This is an archive of the former website of the Maoist Internationalist Movement, which was run by the now defunct Maoist Internationalist Party - Amerika. The MIM now consists of many independent cells, many of which have their own indendendent organs both online and off. MIM(Prisons) serves these documents as a service to and reference for the anti-imperialist movement worldwide.
Maoist Internationalist Movement

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

     XX XX  XXX  XX XX   X   X  XXX  XXX  XXX  XXX
     X X X   X   X X X   XX  X  X X   X   X    X
     X V X   X   X V X   X X X  X X   X   XX   XXX
     X   X   X   X   X   X  XX  X X   X   X      X
     X   X  XXX  X   X   X   V  XXX   X   XXX  XXX

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

         THE MAOIST INTERNATIONALIST MOVEMENT

     MIM NOTES 112                 MID-APRIL 1996


MIM NOTES SPEAKS TO AND FROM THE VIEWPOINT OF THE 
WORLD'S OPPRESSED MAJORITY, AND AGAINST THE 
IMPERIALIST-PATRIARCHY. PICK IT UP AND WIELD IT IN 
THE SERVICE OF THE PEOPLE. SUPPORT IT, STRUGGLE 
WITH IT AND WRITE FOR IT.


MIM NOTES 112 INCLUDES:

1.   ST. LOUIS POLICE MURDER BLACK YOUTH
2.   PAN AFRICANIST STUDENTS AND YOUTH COMMEMORATE
     SHARPEVILLE MASSACRE
3.   "DEMOCRATIC" U.S.-RAMOS REGIME IS A MONUMENTAL
     FARCE
4.   LETTERS TO MIM
5.   BIZARRE LEFT GROUP RESPONDS TO SPARTACIST 
     LEAGUE
6.   SOCIAL CONTROL BEYOND THE PRISON WALLS
7.   RAIL CELEBRATES INTERNATIONAL WOMEN'S DAY WITH
     RALLY AGAINST ROTC
8.   PRISONS AWARENESS WEEK AT THE UNIVERSITY OF
     MICHIGAN
9.   JAILED WOMEN DENIED VISITS WITH THEIR CHILDREN
10.  MIM NOTES IS THE PEOPLE'S PROPERTY
11.  TWO ROADS FOR ENVIRONMENTALISM
12.  ENVIRONMENTALISTS PROTEST CHEMICAL WEAPONS
     TRAINING SCHOOL
13.  UNDER LOCK AND KEY: NEWS FROM PRISONERS AND
     PRISONS
14.  RAMONA AFRICA BLASTS AMERIKKKA; CALLS ON THE
     PEOPLE TO DEFEND MUMIA
15.  MASSACHUSETTS ACTIVISTS CONTINUE VIGILANCE
     AGAINST PRISON REPRESSION
16.  MOVIE REVIEW: DEAD MAN WALKING
17.  MOVIE REVIEW: THE BIRD CAGE
18.  MOVIE REVIEW: RUMBLE IN THE BRONX
19.  NPR CAN'T COMPREHEND NATIONAL LIBERATION
20.  SETTLERS SHIFT INTO STOCK OWNERSHIP
21.  LABOR ARISTOCRACY AND PETTY-BOURGEOISIE GET
     MORE GRAVY


* * *


ST. LOUIS POLICE MURDER BLACK YOUTH


by a member of RAIL

St Louis--Amerika's pigs have murdered another 
Black youth. On January 8 at 4 p.m., officer Eddie 
Sanchez shot Garland Carter, 17 years old and 
unarmed, twice in the back and killed him.

The Black Panthers first pointed out that the 
police are really an army of imperialist occupation 
within the Black communities. MIM agrees with this 
analysis, the case of Garland Carter is the latest 
illustration of this fact.(1)

Officer Eddie Sanchez was known in Garland Carter's 
neighborhood for harassing Black youth. In the 
past, when Sanchez would tell youth to "move on," 
Garland Carter would correctly tell him "this is 
our neighborhood."

The police claim they wanted to question Garland 
Carter about a robbery. The day of the shooting, 
they went to Garland's grandmother's home and told 
her that if Garland did not show up for questioning 
the next day, they would shoot him.

They didn't wait for the next day.

Later that day, a police car drove slowly and 
deliberately by Garland's home. A police officer 
formed his fingers as if they were a gun, pointed 
the imaginary gun out the car window, "fired" it at 
Garland's home, and then drove away.

Finally, at 4 p.m. that day, Amerikkkan pig Eddie 
Sanchez chased Garland Carter down the 1700 block 
of Cass Avenue and around a corner, where he shot 
Garland twice and killed him. One young Black man 
who witnessed the shooting told Sanchez "Don't try 
to put a gun on him!" as Sanchez walked back to his 
car, took a black bag out of the trunk, and then 
returned to Garland's body. (The young man was 
arrested, charged with interfering with police 
business, taken to jail and beaten.)

Witnesses say Garland was unarmed. Chief of 
Detectives Lt. Co. Joseph Mokwa told Garland's 
father, minutes after the shooting, that Garland 
was unarmed. Later that day police said they found 
an automatic weapon on Garland. The next day they 
said it was a .22-caliber pistol. A week later, 
investigators recovered a .22-caliber pistol, a 
tear gas gun, and a toy pistol from the trunk of 
Sanchez' patrol car, and reported to the press that 
Sanchez was expected to be suspended without pay. 
Instead, Sanchez, who is a former Navy SEAL, went 
on "administrative leave," with pay. The community 
outcry exposed the pigs' lie and forced them to 
drop it.

The day after Garland's murder, more than 100 
people met in a neighborhood center to discuss 
Garland's murder with a lawyer. The pigs took note 
of who came and who left.

Police Chief Henderson had pleaded in the St. Louis 
Post Dispatch for witnesses to come to the police 
station and make statements. Those who did so were 
arrested or told to go home; some were even beaten.

This whole story is a valuable experience for the 
Black community, and the international proletariat. 
These people of Garland Carter's neighborhood 
should be applauded and feel pride for standing up 
to pig oppression. It's time to discuss, analyze 
and learn from experiences like this. Police 
violence does not intimidate the Black nation; it 
only exposes the police for the oppressors that 
they are. Their power is illegitimate, a bloody 
obstacle to self-determination and development of 
Black people, an oppressive yoke to be thrown off.

Amerika's police don't "serve and protect;" they 
harass and oppress. In recent years, this 
oppression has increased. Pigs are warehousing 
Black youth in Amerika's prisons, murdering and 
torturing them on a regular basis. Currently, one-
third of Black youth in Amerika is either in 
prison, on parole, or on probation.(2)

They've already brought back chain gangs in 
Alabama. And the Missouri senate is considering 
chain gangs for Missouri's prison system. State 
Senator Bill Kenny, (R-Lee's Summit), who has co-
sponsored a bill modeled after the Alabama law, 
said "I'm not concerned about what the prisoner 
feels on a chain gang. I think it's a good idea to 
make it degrading."(3)

MIM Notes and RAIL Notes report stories like 
Garland Carter's on a regular basis.(4) But this 
writer has to wonder how many stories are going 
unreported. MIM and RAIL encourage our readers to 
write articles or send up information about other 
cases of police oppression. These crimes of 
imperialism should be exposed for what they are. 
This is part of the process of overthrowing the 
system of imperialist oppression.

DOWN WITH WHITE SUPREMACY!

BUILD A MAOIST VANGUARD PARTY!

BUILD PUBLIC OPINION IN FAVOR OF NATIONAL 
LIBERATION FOR THE BLACK NATION!

REVOLUTION UNTIL VICTORY!


NOTES:

1. Information for this story comes form the 
following news articles: St. Louis American Jan. 
10, 1995 "Family Calls Youth's Shooting a 'Murder'" 
and "Columnist Gives View of Shooting." St. Louis 
Post Dispatch, Jan. 9, 1996, "Officer Fatally 
Shoots Robbery Suspect During Chase." St Louis Post 
Dispatch, Jan 17, 1996, "Police Find Guns in Car of 
Officer Who Shot Teen."

2. Information from the Sentencing Project quote in 
the St. Louis Post-Dispatch.

3. St. Louis Post Dispatch Jan. 17, 1996

4. See RAIL Notes Fall 1995 "Masses protest murder 
in Lincoln Heights: pigs execute 14-year-old," MIM 
Notes August '95 "Like a foreign troop: San 
Francisco cops kill Black man," and the Under lock 
and Key section of any issue of MIM Notes. 



* * *


PAN AFRICANIST STUDENTS AND YOUTH COMMEMORATE
SHARPEVILLE MASSACRE


On March 23 in Washington, D.C. the Pan-African 
Student/Youth Movement (PASYM) sponsored a speaker 
from the Azanian Pan Africanist Congress (PAC) in 
commemoration of the March 1960 massacre of 67 
Azanians who were protesting South Africa's 
repressive pass laws. The speaker emphasized the 
need for a Pan Africanist, socialist revolutionary 
movement, and indicted the neo-colonial Mandela 
regime for its negotiated road to an empty power. 
MIM supports this speaker's analysis of the current 
South African regime. MIM holds that nations 
oppressed by imperialism need revolutionary 
nationalist struggles to achieve liberation. Neo-
colonial regimes, because of their dependent 
relations with the imperialists, cannot represent 
the people's needs or aspirations.

"How do you negotiate with someone whose boot is on 
your neck ... and who has an M-16? That's a tough 
negotiation," the speaker said. Drawing parallels 
between the Civil Rights Movement in the United 
Snakes and the movement which brought Mandela into 
the government, the speaker pointed out that the 
oppressor-nation Afrikaners still own most of the 
land, the old army and police structures are still 
in place, and the new regime did not even change 
the name from South Africa to Azania upon taking 
"power."

Just two days earlier, Mandela gave a speech 
commemorating the Sharpeville/Kwalanga massacre 
(now a national holiday) in which he encouraged 
"patience" during the transition from apartheid 
rule. '''We are gradually getting on top of the 
levers of power, but to gain power will take 
time.'''(1) The Pan Africanist speaker, in contrast, 
castigated people for voting without asking "an 
election for what?" reminding the audience that 
without land, Azanians will not have power.

The speaker emphasized the need for discipline, 
democratic process and an independent media of the 
revolutionary movement. As the PASYM put it in its 
literature, "We cannot wait for CNN to broadcast a 
major escalation throughout the world before we 
take to the streets in an Anti-War protest."(2) The 
speaker put forth a strong line against imperialism 
and underdevelopment agencies like the IMF, and 
said that under a socialist, Pan Africanist 
government of Africa, borders would not be 
recognizable and Western "experts" would not have 
such power in the economy.

At the end of the speech, when greetings were read 
from other organizations, a representative of PASYM 
acknowledged MIM's presence at the event, calling 
it courageous for a "white left" group to truly 
support national liberation struggles of oppressed 
peoples. While MIM tried to explain that it is not 
a white left group, but a multi-national vanguard 
party, we readily accept the friendly words of 
unity from this anti- imperialist organization. 



NOTES: 

1. Associated Press March 21, 1996. 

2. "Capitalism and the Military- Industrial 
Intelligence Police Complex," pamphlet by the Pan- 
African Student/Youth Movement (PASYM), P.O. Box 
4404, Capitol Heights, MD 20791-4404.


* * *


"DEMOCRATIC" U.S.-RAMOS REGIME IS A MONUMENTAL 
FARCE



Philippine President Fidel Ramos and his Amerikan 
backers used the 10th anniversary of the fall of 
the U.S.-Marcos dictatorship to portray the U.S.-
Ramos regime as sincerely committed to democracy 
and economic "development." But as the article we 
reprint here points out, all the reactionaries' 
expensive hoopla cannot hide the essential 
character of the government of the Philippines. 
Like the U.S.-Marcos dictatorship, the U.S.-Aquino 
regime was and U.S.-Ramos regime is pro-imperialist 
and pro-landlord.


