![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
I am looking for political groups that accept as true Marxism the following "two step model" for international socialism:
1. Making the extraction of superprofits by the imperialists impossible through successful anti-imperialist struggle which liberates nations and peoples from imperialist dominance. (These successful anti-imperialist struggles do not have to result in socialism, but they have to be successful in the way that no intrusion in the economy by imperialism is tolerated.)
2. As the extraction of superprofits have become impossible, the working class in the global capitalist "center", in the imperialist countries, have no longer a MATERIAL interest in maintaining and protecting imperialism which gave them many benefits, and thus they no longer have a MATERIAL interest in protecting or not confronting "their own" bourgeoisie.
Class struggle - which today does not exist in the Leninist sense (struggle for state power, not "economic struggle for higher wages" and the like, which is NOT class struggle by definition) - becomes POSSIBLE in the capitalist center/the imperialist countries for the first time.
Communist regards,
X
[International Minister for MIM replies:]
You might want to consider that war is happening
and would happen before your step two. So for example,
these Mideast wars might be aimed at resources. Such
wars will be going on the whole time of the international
class struggle. For this reason, the international proletariat
might IMPOSE its rule, before the imperialist country petty-bourgeoisie,
the world's elite 10%, gets re-proletarianized. So in the event
of getting super-profits cut off, you are right that proletarian
struggle becomes possible in the imperialist countries.
We are just checking about your views of "peaceful co-existence."
Wars are going on the whole time. Would you oppose a military
victory of the international proletariat over imperialism
BEFORE re-proletarianization in the imperialist countries happens?
Would you say it amounts to the view that socialism is "impossible"
like our white nationalist critics do? (Because they assume that
socialism is only socialism if carried out by the white so-called workers.)
Would you demand that the international proletariat WAIT till
re-proletarianization happens before counter-attacking imperialism
and defeating it at its source?
Our critics are lying scribes of the imperialists. They say we believe it is "impossible" for imperialist country people to become re-proletarianized and revolutionary. What they mean is to define "socialist revolution" as political revolution to prop up the super-profit system.
What role the Western petty-bourgeoisie plays depends on the pace of the international wars against imperialism. For example, the Germans were put down at the source in 1945, before the people rose up for socialist revolution. The correct line does not pretend that the imperialists will peacefully co-exist while super-profits are being cut off in the Third World. If the imperialists were to stay in their barracks in the whole time as super-profits became cut off, then we could confidently endorse the two points you made. There is an imperialist World War III going on and what happens in the imperialist countries depends on the course of that war first and foremost.