![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
White devils:
The 200th exoneration by DNA evidence freed a Black man convicted of raping a white womyn. He had been out on parole awaiting his name to be cleared, when a judge cleared it April 23.(1)
In the 18 years since DNA has been used to free convicts wrongly railroaded by the injustice system, the testing has gone along at a snail's pace, so Jerry Miller had sat in prison from 1982 to 2006. If 1989 was the first case to clear people via DNA, 1990 should have been the last year of Jerry Miller's sentence, but it took another 17 years of the man's life to be wasted, typical of Amerikkkan lack of concern about oppressed nationalities, the lumpen and being the world's number one prison state. The political reason for this lack of concern is white nationalism and the economic reason is that there is no white proletariat to fight for people who in other countries would be handled in other more social ways.
Upon the clearing of Miller's name, we also did not hear anything about removing cops, lawyers or judges involved in his case within the injustice system. We're supposed to believe that those willing to manufacture a case like that would not undertake other sordid projects.
According to the Innocence Project and USA Today compiling the DNA figures, "the 'typical' DNA exoneration case has not changed much over the years. It often involves a sex crime allegedly committed by a black man in which the white victim is often the only witness."(2)
Let's just be clear how wrong these convictions are. It involves having the wrong persyn's semen or hair on the victim. This is not about any number of other things that go wrong in trials. These are only convictions that are very far off.
The stupid oppressor whites will then say that white prosecutors, cops and judges willing to make up entire stories about people not at the scene of a crime do not undertake lesser shadings of the truth with the same result--unjust convictions. Of course it is absurd. White nationalism is not railroading people solely by putting the totally wrong persyn on trial. If they are willing to put the totally wrong persyn on trial, we should also be asking what else they would be willing to do that is not so obviously wrong.
MIM has said before that the situation where one persyn can accuse another and put that other in prison was an object of overthrow in the French Revolution of 1789. Amerikkkans are going backward in history when they allow the structural situation where an alleged rape victim convicts someone on the strength of her word. The 200th exoneration was even worse than that because it involved someone where the victim never identified the assailant: it was all circumstantial.(3)
The lord is not supposed to be able to throw the peasant in prison just because he said the peasant committed a crime, not anymore. If there is not even "reasonable doubt" when one persyn goes against another regardless of the content of their stories, the underlying reason is a political lopsidedness stemming from class. In Jerry Miller's case, not only did the assailant not identify the perpetrator, but also the family said he was home watching TV.(3) So the injustice system threw out the words of Jerry Miller and his family to benefit a white victim who never saw the attacker clearly. A judge upholding equal citizenship rights should throw out such cases before they come to court. Indeed, this case was so lopsided, the judge should have suggested a civil suit by Jerry Miller just on the structure of the case when it came up in 1982. That is the lesson of the bourgeois revolution, but for the proletarian revolution coming MIM would go further and tell people that their ability to process individual situations in crime, teaching or management is very limited--mostly a myth used for keeping an oppressive order, not accomplishing anything truth-worthy.
After a case like Miller's then the whites all wonder how come self-segregation by Blacks continues. Black kids in cafeterias prefer to stay among Blacks. Paula Zahn at CNN did a report on self-segregation that has people talking; yet, MIM sees no mystery. After being totally framed by troublesome white people, why should Black people seek to live among them. The lesson is to stay away from white people and there will be fewer chances for whites to make accusations. That is the reality of "freedom" in the united $tates. Only the "crazy" oppressed nationality people are brave enough to spend time among whites as if whites were not troublesome.
Here is the racial breakdown of the DNA exonerations so far.
Exonerations by DNA are very racially lop-sided because of the nature of the injustice system. Then out of all the crimes where there is physical evidence available which ones show up most often, USA Today asks:
The willingness to draw conclusions from figures like these is very, very limited in individualist Amerika. Figures pointing to structural injustice go public every day, but Amerikkkans will be fixated on Alex Rodriguez's home run stats.
