BIOLOGICAL DETERMINISM - 2 To MIM
   
   AH HA! Page 348, Gould, Mismeasurement of Man, Revised issue. He
   agrees with me and what B tried to tell you about life forms,
   complexity and all that "chain of being" HOGWASH. Now don't get pissed
   off and tune this out, OK? Sheesh!
   
   You know, you say you don't know this stuff. I try to explain it to
   those who WANT to know it but I have to REALLY simplify it because
   it's NOT presented in the prole sci way at all, it's academic hard-sci
   HARD STUFF. I recommended Lewontin's NEW easy book to all, already:
   Human Diversity - and Gould on evolutionary biology, ANYTHING by
   Gould. So who read it? S&H Rose are over too many heads, as I found
   out.....
   
   In the MT5 posts I think, I explained insects. You didn't get it? I
   even compared insect society to Aryan-think when they think about and
   automatically MAKE race castes and other STUPID shit. I explained how
   this REALLY DOES work with insects who breed castes that not only are
   PREORDAINED to do "this chore and only this chore" but are MARKED,
   RECOGNIZABLE as "this caste" among their own (and even humans can
   recognize them in labs!) All of this is due to NUTRITION. Sure, they
   are genetically identical but how the genes EXPRESS (phenotype) is
   determined and it is the PHENOTYPE THAT DETERMINES _WHAT_ THEY ARE -
   oh man. You don't understand this? Not just how the insect looks, but
   WHAT IT WILL DO IN LIFE, WHAT IT _IS_, defined by its JOB! LIKE
   breeding doctors, breeding lawyers, breeding slaves, breeding obediant
   breeder-women, breeding male studs, etc.
   
   Then you had better NOT be advocating the Aryan dream world with all
   that test tube stuff if you DO NOT grasp this.
   
   Blacks are "black" (not just their color, but the WHOLE THING) due to
   a bunch of genes for something expressing in a "black phenotype" with
   a RECOGNIZABLE, IN GENERAL!, GROUP OF FEATURES that are recognizable
   EVEN IF the "black" person's skin is NOT BLACK AT ALL. (Just ASK any
   black person!) Obviously, something in the ENVIRONMENT (here comes
   Lysenko) has FIXED this since blacks that are born in Alaska REMAIN
   black and don't change into Eskimos in appearance. So it's genetic.
   It's FIXED IN the genome and it DOES express phenotypically no matter
   where they are born. There are those that would say that this IS what
   determines that this or that is a "race" or not! Or a breed (dogs are
   the same, in this regard). Sure there is variation GENETICALLY and
   even in appearancce from one to the other (PHENOTYPE) but the GENERAL
   appearance if you sum up the whole "LOOK" is that this is a black
   person, NOT an Asian person. I explained all this already. If you
   didn't understand it then you had best STOP pretending you do and
   speaking about such COMPLEX matters as the SEXUAL DIMORPHISM OF
   HUMANS, PRIMATES, MAMMALS and such things if you don't even know what
   this is. If you DO NOT know the strategies of life that other VERY
   organized and TOTALLY adapted organisms have taken you better not
   speak about it, organisms here MILLIONS of years longer than primates
   or man and TOTALLY adapted where man is HARDLY adapted at all in the
   same sense! You tell me to review the Marxist scientists? I have
   written in the simplest manner possible WHAT IT IS THEY ARE SAYING in
   these posts, TRYING to make people who want to know, understand it.
   That you don't recognize that we are agreeing with each other here
   (them and I) tells me a LOT! Like: WOW! It is the Marxist scientists
   trying to explain this difficult subject that DONT MANAGE to explain
   it - whereas the Jensen types make simple CACA out of it and everyone
   just falls for it. I try to simplify the TRUTH here, but I see only
   ONE BOOK where Lewontin REALLY dumbed it down for all and this is only
   about humans: Human Diversity. Problem: the book is NOT EASY to get to
   buy. We had to xerox it. It's not cheap either even IF you can buy it.
   But it's SIMPLE and explained in a broken down, step by step fashion
   which other Marxists FAILED to do. If I can explain this to a kid
   (I've done it) then I'm sure I can explain it to an adult and MAHY
   FOLKS out there want to know this stuff. How do you imagine the gang
   formed? They wanted to KNOW this stuff and found a place to find it
   out- and now they each find out more on their own KNOWING where to
   look for it. What can I say, however, about an economics expert (Vad)
   that can't grasp the ToD when that's the most simple thing in the
   world to grasp? Well, that he's learned to be a talking head DEAF to
   life!? That he manages to arrive at the STUPIDEST conclusions and fall
   for the MORON'S line against socialism and that he is UNABLE to see
   past this and THINK PAST the whole ISSUE being presented "against
   socialism?" That he doesn't know NORMAL nature from BROKEN nature? Or
   that he can't reach the ultimate conclusion to any kind of
   NON-socialist nation's outcome when it's written in history over and
   over? What am I to THINK of this then?? That the ONLY way to teach is
   to forget about my 5th grade baby examples: they have to be BEATEN in
   order to learn anything! Yeah, Stalin said this! So did ANDY, by the
   way.
   