Here are just some of the facts which show this is 
true:


* Although Aquino freed many political prisoners 
and carried out some legal reform, her government 
was violently anti-Communist. She openly supported 
reactionary paramilitary organizations which were 
responsible for terrorizing and assassinating 
revolutionary and progressive activists.(1)

* Aquino's Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Plan 
(CARP) was a sham. It fostered the illusion of land 
reform by formally transferring land to a few 
peasants, while at the same time big landlords and 
multi-national corporations used "loopholes" in the 
law to snatch up more land.(2)

* On January 22, 1987, less than one year after 
Aquino took office, Philippine police and marines 
opened fire on 15,000 protesters demanding that 
Aquino implement the land reforms she had promised. 
Thirteen protesters were killed.(3)

* The Aquino regime remained subservient to the 
dictates of the Amerikan-controlled IMF and World 
Bank, which exacerbated the poverty of the Filipino 
people. Aquino's chief economic advisors were 
agents of the IMF and the World Bank.(4)

* Aquino gave the green light to the "total war" 
policy against the revolutionary movement in the 
countryside. Fidel Ramos, then head of the Armed 
Forces of the Philippines, worked closely with the 
U.S. Army and CIA to plan and carry out the "total 
war." More than 1,253,000 people were 
systematically forced from their homes from 1987 to 
1991 by this policy, and many massacres took 
place.(5)

* The U.S.-Ramos regime carried out more village 
bombings and forced evacuations in its first two 
years than occurred during the entire Marcos' 
dictatorship.(6)

* Ramos' "Philippines 2000" economic plan aids 
imperialist exploitation of the Philippines. It 
calls for the removal of nationality restrictions 
on ownership, unlimited profit repatriation, and 
the suppression of workers' rights in order to 
maintain "industrial peace." Ramos' economic 
policies have done nothing to relieve poverty in 
the Philippines: More than 75% of the population 
lives below the (government defined) poverty line, 
and almost 80% of children below school age suffer 
malnutrition.(6)

* Ramos has reinstated martial law in all but name. 
As Crispin Beltran, chair of the KMU (May First 
Movement) points out, "He doesn't need to declare 
martial law, because it is already here... 
Repressive laws go hand in hand with oppressive 
economic policies. They are two sides of the same 
coin... It is clear as day that the U.S.-Ramos 
regime needs to rule with an iron fist in order to 
ram the bitter poisons of the IMF-WB and WTO-
dictated policies down the Filipino peoples' 
throats."(7)



TREACHERY AGAINST THE PEOPLE FROM MARCOS TO RAMOS 
TO AQUINO



The Government of the Republic of the Philippines 
has barely undergone even superficial changes in 
the ten years since the U.S.-Marcos dictatorship. 
"The Marcos boys are back in power. Even Imelda 
(Marcos) is back in power. The only thing lacking 
is Marcos himself."(7)

The Amerikan imperialists and their puppet Ramos 
are trying to save face by claiming that they were 
responsible for the overthrow of the Marcos 
dictatorship, but that honor belongs to the 
revolutionary mass movement led by the Maoist 
Communist party of the Philippines (CPP). The CPP 
struggled for more than a decade against Marcos and 
the semi-feudal, semi-colonial system which 
supported him. The party built a mass movement 
around the National Democratic (ND) line which 
supports real national independence and democracy, 
and led an increasingly successful armed struggle 
in the countryside, where it began to organize the 
beginnings of the socialist state which will 
replace the corrupt puppet Government of the 
Republic of the Philippines.

The legal and underground ND forces continue to be 
in the forefront of the struggle against 
imperialism, feudalism, and fascism. Legal ND 
organizations like BAYAN and the KMU led massive 
nationwide protests in January and February against 
Ramos' reactionary economic policies and increased 
repression. More than 40,000 marched in some cites, 
shutting down 95% of public transport.(8) And, 
thanks to the ongoing rectification movement led by 
the CPP, the underground forces continued to retake 
gains lost due to internal errors and CIA-
organized-and-funded psychological warfare 
campaigns.


***To find out more about the situation in the 
Philippines and the CPP-led National Democratic 
Front (NDF), order a copy of RAIL's pamphlet 
"Support the National Democratic Front of the 
Philippines." MIM and RAIL are organizing events to 
help expose imperialist crimes in the Philippines 
and build support for the National Democratic 
movement. If you can help, write to: MIM P.O. Box 
3576, Ann Arbor MI, 48106-3576 or e-mail 
mim@nyxfer.blythe.org.***



NOTES:

1. "A Rustling of Leaves," video.

2. "Support the National Democratic Front of the 
Philippines," Jan 1996, p.8.

3. "Solidaridad USA," newsletter of the Philippine 
Peasant Support Network (PESANTE), Jan-Feb 1996, p. 
7.

4. Jose M. Sison, The Philippine Revolution (Crane 
Russak: New York, 1989), p. 131.

5. "Liberation International," newsletter of the 
international office of the NDF, Nov-Dec 1995, pp. 
23-24.

6. "Support the NDF," p. 3.

7. "Correspondence," newsletter of the KMU 
international department, Jan-Feb 1996, p. 4.

8. Ibid., p. 3.


* * *


LETTERS TO MIM


ATTACKING THE KKK IN THE DOC

Dear MIM,

I received the paper you send to me (December 
1995). I really like how you show the people that 
only a communist world can bring people together as 
one. The biggest problem we have up here in 
Michigan is that there are a lot of racist prison 
guards. For one, I know of at least three white 
cops that are members of the Ku Klux Klan. When 
they see a white prisoner helping a black one, they 
try to cause trouble. Do you have any helpful ideas 
that I might use in stopping the (DOC) from hiring 
Klan members? Please let me know.

--a Michigan prisoner


MIM responds:

In the Ionia maximum facility that this comrade is 
talking about, there is one prison pig for every 
1.64 prisoners. The percentage of white guards is 
86% as opposed to 12% being Black guards. The 
percentage of Black prisoners in the facility is 
65% and the percentage of white prisoners is 33%.

In addition, the monitoring exercises at the Ionia 
Maximum Facility is twice the amount as other 
prisons of the same security level; the average 
number of shakedowns in facilities of level 5-6 is 
4693 and in Ionia, there were 7279 for the same 
period. The average number of non-routine strip 
searches was 34 whereas Ionia conducted 189 in the 
same period.

Though there is ostensibly no difference between 
Black prison pigs and white prison pigs, the fact 
that the Ionia prison facility was placed in a 
predominantly white area does highlight a specific 
benefit of prisons to the white nation--jobs. In 
Michigan, the kkkorrections department has become 
the state government's leading growth industry 
since the early 1980s. For example, in 1979, prison 
employees accounted for one of every 14 state 
workers. As of 1995, prison employees account for 
one in every four state workers. The Michigan 
prison budget has more than quadrupled to over $1 
billion a year since the early 1980s with 30 new 
prisons. By 1998, there will be an estimated 2,200 
new prisoners in Michigan's gulag system. The 
Michigan gulag system, like that in the rest of 
Amerika, serves as a tool to oppress national 
minorities as well as to provide parasitic jobs for 
the white nation.

At this time, MIM is not currently waging a 
campaign to stop the hiring of KKK members as 
prison guards. Our goal is more general because we 
believe that the prisons in general are oppressive, 
not just the guards. It is the whole system that 
depends on superprofits from the Third World and 
the repression of fights for self-determination of 
internal colonies, the entire system from the cops 
on the streets, to the pigs in Black robes making 
judgments to the pigs in white robes torturing 
prisoners. Within the larger goal, we are working 
on the outside to develop support for prisoner 
struggles and from the inside working to provide 
prisoners with revolutionary material to learn the 
best way to organize. As the fight against the 
gulags specifically in Michigan grows, we can pick 
specific targets. MIM would argue that hiring KKK 
members versus other members of the white nation 
that have a material interest in national 
oppression is not something that we can target as a 
winnable battle that will progress the fight 
against oppression in prisons.

As far as advice to combat the guards, we encourage 
you to continue to work with MIM to build a 
campaign to stop oppressive conditions in the 
prison system. If you believe that there is a way 
that we can effectively stop the employment of 
oppressive guards, continue to struggle with us. 
For now, our approach on this specific issue will 
be to use the above letter as the introduction to a 
petition for people to sign on the outside. Though 
we don't believe that the bourgeois will change its 
policies because of the petition, it can help to 
get people on the outside to understand the 
conditions at Ionia and other Michigan facilities. 
For instance we can talk to people about the fact 
that guards are pigs, but then we engage them to 
work on campaigns to stop the proliferation of 
prisons and work toward revolution.

We encourage you to start a study group with 
comrades Under Lock & Key. One of the things that 
we are doing is organizing a week of events in 
Michigan to educate people about the conditions of 
prisons, police brutality against Black 
nationalists and the Black nation in general and 
the Maoist alternative to prisons. One result of 
this week will be the organization of a more 
systematic drive for books from Michigan students. 
If there are specific issues that you would like to 
study and work to build an study group around, let 
us know. Also, if you would like to write text to 
be read at the events that could educate people 
about the conditions in Ionia, please do so. It 
would have to arrive before the 25th of March.



SUPPORT BOOKS FOR PRISONERS!

MIM thanks the mass that gave several copies of The 
Communist Manifesto, State and Revolution, Wage-
Labour and Capital, The Economic & Philosophical 
Manuscripts of 1844, and A Critique of Soviet 
Economics for the Books for Prisoners program. If 
you are imprisoned in Amerika's gulags and want to 
start a study group, write MIM for copies of these 
books. If you are on the outside write MIM for 
information on how to contribute to the Books for 
Prisoners program. 



* * *



BIZARRE LEFT GROUP RESPONDS TO SPARTACIST LEAGUE


***The Trotskyist Spartacist League's youth arm 
recently wrote about MIM in an article about a pro-
affirmative action demonstration and sit-in at 
UCLA.(1) A fuller version of this article will 
appear in an upcoming issue of MIM Theory, send $5 
for a copy.***



Young Spartacus wrote:

"...For minority youth under attack at UCLA and in 
the ghettos, the way to fight racist oppression 
lies in siding with the multiracial working class, 
which alone has the power to get rid of capitalism. 
It will take a revolutionary workers party that 
serves as a tribune of the oppressed to lead this 
fight.

"One bizarre left group at the UCLA sit-in, the 
Maoist International [sic] Movement (MIM), misses 
this reality entirely. While they defend 
affirmative action as "progressive, but severely 
limited," they raise no demands to open up the 
universities to the majority of blacks and 
minorities. Echoing odd pseudo-nationalist dogma, 
MIM says that blacks are a 'colonial nation' and 
writes off the working class, dismissing the U.S. 
proletariat as a reactionary part of an 'oppressor 
nation.' But black people constitute an oppressed 
minority whose main impetus for struggle since the 
time of slavery has been to fight toward full 
integration--not some 'colonial liberation.' Black 
people helped build the wealth of American society 
first as slaves and today as a strategic layer of 
the working class...."(1)


MIM responds:

The "multiracial working class" within U.S. borders 
is composed of groups which are objectively 
revolutionary and groups which are objectively 
counterrevolutionary. Hence it is incorrect to 
speak of these different groups as though they all 
have the same material interests by virtue of all 
being a part of the same "multiracial working 
class." The majority of the white working-class has 
more to lose than its chains, and hence can only be 
considered to constitute a labor aristocracy.

The Trotskyists pretend to oppose all nationalism, 
but they are in fact Amerikan nationalists--the 
most reactionary kind of nationalist there is. It 
is only within an Amerikan-nationalist framework 
(or its Eurocentric equivalent) that the word 
"minority" can be understood to refer to Black, 
Latino, First Nation, and Asian- descended people. 
The people of the oppressed nations--in Africa, 
Asia, Latin America and North America--constitute 
80% of the world's people. 

When the Sparts say, "For minority youth under 
attack at UCLA and in the ghettos, the way to fight 
racist oppression lies in siding with the 
multiracial working class...," they are spreading a 
popular but deadly illusion.(1) The white working-
class is leading the charge for criminalizing, 
jailing, executing, sterilizing, starving, 
evicting, undereducating and deporting ghetto, 
barrio and reservation youth. And that's just on a 
good day. On a bad day, a white worker like William 
Masters will shoot a proletarian youth down in cold 
blood for writing grafitti on property, while other 
property-owning workers will make a hero out of the 
killer. Warning to ghetto youth: the white working-
class is part of the problem, not the solution. For 
individual whites to be of use in the struggle 
against racist/national oppression, they must join 
with the oppressed in struggle against the white 
oppressor nation, including the majority of white 
workers. 