MIM readers are not surprised by these data. MIM has publicized the work of the "Innocence Project" from the beginning and has been bringing readers the stats on being the world's leading prison state since the 1980s. In MIM Theory 2/3 we were the only ones to point out that cross-racial arrest statistics on rape pointed to something that the public did not want to deal with--the dishonesty of whites. We also showed the racial breakdown for death penalty dispensations that others had already found--again showing Blacks as more likely to receive the death penalty for rape in the history of the u$A up into the 1960s. We said it then: those people who were responsible for that are still around including as the senior people in the injustice system and it is unreasonable to think we are beyond that in the u$a just because the death penalty for rape ceased. Now we have the data to prove that MIM was right again. It will take a few generations of the joint dictatorship of the proletariat of the oppressed nations for whites to unscrew their heads. Even oppressed nation people influenced by whites will face a traumatic process of revolutionization until the corruption of exploitation is long gone.
People who want to do something about rape--emotional cheerleading for the court system is not productive. Putting police booths on street corners does not work. Much pseudo- feminism goes into a fascist or monarchist direction appropriate for pre-1789 feudal Europe. Call for the abolition of pornography; make consent forms mandatory for all sex; even taking up Muslim or Eastern customs on a womyn's "place" (meaning if she shows up in certain places sex is assumed and unthinkable in other places) --these would be less extreme measures than our pseudo-feminist policies and injustice system now, despite the disruption to culture they would involve. Currently, some men go to prison so that other people can enjoy sex everywhere anytime with all the pornography and spontaneity with no forms to fill out. MIM says no: there is no right to sex higher than the right to stay out of prison. Screw the majority. Let it be inconvenienced, because the court system is popular and generates great television but does not actually provide truth.
Without the data from the "Innocence Project" that is now available, MIM already knew from examining ethnic attitude data what the truth would be about the U.$. injustice system. The discovery of new DNA techniques only reveals a tiny portion of the depth of white depravity in the united $tates. There are many other avenues for white nationalism to show up than just totally making up who was at the scene of a crime.
There is fundamental white dishonesty out there that is very common. When even the imperialists could not take the injustice anymore thanks to the daily political exposure the political system was receiving from DNA exonerations and when the governor of Illinois got on board with a moratorium on the death penalty because of all the ridiculous exonerations Illinois went through for prisoners on death row, MIM found countless whites yapping about how the moratorium proves that "the system works" or even "the death penalty works." It's not far from there to saying white victims do not lie and white workers are exploited-- in the face of the mountains of data MIM has provided.
There is basically no data that can give this sort of dishonest white an insight into the system. The resistance to the truth that MIM has faced since foundation on these questions is proof that revolution will have to come from the outside, either when migrant workers increase in numbers or because the united $tates gets itself into one too many wars and finally loses big time. This sort of dishonesty cannot be reasoned with and it would be a crime of the revolutionaries to waste their time trying to convince such people: there ARE other things that revolutionaries can be doing. Arguing with whites proven to be so dishonest in so many contexts in which structural data is available is wrong in itself, akin to excessive drug use that wastes a good revolutionary's talents. We can use this subject matter as an example-- if one has to argue with someone extensively and one hears that the DNA exonerations prove that "the system works," one is dealing with a conscious counterrevolutionary. That could be the definition. No concern goes for the people before DNA testing or the people waiting for DNA testing or for the people whose cases are not so absurd as to involve the totally wrong persyn in the wrong place.
The expanding efforts of lawyers to use DNA to clear a small percentage of prisoners are like a finger in the dike. To really defeat the number one prison-state requires a political effort. Revolutionaries should work serving the lumpen or they should become intellectuals and work on flipping around the political situation. Serving the middle-class is serving the people carrying out and supporting these injustices on a daily basis. If there were a white proletariat, this prison situation in the united $tates would not be so extreme.
Notes:
1. http://1010wins.com/pages/380489.php?contentType=4&contentId=434432
2. http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2007-04-22-dna-exoneration_N.htm
3. http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2007-04-22-dna-exoneration-inside_N.htm