   What's this "more complex" shit? It's Aryan think. It's a HIERARCHY.
   It doesn't MEAN anything either, as GOULD showed.
   
   Let me posit you one then: we can't speak to cats: YET! We don't have
   the technology to do it: YET. But bacteria instruct other bacteria far
   beyond the mere mutation of their species and they are able to EVOLVE
   TOWARD things: DIRECTED evolution. It was the bacteria experts that
   threw out the fruit fly fools who used to argue Lysenko on plants when
   plants have a more COMPLEX genome than ANY animals, including humans!
   
   But I have walked into a room with a severe leg injury that a doctor
   needed a soft tissue xray to find and I have had CATS lurk up to me
   and crowd around me and put their heads ON THE EXACT SPOT of that
   injury. This is such a common occurrence that people just opt for
   "animals are psychic." PHOOEY. WHAT are the cats detecting? HEAT? WHAT
   are they able to see? Well, they can see what NO DOCTOR can see and a
   lot faster. I posted something on worms, ask Karl to e-mail it to you
   since I know he has it, it's very short, half a page. Therein I show
   simply the INTELLIGENCE of these creatures who BUILD, PLAN, TIME and
   so forth. I don't know ONE SINGLE human able to do what these worms
   can do without some OTHER human SHOWING HIM HOW.
   
   As for whether or not SEX would exist if there was no sex activity in
   the culture: that is truly a valid point and not just for humans, but
   for PRIMATES in general - and it's COMICAL to see the proof of it.
   HowIever, sexual DESIRE would exist but no one would have a CLUE what
   it was or what to do if it was not IN the culture - that includes
   chimps. One has to wonder how the "first ones" figured it out... You
   don't have to know what females are, or what sex is or anything at all
   to have a wet dream when puberty comes. Like an itch, you'd learn how
   to scratch it. But you would NOT know what the itch was or why it
   existed --- or what to DO with a female if one just appeared on your
   island out of nowhere when you never saw one before. Chimps too - and
   it's comical as hell to see it. There is documentation too of some
   purely matriarchal societies where males didn't even know HOW babies
   got born because no female ever allowed them to know the secret that
   "if you put that in here, the woman gets fat and then a baby comes
   out." A man would NOT make the connection and such societies have been
   documented. Of course, the men lived totally isolated from the women.
   
