Cathy


Group: Members
Posts: 218
Joined: Mar. 2006 |
 |
Posted: May 02 2006,1:54 |
 |
If you look at the links the
Pine Ridge blogger gives, it is very clear that lawyers with ties to
Ward Churchill/AIM really were representing clients who were accusing
the government of protecting a ring of pedophiles who had allegedly
killed JonBenet Ramsey.
One lawyer was David Lane who is Churchill's lawyer right now.
The other lawyer was Lee Hill. He says he was in AIM and he was connected with Peltier.
An
activist named Evan Ravitz, who made these accusations about a ring of
government-protected pedophiles, even got advice from Lee Hill AND
David Lane.
AIM is often accusing government employees of
protecting killers. AIM made these accusations at Pine Ridge and
(through these lawyers) I think in Boulder.
By comparison to
AIM's unsupported and florid accusations of 342 murders, the Pine Ridge
Blogger's theory is pretty tame and well-documented.
AIM has accused others of its own crimes in the past.
For
example, a court decided that an AIM person killed this Canadian
Indian AIM activist Anna Mae Aquash. Then they made her into a "mascot"
for their cause. They wrote all these eulogies about her, but really
she was killed probably because someone was scared she might tell the
FBI about crimes AIM committed. That's my opinion.
Ward
Churchill has written that the two FBI agents died in their own
"self-made trap." He claims their deaths were their own faults.
Disgusting! Actually, I think it was an AIM trap. It happened on the
annivarsary of Custer's Last Stand and was a staged "reinactment" of
that battle.
The FBI agents only shot a few bullets. It seems they were taken by surprise. http://legendofpineridge.blogspot.com/2006....ld.html
The
FBI agents were killed on a symbolic date. JonBenet was also probably
killed on a symbolic date---December 26, Mao's birthday. That is
interesting because a Maoist site called MIM writes lots of essays
defending Churchill.
As the Pine Ridge blogger observes, if you
google Ward+Churchill+118,000 (the ransom demand for Jonbenet) you get
this Maoist MIM site defending Churchill.
http://www.etext.org/Politic....05.html
The
118,000 is said by this MIM to be the number of Iraqi children in
danger of dying due to US sanctions. So 118,000 has something to do
with children in danger of dying.
JonBenet was in danger of
dying. Maybe the ransom was an obscure symbol for Iraqi children. Sick
killers do sometimes have these kind of personal symbols that don't
make sense to normal people. That's why the FBI studies all their
writngs very carefully. The writings are the key to their obscure,
private symbolism and their fantasy lives. This JonBenet ransom note
seems to be really full of clues--especially when you see what Lee Hill
and David Lane are doing.
|