CCI Tehachapi censors MIM Theory

I have finally received the notice from the administration as to why they did not let me receive MIM Theory: they claim that there were racist articles, and that MIM advocated the overthrow of the U.S. government. I have already filed an appeal. I have the cite for Procunier v. Martinez as well as two other cases that lay the guidelines on the limits of the institutions ability to restrict prisoners first amendment rights. The cites are:

Procunier v. Martinez 416 U.S. 396, 94 S.Ct (1974)
O'Lone v. Estate of Shabazz (1987) U.S. 107 S.Ct 2400
McCabe v. Avave (9th Cir 1987) 827 F. 2d

O'Lone v. Estate of Shabazz is a little more strict than Procunier and pretty much sets the standard. I believe there is an argument there for legitimate political literature. I am doing more research. When I found out more I will fill you in as well so you can share it with others who may be combating censorship. If you come across anything please let me know. Their institutional policy is based around literature that pertains to racism and promotes the use of violence against other races or groups to achieve their objectives. That's not MIM, MIM is focused on class struggle. I know, and they know it, that's why they claimed some articles contained racism without providing any details.

Yours in struggle,
-- a CA prisoner, CCI Tehachapi, June 2003