   All those STUPID tests done to see animals and try to measure this "g"
   in them, that STUPID mirror test. Gould even says it's the Western
   thing. Why is it that when I was first asked what I thought of these
   tests, I said that the gorillas would stare at their reflections and
   just stare and then walk away, but monkeys would try to attack it? I
   was right. HOW did I know this AFORE hand? Well, I know something
   about gorillas and monkeys: STARE AT a gorrilla making threatening
   gestures and stand your ground and it will back off and go its own
   way. Do that with a monkey or stare one down and it will attack you. I
   knew this. And so: what does a reflection do? It stares back at you.
   DUH. So the MORONS conclude that gorrillas are smarter because they
   "know" it's a reflection but the monkeys are dumber because they
   "don't know" it's a reflection. STUPID FUCKS. This doesn't measure
   anything except the HUMAN's incapacity to grasp an animal AS IT IS -
   perfect and intelligent for ITS NICHE. Gould agrees with ME here. YOU
   go read the literature of scientific Marxist writers, then. I already
   did LONG ago. Already wrote heaps of this already to COSsers
   interested. Within SOME post here or there is a LONG review and
   suggested reading of Lewontin's book. I don't have a copy. I'm not the
   one who wants to KNOW this stuff, OK?
   
   Humans cannot communicate with bacteria: YET. Oh, but bacteria can
   communicate with us unbeknownst to us, they can MAKE YOU crave
   chocolate even if you hate it, they can make you go and GET chocolate
   and EAT IT and you'd think it was "your own free will and desire."
   That notion scares the shit out of ARYAN type humans for sure. It
   threatens their notions of individuality (HA!) and power over their
   free will (HA!) and makes them MORE aware of how "dangerous" the world
   is, the world they hate and call "of the devil." UGH.
   
   There are "AIDS ASSASSINS" out there now. Oh? Ever think that the
   virus itself is MAKING THEM DO IT? OH OH...too spooky to contemplate,
   threatens that good ol free will shit again. ALL LIFE has the
   TENACIOUS URGE to replicate itself and spread and that (listen up
   Karl) IS the Will to Power! FOR REAL. Bacteria not only have the same
   urge to replicate but they INSTRUCT EACH OTHER on how to do it better
   in environments they don't even have the genes to survive in --- they
   seem to "GET" the genes and like...HOW? WHO KNOWS, but they DO IT! We
   can't do this! We are too STUPID to do it! This had to do with the E.
   Coli bacteria experiment: new stuff, STRANGE results. Threatens to
   blow Darwin out of the water too......bring back Lamarck maybe? Who
   knows. There are many kinds of intelligence that WE reocgnize: I do
   not accept the Western version of what intelligence is at all because
   I see they LACK some kind of animal sense. But back to Lamarck???:
   
   Blacks, just one example. WHAT could have fixed the genome to end up
   so that a phenotype for "general black" expresses NO MATTER WHERE they
   are born? We don't know what could have done that. Selection would
   have honed in the "type" but what FIXED it in the genes? Don't know -
   no one knows. Not being ALLOWED to study it is all due to the Aryanist
   HATE-LIES about race. But not being allowed to study such things
   RETARDS progress, PREVENTS "the devil's" WISDOM.
   
   You made the ABSURD statement that nutrition can't change your genes?
   EH? WHAT? How do you think we evolved? What do you imagine environment
   is - just the "out there apart from you" stuff? It's IN HERE TOO - IN
   YOU. NOTHING is apart from you unless you are an Aryan who FEELS like
   this about life "out there," and then it's still not apart from you
   but you are SO BROKEN that you LIVE AS IF YOU ARE apart from life and
   "in control." That's a klippoth! It's also CLASSIC Aryan. Yeah, get in
   "touch" with nature: you don't need a back pack or woods, just LOOK AT
   YOUR OWN DAMNED HAND for a start. Metabolism is ALSO environment and
   what you eat SURE AS HELL DOES affect this. So you may THINK you are
   not Nazi-thinking but oh, yes you are, right smack back into it, you
   have drifted right into it in trying to argue with us when you DO NOT
   UNDERSTAND what we are even saying. No matter, your drift was THEIR
   drift. WHY?
   
   You best then question some of your OTHER assumptions and not be so
   DAMNED CONVINCED (just like they are!)
   