It is simply untrue that MIM "raise[s] no demands 
to open up the universities to the majority of 
blacks and minorities." MIM calls for open access 
to education for all rather than just those who can 
buy their way in. And MIM goes further than just 
the chauvinist outlook that only talks about the 
population within U.S. borders: we call for open 
borders so that the imperialist wealth (including 
the educational institutions) can be shared with 
the world's proletariat. 

The Sparts are wrong to assert that "black people 
constitute an oppressed minority whose main impetus 
for struggle since the time of slavery has been to 
fight toward full integration--not some 'colonial 
liberation.'"(1) If this were true, the Sparts 
would not feel the need to opportunistically 
associate themselves with living Black nationalists 
like Mumia Abu-Jamal and Geronimo Pratt, or with 
images of Malcolm X and the Black Panther Party. 
The Spartacist League likes to criticize Martin 
Luther King, Jr. from the standpoint of Malcolm X. 
What they don't acknowledge is that King's 
capitulationist strategy of nonviolence which they 
reject went hand-in-hand with the capitulationist 
strategy of integrationism which they uphold. 

Lastly, the Sparts write, "Black people helped 
build the wealth of American society first as 
slaves and today as a strategic layer of the 
working class...."(1) Aside from the integrationist 
notion of "the" (U.S.) working class which we 
criticized above, this is correct. What the Sparts 
don't mention here is that Blacks on the whole, let 
alone the workers and peasants of the neocolonies 
who contribute enormously to Amerikkka's wealth, do 
not share in this wealth, while whites on the whole 
do. This is why we said that Affirmative Action is 
progressive, but severely limited. The white 
Amerikan nation owes massive reparations to the 
people of North America's internal colonies and 
external neocolonies. Affirmative Action is a token 
step in this correct direction. Which brings us to 
one last question. Why do the Sparts "defend 
affirmative action," when they believe that 
"preferential hiring 'Affirmative Action' programs 
set workers against each other"?(2)


NOTES: 

1. "Defend Affirmative Action--Fight for Open 
Admissions! UCLA Students Sit In," Workers 
Vanguard, Mar. 1, 1996, p. 12. The full article is 
available from MIM or from the Spartacist League, 
which can be reached at P.O. Box 1377 GPO, New 
York, NY 10116. 

2. Marxist Bulletin 5 Revised, p. 12.



* * *



SOCIAL CONTROL BEYOND THE PRISON WALLS


Amherst, MA--RAIL, MIM, the UMass Radical Student 
Union and one other organization organized a series 
of events from February 12 to 14 designed to expose 
how the government controls the people under the 
guise of helping them. These organizations had 
worked on Prison Awareness Week at the University 
in November (see the December 1996 MIM Notes), and 
struggled with the masses to extend the analysis of 
and struggle against social control beyond the 
prison walls.

As MIM wrote on the flyer advertising the events: 
"The welfare system and social service agencies are 
run by the same imperialist government that runs 
the prison system and the police. Within prisons 
there are variety of security levels, each more 
expensive and dehumanizing than the last. ...

"Like the different security levels within prisons, 
welfare and the social service agencies are 
different levels of the same government effort to 
surveil and control the people. "

On the first day, RAIL and MIM made a presentation 
titled "Does Social Control really exist?" and led 
a discussion that laid out the theoretical 
foundations for the week. RAIL and MIM explained 
how the government-funded (and many of the 
privately-funded) social service agencies: Welfare, 
Department of Social Services, Department of Youth 
Services, Mental Heath and others, oppress the 
communities they claim to serve. We also discussed 
alternative service models that serve immediate 
needs while advancing towards the seizure of power 
by revolutionary forces such as those of the Black 
Panther Party and the Young Lords Party.


WOMEN AND SOCIAL CONTROL


On Tuesday, a panel talked about "Women and Social 
Control" and individuals' experiences in the AIDS 
services, Welfare and Prison Industries. All had 
experienced these systems both as clients and as 
providers.

An AIDS activist on the panel described the AIDS 
service system as "unfortunately, an industry," in 
which the service agencies "function primarily to 
perpetuate their own existence." She named the 
bureaucratic style a "Tyranny of Kindness:" the 
agencies build a pretense of taking care of 
clients, in order justify their continued funding. 
The terms client and provider are standard in the 
industry's vocabulary and reveal its deceptive 
intent. By locating problems with the clients, and 
the power to improve their lives with the provider, 
this rhetoric justifies the provider's continued 
funding and strips the client of her or his 
identity as a person and as a member of an 
oppressed group. The rhetoric defends capitalism by 
hiding structural causes of suffering and protects 
service industry's profit under capitalism.

It is standard in direct-service agencies (usually 
operated as non-profit companies selling contracted 
service to federal, state or local government) for 
Administration to skim 60 to 70% from direct costs 
of the services provided. Consumer Advisory Boards 
are paid by the agencies to endorse the providers' 
programs and practices. Criticism and complaint are 
subjected to stifling control by the bureaucracy. 
The Big Brother atmosphere will be familiar to 
readers who, like the panel, have some experience 
with the 'Human Services' system. Careerism on the 
part of the provider personnel leads to a much 
higher priority on covering of asses (another 
familiar phrase in the Industry) and on self-
promotion than on genuine service to the people.


MENTAL HEALTH


On Wednesday, MIM and RAIL showed the video 
"Titicut follies" about the state mental hospital 
in Bridgewater, Massachusetts in the early 1960s. 
The video was banned until recently because of a 
lawsuit against the makers of the video by the 
mental hospital. Recently, the lawsuit was settled, 
forcing the makers of the video to add the 
disclaimer at the end that "changes have been made 
at Bridgewater since the production of this film." 
Of course these changes aren't specified and MIM 
guesses they aren't significant.

The video follows several prisoners at the 
institution for several months. The unnarrated film 
includes interviews with guards, wardens and other 
workers. We see one prisoner discussing politics in 
the yard, and it's clear that calling oneself a 
communist in 1963 was sufficient cause for being 
put away.

The video shows one prisoner going before a medical 
staff hearing to determine the future of his 
treatment. He admits that he is deteriorating in 
the mental hospital, but argues that spending a 
year there is the cause of his deterioration. He 
wants to be released back to prison, but the 
doctors' response once he leaves the room is: "His 
medication should be increased" so he won't be so 
agitated.

MIM has no idea how the makers of this excellent 
video managed to convince the management of the 
hospital to let them make this movie. But the 
doctors are obviously aware of the risks that this 
movie poses to them, so they take the camera 
through the steps of their decision. One doctor 
dismisses the prisoner's argument: "If you take his 
argument at face value, it's rational, but his 
assumptions are wrong." His assumption, that being 
medicated and kept awake by other people all night 
can affect his mental health, makes plenty of sense 
to MIM.

The guards in the institution are much less 
politically savvy them the doctors. The video shows 
guards making fun of the prisoners, especially the 
ones who best fit the psychology industry's 
definition of crazy. This part of the video is most 
striking. We see prisoners who are obviously not 
well kept in cold cells with no clothes, and we see 
the guards continually harassing them. Nothing 
physically brutal, at least on the camera, but lots 
of goading. The worst that MIM saw was one of the 
guards mocking a prisoner while shaving the 
prisoner with a straight razor. It's unfathomable 
that such barbarity can even pass for "treatment" 
and not a cause of mental illness.


PRISONS AND SOCIAL SERVICES FOCUS ON LATINOS


On Thursday, a representative of the National 
Committee to Free Puerto Rican Prisoners of War and 
Political Prisoners and Latinos against the Abuse 
of Prisoners showed "Have you seen the new Puerto 
Rican revolutionary woman?" The video is about 4 of 
the Puerto Rican revolutionary women now imprisoned 
by Amerika for engaging in armed struggle against 
the U.S. government. The video also briefly 
discusses the work these women undertook building 
self-reliant institutions of the oppressed in 
Chicago prior to picking up the gun.

As the largest group of Latinos legally living 
within U.S. borders, they serve as convenient 
justifications for funding to target Latinos. There 
was also a short presentation about how Latinos are 
treated in the Massachusetts prison system, notably 
in the control units where they make up over 80% of 
the prisoners. This is far disproportionate to the 
number in the general Massachusetts population or 
the general prison population.


JOIN THE FIGHT AGAINST SOCIAL CONTROL


This week of events clearly demonstrated that 
social service agencies are just another means of 
social control, targeted particularly at oppressed 
nations inside U.S. borders. As with prisons, the 
nature of these agencies must be exposed and 
fought. Reforming social service agencies is not 
possible because they exist to serve the 
imperialists. Setting up alternative social service 
agencies that truly serve the people is an 
important task for revolutionaries as we build 
independent institutions of the oppressed. Join MIM 
and RAIL to build these independent institutions as 
we fight to overthrow this imperialist system. 



* * *



RAIL CELEBRATES INTERNATIONAL WOMEN'S DAY WITH
RALLY AGAINST ROTC



Los Angeles, March 8--The Revolutionary Anti-
Imperialist League (RAIL) celebrated International 
Women's Day by leading an informational rally 
outside the headquarters for UCLA's Reserve Officer 
Training Corps (ROTC). RAIL was there in part to 
demonstrate that, as one of its signs read, "All 
issues are women's issues." As at least two armed, 
plainclothes pigs looked on, activists gave 
passers-by copies of CALRAIL and a flier promoting 
the rally and explaining its purpose. The flier 
read in part:

"In honor of International Women's Day, rally with 
the Revolutionary Anti-Imperialist League (RAIL) to 
get the ROTC OFF CAMPUS!

"UCLA's Men's Gym is the headquarters for UCLA's 
Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC). An arm of 
the U.S. war machine, the ROTC trains young 
students to become potential corpses and/or hired 
killers of women, men and children. The ROTC also 
continues to discriminate against gays, lesbians 
and bisexuals. RAIL does not seek to integrate the 
ROTC, however--we seek to smash it. RAIL calls on 
gays, lesbians, bisexuals, and their supporters to 
stand in solidarity with the world's majority 
(male, female, straight and queer) who are at the 
receiving end of Amerikkka's guns. Smash the 
imperialist patriarchy! ROTC off campus!"

The rally sought to draw attention to the 
patriarchal nature of U.S. militarism and 
imperialism. One RAIL sign read, "U.S. military 
promotes global prostitution." The rally was also 
part of a RAIL-led campaign to expose and 
ultimately defeat U.S. imperialism, U.S. 
militarism, and the University of California's 
support for the U.S. war machine. In forthcoming 
weeks, this campaign will include the continuation 
of the Los Angeles Revolutionary and Progressive 
Film Series, as well as a rally against U.S. 
militarism and imperialism on International Workers 
Day (May Day), Wednesday, May 1. To join the 
campaign, ask questions, or express your comments 
or criticisms, write to: RAIL, P.O. Box 29670, Los 
Angeles, CA 90029-0670.



* * *


PRISONS AWARENESS WEEK AT THE UNIVERSITY OF 
MICHIGAN


Ann Arbor--MIM, RAIL, and the American Friends 
Service Committee sponsored Prisons Awareness Week 
(PAW) at the University of Michigan, March 25-30. 
The week of events exposed prisons as tools of 
national oppression and social control, and were an 
opportunity to mobilize the masses against prisons. 
Here we cover some PAW events; the next issue of 
MIM Notes, to be published May 1, will include more 
coverage of this week.

MIM and RAIL organize and educate around prisons 
and the criminal injustice system because both are 
forms of state-sanctioned national oppression. From 
police brutality to the brutality of control unit 
prisons and the inhumane treatment of prisoners in 
general, the so-called criminal justice system is 
attacking national minorities. The Under Lock and 
Key section of MIM Notes (pages 6 and 7 of this 
issue) exposes violence inside the prison walls. 
Prisoners do not have free access to print or 
broadcast media; that is why it is so important for 
people on the outside to organize and agitate on 
behalf of prisoners, keeping in mind the larger 
goal of ending the criminal injustice system as we 
know it.


A SOCIALIST SOCIETY'S RESPONSE TO CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR


Dr. Allyn Rickett, co-author of **Prisoners of 
Liberation**, opened PAW with a talk on his 
experience in a communist prison in China from 
1951-1955. Rickett was arrested in China for spying 
on China during the Amerikan war in Korea. Through 
the process of criticism, self-criticism and study, 
Dr. Rickett came to realize why his spying activity 
was wrong. MIM looks to China's prison system under 
Mao as an example of how a society can effectively 
deal with its enemies. 

