Reply to Fri, 14 Nov 1997 21:02:53 -0500 (EST) message by mim3@mim.org. "/" indicates paragraph break in quoted material. Mim3: ... O tried to support you on Turanians and Blacks by saying he doesn't understand cats. / Look where you are leading people?! Turanians and Blacks are compared with pets of lower thinking orders. Well I don't spend much time talking with cats. I leave the science of that to vets and biologists. B replies: Here MIM expounds the standard American bourgeois assumptions, and reveals scientific ignorance re. cats. MIM also revealed such attitudes on page 35 of MT13 when they say "We agree that it does not make sense to describe humans as 'better' than insects, but it would be correct to describe humans as 'more complex,' and to make distinctions based on that difference." The science of complexity is a new field, and has not yet (to my knowledge) produced an objective way to measure "complexity." Any statements made comparing the complexity of organisms is bound to reflect unscientific cultural assumptions, in MIM's case tracing back to Western humanism and ultimately to Christian religious doctrine. The eminent biologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued that some bacteria are more complex than humans, based on DNA length. Currently, there is also no scientific basis for the statement that "cats are of lower thinking orders than humans." This too traces back to Western hierarchal ideology, and is the same type of thinking that produced theories of racial superiority. It traces back IMO to Western people acutely FEELING different from animals, their own women, and people of other races (modern neurology suggests this is due to brain miswiring). Typical klippoths, they turned this AWFUL feeling upside-down to IMAGINE that they were better due to this, because they originally felt inferior. See Vad's statement that he sees Tani as "perfect" (and therefore himself as "imperfect"). This leads back to solipsist non-logic also, i.e. "I'm a human, I am not a cat, therefore I am superior." Such judgements are non-materialist and utterly unscientific. See my posts to Karl's grotto re. supposed human superiority. Mim3: I do talk with Turanians, Blacks, FN--everyone. To do so, you MUST do so with the ASSUMPTION that we are ALL-KNOWABLE to each other. Otherwise, you should do EVERYONE a favor and just say you think it's impossible and not waste time. It's the same thing for the stupid hetero pseudo-fems. They say men cannot understand wimmin and yet they create feminism to do what? To improve their relations with men. Those who assume communication is impossible should not be spreading hetero feminism! .. B replies: Why not follow through on your solipsistic logic, since you cannot be from all of the above ethnic groups: you are not them, therefore they are inferior. Much better talking with creatures of "higher thinking orders." Since science cannot measure this, this logic must rely on white culture assumptions. So, since white men are the smartest and most advanced and complex people in God's creation, why waste time talking to inferior life forms? Etc etc. See where wrong ideas lead? No, no two creatures are "ALL-KNOWABLE" to each other. That's crazy! But that does NOT mean communication or interaction is futile. Creatures understand each other THROUGH their relations/interactions; see Mao for that one. IN REALITY, every sentience IS alone ("Each persyn an island"), yet we are ALL here in constant interaction, and our sentience COMES FROM that very interaction! This relates to the very deep question of "what is sentience?," which Tani addresses this in her recent posts about the ToD, which MIGHT NOT be the result of "world controllers", but instead might have an emergant DIRECTION (i.e., IT has a Will resulting from the interactions and history of those in it, JUST AS *I* have a Will manifesting from the interactions and history of the cells and molecules in ME). Tani suggested that the ToD might have a Will that is BIGGER than the wills of the individual people inside it, JUST AS I have a Will that is BIGGER than the wills of my constituent cells, organs, etc. Consider, nowone AGREED on making this Will, it just AROSE of its own. PHEW! Back to the point, these interactions peoples/people such as FNs, Blacks, etc, their will is not necessarily to make you have omniscience of them, duh, they interact with you for their own selfish purposes. I don't mean this in a judging or moral sense. See Mao, there is no such thing as omniscience. Either way, just because people cannot attain omniscience does not mean that communication is futile. Mim3: You keep talking about breeding humyns--now even in opposition to getting them Robocop bodies. This eugenics crap, like I said before, it goes in a Nazi direction. B replies: T has said (to me at least) that eugenics means such things as good prenatal care, good health, good nutrition, etc. This is not like Nazi-style eugenics (e.g., eliminate genes for whatever)at all, which T has opposed, since it can make unforeseeable changes on the affected population. E.g., remove genes for sickle-cell anemia and you also remove existing resistance to malaria. BUT good nutrition and care can eliminate Fetal Alchohol Syndrome, for example. T has also said that e.g. blind people could contribute to the species by using their OWN different abilities, perhaps combined with eg sonar technology. T addressed the idea (MIM's??) of growing babies in test-tubes or whateve----humans that adapted such technology would become NON placental mammals, WIERD. Some INSECTS do something like that, with larvae in artificial cells where adults FEED them. WIERD---does MIM even realize what they are advocating, or that they might be advocating something that some INSECTS ("LESS complex" according to MIM?!?) have ALREADY done as PROGRESSIVE for humyns!! B