   IMAGINE IF we could "talk" to other animals. You didn't. You opted for
   THEIR solutions - not ours. FYI, Lysenko and his strongest advocates
   were dead against ALL FORMS of artificial insemination of COWS (!!)
   because "it interfered with the female cow's freedom of choice in her
   mates and this is an insult to Soviet womanhood." They believed it
   affected the quality of the offspring to do such a thing. FACT IS
   (yeah, you don't know this) - artificial insemination as it stands
   right now is practially a bust - for "some unknown reason" it is VERY
   HARD to get a woman pregnant using it. This is not widely known, but
   if you are going to MOUTH OFF on such things, you better START knowing
   it. And then there is the dark doctrine on such matters of birth and
   orgasm of female affecting the quality of the offspring and so much of
   what that doctrine says is 100% on target, perhaps this is too. Fact
   is, women would have to have that INNER LIBERATION before they could
   begin to liberate themselves in ANY other way: I don't expect any of
   you to REALIZE this or know it or even CONTEMPLATE the logic of it.
   But you'd mock it out. NONE of the Panthers mocked it out: THEY AGREED
   WITH IT and some of them said "damned, I had an idea like that too."
   
   Man has been eating the wrong shit, doing the wrong shit, EVERYTHING
   WRONG since the agrarian age began. Man is so twisted that I have NO
   IDEA if man will survive as a species: these are signs NOT of
   evolution but of extinction and LOTS OF OTHER STUFF backs that up.
   Sure you don't see it - you are living IN it and it seems slow.
   Nutrition, prenatal and post natal, is EXTREMELY important - it
   determines whether or not you are a dull witted moron or a bright
   person capable of NORMAL intelligence (I don't mean genius or
   Einstein). And well, DOES THIS eventually get fixed in the gebnome so
   that the dullards start to breed dullards? MAYBE IT DOES! LOTS of
   other things got FIXED in the genome, you know, and are now
   independent of environment eg where you are born. ALL this shit people
   eat - BEANS THE WORST - DULLS the senses and wit. It wouldn't surprise
   me if the akatharsis is not cultural or xian at all, but PURELY
   DIETARY. Now we are entering directly into Lysenkoism - the real thing
   - what he was really talking about that can definitely ALTER a
   species! HE DID IT with plants! And it IS inherited, it CAN BE. Once
   the genes get FIXED it's permanent, inherited, DETERMINED whether or
   not it expresses or not - and we all know environmental factors make
   genes express as phenotypes UNLESS THEY ARE FIXED (blacks born in
   Alaska are still blacks; Siberian wolfhounds born in Florida are still
   Siberian wolfhounds; they'll surely be uncomfortable and SUFFER a tiny
   bit living in Florida but they won't die: but then there is death and
   then there is SLOW SLOW death and that's what man HAS BEEN SUFFERING
   for a long time, so long that it's not even noticed save to give the
   condition mystical names like angst, anome, ennui, akatharsis). WHAT
   CAUSES the neurological NORMAL condition of western people:
   alexithymia? It's not normal - that's known now, but WHAT causes it?
   True, they have not tested too many NON-western people for it but I
   KNOW it would exist in those patriarchal suffocating countries where
   that STUPID culture just perpetuates itself as if unable to just STOP.
   WHY can't it stop? Don't give me economics. It was around LONG BEFORE
   that; CENTURIES before: it STARTED with AGFRICULTURE: DIET!
   
