This is an archive of the former website of the Maoist Internationalist Movement, which was run by the now defunct Maoist Internationalist Party - Amerika. The MIM now consists of many independent cells, many of which have their own indendendent organs both online and off. MIM(Prisons) serves these documents as a service to and reference for the anti-imperialist movement worldwide.
"Black Hawk Down"
Ridley Scott, director
Columbia Pictures (2001)
The October, 1993 events on which "Black Hawk
Down" is based teach us three lessons. First,
although the United $tates may cloak military
intervention in humanitarian rhetoric -- in this
case sending soldiers to guard food aid and
"restore order" -- it is principally pursuing its
own military and political goals. As the president
of Eritrea noted at the time, "Not once in 41
years did Eritrea, scene of the longest war in
Africa and victim of some of the grossest
violations of human rights, figure in the agenda
of the United Nations... assistance and amounts of
assistance appear to be decided not on the basis
of needs or capacity to put the assistance to good
use, but -- even after the proclamation of the end
of the cold war -- on the basis of the interests
and agendas of donors."(1) An editorial in the
Washington Post that summer made the same point.
"A memory-flawed Congress has forgotten that about
a year ago [1992], its concern for the world's
hungry was of such intensity that it was closing
down the House Select Committee on hunger."(2)
Prior to its closure that committee was the lowest
funded in Congress. "Humanitarian aid" from the
United $tates may feed some people in some places
for some time, but it cannot solve deep problems
of hunger, homelessness, unemployment and war in
the majority of countries around the world. In
fact, U.$. imperialists are behind many of those
problems. For example, during the 1980s, "[U.$]
assistance to Somalia was of another kind --
selling weapons to a dictatorial regime, $200
million worth from 1977 to 1990.
"During one
period, this included 4,800 rifles, 3,672
grenades, 482 TOW missiles, 18 howitzers, 6,032
artillery shells, 75 mortars and 144 land mines.
Any doubts about who's on the receiving end of
that firepower the past few weeks?"(2) Second, the
United $tates is willing to kill thousands and
risk the lives of its citizens to achieve its
goals -- in this case the elimination of Mohammed
Farah Aidid, who stood between U.$. oil companies
and billion-dollar oil concessions.(3) According
to Mark Bowden, whose book forms the basis for
"Black Hawk Down," "Task Force Ranger was not in
Mogadishu to feed the hungry. Over six weeks, from
late August to Oct. 3, it conducted six missions,
raiding locations where either Aidid or his
lieutenants were believed to be meeting. The
mission that resulted in the Battle of Mogadishu
came less than three months after a surprise
missile attack by U.S. helicopters (acting on
behalf of the UN) on a meeting of Aidid clansmen.
Prompted by a Somalian ambush on June 5 that
killed more than 20 Pakistani soldiers, the
missile attack killed 50 to 70 clan elders and
intellectuals, many of them moderates seeking to
reach a peaceful settlement with the United
Nations. After that July 12 helicopter attack,
Aidid's clan was officially at war with America --
a fact many Americans never realized."(4) Somalis
suffered 6,000 and 10,000 casualties during the
summer of 1993 alone, including attacks on
hospitals and civilian gatherings. Estimates of
the number of Somalis killed in the battle of
Mogadishu depicted in "Black Hawk Down" range from
300 to over 1,000.(5) Eighteen U.$. soldiers died.
Third, the U.$. military, for all its
technological superiority, is not invulnerable.
Somali militia shot down two Blackhawk helicopters
during the Battle of Mogadishu and crippled at
least two others. Although the battle started when
U.$. forces entered Mogadishu to kidnap some of
Aidid's lieutenants, the Somalis quickly seized
the initiative and kept the Americans pinned down
for close to 15 hours. Shortly after the Battle of
Mogadishu President Clinton ordered U.$. troops
out of Somalia. Some of the conclusions the
Washington Post drew in early 1994 resonate today.
"[T]he Somalia expedition again demonstrated the
difficulty of finding a single individual --
Aideed [whom the United $tates never arrested] --
who does not wish to be found, even when the
world's most sophisticated military intelligence
apparatus is brought to bear."(5) The film version
of "Black Hawk Down" fails to make any of these
points. Instead, it accepts the pretension that
the U.$. military was principally in Somalia to
feed the hungry. Worse, it portrays the Somalis as
vicious thugs. Civil war is in their nature.
Somalis strip dead American pilots and drag them
through the street, for apparently no reason,
since the film does not mention the thousands of
Somalis killed by Amerikan military operations.
The pilots were stripped because their flight
suits contained a homing beacon.(6) A militiaman
in the film scorns a captured Amerikan pilot,
because Amerikans lead boring, middle-class lives.
In real life, the captured pilot was treated as
well as he could be; his guard was friendly, even
as he told the pilot of the suffering the
Amerikans had caused. Later, that pilot said: "Too
many innocent people are getting killed. People
are angry because they see civilians getting
killed."(7) The film's principal take-home message
is a re-hashing of the "white man's burden."
Humanitarian aid must be imposed upon Third World
countries for their own good. If Amerika does get
involved militarily, it should use overwhelming
force and not regret any civilian casualties. The
secondary take-home message is also clichéd macho
crap. "When the bullets start flying, politics
goes out the window," says one soldier. "It's all
about the guy next to you." But politics determine
why the bullets are flying, or if they fly at all.
Why were these soldiers in a situation where they
felt they had to pump thousands of rounds into a
Somali crowd to help "the guys next to them"?
"Black Hawk Down" is a timely movie, reflecting on
an incident of the recent past which is already
slipping into obscurity and which has immediate
relevance to the "war on terrorism." But its
perspective is reactionary. Instead, MIM points
out that the imperialists' search for "security"
is futile as long as their system is based on
oppression, weapons profiteering, and famine.
Notes: 1. MIM Notes 82, Nov 93. 2. Washington
Post, 19 Oct 1993. 3. Larry Chin, "Black Hawk
Down" lies about real history. 4. Quoted in Chin.
See also Mark Bowden, "Black Hawk Down," New York:
Signet, 2002, pp. 83-89. 5. Noam Chomsky, quoted
in Chin. 6. Bowden. 7. Bowden, p. 373.