites arrested/convicted for  Crack sales have resulted in State cases Vs.  Federal cases and longer sentences for the  minorities.

On Oct. 19th, 1995, in the Federal Correction  Institution - Talladega, Alabama, a rebellion  occurred. [Which resulted in] nearly seven million  dollars in property damage and numerous injuries  for both staff and inmate alike. This was the  beginning of a rash of rebellions which began to  occur instantaneously through-out the Federal  Bureau of Prisons. (There are nearly 90 federal  institutions across the U.S.)

On October 20th, 1995, the Director of the b.o.p.  sent a communiqué to the Wardens of all secured  institutions, ordering a nation-wide lock-down.  Some of the rebellions occurred before the lock- down, at the announcement of the lock-down, and  after inmates were released from lock-down.

Around Jan. 1996, the b.o.p. designed a program to  further punish the alleged main participants of the  rebellions (as all of those found guilty received  various sanctions from the discipline hearing  officer in the range of loss of good-time, time in  disciplinary segregation and disciplinary  transfer.) and to deter the non-participants from  massive rebellions in the future. They designed ten  institutions that would house 465 inmates (alleged  main participants) for up to one year. These  institutions are being run in CONTROL UNIT fashion,  whereas: inmates are on lockdown status 22 _ hours  a day, inmates must be shackled upon leaving their  cells for any reason, visits are non-existent,  being that everyone was sent to institutions on the  opposite of the u.s. from their legal residence,  and we are allowed one 15 minute phone call a  month. The Control Unit has always been used for  BEHAVIOR MODIFICATIONS purposes and the general  methods that are still utilized to achieve the  objective are:

1. ISOLATION - Deprives inmates of all social  supports of his ability to resist, in turn causing  him/her to become dependent upon correctional  staff.

2. MONOPOLIZATION OF PERCEPTION - Fixes attention  upon immediate predicament; foster introspect.  Eliminates stimuli completing with those controlled  by staff. Frustrates all actions not consistent  with compliance.

3. SLEEP DEPRIVATION - Bright lights, or darkness,  barren environment, restricted movement, and  monotonous food, slamming of doors, shaking of keys  loudly in front of an inmate's cell, loud clicking  of handcuffs as passes an inmate's cell.

4. DEGRADATION - Denial of privacy. Insults and  taunts makes cost of resistance appear more  damaging to self-esteem than capitulation. Reduces  inmates to "animal level" concerns.

5. OCCASIONAL INDULGENCES - Occasional favors,  fluctuations of interrogation attitudes, promises,  rewards for partial compliance, tantalizing.

6. DEMONSTRATING "OMNIPOTENCE" - Confrontation  staff to inmates, pretending co-operation taken for  granted, broken promises, demonstrating complete  control over an inmate's fate.

There are 25 of us at this institution for alleged  riot participation. Being under these conditions  creates instances of "double jeopardy," as we have  already served sanctions for our alleged wrong acts  and being on lock-down for one year was not one the  sanctions melted out to any of us. However the  b.o.p. has attempted to cover themselves from legal  attack on these grounds by claiming, "they have no  bed-space at the HIGH institutions to house us and  once bed-space is available we will be designated."  This is the official position of the b.o.p., but  upon arrival here and at the other institutions the  staff made it know that we would be held here for  punishment up to one year and that we have nothing  coming, and that each time we violate any rule the  year will re-start from the date of the infraction.

During the later part of June 1996, we were told  that due to structuring problems at the High  (presently being constructed) institution in  Beaumont, TX that we would be here for 18 - 24  months. This information created a "food strike,"  which lasted four days and one inmate didn't eat  for 10 days and became ill. He was force fed in a  brutal manner by staff and repeatedly threatened by  staff. These type of situations are occurring at  all ten of the institutions that are housing 465 of  us.

In between Oct. 19, 1995 and April 1996, many  inmates were brutally beaten by staff without  provocation, as retaliation for their alleged  involvement in the rebellions. These beatings have  been silenced and no charges, administratively nor  criminally have resulted in the staff on inmate  assaults. However, a large number of inmates were  charged in federal court with MUTINY, ASSAULT, AND  DESTRUCTION OF GOVERNMENT PROPERTY. The staff  continue to mentally and physically abuse us, and  pit other inmates (we are housed with pre-trial  detainees) against us by telling them we are the  reason for them being locked-down at this  institution, we're vicious killers, etc.

We (all 465 of us) are placed in a hazardous,  biased, unconstitutional and subjective situation  simply because of our skin color. For the most part  many of the administrative staff, at many of the  institutions which had rebellions, over-played the  rebellion situations. And to put themselves in  better position for promotion, they targeted  inmates who were not wanted at their institution  for whatever reason and gave them up as agitators  or leaders of the rebellion, when there was no  evidence to support these findings other than  fabricated evidences. It is a well known fact, that  the crack-cocaine laws have suppressed a large  percentage of minorities. The longer sentences are  in fact stagnating out reproductive years and  creating a genocide against the people. This is a  crime in itself, but the ones instituting the laws  are apparently ABOVE THE LAW, as no one has been  charged for its implementation. Prisons have become  BIG business and I say it's time that someone take  a closer look at the matter

There has been a media black-out on this situation  even though there is a major need for public  exposure, as their tax dollars are involved in a  large way. Many of us accused of involvement have  supported many organization, Famm, Million Man  March, Cure, etc. but we have received little or no  support in return. Has solidarity died in these  times of mass prison building?

Thus far there have been three legal challenges to  the incident reports and about four more challenges  forthcoming. It's my hope to re-alert the people to  the after-math of the b.o.p. riots and to see if we  can generate some form of support

Free the Land! Respectfully,
--A Federal Prisoner, 8 Dec. 97