MIM(Prisons) is a cell of revolutionaries serving the oppressed masses inside U.$. prisons, guided by the communist ideology of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism.
www.prisoncensorship.info is a media institution run by the Maoist Internationalist Ministry of Prisons. Here we collect and publicize reports of conditions behind the bars in U.$. prisons. Information about these incidents rarely makes it out of the prison, and when it does it is extremely rare that the reports are taken seriously and published. This historical record is important for documenting patterns of abuse, and also for informing people on the streets about what goes on behind the bars.
To an amazing extent, my organization, Mandingo Warriors, would like to
put our strength with your strength and unite as one, under one common
cause - the United Front for Peace in Prisons. It is our honor to be
listed as an affiliate of the United Front for Peace in Prisons.
The Mandingo Warriors are a non-disruptive organization in Texas prisons
which was formed to protect each other from harm and defend our
community from oppressors. We strive to improve spiritually, morally,
mentally, politically and economically. Our concepts and principles are
no different than the United Front organization: peace, unity, growth,
internationalism and independence. We study and uphold the five
principles, our cause is not about self-destruction and mis-educating
the people. Instead our purpose is to educate the people and uplift our
people from fallen humanity. We will incorporate no different principles
into our cause than the United Front’s five divine principles. We will
help promote peace and unity between factions where we are at on the
basis of opposing oppression of all prisoners and oppressed people in
general.
I have much unity with Loco1’s
piece
concerning a strategic retreat and after reading his essay I now
have some things I’d like to speak on concerning the strike. However, as
I myself am not currently housed in the SHU my words should be taken
merely as food for thought, as it is up to those participating directly
in the movement to analyze their own conditions.
Firstly, I believe that the SHU prisoners are currently in a crucial
period. They have successfully completed the first stage of their
struggle but if they are to successfully complete the next stage then
they must enter into a period of criticism, self-criticism as it is the
best way to avoid any left-deviations or rightist errors. The SHU
prisoners are the vanguard in this struggle and it is up to them if the
movement moves forward or dies a humiliating death. By moving forward I
in no way am implying that the struggle must continue full steam ahead
regardless of their present conditions.
Loco1
is correct to point out the fact that this is a protracted struggle,
and the SHU prisoners aren’t going to go anywhere anytime soon, except
to another SHU. This is especially true for the ones that are
“validated;” they have all the time in the world to sit and hammer shit
out. Or as the Afghans like to say of invading oppressor armies: “you
have the clocks, but we’ve got the time.”
Thus, here are some points of attention:
The life and death of the struggle depends on the willingness of the
prisoners to remain united. It is essential that contradictions between
the oppressed and the oppressors do not become contradictions between
the oppressed themselves.
The main force of the movement are the SHU prisoners. The immediate
reserves are the general population prisoners. Loco1 is correct to call
out specific LOs as they have the ability and influence to organize the
vast majority of the prison population. Therefore they should exert all
their power and energy into catapulting the masses to complete victory.
It is integral to the struggle that a correct political line should be
developed so that the masses may gather round it to find guidance in the
movement.
Indeed, practice is principal but this is also the time for studying
theoretical knowledge and to concentrate on concrete study, criticism
and self-criticism. Weakness in the ideological level will turn into
errors in the political field, which will ultimately manifest themselves
into mistakes in the organizational level.
“Over a long period we have developed this concept for this struggle
against the enemy: strategically we should despise all our enemies but
tactically we should take them all seriously. This also means we must
despise the enemy with respect to the whole but that we must take him
seriously with respect to each and every concrete question. If we do not
despise the enemy with respect to the whole, we shall be committing the
error of opportunism. But in dealing with concrete problems and
particular enemies we shall be committing the error of adventurism
unless we take them seriously. In war, battles can only be fought one by
one and the enemy forces can only be destroyed one by one. The same is
even true of eating a meal. Strategically, we take the eating of a meal
lightly - we know we can finish it. But actually we eat it mouthful by
mouthful. It is impossible to swallow an entire banquet in one gulp.
