Reuters: United $tates "has largest prison and jail population in the world" A major bourgeois newspaper has finally admitted the truth about the supposedly "free" United $tates in a lead front-page article. The Boston Metro running a Reuters article as its front-page headline admitted that 1 in 32 adults in the United $tates is in jail, on probation or parole. The "Bureau of Justice Statistics" of the U.S. Government released figures showing that another 117, 400 people joined the "correctional community" in 2000. MIM's position is that the "freedom" of a society can be measured and that U.$. imperialism and its defenders are extremely hypocritical for using their "free country" rhetoric. Whatever the different societies call their crimes, the fact is that other societies can manage with fewer prisoners per capita. They deserve credit and the United $tates deserves the ultimate in criticism. Our critics would say that prisoners committed crimes and deserve their punishment. Yet since we are talking about very high murder rates and other crime rates, it should be a crime to defend the U.$. system as it is. People who defend the status quo are guilty for the high crime rates in the United $tates. MIM intends to imprison "enemies of the people" and use a language of justice much different than seen today in the United $tates, but what counts is not the rhetoric people use to defend their use of prisons but the results. Imprisonment rates such as those in the United $tates can only be justified for transitional periods of progress. When it comes to the overall freedom of the people, what matters is the overall statistic. During World War II, Stalin imprisoned people at the rate Blacks are imprisoned in the United $tates today; hence, MIM is not going to say there are never circumstances in which high imprisonment is not justified. World War II when the Soviet Union fought Nazis certainly justified harsh repression. Nonetheless, the United $tates of today is not under invasion, is not ending slavery and is not even making a dent in the "war on drugs." There has been nothing to justify the wasteful imprisonment of the last few decades that has grinded on and on. The "drug war" cannot be won in a for-profit system. The more imprisonment in connection to drugs, the lower the supply is and thus the higher the profits for supplying drugs. While MIM could defend a very brief surge in imprisonment in connection to drugs, there is no justification for failure to handle the underlying problem decade after decade as in the United $tates; however, capitalism cannot eradicate the reasons that people supply and use drugs. Even more important than the internal imprisonment of people at record rates is the contribution of U.$. military aid and direct military intervention to support repression of peoples in the Third World. So to say the United $tates is a "free" country is doubly wrong, first internally and secondly because the United $tates is the main prop of repression internationally. Note: Boston Metro 27August2001, p. 1.