Not Down with the Lockdown: Fight against super-jail for kids advances July 28 -- Oakland CA, Books Not Bars and the Youth Force Coalition, representing more than 30 youth organizations in the Bay Area, held a Not Down with the Lockdown jam to stop the building of a new Alameda County super-jail for youth. Attended by hundreds of people the event featured political music, spoken word, informational speeches, chanting and lots of education advancing the struggle against the new juvenile detention facility. This move for a larger juvenile facility comes after California voters passed proposition 21 in March 2000 which moved 14-year-olds into adult courts and 16-year-olds into adult prisons. The move to expand incarceration of youth is just another attack on oppressed nation youth. Similar to statistics on imprisoned populations across the united $tates, Blacks make up 17% of Alameda County's population but are 60% of the kids incarcerated in the Juvenile Hall. Alameda county, in northern California, encompasses Oakland and surrounding cities with a population of 1.5 million people. Currently the county has a juvenile facility with 299 beds. That's in comparison to counties like Seattle's King county with 1.7 million people and only 160 juvenile hall beds. But Alameda county wants to spend more than $200 million to build a new facility with 450 beds. And they want to locate it in Dublin, a 45-minute drive from Oakland, where the youth who will be locked up and their families live. Alameda county decided they needed this new big facility after asking the Rosser firm to do a study of how many beds were needed. Rosser is the main contender for the contract to build the new prison. When one of the county supervisors asked for a new study to determine the appropriate size of the facility he was voted down by the board of supervisors (3-2, currently two supervisors have been won over to opposing the new super-jail after much pressure from activists). As speakers at the rally in Oakland pointed out, there is no such thing as an objective assessment of how many beds should be put in the new jail: if the beds are built the criminal injustice system will fill them. The current juvenile hall is unsafe and built on an earthquake fault line so Alameda County has to build a new one. But the debate should be over how to eliminate the jail for kids and replace it with education programs and social services, not how many more youth to lock up. Books not Bars and the Youth Force Coalition are correctly demanding this change of focus in the discussion of youth services demanding "the minimum number of cellblocks, with maximum number of alternatives to incarceration." MIM supports this demand -- from the perspective that we do not want the imperialist state to use this tool of social control against the people. In May activists took the battle against the new super-jail for kids to the California Board of Corrections meeting in San Diego where they were expected to approve the Alameda County officials request for $2.3 million in funding for the new facility. The proposal had already been pre- approved by the Board of Corrections executive steering committee. After many youth spoke out at the meeting, pointing out the falling crime rate among youth and the desperate need for funding for the crumbling school system in Oakland, the Board shocked everyone and voted 10-2 to reject the funding request. In another recent victory for activists, in response to protests the county board of supervisors downsized the projected facility from 540 to 450 beds. But they are still determined to use local bonds to build the new expanded jail. While continuing to fight on all fronts, activists hope to pressure one more member of the County Board of Supervisors to change their position. With a majority (3-2) opposing the new super-jail the project would be defeated. They have selected the two most likely of the three opposing supervisors to focus on, sending postcards, faxes, letters and phone calls asking them to reconsider their support for the expanded the Juvenile Hall. Supervisor Alice Lai-Bitker seems like the most likely target with a history of advocating for youth and social services, but she has given no reasons for supporting the Super-jail and has actually said she would be willing to change her vote if another pro-incarceration supervisor changed their vote first. Clearly she's willing to follow peer pressure so activists are targeting her for pressure from the community. MIM encourages our readers to contact Alice Lai-Bitker and demand that she oppose the new super- jail for kids. Phone: 510-272-6693 Fax: 510-268-8004 Email: bosdist3@alameda.co.ca.us Notes: Books not Bars (http://www.booksnotbars.org)