   And to Goldhagan. The man is not liberal or political in his book at
   all, he is giving naked facts about what people DID and HOW they DID
   IT, ordinary xian Germans, NOT Nazi fanatics or Hitlerites but
   ORDINARY GERMANS. No one can deny these facts and pictures exist,
   letters they wrote to their wives, etc. FACTS. You think people can't
   just DO this because they hate your race? HA! Naive. Marxists don't
   WANT IT TO BE pure rage and race hate unleashed. They WANT to make
   economic logic out of it where it doesn't even exist. What: looking at
   man at his most UNLEASHED AND BRUTAL is too painful for them? Always
   putting their fucking Aryan non-brains on it to explain it or use
   "REASON" (their divine new bullshit) to "explain" it. RAGE. Grasp it.
   RAGE. UNLEASHED: CATHARSIS. That is what LIBERATION did for those
   Germans! I mean now inner liberation, the kind that enables you to
   UNLEASH your passions without ANY KIND of moral fears (restraints).
   That they could do this is TERRIFYING to the honkies these days:
   because they have it inside them and they are AFRAID of their own
   feelings. Maybe you don't know what it FEELS LIKE to beat a person
   half to death that has bugged you, a person you HATE when that hate is
   unleashed without any fear. IT FEELS GOOD! It's a total release and
   then the ANGER is completely gone. Anything else and the anger gnaws
   away inside YOU instead. Imagine a nation feeling this for a whole
   other GROUP of people that they perceive or recognize as another race.
   It's EASY for me to understand this. I'm closer to savage than you.
   THANK THE GODS. Do you know how I fight? Like a lion or wolf. Teeth
   barred, JUMP ON the person like an animal would, claws and fangs. Let
   there be a bottle, bash and bash and continue to bash the person's
   face with it, not even mindful if the glass cuts into YOU while you do
   it. RAGE UNLEASHED. The enemy is EXTERMINTED, or at least you TRY to
   do that. It feels GOOD. People should NOT fuck around with people and
   they DO NOT if they realize they are up against people who CAN DO shit
   like this to them. Somilians ripped a man to pieces and DANCED in glee
   holding his torn off leg up for the cameras to film. I UNDERSTAND THEM
   PERFECTLY. But I DO NOT understand YOU! Or Malecki. Or Martins. My
   grandfather's brother RIPPED OUT the hearts of Chinese POW's and gored
   up the flag banners with the blood: this after he skinned them alive
   after hog-tieing them. I UNDEFRSTAND THIS. I DO NOT understand putting
   Jeffrey Dahmer on trial in a court and sitting there CALMLY testifying
   against him, or sitting in the court LISTENING to him calmly when he
   murdered your brother. I DO NOT understand this kind of civilization
   where RAGE is pent up in all aspects. So people go "postal." I
   understand them perfectly. I DO NOT understand the civvy shit. I
   understand breaking the door down to a house where lives a girl who
   fucked with my neice. I understand trashing her house and PUTTING HER
   FACE into a lit flame from the stove after bashing her almost
   unconscious with a chair and then smashing all the glass on the
   cabinets in her dining room, even tho it was her PARENT's house that
   got trashed. THIS I understand. And what cops? COPS never came around
   ethnic areas back then and interfered or else EVERYONE involved would