Amerika could not implement criticism and self-
criticism as a solution to criminal activity. 
Criticism and self-criticism are important 
processes for revolutionaries organizing within 
Amerika, but they require that a person be able to 
reform thoughts and behaviors. Rickett stressed 
that a person's conditions were a decisive factor 
in whether or not they could maintain their new way 
of thinking and acting. Without eliminating 
national oppression in Amerika, so-called crime and 
recidivism will never decrease, no matter how many 
people the state locks up. A socialist revolution 
will eventually make proletarian justice in Amerika 
a reality.


ALL PRISONERS ARE POLITICAL PRISONERS


On Tuesday night, MIM and RAIL showed a 20/20 clip 
called **Johnny-D** about a Black man in Alabama 
who was framed for murder and sentenced to death. 
MIM then led a discussion on why all prisoners are 
political prisoners. One audience member who has 
been active with Puerto Rican independence fighters 
in Amerika's prisons objected to this. S/he argued 
that calling all prisoners political prisoners 
denies legitimacy to prisoners who were captured 
specifically for their revolutionary activities. 

MIM does to work with prisoners captured for 
political activity. But we struggle to take the 
struggle beyond a few prisoners by defining 
Amerikan occupation of ghettos, barrios and First 
Nation land as a war on the internal colonies. MIM 
asks: if only prisoners captured for political 
activity on the outside are political prisoners, 
what about jailhouse lawyers who are put in control 
units for their activity? What about people 
imprisoned for killing cops in their neighborhoods 
in retaliation for pig murders in their 
communities? We fight for justice for prisoners 
because they are being held captive by a 
illegitimate government--recognizing this fact, 
marking distinctions between prisoners we work with 
and for serves no purpose.

In the heated discussion about imperialism and 
national oppression that followed, one audience 
member argued that the criminal injustice system 
was essentially good and that injustices within it 
are unfortunate aberrations. Another attendee 
correctly explained how the criminal justice system 
never works for the oppressed. Another audience 
member explained why people in the Third World 
deserve the right to control their own economic and 
political conditions without Amerikan (or any other 
imperialist) domination. MIM then explained how 
imperialism hinders development.

Everyone at the events agreed on the need for 
changes within the criminal injustice system. Some 
agreed with MIM that the system as we know it needs 
to be abolished. No one argued that increasing the 
number of people in the Amerikan gulags would solve 
anything. Yet many people were content to leave 
without agreeing to learn more about and organize 
against the Amerikan prison system of oppression. 
MIM encourages all people who want to abolish 
oppression, including the oppression of prisoners, 
to work with MIM and RAIL toward this goal. 
Recognition of problems does nothing without 
organizing action to solve them!



* * *



JAILED WOMEN DENIED VISITS WITH THEIR CHILDREN


Ann Arbor, MI, March 28--A small crowd gathered 
outside the Washtenaw county jail for a protest 
against the termination of the volunteer-operated 
and -funded Children's Visitation Program (CVP). 
The seven-year old program, which offered women in 
the jail monthly contact visits with their 
children, was stopped in January, 1996. The CVP 
visits between mothers and their children lasted 
three hours, one Saturday per month, with 
volunteers providing transportation for the 
children.

MIM is sorry to learn of the program's termination, 
but not surprised. The pigs claimed they could no 
longer house the program because there was no space 
available after the room that had been used for the 
CVP was converted into a courtroom. One activist 
involved with the protest speculated that the jail 
can use the CVP as an excuse for expansion when 
they want to, and reinstate the program at will. 

Michigan is part of the continental prison-building 
craze. The korrections department is Michigan's 
leading growth industry with 30 new prisons built 
since the early 1980s. Prison employees now account 
for one in every four state workers in Michigan, 
compared with one in every 14 in 1979.

The activists who organized this protest in favor 
of the CVP are asking concerned individuals to 
write letters to the Sheriff and to the Washtenaw 
County Board of Commissioners. They are also 
attempting to negotiate a new location, though they 
doubt space is the real obstacle. MIM does not 
think appealing to the state is an effective 
strategy to bring about change. But this may be a 
winnable battle: the demands are minimal and the 
state will sometimes make concessions, so activists 
may succeed in reinstating the CVP. But 
reinstitution of the CVP does not begin to address 
the prison system's destruction of families and 
communities in the oppressed nations within U.S. 
borders.

MIM supports struggles for improvements in the 
lives of people jailed and imprisoned in Amerika. 
But it is important to work for reforms in a 
revolutionary context. True justice is not 
available under imperialist patriarchy. So while 
some reforms that make imperialism less immediately 
oppressive are possible, only a revolution for 
national self-determination and socialism can 
implement real justice.


LETTERS DEMANDING THE PROGRAM BE REINSTATED CAN BE 
SENT TO:


Sheriff Ron Schebil 
Washtenaw County Sheriff's Dept. 
2201 Hogback Rd. 
Ann Arbor, MI 48105 
Fax (313) 971-7296



Washtenaw County Board of Commissioners 
Administration Building 
220 N. Main St. 
Ann Arbor, MI 48107 
Fax (313) 994-2592 



* * *



MIM NOTES IS THE PEOPLE'S PROPERTY


Ann Arbor, MI--A MIM Notes distributor was recently 
yelled at by the store clerk at Stairway to Heaven, 
an Ann Arbor headshop. The clerk wasted some MIM 
literature, attempted to spread gossip about MIM, 
and eventually threatened to ban MIM literature in 
Ann Arbor stores. MIM takes this opportunity to 
expose this pig who won't even recognize bourgeois 
free speech for fear of Communism, and to challenge 
others who feel similarly threatened to struggle 
with us over our line rather than attempting to 
silence it.

The gross thing about this incident is that the 
Stairway to Heaven pig ranted on about MIM's 
supposed class and national composition, claiming 
that the party is all white, all petty-bourgeois 
and only involved in politics for feel-goodism. MIM 
says this so-called reasoning is bogus: parties' 
political lines should be evaluated based on 
materialist reasoning, not based on who is 
speaking. By contrast, we recognize that First 
World men as a group (like this store clerk) have 
an interest in maintaining patriarchy and national 
oppression, which makes it very much in their 
interest to spread gossip on MIM. MIM works to end 
the domination of oppressor group interests over 
the oppressed, and we will work with any individual 
who is willing to engage in materialist reasoning 
and work with us for the end of oppression.

Our incident at Stairway to Heaven began when the 
clerk working there yelled at a MIM Notes 
distributor and attempted to blame MIM for so-
called socialist parties' political ineptitude when 
the distributor asked if s/he could leave some free 
copies of MIM Notes in the store for shoppers to 
read.

Normally, MIM appreciates it when people air their 
disagreements with our line and practice, as this 
is a useful practice for advancing our line and our 
relations with the masses. This situation is an 
excellent example of what could have been a 
clarifying political discussion. The clerk stated 
that MIM was not socialist and that all those 
socialists at the Detroit Newspaper strike had 
yelled at the clerk's friend. MIM does not support 
the Detroit newspaper strike and therefore would 
not have been arguing with a dissenter in their 
ranks if we had been there, but the Stairway to 
Heaven clerk wouldn't let the MIM Notes distributor 
explain that. After a few more minutes of 
discussion in which the clerk accused MIM of 
propagandizing and explained that he has a 
socialist friend who does not like MIM, the MIM 
Notes distributor took her/his copies of MIM Notes 
and left the store.

Shortly after, the MIM Notes distributor saw the 
Stairway to Heaven clerk take copies of MIM Notes 
from the nearby Espresso Royale Caffe. The MIM 
Notes distributor also noticed that papers from 
another nearby store were gone quicker than usual, 
although the distributor did not see the Stairway 
to Heaven clerk take these other papers. When the 
MIM Notes distributor went back to Stairway to 
Heaven to ask the store clerk if he had taken MIM's 
papers, the distributor saw a stack of papers in 
the trash behind where the clerk was standing.

The MIM Notes distributor then informed the store's 
customers that the clerk was lying and what he was 
lying about, and then informed people on the street 
outside who witnessed the store clerk yelling at 
the MIM Notes distributor of what the clerk was 
yelling about. The clerk then threatened to make 
sure that every store in the area refused to accept 
MIM Notes in the future. This hasn't happened yet.

MIM will make sure that this pig does not stop 
distribution of anti-imperialist news to people in 
Ann Arbor, and we hope avoid this pig's violent 
reaction to MIM in the future. We don't care about 
distributing through Stairway to Heaven 
specifically, but we will not stand by and allow 
this clerk to stop the flow of Maoist news and 
analysis in Ann Arbor.



* * *



TWO ROADS FOR ENVIRONMENTALISM


Western Massachusetts--On March 10, activists from 
the Cove/Mallard Coalition in Idaho gave a 
multimedia performance at Smith College about their 
campaign to save the largest roadless forest in the 
contiguous 48 states. On March 12 at UMass Amherst, 
MIM and RAIL showed the video "Green Guerrillas" 
about the New People's Army in the Philippines and 
their work to save the culture of the indigenous 
Mandayan people and the rainforest they live in by 
enacting a ban on logging. 

In the week prior, activists at a MIM-led study 
group studied the communist understanding of 
environmentalism, in which the assault on 
imperialism is the focus and the struggles of 
oppressed peoples are recognized as the way 
forward. In preparation for the upcoming events, 
the activists read the Communist Party of the 
Philippines statement on the environment, as well 
as a bourgeois news article about the Environmental 
Rangers taking up arms in Idaho and Montana to save 
the forests.


PACIFISM IN IDAHO


Cove/Mallard is 76,000 acres and is "part of the 
... largest tract of unlogged primary forest in the 
continental U.S." In 1990, the U.S. Forest Service 
agreed to allow 200 clearcuts by logging companies. 
This would entail building 145 miles of roads to 
get the loggers there and the trees out. Twenty one 
million board feet are being logged, which will 
fill 26,000 logging trucks. Via road subsidies and 
deficit timber sales, the U.S. Forest Service is 
subsidizing the logging industry in Cove/Mallard 
for $6 million over the 6 years of logging.

The Cove/Mallard Coalition engages in non-violent 
direct action as well as lobbying to try to stop 
the logging. According to their pamphlet, they do 
not damage logging machinery like Earth First, nor 
do they carry weapons like the Environmental 
Rangers. These distinctions were not discussed at 
their event.

The Cove/Mallard activists were on tour encouraging 
people to become active to stop the logging. They 
wanted people to come out to Idaho in the summer 
and participate in direct action. Recognizing the 
continuum of activism, they expressed additional 
options for people: tell your friends, and write to 
Clinton and Congress. While it is good to see 
leftists recognize that there is a variety of types 
of support that you can get, it was unfortunate to 
see that the activists didn't directly challenge 
people to follow what they saw as the best way 
forward.

The multimedia performance expressed many anti-
capitalist and anti-big business sentiments, with 
songs with lines about how the environment is dying 
for "your [corporate] bottom line." Resistance 
outside of the so-called law was praised in "Ain't 
playin' by your rules anymore." 

MIM would disagree with the neo-Luddite approach 
taken in one song: "Quitting time on the high-tech 
plantation." While it is correct to say that there 
is no connection between higher technical levels 
and more meaningful life, the answer is not to 
oppose technology. So much technology is oppressive 
and destructive in Amerika because Amerika is an 
oppressive and destructive society based on 
capitalism. The social system is the problem, not 
just the tools it uses. Elsewhere in the 
performance the activists correctly pointed out 
that the solution is to ban logging and transform 
the society that sees destroying the environment as 
profitable.

The first video was MIM's favorite, at least until 
the last few seconds. It was a poem entitled "The 
faceless ones" about animals being brutally killed 
by the corporate rush to profits. There was footage 
of animals dying in oil slicks and in other gory 
ways. The last line was the most disappointing, 
however. After sounding a strong call for action, 
the poets advice: "We have the power to vote."

At the moment, MIM believe that the majority of 
Amerikans would support logging in Idaho "for 
jobs." So voting won't really work. However, MIM 
does believe that reformist means to save forests 
in North America can be successful because Amerika 
is an imperialist society whose wealth production 
is external to it's home territory. There are a 
variety of reasons to save the forests in Idaho. 
But activists have to keep in mind that the logging 
companies, if kicked out of Amerika because they 
are 'spoiling the view' can readily go somewhere 
else. Kicking the logging companies out of Idaho, 
unless it is done on an internationalist basis, is 
not a blow to logging. Rather, by preserving the 
"view" and by preserving North American bio-
diversity, this shores up First World support for 
international logging.


