Maoist Internationalist Movement

Security update

July 18 2007

First I will start with a persynal apology regarding my mistakes in the non-electron world, the "ground game." This is not a good time to be taking risks communicating with MIM, partly because of recent real world mistakes by yours truly.

Secondly, I would like to remind readers why we have no email. There seemed to be a pretty repeated effort to pin death threats on us by posing as us. People who have observed the struggle lately need to understand that people trained in MIMism, down into our peculiar diction are feds. With no political email, we can only be pinned for what we say at etext. People who do not accept that the state is real and mimics MIM successfully will not agree with us.

In addition, people were sending us pictures of themselves and other revealing material when we had email. The proletarian camp was too excited internationally and MIM needed to figure out a solution for that, which we have not.

Thirdly, on why we have no email is that we here at MIM had a certain laziness creeping in and a weakness in our literary training. The enemy did penetrate us for our day-to-day operations.

Appropriately enough, today Yahoo features a story on its home page titled, "American individualism may hinder understanding of others." The Chinese are more likely than Amerikans to predict behavior of others, because the Chinese have an easier time entering the shoes of others than Amerikans do.

MIM makes mistakes of the sort mentioned in the study. One advantage of our current pattern of communication is that we see who has cryptic communication ability. For a long time, MIM noticed that a substantial portion of readers are spooks and those in their related fields. Some of our readers are much better in this area than anyone at MIM's etext cell. We might even hypothesize that those with cryptic communication ability have a much higher belief on average in MIM's ability to shape the world, its power. Underlying that could be that people with cryptic communication ability have higher class background themselves on average. This points to a danger in serving only the lumpen, not to mention allowing ourselves be swamped by the petty-bourgeoisie. At the moment, we see some in MIM circles swamped into inaction by cryptic struggle. We see others swimming fine, better than us.

We used to rely on individual emails and PGP, but the enemy penetrated that and we also used it as an excuse to slack on improvement of cryptic abilities. For Amerikans it is already a cryptic ability to look at a cardboard screen in front of someone across the table and realize that the persyn behind the screen can only see one block on the table, not the two visible on the other side of the screen where the Amerikan is sitting.

Recently, we needed to struggle with people who do not know how to use PGP. We also needed to get around having individuals handle struggles through individual emails. The "Scuttlebutt updates" give people some idea about how communication can go and what sorts of things can be handled without PGP. So the advantage of pitching PGP has been that allegorical communication is actually more participatory. When one is in a somewhat strong position, allegorical communication can aid in the development of offensive abilities.

The lumpen and First Nations can fight territorial battles of control, but intellectuals can also separate and leave the middle classes far behind in their own way. That is why we emphasize to people not to spend all their time debating Bushies and calling them "stupid." We also need to leave the New York Times in the dust. The Russian and Chinese revolutions both had that obvious aspect of intellectual ferment. The Maoists in particular had to bring Marxism to the Chinese people for the first time. So if we here in the united $tates water things down to be palatable to the Euro-Amerikan nation, especially in a bid to be majority-oriented, dumbocratic or libertarian, then we are forsaking the maximum revolutionary advantages obtainable. We do not want to be too close to the majority.

The allegorical struggle is also another blow to persynality cults. With no individual political emails to the world, we have fewer possible claims of unaccountability of individuals in MIM.

Frustration can build with MIM for the reasons above and also because we do not have a "who-oriented" approach to intelligence. We maintain that the imperialists are just as good at "who-oriented" intelligence as MIM is and of course, they have more money and government power to implement it. To put this in negative terms, those who can mimic us and those who are up-close and persynal with us can cause us a lot of difficulty, if we have mainly who-oriented intelligence or counter-intelligence methods. We prefer "what-oriented," "where-to-oriented" and structural intelligence. In our current struggle, MIM is finally tapping into literary-oriented intellectuals.