   say "oh, he just FELL off the roof, they were playing;" no one would
   tell the PIGS that "he PUNCHED the mother fucker off the roof where he
   fell 3 stories to his death." Local fights. Family violence too, NO
   ONE got involved and they didn't dare lest the two fighting parties
   SIDE for the moment and gang up on the one interfering. THAT was how
   it was. Now everything is sue crazy and everyone is also pent up - and
   SURE THERE IS MORE VIOLENCE THAN EVER BEFORE: GET A CLUE!!! And it's
   misdirected and/or directed against the wrong damned target or even
   against the self! This is PREDICTABLE! It's all pent up now. All it
   would take is a "leader" here to UNLEASH IT and also give these people
   a "TARGET" to hate. HOOEY, move over Germans. You seek to appeal to
   reason, yet the people who HAVE BEEN RED or descended from Red DID NOT
   USE REASON when they DID revolutions. PASSIONS were unleashed. You
   clean it all up after the fact, analyse it, put your BRAIN on it,
   reason it all out. REASON does not "MOVE" nations. PASSION does. It
   wasn't reason that put Lenin in power at all: ANARCHY broke out. It
   wasn't Stalin's or NKVD's reason that stopped kulaks;it was peasant's
   PASSIONS. Later on the reason set in after (I WISH) a few million
   (WISH)....a few thousand kulak SHITS were ha ha....beaten to death and
   beaten AFTER they were corpses! RAGE. And don't you know that the
   Banderas, equally rageful and hating the Reds, didn't just "murder,
   shoot, execute" the Reds, HO....they stuck hoses up their asses and
   turned on the water and pissed on them and other RAGE acts. They cut
   the dicks off the little children of Reds and other TORTURES, cut tits
   off, - and that's got NOTHING to do with a "reasonable capital
   punishment" thing. RAGE. Same as what Nazis did, all kinds of rage
   acts. It's the hard-core Nazis that behaved more "reasonable" when
   they murdered hundreds in pits. Goldhagan points that out too! And it
   is TOTALLY NORMAL to feel rage when rage is provoked, Mim, it is MORE
   NORMAL to behave this way with rage than it is to pent-up all of this
   and get all stoical and reasonable and RISK the rage becoming
   sexualized as it is in the stoical, akathartic west. I understand
   naked rage. I UNDERSTAND what the Germans did to the Jews for the
   FIRST TIME - NOW it makes PERFECT SENSE: THEY HATED THEM!!! I have
   felt HATE and acted on it. And those who'd call us savages and animals
   (yes! WE ARE) they are KLIPPOTHS for NOT BEING ABLE to unleash their
   own passions which just fester inside them and then transform into all
   forms of sublimated vicarious SHIT. Oh, then they want to ESCAPE their
   feelings? That can't be done! They FEAR their own fucking feelings?
   Now we got a COMPLETE klippoth. They just SPLIT, get schizoid doing
   this, become like classic honkey, try to be talking head. The people
   who DID Red in the USSR, forget the leaders that wrote and spoke later
   on IN PUBLIC, were all DIONYSIAN people and there is much they
   themselves have written in NON-academic reading material to show this
   clearly. That's what B was trying to tell the corpses on Marxism
   space. How could they "get it?" They're dead people. Rage wells up, is
   expressed in a paroxism of what lilly whites call "terror" and then it
   subsides
   