ARMED STRUGGLE IN THE PHILIPPINES


The differences between the strategies of the 
Cove/Mallard activists and the New People's Army 
were discussed at the MIM & RAIL "Green Guerrillas" 
event, in addition to the underlying differences in 
the political situation.

At the Cove/Mallard multimedia presentation we saw 
video footage of activists chaining themselves to 
roads or tying themselves high up in trees 
scheduled to be logged. This can stop or at least 
slow logging within U.S. borders, but in the 
Philippines would quickly result in dead 
environmentalists.

One RAIL member relayed to the event participants 
how the Communist Party of the Philippines 
statement made the connection between imperialism 
and the continued destruction of the environment in 
the Philippines. First the Spanish and then later 
the Amerikan imperialists cut down trees in large 
numbers to make way for the planting of export 
crops.

The CPP statement reports that "agricultural 
chemicals already banned for being harmful to users 
in the developed countries are sold to and used in 
the Philippines." This clearly exposes why 
reformism can work in one area, but it is not an 
international strategy. The corporations that 
directly peddle death will leave places where there 
is too much resistance, such as within U.S. 
borders. Some reformists would respond that 
Amerikans should lobby Congress to ban the export 
of chemicals banned for use in the U.S. But this 
does nothing to effect the reality that these 
**multinational** corporations could just shift 
their corporate headquarters or possibly 
manufacturing plants, to a different part of the 
world and continue selling deadly products. The 
problem here is the capitalist system, not it's 
products.

It is only this clear systemic analysis held by the 
Communist Party in their statement and in the 
practice portrayed in "Green Guerrillas" that can 
adequately and permanently end environmental 
degradation.

At the MIM event there was also some discussion 
about the motivations of the Green Guerrillas as 
compared to the Cove/Mallard and similar activists. 
The principal reason why the New People's Army 
instituted a log ban was because it was the best 
way to preserve the Mandayan people, and in a 
larger sense, the Philippines itself. The log ban 
serves to prevent the international logging 
companies from taking away the natural resources 
that rightfully belong to the Filipino people. The 
preservation of a whole community of people who 
live in harmony with their environment is a 
superior practice to working to preserve a national 
forest which exists **at the expense of** forests 
and people around the world.


ARMED STRUGGLE IN IDAHO?


There was also some discussion about the 
Environmental Rangers in Idaho who say "They're 
[logging and mining companies] not getting these 
places without a war. And I mean a real war.... 
We're the ones who will put our lives on the line 
if that's what it takes." MIM can't predict whether 
the Mallard/Cove logging will be stopped, but we 
can predict that it likely won't take picking up 
arms to do it.

The difference in strategy between the anti-
imperialist Filipinos and Idaho's Environmental 
Rangers shows why the Idaho armed movement is not 
significant. The New People's Army is working to 
defend people and their homes, whereas the Rangers 
are offering to die to protect the land for non-
human reasons. The NPA is working to build up 
enough independent power to drive, first the 
logging companies and then the imperialists, out of 
the Philippines. There is no similar situation in 
Idaho, and the Environmental Rangers can offer only 
symbolic reformist resistance.


NOTES:

1. Los Angeles Times, Jan 9, 1996.
2. International Department, Central Committee, 
Communist Party of the Philippines, March 31, 1996. 
"On the issue of the environment in the world and 
in the Philippines"
3. The Cove/Mallard Coalition, "Why all the fuss?" 
P.O. Box 8968, Moscow ID 93843, (208) 882-9755, 
cove@moscow.com


For information about the revolution in the 
Philippines or showing "Green Guerrillas" in your 
area, contact MIM or RAIL. 



* * *



ENVIRONMENTALISTS PROTEST CHEMICAL WEAPONS TRAINING 
SCHOOL


by a RAIL comrade

On February 5, a protest rally was held on the 
steps of the capitol building in Jefferson City, 
Mo. The Student Environmental Action Coalition and 
other concerned people were protesting an army 
proposal to relocate their chemical weapons 
training school from Fort McClellan, Alabama to 
Fort Leonard Wood, Mo.Fort Leonard Wood is located 
in the heart of the Ozark Forest. 

"We believe the Army's Mission of 'national 
security' jeopardizes the health and well-being of 
Amerikan citizens, and that this is unjust," says 
SEAC member Jillian Borchard. A chemical weapons 
training facility at Ft. Wood puts human and non-
human communities at risk through its obscurant 
training program, chemical decontamination program 
and use and production of radioactive nuclides, 
nerve gas, mustard gas, and dioxin. Member Eric 
Hempel says that "the chemical weapons school is a 
school of death and we don't want it in our state." 
MIM takes it further--we don't want the chemical 
weapons training school anywhere. 

The purpose of the rally was to raise the awareness 
and express discontent to the government about the 
army's proposal to relocate the school. The SEAC 
demanded: 

1) That the military not jeopardize the people and 
environment through defense training. 

2) That the United States Army be required to 
comply with the Endangered Species Act. 

3) That the United States uphold the Biological 
Weapons Convention of 1972 which reads that signing 
countries agree to "never in any circumstances 
develop, produce, stockpile or otherwise acquire or 
retain any biological weapons."

MIM agrees with protests against U.S. militarism 
but it takes the approach: "think globally--act 
globally." United Snakes imperialism is a global 
problem--not a local problem.

Environmental groups such as the SEAC righteously 
defy U.S. militarism's disregard for the 
environment and people. The chemical weapons 
training facility trains U.S. soldiers to use these 
weapons on people of the Third World--millions of 
hungry, oppressed people who organize to throw off 
the domination of their land, labor and resources 
by the United Snakes of Amerika--now this is 
unjust.

But it won't be stopped by telling the imperialist 
beast that they must obey laws such as the 
Endangered Species Act and weapons treaties. U.S. 
imperialism will end when a revolution led by the 
proletariat overthrows the U.S. and replaces it 
with socialism. That requires the building of a 
revolutionary Maoist Party to create public opinion 
and ripen revolutionary conditions. We invite you 
to join us. No U.S troops--anywhere--anytime!


Note: Information for this article was provided by 
a press release issued by the Student Environmental 
Action Coalition. 



* * *


UNDER LOCK AND KEY: NEWS FROM PRISONERS AND PRISONS


THE MASSES MAKE HISTORY--THIS MEANS YOU!


Hey MIM,


...I've been teaching X about MLM [Marxism-
Leninism-Maoism] but my voice in here is minimal. 
The tide is heavily against me. A lot of bourgeois 
influence is expressed and a lot of prisoners my 
age is lax when it comes to studying about the 
science of revolution. They tend to think that the 
revolution will come from some mystical savior. 
They say that *when* the revolution comes they will 
be there and get down but they fail to realize that 
we are the makers of revolution. Sometimes I really 
begin to think that all is doomed and our only true 
hope lies in the Third World. But I can't neglect 
those in Amerika who are truly interested in 
revolution. I'm most sure our day will come....

--a New York Prisoner, Jan. 25, 1996



VIRGINIA DENIES PRISONERS ACCESS TO MIM


MIM, Yesterday I received a letter from you folks 
advising me that the latest issue of MIM Notes was 
refused by the prison here and returned to you. 
Certainly this is something which both concerns and 
vexes me.

The prison administration here has adopted a policy 
which seems clearly calculated to deprive prisoners 
here of access to news and opinions outside the 
mainstream...and even most of the mainstream media, 
for that matter.

The current mission of the prison is to separately 
warehouse death row, parole violators and long term 
segregation...and no prison jobs whatsoever are 
available to any of us here...so unless we have 
source of revenue from the outside, we are 
penurious [(poverty-stricken)].

...The administration has expressly prohibited both 
donated or free publications and will not allow for 
family or friends to order subscriptions for us 
either...which means that we simply are not 
permitted to subscribe to anything to anything to 
read from the outside....Occasionally the mailroom 
with slip up and something will get through, but 
this happens less and less often and so far none of 
your MIM Notes have escaped their scrutiny.

I have contemplated litigation regarding this broad 
censorship and would welcome any suggestions you 
folks might offer. It might also be helpful if I 
could bring you in as a plaintiff, since your 
rights to free speech are being infringed upon by 
this policy. I would welcome hearing from you on 
the subject.

...As far as why the administration thinks it is 
"OK" to restrict prisoners' access to political 
views (other than their own) an a multiplicity of 
news sources here in a supposedly "free" america, 
it is my opinion that they simply do not consider 
prisoners to be people and that, as a class, we are 
deemed undeserving of the rights ostensibly 
bestowed by the Constitution and our sentence.

This opinion is bolstered by the draconian new 
property policy that the administration here in 
Virginia is implementing statewide...a policy the 
likes of which I have never heard of being 
implemented in any state of these United 
States....My regards,

--a Virginia prisoner, Jan. 14, 1996



RCG1 responds:

We at MIM support all prisoners in their struggle 
against the tools of oppression. If you wish to 
pursue a legal battle, more power to you. MIM Notes 
is tool which can be used to expose the atrocious 
conditions in prisons and publicize the struggles 
of the oppressed worldwide. In addition, MIM has 
started compiling a legal resource list for 
prisoners. Unfortunately, however, MIM cannot be 
involved directly in litigation because we feel it 
would pose a security threat to our organization.

We believe that prisons censor viewpoints other 
than their own as means of social control and to 
uphold mainstream society. Keep up the good work 
exposing the pigs and the oppressive ways.



BANNED FROM PRISON LIBRARY, MUSLIMS CREATE THEIR 
OWN



...The general population library here has been 
restricted to inmates attending classes in the 
Windham School System. However, we (Muslims) have 
implemented a Community Awareness Program (CAP) 
where knowledge of self, family, community and the 
nation is taught in a political, social, economical 
and moral format. Our service (CAP) is open to the 
general population and visitors from the outside.

Also, we have a library of our own. We would be 
very appreciative of any revolutionary literature. 
All MIM Notes and other donated literature will be 
donated to our library after being read by our 
lecturing team who will teach the masses of the 
general population who attend our services. There 
are over 150 Muslims on this unit.

Since MIM Notes covers political and social 
injustices on an international basis, including 
institutional, we feel that it is potentially a 
powerful tool for enlightening and unifying the 
consciousness of the oppressed all over the world.

At present, we are informing people about the "New 
World Order" that's being forced upon us by the 
government and various devices used to keep us 
divided as a nation for purposes of control and 
manipulation. [We are also discussing] the remedies 
and possible solutions for alleviating the causes 
and effects of social, economic, political and 
religious oppression. Thank you for your time and 
may Allah guide and protect you!

--a Texas prisoner, Dec. 18, 1995



TEXAS LOCKDOWN



To my brothers and sisters at MIM Notes,

I am deeply sorry for not returning a letter to you 
in so long. Please try and understand that I am 
under the cruel circumstances of the 
administration. Here on Terrell Unit, it is so 
unpredictable. There's no telling what's to come at 
times. Just to let you know the absence of my 
monthly letter to you was not intentional.

Me and a cellmate of mine ran out on a five man 
team of officers, while on lockdown. We have been 
on [lockdown] for no reason and for seven months 
now. During which they refused to feed us about 
three times and refused to let us shower about two. 
I couldn't take it no more, bad as it is. They 
tamper with our mail from time to time, so I don't 
know if you'll receive this one.

...They have the whole unit on lockdown and yet 
they haven't told us the reason for it. So when, if 
by chance, I do find out, I'll be sure to tell 
you...

--a Texas prisoner, Jan. 23, 1996



SOUTH DAKOTA: PASSING SNACKS EQUALS TWO YEARS AD-
SEG TIME



Being a convicted felon, I have seen a lot of rude 
and downright despicable acts inflicted upon my 
fellow comrades and brothers in arms.

Here in South Dakota, the pigs are just as rude and 
spiteful as any other prison in the injustice 
system. I have a dear friend in administrative 
segregation doing two years for loaning a bag of 
barbecue chips to another inmate. Of course I must 
note that my friend is a rather large man who 
intimidates the small runts of oppression and my 
friend will file a lawsuit trying to improve all 
fellow inmate situations.

