Roger to all that. Honestly, all of it. It's too clear and that's our fault.
If we had not made so many mistakes this year, there would be less to talk about, never mind stuff from the distant past. Things that happened exactly 25 years ago have come to light this year, thanks to the sort of struggles we have been having and the ricochet-effect. Funny, the way it works out, we have to apologize for our mistakes. Our apologies to those who speak so well.
In addition to what MIM reported before about techniques, comrades should know to be paranoid in some additional areas.
One, the USA Today at the end of 2006 reported on tracking of autos, at about the same time it ran a story on a female Iraqi translator.
Autos, telephones etc. can be tracked for location. Cell phones can be turned on remotely for recording purposes for the state. The enemy has also caught up on wireless Internet.
If you announce a meeting, not only can a humyn end up attending from the state, but there is also an improved possibility for remote bugging.
The humyns involved include undercover cops, the usual men-in-blue and even military recruiters have been sent to verify ground locations and technology.
The ideal is to proceed from thought to action--with no talking, no tracking and no appearances to be observed possible. There is no liberated territory or aspect of society, so return to ancient intellectual methods is not surprising.
The belief that the state exists and knowledge of how to deal with it is rarely distributed. This creates countless elitist situations, where anything less than an authoritarian approach causes security breaches.
There is no spying against MIM that our own statements publicly available do not predict. We have yet to learn anything in that realm that shocks us. Things are usually more transparent than one would think despite all the undercover aspects. Sometimes we appear to make a mistake when we do not, but our real mistakes come in implementation, especially in 2007. Apologies again.