   Later: do any of you watch "Earth, Final Conflict" Roddenberry's
   excellent series and newest one? It's a model of the old system only
   involving all of earth. WHO do the Tailons enlist to assist them?
   Police force for top security. Scientists (the philosophers and
   knowers of old days). Priests (the religions athorities who have
   hordes of true believers). And what are the Tailon aims? And what do
   the Tailons look like??? In an interesting episode, Boone (the spy for
   the human resistance who is unclear on what the real Tailon agenda is)
   compares Da'an to human "authorities of old who are STILL revered
   today" andthere is a similarity of appearance: I call it the Jesus
   face and offer a PAGE of faces with a page of the Turanian looking
   types from all over the world to contrast it: the western conception
   of "evil, devious, cunning" appearances which WE Turanians all have in
   the western and even black American mindset. It is two pages of two
   types of physiognomy that tends to BLOW MINDS when people see it,
   scales fall from their eyes and they SEE and BEGIN to understand
   something very very deep.
   
   I will say something that I think is non-scientific, but then I have
   to wonder: WHY does this exist and IS IT non-scientific? ALL primates
   including white/black humans have round staring eyes. ONLY the top
   land predators such as felines and non-domesticated canines have the
   kind of "face" that resembles the Turanian face. WE look like CATS, or
   WOLVES. We also have digestive systems that are identical to a wolf's
   AND WE HAVE the faces to match this. Sound funny? I thought so too
   until I started to wonder: WHY are we Turanians (and Asians, in fact,
   MOST HUMANS) of this appearance? WHAT survival basis does this serve?
   Perhaps it is an evolved MARKER of some kind, much like a tiger's
   stripes or a male lion's mane which also seem to be there just for
   appearance! It's a theory NO ONE has looked into. That we who look
   this way are universally PERCEIVED by BOTH whites, and blacks too, as
   being somehow SCAREY in some way is INTERESTING. WHY is this? We look
   "demonic" as it is called, wolfish, catlike, CUNNING, devious, and so
   forth. This is surely a cultural perception but WHY? It couldn't just
   come out of thin air - SOMETHING MATERIAL HAD TO PRECEED the formation
   of these ideas about us! OK? The EARLIEST contact of Aryans with us,
   they thought us half demon or half god. A little later on, they blamed
   us for all their woes and thought we cursed them, thought we had the
   power of "magic" of some kind to do this to them. WHY? Oral history
   doesn't answer it: we did nothing to them except GET AWAY from them as
   they tried to push us (and DID push us) out of our native lands - this
   is pre-history but it's being dug out these days. The Hun and Tatar
   invasions might explain it as one author (I used to have the book, no
   longer remember the title, even) thought that the perception of "the
   xian devil" as a Turanian faced being came around the time of the
   Huns. This IS possible - but where then did the blacks get the same
   perception? Fear of cats due to life in Africa? We look like cats.
   
   Apprearance is there due to environment AND selective breeding in
   populations in isolation, but these appearances become markers by
   which OTHERS can tell us apart from themselves and vice versa. Humans
   don't come in STRIPES or SPOTS tho ALL primitives tend to MAKE stripes
   and spots on their naked bodies for DISPLAY and other things, - but we
   DO come in physiognomies which is the first thing anyone SEES when
   they talk to another: FACE. I often thought that striped or spotted
   humans would be so cute and I wondered why we DON'T have these
   markings. Perhaps one time we did? Having stripes would have aided
   hunters for sure, any soldier knows this! And it is a mistake to
   imagine that only prey have "disguise" mechanisms like this: MANY
   predatory animals also have these. A uniformed blotch of color such as
   humans have of all races would stand out, not good for any predator OR
   prey to have this. Humans took to painting themselves for this - all
   primitives did it and STILL do it. Make-up is the modern equivalent of
   this, by the way, and it is a LIMBIC behavior. To advocate "not
   wearing it, in order to be natural" is just the PURITAN'S line and I
   see thru that and also know it's the same TYPE OF PEOPLE who try to
   insist on this puritanism no matter WHICH dogma they use to "justify"
   their little STOICAL tyranny.
   
   For you not to realize that the PRIMATY MOTIVATING FACTOR that made
   people fall in against the USSR was the APPEARANCE of the Soviets -
   primarily Turanian. I can't believe you don't realize this. They fall
   right in with wanting to know about the Queen of England of Princess
   Die and all that STUPID SHIT but they are as if they DO NOT WANT TO
   KNOW about Soviets. The general perception of the Soviet type, just by
   appearance, is of a cold, calculating type of cunning "spooky" person.
   Yet they/we are the opposite in terms of how open and friendly we
   spontaneously are: BOISTEROUS is the word for it. Yet the overall
   impression of the Scandinavian is of a very civilized peaceful people
   and yet they are by their own admission brusque, aloof and quite
   repressed: Ole calls it Danishism and it's SUFFOCATING. These are knee
   jerk impressions people have BASED ON APPEARANCE and nothing else! Yet
   everyone always thought Diane Vera was Jewish even so she doesn't
   "LOOK" it at all: why? Because she is SMART and rather liberal-left
   wingy. Impressions. I knew she was not Jewish and not Catholic but a
   WASP and I was RIGHT: how did I base MY perception? On the degree of
   repression and self-oppression I could feel from her over a telephone.
   I even described her general appearance to her over the phone which
   she thought was psychic. No it wasn't. So how'd I do it? YOU figure it
   out. I heard her voice, talked to her. GET IT? I can ALWAYS tell if a
   person is black over a phone no matter what accent they have: it's
   EARS. I hear it. These are just an awareness that everyone OUGHT TO
   have. BAck to Earth Final Conflict. Roddenberry has the set up like it
   was of old in the old days with other Empires and their compradors. Do
   you imagine that the USA gets into these places by claiming it's out
   to conquer the people? They come with with offerings of favors and
   good deeds, guarantees of improvements and they DAZZLE the people with
   trinkets and make promises! And so? At first the tribel leaders,
   elders and "witch doctors" are always against this and so they are put
   down and ridiculed as the NEW STUFF is still in its dazzling phase. By
   the time the empires take over, it's too late, the elders and wise
   folk are all gone and the people are enslaved.
   