This is known as piecemeal solution. In military parlance, it is called
wiping out the enemy forces one by one.” -
Mao
Zedong
Knowing that the prisoncrats hate to lose ground to the prisoner
population, whether it be an inch or a mile, it then becomes the duty of
the strikers to focus all of their efforts into wiping out the most
debilitating aspects of their oppression one-by-one. One way of doing
this is to de-fang their paper tiger (SHU), thereby rendering it next to
useless.
Some might argue that the most debilitating aspect of the SHU is the
long-term isolation. We must keep in mind that the oppressors will never
give up this method of torture and oppression; it’s too effective.
Instead We must focus on winnable battles and while We can’t at this
time shut down the SHUs, We can fight going there.
It is the debriefing process that keeps people sent to the SHUs and
locked in the SHUs past their kick-out dates, and it is the debriefing
process that turns people into snitches and ensures that more people
enter the SHUs rather than leave it.
If and when the debriefing process is finally defeated then the strikers
can move on to a secondary and less crucial aspect of the
5
Core Demands which should then be able to gain primary importance,
and so on and so forth. It is in this way that the piecemeal solution is
applied.
Set in the year 2161, In Time is a science fiction film
portraying a world where people stop aging when they hit 25 years old.
At that point they have one year of life in their bank, and living time
has become the currency instead of money. When a person’s time runs out
they die instantly, and so rich people have lots of time, while poor
people live in ghettos, living day to day, barely earning enough to
survive another 24 hours. Poor people literally have to rush around to
earn enough time to survive, eat and pay their bills, while rich people
can waste time relaxing or doing nothing, without fear of death.
This movie has a solid proletarian premise with the few rich bourgeois
people living at the expense of the poor masses. “For a few immortals to
live many people must die.” The movie’s hero, Will Salas, learns that
there is plenty of time for everyone from a wealthy man who is ready to
die and transfers all his remaining time to Will in order to commit
suicide. Will decides to use this time to seek revenge and end the
brutal rule of the time rich.
When Will buys his way into New Greenwich where the rich live entirely
separate from the poor masses, he meets a young woman, Sylvia, who
suggests that rich people don’t really live because they spend all their
time trying to avoid accidental death. This is not a bad point to make:
capitalism’s culture is bad for everyone, including the bourgeoisie. But
the case of Sylvia is a pretty good example of what happens in real
life: only a very few of the bourgeoisie will commit class suicide and
join the proletarian cause and the youth are the most likely to do this.
Sylvia and Will set out to steal time from Sylvia’s father’s companies
and redistribute the wealth to the poor people. They plan to distribute
time in such large quantities so as to bring the entire system down.
This is where the politics of the movie fall apart. Capitalism will not
be ended with a quick massive redistribution of wealth liberated from
the banks by a few focoist fighters.
The In Time world includes police who enforce the system. The
Timekeepers work for the wealthy to ensure the poor never escape their
oppression. But the Timekeepers seem to have very limited resources and
staff so it’s not so difficult for two people to out run and out smart
them. And except for one key Timekeeper, the others are happy enough to
just give up and stop defending the rich. Under capitalism the ruling
class understands the importance of militarism to maintain their
position and they won’t trust enforcement to just a few cops.
In another interesting parallel, In Time includes a few
characters who play the part of the lumpen, stealing time from the poor.
At one point, the leader of this lumpen group explains that the
Timekeepers leave them alone because they don’t try to steal from the
rich.
History has plenty of examples of a few focoists setting out to take
back wealth to help the people and ending up in prison or dead, often
bringing more repression down on themselves and the masses. A quick
action to liberate money from banks will not put an end to the system of
imperialist repression. True and lasting liberation will only come from
a protracted struggle organizing the oppressed masses to fight and
overthrow the imperialist system.
The other major political flaw of In Time is the complete lack
of any parallel to the national oppression that inevitably exists under
imperialism. In the movie the oppressed and the wealthy are mostly
white. There are a few Blacks and people who might be other
nationalities among the oppressed, but they all are oppressed equally.