Something as petty as a bag of chips has just 
caused him two years worth of isolation.

"It's not the chips, it's the dips that run this 
place," he said to me. "The ironic thing they will 
never see, until it's too late, is that I will only 
grow more resistant and have plenty of time to plan 
new ways of resistance."

I could not have said it better. Oppression breeds 
resistance. Resistance incubates revolution....

--A South Dakota, Jan. 12, 1996



IN PENNSYLVANIA IT'S LEGAL TO LISTEN IN



The following is a letter from the Pennsylvania 
Department of Corrections.



Subject: Act 20 of 1995 (Formerly HB127): 
Intercepting, recording, monitoring or divulging 
telephone calls

To: All Inmates

From: Martin F. Horn, Commissioner



Act 20 of 1995 amended Section 5704 of Title 18 by 
adding a paragraph to permit employees of the 
Department of Corrections to intercept, record, 
monitor, or divulge any telephone call from or to 
an inmate in a facility.

This act was signed by the Governor on September 
26, 1995. It became effective in 60 days or on 
November 25, 1995.

This memo is intended to provide notice to you that 
any telephone call which you make or received in 
any state correctional facility may be intercepted, 
recorded, monitored, or divulged. The only 
exception is properly placed telephone calls to or 
from your attorney. The monitoring of telephone 
calls is being done to preserve the security and 
orderly management of the institutions and to 
protect the public.

The Department of Corrections provides several 
methods to maintain confidential contact with your 
attorney. For example, inmate-attorney 
correspondence is covered under privileged mail 
provisions and private inmate-attorney visits are 
provided.

In addition, the inmate may request to place an 
occasional unmonitored call to his or her attorney. 
In order to do so you need to contact your 
counselor who will arrange this call on either a 
collect, or time and charge basis. The counselor 
must place such calls and ensure that any 
unmonitored call they place on behalf of an inmate 
is to an attorney's office.

Frequent unmonitored inmate-attorney calls will 
only be allowed when an inmate demonstrates that 
communications with his or her attorney by other 
means would not be adequate or the inmate's 
attorney can demonstrate an imminent court 
deadline.

--Martin F. Horn, Commissioner, DOC, Pennsylvania, 
Nov. 30, 1995



HOW MANY TIMES DO YOU HAVE TO BREAK A MAN'S BODY 
BEFORE YOU BREAK HIS SOUL?



Shaka Shakur is back in a lockdown situation. He 
was recently put into the Hospital Restraint Unit 
(HRU) of the Indiana Reformatory until he learns to 
walk without crutches again.

After much pressure was put on to get him taken to 
an outside doctor, Shaka was finally sent to a 
hospital and diagnosed with a herniated disc in his 
back. He has been on medication for the pain for a 
year and has been on crutches since June. Recently 
his crutches were taken away from him arbitrarily.

He was scheduled for surgery under the 
recommendation of Dr. Kevin Kaufman at Wishard 
Hospital in Indianapolis, Indiana. Shaka has not 
been allowed this surgery and has been further 
isolated by being put into the HRU. Indiana 
Reformatory "doctor" Dr. Chavez has further 
escalated the situation by harassing Shaka, calling 
him a "fucking shithead" and accusing him of faking 
his injury.

The HRU is in total isolation from the rest of the 
prison. According to Shaka it is much like the 
Maximum Control Complex prison in Westville, 
Indiana with boxcar doors, forced air and no 
contact with anyone. The one other prisoner in the 
HRU is being "treated" (read: experimented upon) 
with psychotropic drugs.

Please write letters and send faxes to:

Ed Cohn, Indiana Department of Corrections, Indiana 
Government Center South, 302 W. Washington Street, 
Indianapolis, IN 46204, FAX: 317-232-6798

Demand that Shaka Shakur 28443: 1. be removed from 
the HRU and taken back to the AS unit where he was 
2. that he be sent to Wishard Hospital for the 
Surgery recommended by Dr. Kaufman, and 3. that he 
be given back his crutches.

Write letters of support to:

BCAC, P.O. Box 93312, Milwaukee, WI 53203

-- BCAC, Oct. 7, 1995



TWO POLITICALLY ACTIVE NEW AFRIKAN STUDENTS ARE 
DESPERATELY SEEKING EDUCATIONAL SPONSORSHIP



We are two Afrikan prisoners who are also 
independent students. We have been actively engaged 
in self-education and the political and academic 
education of other young Afrikan prisoners in the 
Indiana prison system for a number of years. Also, 
we have been politically active outside prison 
walls for the premises of both interpersonal 
relations and organizationally.

Because of the intense repression that politically 
active Afrikan prisoners are subjected to by prison 
officials, it is very hard for us to take advantage 
of any prison based educational programs or any 
other programs offered by the state. Despite this 
we have been able to reach higher educational 
levels on our own.

Both of us have, to our credits, published writings 
which are of political and educational value to the 
mis-educated oppressed.

Like many others, because of our political 
commitments and activities, we have been targeted 
by prison officials and repressed, abused and 
denied any opportunities to advance ourselves 
through any prison-based educational programs.

Due to a bill which was initiated and fought into 
existence by Indiana State Representative Dr. 
Vernon G. Smith, D-Gary (who has interviewed both 
of us and has expressed pride in our development) 
where a prisoner receives time off of their 
sentences for educational achievements, namely high 
school diplomas and college degrees, repressive 
measures have been intensified by the state to keep 
politically active prisoners from having any access 
to any type of developmental prison program 
activities. It is to no avail to continue to battle 
with the prison officials for any type of justice 
because they have made it perfectly clear, conform 
and surrender everything that we are as men to the 
genocidal demands of the state or suffer. We refuse 
to debrief.

This clearly means that we must develop different 
methods to get around the state altogether. One way 
is through the means of non-traditional education.

Many universities and colleges offer correspondence 
programs for non-traditional studentship. Some 
offer end-of-course exams which allow for a non-
traditional student to take final exams for credit. 
Also some schools have particular standards for 
what is referred to as Life Experience Learning 
which allows for a non-traditional student to 
submit what is called a "Life Experience 
Portfolio." This document is good for higher 
learning credits based off the educational 
knowledge that one has acquired through experience, 
on the job, or by any means that has provided one 
with the skills learned through experience.

We are seeking educational sponsorship so that we 
may approach these non-traditional methods to 
education. There is also a system called a contract 
by learning between a student and school and/or 
educator which is worth credits, perhaps worth 
certain types of degrees -- equivalency exam 
programs, etc.

What we need are sponsors to help us set up a 
standard that politically active (repressed) 
prisons nationwide can employ as a means to obtain 
educational degrees, in spite of prison officials' 
attempts to hinder our educational advancement. It 
is our desire to develop an association through 
sponsorship that will lend to this cause 
nationwide.

Whereas exam packages for the purpose of us 
furthering our education through non-traditional 
means can be established especially for politically 
active repressed prisoners at the lowest possible 
cost to the association. There would have to be to 
this development some type of national fund that 
would give financial aid to those who qualify.

Please, anyone who is interested in this idea 
should contact us immediately [by writing to MIM]. 
Any type of assistance that anyone can offer in any 
way is needed. We need ideas and talent as bad as 
we need other backing to realize this objective. 
Something as simple as sending stamps and 
reproducing this flier to help us get the word out 
would be a great contribution to this cause. We 
thank you to the utmost for any assistance 
rendered.

--two Indiana prisoners, 11/9/95



MASSACHUSETTS PRISONER CALLS FOR INVESTIGATION OF 
LOCKDOWN



Dear MIM and RAIL:

Thank you so much for being concerned about the on-
going unlawfulness that continues to go on behind 
these prison walls....

Let me begin by stating that here at Walpole prison 
things are very much violative in many aspects. As 
MIM is very aware, we are seriously segregated in 
this prison.

1.) At the present, nine blocks in the general 
population are only out for no longer than one 1/2 
hour per day and we're only allowed to go outside 
for some fresh air every other 4 days. All of which 
takes place in a small fenced-in barbed wire cage 
(that hold approximately a very small amount of 
people if one needs to exercise let's say 20 
individuals....)

2.) There are only three Blocks which are allowed 
out of cell recreation for almost all of the day in 
the prison. They are called Bristol Block 2, Essex 
Block 2, and Suffolks Block 2. It is also known as 
the minimum end, and you are allowed to work, to go 
down to the gymnasium, to the prison's chow hall, 
you can go to the prisons' big outside main yard. 
None of which the other nine population blocks are 
allowed to do so, but yet they are still telling us 
that we are all in the general population.

How can this be, when others are receiving way more 
privileges than the other members of this so called 
Equal General Population... [Walpole recently 
"ended" it's lockdown. For most of the prisoners, 
this is only semantic. --MIM] I'll tell you: it's 
because these administration officials are running 
this prison on a very much unequal treatment 
mode....The truth is this so-called general 
population is really segregation and very much a 
violation of equal fair treatment.

3.) Our meals are served to us in styrofoam 
containers or trays and are most of the time very 
cold or very mildly warm. We complain but it goes 
ignored like so many other issues which we do bring 
up to the superintendent Ronald T. Duval and his 
designees. The officers handle the servings of the 
food to the inmates. Most often they never put on 
gloves and they put their fingers on the ring of 
the Dixie Cups which the Kool-aid is served in, and 
at times their fingers penetrate into the drink.

4.) Since my arrival to this prison in 1992 all the 
way up to this period so many privileges and rights 
have been taken from us like: education, programs 
of all kinds, religious services in the chapels to 
most of the prison population, appliances, hot-
pots, personal good radios, TVs, sweatsuits,...They 
took away all inmates' Christmas packages our 
families send us. We do not receive any Christmas 
funds of around $10 to $20 anymore for those 
inmates who don't have no one sending them nothing.

5.) We are only allowed to receive one roll of 
toilet paper per week and one bar of state soap 
every other week and there is no exception. As far 
as toothpaste, deodorant and any other hygiene 
product is concerned, they don't provide us any. We 
must buy it ourselves from the Canteen Store or go 
without.



MIM and RAIL, I am here to vouch for what has been 
taking place here in this Walpole prison. There are 
a good amount of issues that I truly feel should be 
brought forward along with the fact that numerous 
racist officers work in the 9 and 10 Block 
Segregation Unit along with the DDU which beat down 
inmates when they are taken to these sections while 
they are handcuffed and shackled.

No one is looking in on these prison officials and 
they feel like they are gods at times because they 
keep on getting away with these unlawful and very 
much volatile acts.

Dear MIM and RAIL, if we had an independent agency
looking in on these correctional officials and 
their running of these institutions and others like 
these we wouldn't have these sorts of unlawful 
occurrences happening....

Dear MIM and RAIL, I am certainly glad that you 
send me this letter of yours in regards to both 
your organizations being very much caring and 
concerning to this serious matter which pains all 
good citizens of this true world of ours.

I greatly thank you for being there for us in our 
struggles my dear comrades!

Sincerely, --A Massachusetts prisoner, Nov. 8, 1995



PRISONERS START UNITED NATIONS MOTION TO ADDRESS 
HUMAN RIGHTS IN U.S. CONTROL UNITS



We are in process of filing a motion to the United 
Nations, to address Human Rights with any and all 
control units. We may need some help in organizing 
such a writ.

From what I've read, we as confined prisoners are 
constantly subject to poisoned drinking water. 
There is no means to survive without water. Those 
who put us here knew prisoners would file 
complaints about the conditions as well the 
confinement.

We may need other groups who have filed such a writ 
to supply any and all information they have to 
help. This is our first [attempt], when complete, 
we will [send] a copy. Staying strong.

--a Indiana prisoner, Jan. 26, 1996



MC49 responds:

The United Nations has proven itself to be an enemy 
of human rights by among other things serving as a 
cover for Amerika's war on the Iraqi people. 
Strategically, we prefer building independent 
proletarian institutions to appealing to enemy 
institutions. But while it is important not to hold 
any illusions in bourgeois institutions like the 
U.N., your approach may succeed in winning some 
tactical gains for the people. We wish you success 
in your endeavors. 



