June 12 2007
In response to the question at IRTR whether a two-line struggle over the JDPON's international form is unique, the answer is no. However, we have no particular need to contest that Servethepeople has expressed her thesis in the most polished form and deserves theoretical credit for discussion of how the JDPON should come about.
Regarding documentation of predecessors to the thesis that the Amerikkkans may have to be deported instead of instituting the JDPON on Amerikan territory, of course there is much. Even in the left-wing of parasitism, MIM has been accused of advocating genocide against the Amerikkkans before. For that matter, there was discussion of this point when the Red Army liberated Germany.
In actual fact of course the idea of genocide and diaspora are nothing new and they are intertwined. For example, the oppressor has often mixed together a variety of ideas to handle the Palestinians, including repression of the cultural institutions of the Palestinians such as museums.
Of course, then the anarchists say that we Marxists obtained our ideas about JDPON from the oppressor. As materialists who do not believe that our ideas appear out of the blue, we see no need to contest that our ideas might in some portion come from the oppressor. No class can be so far ahead of the mode of production it is in that ideas can appear almost virgin-Mary-like, uncontaminated by birth. Quite the contrary, we observed things such as how U.$. slavery died at the hands of previous bourgeois ruling classes, not an immaculate communist revolution.