National distinctions have disappeared and class oppression is all that
exists. While this is a fine science fiction premise, we fear that the
Amerikan petty bourgeois audience will see in this movie false parallels
to life in the U.$. where workers actually have more in common with the
time rich people than the poor in the movie. The reason for this, found
in imperialism and the superexploitation of colonial people, doesn’t
exist anywhere in this movie. And with an audience that likes to
consider itself part of the
99%
oppressed, this movie is going to reinforce this mistake of ignoring
the global context of imperialism.
Helping Prison Activists Stay Active on the Streets
MIM(Prisons) has spent years trying to build the Re-Lease on Life
program for prisoners coming back to the streets. Our goal is to help
prisoner activists stay politically active when they are no longer
incarcerated. An important component of this is helping our comrades to
set up stable life situations that won’t lead them back to prison. As
most of our readers know, this is very challenging, demonstrated by the
recidivism rate of 43% within the first 3 years post-release in
Amerika.(1)
While in prison, people have a unique opportunity of having much time on
their hands to study and engage in political organizing. While prison
oppression certainly interferes with daily life, the structure of prison
and this same oppression enables and in fact encourages political
activism. When prisoners are released they face the difficulties of
meeting their basic necessities, and dealing with people in random and
complex settings, often after years of isolation. And with
discrimination against people with a prison record, things like housing
and a job can be very difficult to find. Consumed with day to day life
issues, it becomes much more difficult for former prisoners to stay
active on the streets.
As hard as those challenges are, the primary barrier to reaching our
goal is preparing people mentally to deal with these challenges and
prioritize serving the people. Even those with a stable home and support
on the streets struggle to stay politically active. They are often
pulled back into street life with their LO. Other times, their free time
is taken up by friends and family who have an expectation of consuming
free time with destructive behavior like alcohol, drugs, or just wasted
time watching TV.
Part of MIM(Prisons)’s Re-Lease Program involves reaching out to
prisoners well before they are expected to hit the streets, and working
with them to build a study program and a release plan. If you hope to
stay out of prison and support the struggle after you get released,
having a strong political education is a vital piece for staying on
track.
It is never too early to start preparing for continued activism outside
the walls. We’ve seen too many solid politically active comrades
disappear once they get out and are faced with the realities of getting
by on the streets.
MIM(Prisons) has very limited resources and we cannot offer the kind of
release support that is needed in the United $tates. Instead, we focus
on working with our comrades who are active behind bars and who show a
commitment to stay politically active when they hit the streets. This
means we want to work with you now, both to satisfy some general study
requirements, and put together a release plan that will help ease the
transition to the streets. If you want our support, we need yours.
Requirements for participating in MIM(Prisons)’s Re-Lease on Life
Program include:
Creating a realistic post-release plan for both practical living needs
and political involvement
Participating in required study programs behind bars
Undertaking political work while in prison
Planning for both contact and political work once on the streets
Prisoners who do these things are offered our resources and support
to help stay politically active and focused on the streets. Keep in mind
that we can’t offer housing or a job, but we can provide support, help
finding resources, and most importantly a strong tie to maintain
political sanity and activism.
We work with our comrades to develop a plan for what sorts of political
work can be done after release. On the outside there is a lot more
freedom to do political organizing, but it’s also harder in some ways.
There is no longer all the free time there was in prison, and there is
not the same level of political interest among the people on the
streets. And we know it’s hard to walk away from the temptations or
difficulties of street life.
This program needs help to expand. We need people who are expecting
release in the next few years to get in touch with us to work on a
release plan. And we are collecting stories from our comrades who have
been out and back in about the challenges they faced trying to stay
politically active on the streets. This will be the focus of an upcoming
issue of Under Lock & Key, so send us your submissions
soon!
by a Pennsylvania prisoner November 2011 permalink
Back in 2008, I was denied a lot of reading material and did not file
grievances about any of the instances. During that time, I was
stubbornly relying on just physical action to challenge these
oppressors. That certainly was not conducive to making my situation
better.
Fortunately, I’ve grown wiser over the years. I now litigate against
these tyrants and use the grievance system regularly. Since I began
utilizing the pen against them, I am yet to have any material from
MIM(Prisons) rejected. Should that change in the future, I will file
grievances and subsequent appeals. I will also keep MIM(Prisons) abreast
of the results and be willing to take action in the court if there is
strong probability of success.