* * *



RAMONA AFRICA BLASTS AMERIKKKA; CALLS ON THE PEOPLE
TO DEFEND MUMIA


by a member of RAIL


Washington D.C.--Ramona Africa, Minister of 
Information for MOVE, spoke at Howard University on 
March 22. The pro-Mumia Abu-Jamal event was 
sponsored by the D.C. Coalition for Mumia Abu-Jamal 
and the Malcolm X Grassroots Movement. Africa's 
speech was preceded by speakers from the two 
sponsoring organizations, a showing of **Date with 
Death**, a movie about Jamal's frame-up, and a rap 
video by MC Shank about Mumia. The video is 
available from the New Jersey Anarchist Black 
Cross.

Ramona blasted the Amerikkkan criminal injustice 
system for its racist white supremacy. She 
explained that Blacks know they will go to jail if 
they're caught doing drugs, while affluent whites 
like David Kennedy hardly ever do time. According 
to Ramona, over 60% of people on Pennsylvania's 
death row are oppressed nationals. She says "The 
issue is who is victimized by the system, and who 
is protected by the system and not victimized at 
all." 

Ramona compared genocidal acts perpetrated daily by 
the United Snakes with common crimes. "Compared to 
what the officials of this country do daily, nobody 
outside [the] officials is guilty." Ramona traced 
official violence to the founding of Amerika: the 
genocide of the First Nations. "This country don't 
have a problem with killing. That's what this 
country was founded on. And they have the audacity 
to put an Indian [Leonard Peltier] in jail." Like 
Peltier, the famous First Nation political prisoner 
framed for murdering a FBI pig on the Pine Ridge 
reservation, Mumia is accused of killing a kkkop. 
But as Ramona says "the concept of innocence or 
guilt at this point is totally ridiculous." 
Amerikkka is guilty, it's time for the People to 
commence sentencing.

Ramona urged the audience to "be clear on who our 
enemy is; and it's not each other, it's not us." 
She castigated the Left for being unnecessarily 
sectarian. "You don't have to have the same 
ideology...Does the system care?" Instead, she 
offered up unity as the answer. "Unity is the 
foundation of revolution. That's why there has 
never been a true revolution." MIM agrees that 
unity against the enemy is important. But many so-
called revolutionaries in North America do not know 
who they're fighting against. Ramona is obviously 
correct when she says that whites are protected by 
the government that victimizes Blacks. That fact 
underlines the need for revolutionaries to fight 
against white Amerikan privilege, and that is why 
the "Left" is not all on our side. Plenty of the 
"Left" wants to keep their First World privilege 
and stolen First Nations land.

"I don't care what my situation is," says Ramona. 
"I'm gonna call a cop? I'm gonna call Mark 
Fuhrman... to protect me?" The answer, she 
continues, is for oppressed people to stop fighting 
each other and learn to solve their own problems. 
She talks about oppressed nation youth, saying 
"Rather than build an army, they're snatching 
sisters out of their cars...That's not tough...We 
do need an army." Ramona chastised Black youth in 
college for not doing more activism. She said that 
"it is a disgrace" that no Black college or 
university has invited her to come and speak. 
Ramona has been invited by community groups to 
speak, but never by a student body of a Black 
college. Ramona declared that "Self-defense is 
God's law, natural law" and that the People need to 
stop complaining and start organizing for their 
defense. At the same time however, MIM notes that 
Ramona is organizing a letter drive to big pig-
attorney general Janet Reno on Mumia's behalf. She 
also has not suggested any organization--MOVE, 
Friends of MOVE, or anyone else--to lay the basis 
for an army. MIM agrees that the People need an 
army and is building a revolutionary party that 
will lead an army when the People are mobilized.

Finally, Ramona said that "Everyone has to pull 
their own weight...Fighting for your freedom cannot 
possibly be a crime." On the contrary, for the 
oppressed, it's a duty. On the Move!


LETTERS ON BEHALF OF MUMIA ABU-JAMAL SHOULD BE 
ADDRESSED TO: 

Honorable Janet Reno, Attorney General
U.S. Dept. of Justice
Washington D.C. 20530

and sent to: Equal Justice USA

P.O. Box 5206
Hyattsville MD 20782



The letters--they're hoping for a million --will 
all be delivered personally during a massive rally 
in D.C.(Date to be announced).

Ramona is suing the city of Philadelphia for 
blowing up the MOVE house on May 13, 1985 and 
murdering her family. The first day of trial is 
April 1, 1996. A demonstration is planned outside 
Federal Court. 

MOVE has announced an action on May 11, 1996 in 
Philadelphia, 10am-3pm, on the anniversary of the 
May 13 bombing. Call MOVE at (215) 387-9955 or 
write Equal Justice USA for information about this 
and numerous other pro-Mumia and pro-MOVE events. 



* * *



MASSACHUSETTS ACTIVISTS CONTINUE VIGILANCE AGAINST
PRISON REPRESSION



Boston, March 23--One year after implementation of 
the lockdown at Walpole prison, a large crowd of 
activists gathered on the steps of the 
Massachusetts State House to protest repression in 
Massachusetts prisons. The rally, organized by the 
American Friends Service Committee, included a 
Revolutionary Anti-imperialist League (RAIL)/Maoist 
Internationalist Movement (MIM) contingent. 

Signs and speakers at the rally reminded the crowd 
that we are still protesting Governor Weld's 
transfer to Texas of 299 prisoners in the middle of 
the night on November 1, 1995. These prisoners were 
used as hostages in Weld's budget negotiation; this 
scam resulted in passage of a bill to fund close to 
$500 million in prison expansions. 

The RAIL/MIM contingent focused on the lockdown as 
a means of preventing prisoners from studying 
politics and organizing politically. Lockdown 
includes isolation, sensory deprivation and brutal 
repression. Prisoners at Walpole are enduring 
conditions which are internationally recognized as 
torture. The prisoncrats at Walpole have made the 
lockdown permanent by upgrading the prison's 
security rating. This rating requires non-contact 
family visits so that prisoners cannot even touch 
their visiting children. 

Speakers focused on the failure of the criminal 
injustice system to rehabilitate, pointing out that 
torture is not rehabilitation. Several speakers 
told how they or people they knew had been 
convicted of crimes they did not commit as 
punishment for their political activism. Other 
speakers took this point even further to say that 
crime is political in a society that gives crack 
users (mostly Blacks and Latinos) higher sentences 
than powder cocaine users (mostly wealthier 
whites). RAIL pointed out that under a government 
that condones rape, murder and torture in the name 
of "democracy" around the world while placing one 
in every three Black men under the criminal 
injustice system, all prisoners are political 
prisoners.

RAIL and MIM will continue fighting for better 
prison conditions while we organize more broadly 
for a dictatorship of the proletariat. The 
oppressed will rise to the historic task of 
smashing the bourgeois dictatorship which defines 
crime opportunistically so that it can punish the 
oppressed.



* * *



MOVIE REVIEW: DEAD MAN WALKING


"Dead Man Walking" is based on the book of the same 
name that tells the true story of a Louisiana nun 
who befriended a man sentenced to die for murder on 
Death Row at Angola State Prison. Sister Helen 
Prejean saw her correspondence with "Matthew 
Poncelet" (a composite of real-life Patrick Sonnier 
and Robert Lee Willie) as a religious duty. Her job 
was to show Poncelet the light of Jesus and make 
him accept responsibility for the murder for which 
he was sentenced to die, so that he could go to 
heaven. 

In a recent interview Prejean said that it was her 
mission to help death row inmates die with dignity, 
"'[n]ot now own up so I can save your soul.'"(1) 
Maoists also believe in taking responsibility, but 
not for individualist moral reasons. We want people 
to take responsibility for their actions and their 
role in perpetuating an oppressive society and act 
to overthrow the system which unjustly executes its 
enemies. Amerika does not have the moral authority 
to execute anyone, as the murder and violence 
perpetrated by the state are far greater than what 
any individual Amerikan could do on the street.

"Dead Man Walking" does not come out against the 
death penalty, and the book is a stronger testament 
than the movie to Sister Prejean's anti-death 
penalty activism. After Prejean's experience with 
her first death row friend, she went on to work 
with several others. She is vigilant about 
incorporating public awareness campaigns into her 
work and continues to speak out at rallies, and 
lobby against the death penalty.

The movie portrays the death penalty as arbitrary 
and unfair. Poor people who cannot afford good 
lawyers get the death penalty, while richer people 
get lesser sentences. This is exemplified in the 
fact that Poncelet's co-defendant got a life 
sentence for the same crime for which Poncelet was 
murdered. MIM knows that there is nothing arbitrary 
about the death penalty or anything else in the 
criminal injustice system: poor people and 
oppressed nationals are targeted by the criminal 
system from start to finish.

Poncelet is an unlikable guy whose racist bigotry 
makes Prejean shudder. She argues with him about 
his views on "niggers, spics and chinks." Until the 
very end, Prejean cannot convince Poncelet to admit 
he is guilty of the rape and double murder for 
which he was convicted. At the last minute before 
he is dragged to his death, Poncelet confesses, 
saying he raped the girl and killed the boy. Sister 
Prejean is completely relieved, having done her 
duty to guide him to Jesus; for only by confessing 
his sins could he "die with dignity." 

One Denver radio talk-show host criticized Dead Man 
Walking, saying he was not persuaded by the 
political argument in the film that "Poor people 
tend to get executed, not rich ones. This is no 
doubt true, but not very persuasive as a 
disqualifier for the death penalty. Rich people 
tend not to commit capital crimes Yes, in rare 
cases, an O.J. Simpson with millions to spend on 
his defense might beat a rap, and that's a shame, 
but rich people can also afford better medical 
care, houses, cars, clothing, food and education; 
and that's not fair either. Unless we're ready to 
adopt Communism and divide everything up evenly, 
it's not a good enough reason to spare someone like 
Ted Bundy from his rendezvous with justice."(2)

MIM obviously does want communism and our position 
is much more consistent than that of the Denver 
talk show host. The man on the radio claims that 
the crimes of Ted Bundy are bigger than the 
millions of murders Amerika has committed and the 
violence it sanctions daily. MIM has its priorities 
straight: we are committed to bringing Amerikkka to 
justice.

Prejean incorporates a victims advocacy 
perspective, maintaining contact with any of the 
victims' families who will speak with her. The 
movie addressed this tension, and showed the 
different responses of the two families--the father 
of the boy who struggled with Prejean, and the 
parents of the girl who wanted nothing to do with 
her. Under socialism, victims of crimes might play 
a genuine role in the rehabilitation of their 
assailants, but under imperialism, victims' 
**rights** to have front row seats at state 
sponsored executions are part of a pornographic, 
talk-show culture that glorifies the power of the 
state.

In addition to merging characters and making the 
movie much shorter than the book, the movie Dead 
Man Walking takes political liberties with the 
facts. At the time of Sister Prejean's story, 
electric chair was the only means of execution in 
Louisiana. In 1990 lethal injection became an 
option for death now prisoners, and this method 
clearly made a more palatable death scene for a 
movie-going audience.

The movie also leaves out Prejean's critical 
understanding of social injustice. Prejean recalled 
her childhood: her parents were never mean to Black 
people, but they also did not question "the system 
of racial discrimination that permeated every 
aspect of life It would take me a long time to 
understand how systems inflict pain and hardship in 
people's lives and to learn that being kind in an 
unjust system is not enough."(p. 7) This is not a 
communist analysis, but it is more analytical than 
what the movie portrays.

Prejean's book goes a long way toward humanizing 
the debate about the death penalty, taking into 
account the grief and anguish of the victims' 
families while steadfastly maintaining that the 
death penalty is wrong. "If I were to be murdered I 
would not want my murderer executed. I would not 
want my murder avenged. **Especially by government 
**--which can't be trusted to control its own 
bureaucrats or collect taxes equitably or fill a 
pothole, much less decide which of its citizens to 
kill." (p. 21, emphasis in original)

Of course Prejean does not go far enough for MIM, 
but she is a friend in the struggle against the 
death penalty. Only through communism will all 
oppression of groups over groups end, and only 
through communism will the kinds of killings that 
are now called crimes, and the executions to punish 
them, end.


NOTES:

The page cites from the book are from the 1994 
edition, **Dead Man Walking**, by Sister Helen 
Prejean, Vintage Books. 

