Maoist Internationalist Movement

Security update

Security Minister, November 12, 2006

This is our last cryptic message, hopefully forever on this web page.

Allegorical writing
MIM has broken with writers that have handed us 90% of our allegorical material that arrived in the recent past. We apologize for having it around at all and we apologize for this cryptic period of our writing, which a minority of people even find scary. Our allegorical writers are good at what they do. MIM means nothing against them that way, but the situation is what it is.

In this recent situation, allegorical writing was particularly unwelcome. People remember that those who started attacking Mao via Hai Jui came to no good ends. That is the most central Maoist allegory. Seeing this can make people think some kind of cultural revolution is breaking out at MIM. MIM disowns this analogy, because we do not have the approach to leadership that Mao used in his circumstances of living in a country where people were raised under semi-feudalism.

Many people take offense at MIM's writing and that is good. MIM is a calculating set of writers that usually knows the numbers behind any social phenomena it talks about. And this makes us more effective in offending many people simultaneously, sometimes hundreds of millions of people potentially in a single sentence.

At the same time as cracking down on allegorical writing for now, we do not want to make the opposite error of unjustly stifling criticism because it might offend an individual. We have also had that concern. When in doubt people should think hard about history and 300 million people in the united $tates and try to arrive at consistent standards.

Inevitably there is an ad hominem or psychological attempt to trace the origin of any MIM writing. It's inevitable within pre-scientific society. MIM has disowned the theory of "origins" as leading to ad hominem and psychological thinking--pre-scientific method. In the Ward Churchill case, a bourgeois history scholar has called for his punishment in connection to the individual "origins" (as opposed to class or national origins) of bloodline thinking in First Nations.

While we do not mind noting origins sometimes especially in reading bourgeois history, ultimately it is not what we care about, because we are concerned about broad social forces--classes, nations and genders.

This subject is also connected to the struggle against Liberalism. "Present company excluded" is how Catharine MacKinnon says wimmin most commonly express Liberalism so as not to offend those closest to them. "Present company excluded" can also apply to the discussion of spies. MIM is saying there are spies in our midst in the party-building context. Likewise, MacKinnon says men are in the midst of wimmin. We cannot fail to talk about spies or sexual harassers just because they are close at hand. That's not saying we should spread rumors, but when MIM comes to the Internet and says, "all sex is rape," and people do not respond because of how they would have to think of people close to them, then we have yet to achieve a scientific production method.

International communist movement
Now we are hearing opposing "sectarianism" means working with Bush on Iran. There are organizations that dare not stand on the same side with MIM in this 2006 collapse of the international communist movement that parallels precisely the one of 1914.

Opposing sectarianism does not mean we have to work with everyone. We do not have to work with Condoleeza Rice or be called "sectarian." Right now MIM's alleged communist critics are working with Rice. That's how it has to be in a war. There is no petty-bourgeois "third position."

In the midst of this struggle it is not surprising that various ad hominem attacks arose against MIM, but there are only two sides, and on both sides we will find people we do not like for one reason or another.

Racist CIA asswipe and backers

(P.S. We say "CIA" to refer to predominantly international related spying. We refer to "FBI" for principally domestic concerns. That's how it's been through this whole past few weeks.)

Racist CIA asswipe has not appeared. Things can always be solved more easily when people cooperate. So I will leave this to the FBI and now we begin our slow slog through hard journalism. Can we find a big fish and do things more elegantly we have been asked. We have two leads, one of which looks good.

Racist CIA asswipe and five associates (yep I added two) for six asses in one sling. They just need the cord cut to head for a proverbial hanging, taking less than 20 questions of discovery. It could start tomorrow. If we hear the word from the right persyn, that's what's going to happen. That's the short-run answer. Are we clear?

Perysn of concern out there, if you want us to do something about this, we are going to do it. Just contact us directly without intermediaries.

Got that CIA running dogs and "RCP"? Cut the rumor-mongering shit or MIM might get pissed. Simmer shit down. Also, you never know who thinks she knows what is going on. That's why your associates are now in the sling in fact.

You got other shit on us, so use that if you want to make a point. Don't we generously concede your shit usually? How the hell could we possibly concede more shit in print than we already have? Go read it instead of making provocations. It's 3 gigabytes.

You ought to be sued to hell by the gods of "pc."

International factors

Excellent, excellent, brilliant--finally a clear cut admission, maybe too clear cut. I was already starting to believe that there is someone intelligent paying attention. Notice received, maybe first of three would have been enough, but see above.

Hey and put 2 and 2 together and see that there is a connection in our minds too, as in there would have been no trouble if what? If what? Should be a few trains of thought there. And think like a journalist. Save us some trouble.

Audience

Pornographic trailer trash, it's time to scamper back to your trailers. Derivative life is talking about someone else. Anyway, the porn stars on TV are much better looking than MIM.