On Sun, 29 Mar 1998, K wrote:
   
   > > You're line against solopsism is almost contradictory considering
   your > line against Bogdanov and insistance of the reading of
   Emperio-Criticism. > >From what I understand, Lenin's veiw of the
   universe was wrong, and > Bogdanov's was right, at least from the
   viewpoint of what we know in 1998.
   
   [1]mim3@mim.org replies:
   
   Then you have been suckered by Tani's preening along with the rest of
   the intellectuals with a class interest in Bogdanov's line. Bodganov's
   philosophy when it departs from previous Marxism has nothing to do
   with how the physical world works. It is strictly an issue of
   neo-Kantianism.
   
   For Bogdanov there is no truth apart from humyn experience. It's
   really galling to read B. back this up when B. used to be so against
   anthro-centrism. Once again, where did it go? What about the other
   animals that existed before us?
   
   Creationism and neo-Kantianism would be very difficult to tell apart.
   The only difference might be that earth's history is lengthened from
   4000 years to a few million years--still far short of the actual
   truth.
   
   Tani's stuff on physics and MEC could have been lifted right out of a
   New Age tract on why there is a god. When I find the reference, I'll
   show it to you.
   
   Oh, I can see it now. Tani will come back and say she was being
   "Socratic," not contradictory. It's pointless arguing. Maybe this is
   what B. means by Tani having no ego--being willing to contradict
   herself from minute to minute. That's why we should focus on the web
   sites and involving more people.