1. The Guardian Mar. 4, 1996, p. T6. 

2. The Denver Post Feb. 23, 1996, p. B9.



* * *



THE BIRD CAGE


This take-off on La Cage aux Folles has received 
surprisingly wide mainstream distribution for a 
movie about drag queens. As a contemporary 
criticism of the religious right and the rest of 
the republican party, The Bird Cage is a fun parody 
of hypocrisy among the Amerikan family values 
fascists. The Bird Cage is not a revolutionary 
movie, preaching greater tolerance for different 
lifestyles and begging the religious right to 
accept queens into their families so that everyone 
can live happily ever after.

It is progressive for mainstream Amerika to see 
queens portrayed as real people--The Bird Cage 
suggests that queens are better at 'family values' 
than straight nuclear families--but the struggle to 
gain acceptance in imperialist society is a 
reactionary one. Queens in Amerika are oppressed as 
outsiders to the dominant hetero-patriarchal 
culture. But they can also live in penthouses, own 
successful clubs and even raise children; while the 
majority of queers on the planet are too worried 
about survival to devote much energy to sexual 
liberation. Progressive queers in Amerika must ally 
themselves with the struggles of the international 
proletariat fighting to overthrow the patriarchy, 
not attempt to win acceptance from these 
oppressors. 



* * *



RUMBLE IN THE BRONX


Review by MC17

Hong Kong actor and director Jackie Chan edited 
"Rumble in the Bronx" for an Amerikan audience, and 
it shows. "Rumble" caters to Hollywood's vapid and 
reactionary standards.

Chan is an action superstar in Asia and well-known 
throughout the world. "Rumble" is his third attempt 
to crack the Amerikan market and the first major 
Amerikan release he directed. Earlier Amerikan 
releases included the pitiful "Cannonball Run" 
series, where Hollywood chauvinists cast Chan as a 
Japanese.

Some of Chan's earlier films--most notably "Drunken 
Master II"--were marked by political themes of 
revolutionary anti-imperialist nationalism with 
Chan playing the hero who rises above his lumpen-
proletarian background when events educate him 
politically about the need to fight the big 
imperialist enemy. Occasionally accurate renditions 
of historical struggles, these older films are also 
significant for the strong roles played by women 
and the lack of romance in them.

Rumble in the Bronx is pure Amerikan tripe: 
gratuitous sex, gratuitous violence, gratuitous 
racial stereotyping and a politically meaningless 
plot. With women all wearing scanty clothing and 
doing little beyond clinging to their men, this 
movie should appeal to the lucrative Amerikan 
audience that pays for the popularity of the many 
mindless and meaningless Hollywood films.

Chan's role in making his older movies also points 
to the differences between the Amerikan and Hong 
Kong movie industries. In an appearance on 
Amerika's National Broadcasting Network's the Late 
Show with David Letterman, Chan explained why he 
always does his own stunts. In Hong Kong, the 
actors are cheaper, and it is not such a big deal 
if one of them falls in a scene and breaks his 
ankle. In Amerika, the contracts for actors like 
Steven Seagal (a pulp action martial artist movie 
hero) carry such expensive insurance that the 
producers wouldn't consider risking these actors on 
their own stunts.

Amerikan audiences are titillated by the fact that 
Jackie Chan does his own stunts because it makes 
him seem that much more the studly action hero. But 
really this aspect of Chan's career is only 
evidence of the tremendous gulf in the value 
imperialism puts on Chinese lives versus Amerikan 
lives.

Jackie Chan is an excellent martial artist and a 
great entertainer. While he did not start making 
movies until after the beginning of capitalist 
restoration in China, his talents were used to 
educate and influence his audience towards anti-
imperialist politics by a Third World movie 
industry. It is unfortunate that Chan has now sold 
his skills to the disgusting bourgeois Hollywood 
movie industry. MIM looks forward to a day when 
movie actors will be engaged making educational 
films rather than junk fiction nonsense which 
glorifies patriarchal sex and violence. 



* * *



NPR CAN'T COMPREHEND NATIONAL LIBERATION


On February 27, nearly 100 Cuban doctors arrived in 
South Africa to take up rural medical posts. South 
Africa suffers from the "brain drain" that afflicts 
other Third World countries, as the educated and 
technically trained leave their country for better 
paid positions in the First World. South Africa's 
problem is particularly severe in the countryside, 
where conditions are much harsher than in the 
cities. South Africa has 2,000 vacant posts in the 
state health service.

South Africa has invited Cuba, which has a surplus 
of medical workers, to send doctors to staff its 
rural clinics. This will likely improve the health 
situation in rural South Africa on a short term 
basis, but this stop-gap measure exposes the short-
sightedness of South Africa's neo-colonial regime. 
The nationalist and pro-peasant program utilized in 
revolutionary China under the leadership of Mao 
Zedong was a powerful rejection of neo-colonialism. 
Maoist China focused on national self-reliance and 
an orientation towards the countryside--where the 
great majority of the population lived. Strategies 
included political incentives for doctors to work 
in the countryside and training more than 1 million 
peasant masses as "barefoot doctors" to teach 
preventative medicine and carry out simple first 
aid.

National Public Radio's story about the Cuban 
doctors being sent to South Africa played upon two 
fallacies. First, that the Azanian masses would 
actually rally to sing the praises of Fidel Castro-
-Amerika's bogeyman. It was apparently 
inconceivable that a country that Amerika doesn't 
like could actually be appreciated elsewhere in the 
world.

Secondly, the reporter stressed that only a few 
years prior, Cuban soldiers were fighting South 
African soldiers on the battlefields of Angola. 
What the reporter missed, however, was that South 
Africa is no longer the same country that supported 
reaction in Angola a few years ago. Until 1993, the 
Azanian masses under the leadership ship of the 
African National Congress and other organizations, 
were fighting the white South African regime. In 
1993, Nelson Mandela was elected president, ending 
white rule and ushering in neo-colonialism. The 
African National Congress was on the same side of 
the Angola struggle as the Cubans.

While the political realities for the Azanian 
masses has changed little since the end of open 
white rule, this was not the reporter's point. 
Rather, she was trying to liquidate the historical 
struggle of the Azanian people against the South 
African government. --MC234



NOTES: NPR February 27, 1996; Boston Globe February 
28, 1996, p. 4. 



* * *



SETTLERS SHIFT INTO STOCK OWNERSHIP


Statistics collected by the Federal Reserve bank of 
the U.S. Government for 1995 show that stock 
ownership surpassed home ownership in total value 
for the first time since the early 1970s in the 
United Snakes. The class of people MIM calls 
settlers owns the majority of home equity and now 
it is putting money into its Individual Retirement 
Accounts (IRAs) and 401(k) programs. 

"In 1980, for example, Americans purchased only 
$2.1 billion in mutual fund-shares, the prime 
vehicle for middle-class stock ownership. Last 
year, mutual fund purchases were close to $200 
billion."(1) The big spur to the increases is a new 
pro-settler tax code that gives a special tax 
status to IRAs and such strategies for building 
wealth for retirement.

The middle-classes--people not in the top one 
percent of wealth holders and unable to live just 
from owning property--these classes that MIM calls 
the settlers or labor aristocracy and the petty-
bourgeoisie have long owned the majority of home 
equity. In 1995 home equity wealth totaled $4.3 
trillion. The bottom 90 percent of society owns 65 
percent of the home ownership wealth, in addition 
to 65 percent of the life insurance and 76 percent 
of the automobiles.(2)

The comparison of home equity and stock ownership 
is notable in itself. Home equity is a major source 
of power in many imperialist societies. It is also 
a major economic fact in separating white working 
classes from the working classes of the oppressed 
nations. 

In the poorest 20 percent of society, home equity 
accounts for 59 percent of all wealth as of 1988. 
The wealthier people rely less on home equity. When 
one looks at the white people of the United Snakes 
only 8.73 percent of households qualify for Marx's 
statement that "they have nothing to lose but their 
chains," because they have zero or negative net 
worth. A good chunk of Blacks and people of 
"Hispanic origin" have been bought off too, but 
29.12 percent of Blacks and 23.82 percent of 
"Hispanic origin" people have zero or negative net 
worth. Indeed, while the median net worth for 
whites was $43,279 in 1988 dollars, it was $4,169 
for Blacks and $5,524 for "Hispanic origin" 
people.(3) This contributes to the different 
national interests that give people of oppressed 
nations in Amerika a different outlook from white 
people and gives them, as a group, a material 
interest in revolution. 

The 8.73 percent of white households with no net 
wealth are too insignificant to form a class. They 
are the most extremely marginalized whites with 
health problems or young age, and they all know 
many middle-class people who "have made it." 
Meanwhile, it would not take much to knock the 
oppressed nation middle-classes back into 
absolutely zero asset ownership. A catastrophe or 
creeping taxes worth four or five thousand dollars 
would eliminate the savings of these classes. 
Hence, for this reason MIM concentrates itself in 
the bottom 20 percent of society where the 
oppressed nations are concentrated.  Such wealth in 
houses is not accrued in the oppressed nations of 
the Third World. In the 1970s and 1980s it was 
possible for most Amerikans to make five and six 
digit dollar sums just from owning a house, doing 
no work and watching the price go up. That wealth 
contributed to the corruption of the political 
outlook of workers here and among other things made 
widespread homelessness possible at the very bottom 
of society. Real estate speculation of this sort is 
a key way in which the capitalist system in the 
imperialist countries rewards the bought-off 
workers with the labor of other people. 

In the accompanying article on overall wealth, MIM 
showed that the top one percent lost ground in 
percentage of wealth owned to the next highest nine 
percent of wealth owners in recent years. The 
growth of employee ownership of large companies, 
the IRAs and 401(k) programs point toward further 
bourgeoisification of the Amerikan people. 

Much attention is drawn to the fact that worker 
incomes excluding benefits have fallen in recent 
years. Others point to the decline of Social 
Security that the bourgeoisie is predicting. 
However, these trends are offset by increases in 
worker benefits and stock ownership. While many so-
called Marxists would like to join President 
Clinton in seeing the attacks on Medicaid and 
Medicare as a symbol of class destabilization, in 
actual fact, the middle classes are becoming 
slightly more stable, not less stable at this time. 

It is important to have an accurate gauge of the 
position of the middle-classes, because too often 
communist parties have based themselves on the idea 
that the middle-class was collapsing when it was 
not. The only result was the importation of middle-
class ideas into communist parties and not 
communist ideas into middle-classes. 



NOTES: 

1. New York Times Mar. 22, 1996, p. d17. 

2. Leonard Beeghley, **The Structure of Social 
Stratification in the United States** (Boston: 
Allyn and Bacon, 1996), p. 179. 

3. U.S. Census data in Charles E. Hurst, **Social 
Inequality: Forms, Causes and Consequences, 2nd 
ed.**, (Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1995), pp. 28-9.



* * *



LABOR ARISTOCRACY AND PETTY-BOURGEOISIE GET MORE 
GRAVY


From listening to the campaign rhetoric of the 
imperialist parties seeking to woo the labor 
aristocracy voters in the United Snakes, one would 
have the impression that the middle class has 
disappeared. In actuality, while the proletariat 
continues to be exploited and driven into further 
degradation, the majority of white workers continue 
to expand their wealth or at least hold their own.

The latest in a thorough survey conducted every 
three years shows that the upper ranks of the labor 
aristocracy and petty-bourgeoisie got richer 
between 1989 and 1992. The survey conducted by the 
Federal Reserve and Internal Revenue Survey 
surprised the New York Times editors, who called 
its accuracy into question. 

"The aggregate wealth of the bottom 90 percent of 
Americans grew by 20 percent from 1989 to 1992. The 
total net household worth of the richest 1 percent 
declined by 4.6 percent during that period, while 
the biggest winners, the next 9 percent, saw their 
wealth increase 37 percent." The top one percent of 
the population--defined as the capitalist class 
because it owns enough wealth to live off of 
without working--saw its share of wealth decline 
from 37.1 percent to 30.4 percent between 1989 and 
1992. This reflected the need for the bourgeoisie 
to sweeten the pot for its top technical and 
organizational managers who receive top salaries. 

It has become economically efficient to reward the 
top one percent of people with greater settler 
loyalty rather than more wealth for the time being. 
The capitalist class is willing to give up a little 
on its annual income in the name of buying off the 
Amerikan labor aristocracy as a staunch ally in 
domination of the oppressed.



NOTE: New York Times March 13, 1996, p. d1.

 [About]  [Contact]  [Home]  [Art]  [Movies]  [Black Panthers]  [News]  [RAIL]