Maoist Internationalist Movement

Security Ministry Update

November 2 2006

by Security Minister

Extortion:

extortion Show Spelled Pronunciation[ik-stawr-shuhn] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation –noun 1. an act or instance of extorting. 2. Law. the crime of obtaining money or some other thing of value by the abuse of one's office or authority. 3. oppressive or illegal exaction, as of excessive price or interest: the extortions of usurers. 4. anything extorted. [Origin: 1250–1300; ME extorcion < LL extortio-n- (s. of extortio-). See extort, -ion] —Synonyms 1, 4. blackmail.
(www.dictionary.com)


In light of new facts uncovered by the Security Ministry, a certain past struggle against MIM has to be re-interpreted. You see gentlemen, you are not supposed to make references even to the court system in order to obtain something else. You suck, but we are much more accountable. We tell our readers a fraction of the time when we have been threatened and bribed while not disclosing details. We are still somewhat unaccountable but no where at the level of our critics.

Enemies: your extortionate reference did not work. What you wanted in principle sucked on principle, but you knew that which is why you asked for it this way.

With the new facts in hand, we can also piece together why a certain pot-smoking league academic with a Reichian line was making death threats and passing around height and weight information and then tried to cover his tracks. What a hero. We can also piece together why this persyn suddenly took up a racist interest in defending war criminals.

As a security operation, what the three gentlemen were doing sucked. One even claimed to be an open CIA agent (important: NOT FBI) and circumstantial evidence confirms his claim. It could have looked like he caught wind of the operation and used it for his own ends (but did not work that way because of coordination with these other gentlemen), but in any event the goal was the anti-Bush, "be well-behaved"- politically deal offered which included money that MIM reported on already. Because of the timing, the three gentlemen involved in informing MIM of the extortion demands served only to expose each other further.

No offense to our near-open CIA agent, he performed well. His partners left him in the lurch. Sir, you are being linked now to total bunglers. Is that what you want? I can't prove that had you known some of your associates down to the last detail that you would have wanted this connection. I doubt it, even within a CIA career logic.

The very senior academic in question pretends to be neutral between MIM and "RCP," but in fact holds the white working class line and has worked directly with "RCP" in the past. This can be documented as can much more.

Pornographic, Reichian white anarchists in academia are a strange brew. In order to make up for the reproach of those they harass and break up with, they try to prove somehow a feminist line. Lacking in any action or history of risks they can point to, they end up playing on MIM's court, against MIM. Perhaps they should look over a generation and see what some of their actions have done a little more clearly. MIM can reference the effects of their rumors in totally unrelated cases.

Not too thought out, they spend their time on rumors, enjoying other people's sex lives. These are the derivative political types. They saw the flame and fury of the revolutionary movement, but could never enter it directly. Spectatorship suits them much better. When they do participate it is only at the pornographic level. This current situation is perfect for them.

Ah, so why don't they just come out in the open people may wonder? Why are they still bringing Cold War bullshit to MIM's desk, sometimes on a daily basis, even this year in 2006? Well see then, the pornographic fun would have to end and CIA objectives would require other defenses.

One would think they overplayed their hands and know it. Why extort when they can just admit what they are doing? Third parties should think about this. If it is not extortion, why is it done this way? Confidentiality concerns do not require anti-Bush deals and other political references in the same breath. This should be the point of view of the FBI and those concerned with extortion references. It's not, because thus far, those with international interests have the upper hand in the struggle.

Another reason that this does not come to conclusion, is that someone is afraid of many lawsuits. So here we have it, a Cold War era problem cannot be brought to conclusion, partly because someone still undercover is afraid of being sued. That's typical. It's so much better to have a cover, a cover so innocent and righteous, so the continuation of this conflict suits this persyn's interests very well.

Then of course, there is the "RCP" operation. They are well-suited for this. The "RCP" went so far as to steal a police report, not find what it was looking for, and instead of admitting that said "they've never been repressed" to run down MIM's revolutionary credentials. That is an ongoing interest, a group with a self-interest.