   Other empires managed to do this without affecting the native cultures
   of people - such as the Romans or even Egyptians. But the Aryans have
   found a new way to subvert the very NATURE of the conquered people and
   that is to turn them against WHAT THEY ARE IN THE FLESH ITSELF - turn
   them against their own RACEHOOD so to speak, turn them against their
   own APPEARANCE!!! THIS is what you are not seeing is SO DIFFERENT
   about THIS stage of imperialism - whereas the economic factors are
   exactly the same as they were of old: THEY have resources, YOU need
   their resources, YOU don't live there, THEY live there. So you gotta
   find a way to GET the resources - this is the history of agrarian
   life, the ToD. The only difference is the Aryan element: it is
   DECIDEDLY KLIPPOTHIC IN ESSENCE - and this is APART FROM slavery,
   completely apart from economics or anything else that ever drove ANY
   imperialists of old to enslave others or conquer them. I have read all
   their literature and learned their utter PARANOIA as regards
   APPEARANCE! Not work, or money, but APPEARANCE. The only explanation I
   have is that they are a true minority and their genes are TOTALLY
   recessive. What else could make them FEEL that way and write SO MUCH
   on it? They said the same exact things when they instituted the Laws
   of Manu in Aryan India based on Varna: COLOR of person decides his or
   her worth. PURE Aryan conceptuaizations of old and of modern times. To
   not consider this a factor, THE factor, in all they've done is to be
   deliberately blind. FOR WHOM do you think posters of Stalin and others
   were touched up to make them look NOT more black, NOT more asian, but
   MORE WESTERN EUROPEAN? Do you think they did this for their own Soviet
   people? There are many, or MOST that I happen to know that do NOT
   share this conceptuatlization of "what looks IDEAL" at all! When they
   make Stalin look other than he really looks, I see they have made him
   look BLAND. When they "idealized" Yezhov's picture I see they made him
   look like NON-Yezhov, like some English guy or something, they even
   make his jet black hair look light! It's AMAZING: you don't notice
   this? This has NOTHING TO DO with economics! There are LOTS of rich
   Japanese and Chinese and Jews, you know, and imperialists among them
   too.
   
   BUT WHO HAD this nordic hang up? Nordics? Yes, English and Germans had
   it big time but SO DID HOLLYWOOD JEWS, Mim. And the JOKE of it is that
   it was started by Winkleman, a GAY GUY in love with the type of guy
   that looked like that. WHAT a mock out: it puts a new slant on the
   concept that they are a HOMOEROTIC RACE of solar phallic culters. Read
   "Male Disease" for a clue to what I mean - the whole post, it's on
   Vad's website, both parts. It's a fact that a lof of other ethnic
   groups have their own PIGS in uniform of the same military type but
   the IMAGE of the "stoic soldier " remains a nordic image. Lebed will
   always be thought of as a Darth Vader or something while Churchill,
   JUST DUE TO HIS LOOKS, will be thought of as the kindly old Englishman
   who wants freedom. THAT is how strong these perceptions are in humans.
   What causes it? MEDIA? HOLLYWOOD? If so, WHY doesn't it work on
   everyone? Perhaps it doesn't work on the folks I know because we are
   not "THE CONQUERED." But back to the original point (this all blends
   into it in case you don't catch that), what NATO does is exactly like
   what the Tailons are doing on that show (EXCELLENT show, by the way!)
   Obviously Roddenberry, with his dream of progressive world communism,
   KNEW this when he wrote it.
   
   chow.