Kobe vs. Shaq revisited Earlier we used the feud between basketball superstars Kobe Bryant and Shaquille O'Neal to illustrate the principles of democratic centralism. Developments in this earthshaking debate force us to comment further. According to some sports-radio blabbermouths, Kobe understands the principles behind coach Phil Jackson's strategy, which calls for him to pass the ball more and gives Shaq the leading role. But Kobe nevertheless finds criticisms that he has deviated from Jackson's plan insulting and offensive, given that he works so hard -- he was in great physical shape at the beginning of the season, he can shoot free throws, etc. Kobe's alleged attitude is similar to what we Maoists call "subjectivism", "selfish departmentalism," or "inner-Party sectarianism." MIM has had to struggle against this problem in the past. Comrades will be criticized for mistakes in one area only to respond that they've worked harder than those making the criticisms in another. Or comrades approach discussions of party strategy from the perspective of their particular project, and not the party as a whole. MIM's struggle against its "anarchist wind" involved exactly this question.(1) Hard work is indispensable to revolution and party-building. That is why MIM requires that party leaders be monomaniacal when it comes to serving the international proletariat. But there is nothing about hard work per se that guarantees a correct perspective. MIM does not doubt that evil geniuses like Bill Clinton or Dick Cheney bust their asses. So do running dogs like Green-turned-militarist Joschka Fischer. In fact, we recognize that there is a danger that full-time party workers with tons of energy could out-organize the rest of the party and then use the party for private interests. That is why MIM opened its party congress to Honorary Comrades, people who agree with our cardinal principles but do not live under the same stringent discipline as full part members. On the topic of placing one's own department (or position) ahead of the interests of the whole party (or team), Mao was pretty blunt. "Some comrades see only the interests of the part and not the whole; they always put undue stress on that part of the work for which they themselves are responsible and always wish to subordinate the interests of the whole to the interests of their own part. They do not understand the Party's system of democratic centralism; they do not realize that the Communist Party not only needs democracy but needs centralization even more. ... "Those who assert this kind of 'independence' are usually wedded to the doctrine of 'me first' and are generally wrong on the question of the relationship between the individual and the Party. Although in words they profess respect for the Party, in practice they put themselves first and the Party second. What are these people after? They are after fame and position and want to be in the limelight."(2) So Kobe needs to stick to coach Jackson's system, regardless of whether he worked harder than Shaq during the off season (which is likely, judging from Shaq's play in the first half of the season), and regardless of whether he is a better guard than Shaq is a center. Notes: 1. MIM Theory 8, pp. 45-61. 2. Mao Zedong, "Rectify the party's style of work," Selected Works v. 3, pp. 34-45.