There is another persyn who could bring this to a close. In total, we are now talking about two CIA agents, maybe three or even four with others historically involved of course. It certainly appears three active right now. This third once professed a desire for "equality." Maybe at root, that is what all this is about, in which case I understand, and then we cannot expect to end the game, because the goal is a game process. (I'm hoping with age that one can give up on old goals and take on new ones, but maybe the goals are too similar and the new and old are the same.) If that's what it is, then OK, we can all just be one big footnote in CIA/FBI type struggles, a part of history in that way. MIM is here trying to bring something to an end, which may not be able to end.

You extorters cannot ever expect that MIM is going to tone down anything. Asking for an anti-Bush deal was way, way over the top in this context especially. Some of you from the 1960s knew Lieutenant Calley's name as a household world, and now like the rest of the white parasite left you have taken a line downplaying war crimes and running to the CIA. Is that how it was in the 1960s? Not. Not just the imperialists but the troops themselves were regarded as monsters. Yet here you are thinking MIM is going to be toned down? MIM did not even exist in the 1960s, but it knows that non-imperialist war criminals were household names, and you from the 1960s know it too, you stupid, pornographic ad hominem scum. Don't be asking for Liberal dispensations for war criminals.

You don't like what MIM is saying? Then it's easy. Don't read it.

One agent has bungled badly by assuming that MIM does not know what it knows. One is getting a pass from MIM on account of age and other factors.

Quite a timing, as MIM brings down the curtain on the "RCP=CIA," someone who knows he has been exposed shows up again. Does he think we don't know? Some utter morons think because we are not there and do not appear "in control," we don't know what is going on? Then they want to claim they can find a better leadership than MIM? Horse shit.

Someone is between a rock and a hard place. Afraid of lawsuits, afraid for the reputation of people at the height of their careers, his course of action has been to try to split or discredit MIM politically but quietly. He will succeed with scatter-brained people that have no cardinal principles and so we have left him to his way till now!

Moron, your best hope is to confess openly. Your petty-bourgeois concern about lawsuits, did you think it through? Don't you realize by now that MIM knew what it was doing all the way through? Yes, MIM gave you license to play. You noticed that by now, right? Then we took it away.

Think about your other associates who also had contact with MIM. You think MIM did not know about them? And how many, think hard, not too narrowly. Ah yes, you should be able to point to four including yourself--four important people including yourself. Such a great free country, eh? MIM does not care about you or your associates. MIM is not so deluded about the United $tates of Amerikkkka as to take special offense. MIM is hellishly busy. You do not have to say what it is your connection is to the CIA, but you need to confess publicly a connection and that you wrongly have attacked MIM in a pornographic way. That's all, then peace be with you. Do you think MIM really cares about the rest? Your shit is a dime-a-dozen. This is an extremely generous offer. People are going to note if you turn it down. They are going to conclude that you are intentionally drawing this out and got caught.

Gentlemen, you played your hand. It was a very, very weak hand. As you can see, MIM has many more cards to play. Are you totally oblivious to the cards we have played just in the last two months? Do you think you are playing in the same league? Why not try to see it a different way? Can't you see that dispassionate third parties are going to conclude that you like to draw this all out, that you are enjoying something pornographically toward a certain political goal? Will MIM have to document what you were doing each day before you understand you are not going to get away with this? Do you think MIM could not have documented a lot of things by now had it wanted to? How exactly can you possibly win? How much more shit will have to be thrown?

Third parties, think really hard. Do you really think it is in MIM's interests to keep raising this sort of question? Do you think we like the pornographic image of us painted? Sure, the FBI could be fooling with us to check our "psychological state of being," but that is not the main part of the story. That is not why things are crossing my desk the way they do. The people most interested in MIM are not FBI types; although I'm not denying an inordinate interest from the FBI.