This is an archive of the former website of the Maoist Internationalist Movement, which was run by the now defunct Maoist Internationalist Party - Amerika. The MIM now consists of many independent cells, many of which have their own indendendent organs both online and off. MIM(Prisons) serves these documents as a service to and reference for the anti-imperialist movement worldwide.
Maoist Internationalist Movement

The difference between "Americans" and "Amerikkkans":

U.S. embassy response to Gaur massacre out to lunch

Two days after the killing of 28 people often referred to by the bourgeois media as "Maoist" (followers of Prachanda Path) and their allies, the U.S. Embassy in Nepal issued a statement that made it sound like the so-called Maoists were responsible for the violence against themselves in southern Nepal:

U.S. CONDEMNS VIOLENT CLASH, URGES LAW AND ORDER, DIALOGUE

March 23, 2007 The armed and deadly clash in Gaur on Wednesday was a tragic and unnecessary confrontation. The U.S. Embassy condemns this violence. We urge the Government of Nepal to arrest and prosecute all perpetrators involved, regardless of their political or ethnic group affiliation. Law and order must be enforced – and not on a selective basis. We also call on the Government to initiate a transparent and effective dialogue with indigenous and ethnic groups to consider grievances. If unity and inclusiveness are not promoted, further bloodshed may result and Nepal’s peace process could be imperiled. Finally, we note that the Maoists continue to break their commitments to the people of Nepal. When People’s Liberation Army soldiers walked out of cantonments en masse on Thursday, Maoists demonstrated again their disdain for the commitments they have made in the peace process. The U.S. Embassy condemns these actions and urges the Maoists, again, to foreswear their addiction to violence and join the political mainstream.

The incident in Gaur was the killing of 28 so-called Maoists and their allies, but the statement by the U.S. Embassy in Nepal ends with a call on the Maoists to foreswear violence. For the ignorant it would be possible to conclude from the U.S. Embassy statement that so-called Maoists carried out the killings in Gaur. For the more sophisticated reader, it is clear that the United $tates is conniving behind-the-scenes with the killings in Gaur and those killings are now being used to discipline the Prachanda Path people being called "Maoists."

Ironically, the U.S. Army's reference books on the American Revolution cite the very same U.S. State Department the embassies belong to as their source for the following:

In New York and the Carolinas, the confiscations from Loyalists resulted in something of a social revolution as large estates were parceled out to yeoman farmers. About 100,000 Loyalists left the country, including William Franklin, the son of Benjamin, and John Singleton Copley, the greatest American painter of the period. Most settled in Canada. Some eventually returned, although several state governments excluded the Loyalists from holding public office. In the decades after the Revolution, Americans preferred to forget about the Loyalists. Apart from Copley, the Loyalists became nonpersons in American history.(3)
19,000 Loyalists actually fought violently against the American Revolution, which means that Americans had a violent struggle to end their own monarchy; yet, here is the U.S. Embassy telling the anti-monarchists to foreswear violence right after being massacred. That is why MIM distinguishes between "Americans" and "Amerikans." Today we have "Amerikans" or "Amerikkkans," no "Americans" living in the united $tates. Amerikans are quite happy with monarchism.

One royalist merchant gets a beating in Katmandu over $140,000, and the pro-U.$. Liberals go berserk,(3) as if the American revolutionaries did not confiscate entire properties in their own bourgeois revolution. Today's Amerikans live the rich life in a system they had nothing to do with setting up and they are quite happy to impose monarchy on other countries. No one trying to get past divine authoritarian regimes should pay any attention to the Amerikans of today.

Listening to the pseudo-Liberals of Nepal supporting the Nepali Congress, one would think Nepal did not have the king take over and suppress Parliament February 1, 2005.(4) Maila Baje wrote that the king is just a "phobia" of the anti-monarchist politicians and has been for a whole year--a drop in the bucket by Nepal historical standards.(5) Listening to these same pseudo-Liberals before, Nepal already had a mere phantom of a king, when the king dismissed Parliament. These pseudo-Liberals' grip on reality leaves something to be desired.

The royalist forces are still active. The king has not abdicated and the people have not finished with him. In Google News it is possible to find I.K. Pradhan still writing for the political role of the king now that the interim government has been delayed to the point of near-failure.

Our political parties and political leaderships must try to understand that a majority of the sovereign people exist far more, outside the premises of the political parties. It is this greater bulk of the population, who are the focal point of democratic development and indispensable force in determining the destiny of the nation. The King as well as the political parties ultimately must go to the people. The fundamental difference lies in that the King as the guardian, preserver, protector of the constitution and democracy, has always gone and goes to His people, with the clear, august purpose of strengthening national unity. This is exactly what is most needed for Nepal today. But the political leaders, political parties have gone with their own limited individual and partisan interest, to beg for votes with their begging bowls in quest of public mandate for governance.(6)
That sounds like more of the same old royalist crap. Not surprisingly we hear reports of a royal coronation ceremony for the end of April(7) and bombings of non-royalist newspapers.(8)

The real Americans, the farmers of 1776 would have told Moriarity where to put his gun control ideas.

Notes:
1. http://kathmandu.usembassy.gov/index.html
2. http://countrystudies.us/united-states/history-33.htm
3. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/NEWS/World/Rest_of_World/Nepal_shuts_down_as_traders_go_on_strike/articleshow/1784512.cms ;
http://www.hindu.com/2007/03/21/stories/2007032105741600.htm
4. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nepal
5. http://newsblaze.com/story/20070326223920baje.nb/newsblaze/OPINIONS/Opinions.html
6. http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0703/S00464.htm
7. http://www.telegraphnepal.com/news_det.php?news_id=376
8. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/World/Rest_of_World/Bomb_planted_at_media_office_in_Nepal/articleshow/1816234.cms ; http://peacejournalism.com/ReadArticle.asp?ArticleID=18264