MIM Notes 186 May 15 1999 Pigs use whatever reason works to censor An Indiana prisoner sent MIM the prison paperwork related to the censorship of his Notas Rojas subscription. The first censorship notice said that Notas Rojas contained possible gang related signs. The Security Threat Coordinator of the facility was notified of the fact that MIM sent Notas Rojas to the prisoner. Nowhere on the notice did the officials specify what signs in NR were allegedly gang related. The prisoner responded by filing a grievance which stated that neither the prisoner nor MIM were gang-related. The response to the prisoner's grievance? "The material that is in question was translated from Spanish to English. I was informed that this material is explaining how to overthrow and to keep the American backed businesses out of Mexico. This type of literature is a threat to the safety and security of the facility. It will not be released to the offender but may be sent out at the offender's expense or destroyed per IDOC procedures." According to the Indiana statute related to correctional standards and procedures, a prisoner's "correspondence may not be read, censored, copied, or otherwise interfered with in regard to its prompt delivery unless: (1) The department has reasonable grounds to believe that the correspondence: (A) Poses an immediate danger to the safety of an individual or a serious threat to the security of the facility or program; or (B) Is prohibited under section 2(b) [IC 11-11-3-2(b)] of this chapter; or (2) The correspondence contains contraband or prohibited property. . . (c) For purposes of this section, disagreement with the sender's or receiver's apparent moral, political, ethical, ethnic, or religious values or attitudes, veracity, or choice of words may not be used as a reason for censoring, copying, delaying, or disallowing the delivery of a personal communication." Burns Ind. Code Ann. Sec. 11-11-3-4 (1998). (Section 2(b), referred to above, is not applicable to correspondence and subscriptions sent by MIM to comrades inside the walls of Amerika's dungeons.) This is a perfect example of how prison officials can make up their own "rules" in flagrant violation of even those few laws on the books which do recognize a prisoner's "right" to receive literature and correspondence. The law in Indiana says that a prisoner can "send and receive, in any language, an unlimited amount of correspondence to or from any person," except another prisoner.(11-11-3-2) So, the fact that NR is in Spanish does not provide the Indiana pigs with a legal reason to censor the subscriptions. And the fact that the pigs disagree with MIM's politics or choice of words also does not provide a legal justification for censorship of NR. MIM calls on all readers to work with MIM to stop prison censorship of political material. To find out what you can do, contact us.