This prison recently rejected some issues of a Turning the Tide
newsletter. I will send you a copy of the grievance I filed, the
appeals, and responses.
I know they would like to prohibit us from receiving and reading
literature that teaches us correct ideology and ways to thwart their
oppressive establishment. I will no longer allow them to get away with
trying to control my mind by putting unreasonable limits on what I can
read.
MIM(Prisons) responds: We don’t want to mislead our readers to
think that filing grievances will guarantee your rights are respected,
as other articles in ULK will quickly disprove. But as
materialists we should be struggling to learn and utilize the most
effective means towards progress. And this correspondent’s change from
physically challenging COs to utilizing the administrative process is a
very common transition for readers of Under Lock & Key in
this learning process. Progress is not just about using the legal
system, it’s about organizing for our own needs and building independent
institutions of the oppressed.
While MIM(Prisons) continues to discourage violence against COs, and we
see this play out in prisoners’ behavior, the prison administrators
regularly censor ULK as a “threat to security.” It is clear
that they are not concerned about the physical safety of prisoners or
staff, but rather the security of their jobs, hazard pay and white
power.
by a South Carolina prisoner October 2011 permalink
Comrades, I received the copies of letters that were sent to Director
Gary Boyd and McCormick Correctional Institution Warden L. Cartledge
concerning censoring of mail from MIM Distributors. I sent Warden
Cartledge a detailed request form concerning that issue also.
I think I’ll wait until I receive mail from CRC and then file a
grievance claiming discrimination and harassment against this mailroom.
From my understanding two prisoners here have filed lawsuits against the
mailroom already.
South Carolina Department of Corections (SCDC) officials are quick to
tell you that they don’t care about lawsuits. All SCDC officials have
qualified immunity. If a lawsuit is successful the state has to pay a
monetary settlement.
What makes these matters worse is higher institutional officials tell
staff that as prisoners, we don’t have any rights. And that the harder
they make it on us the less likely we’ll be to return to prison.
To them our being sent to prison was not punishment. The punishment is
to come from them once we get to prison. Imbeciles masquerading as
psychologists. To become a warden in SCDC all you’ve got to do is take a
prison management class, which is provided by SCDC.
Due to a staffing shortage they’re hiring new recruits who’re in their
50s and 60s. They’re the worst pigs to have as guards, they think they
have everything about life figured out and they’re really doing society
a favor by working here.
MIM(Prisons) adds: We need our comrades behind bars to follow
this prisoner’s example and fight censorship of mail. We have to follow
the legal procedures even when we know the officials are not worried
about lawsuits if we want to win these battles. If you learn about
censorship of mail from MIM(Prisons), let us know and work with us to
fight back.
The recent strike has unleashed a new round of censorship here in
Pelican Bay. It’s crazy that the very issue that CDCR claims to be
“working on changing,” that is ‘Group Punishment,’ is the very thing
they are still doing by punishing everyone for the strike.
Administrators from Sacramento came in their suits to beg prisoners they
label falsely as ‘worst of the worst’ to stop striking and told them
that if they stop there will be no retaliation, and yet here we are
getting our political literature censored because of participation in
the strike!
The state is so sick that it is not enough to keep prisoners locked in
solitary confinement for years. It shows the cruelty, the depravity of
what we are up against, and so when I think of so called ‘constitutional
rights’ I know in my heart that these so called rights don’t apply to me
or any other prisoner in Amerika. When I’m denied even the ability to
think, this is when I know the intention is to destroy me mentally and
psychologically.
This is what the Security Housing Units (SHU) is used for - destruction
cut and dried, there is no other reason for the modern day control unit,
it’s used to break you down by all means necessary. Whatever it is you
enjoy is taken. If you like the fresh air we will have lock down, loss
of yard privileges, etc. If you like to watch TV the power will go out
throughout the week or COs can simply take your TV for 90 days. If you
like to read, your books and newspapers will be denied and censored. If
you like to write certain people they will stop your mail, return to
sender and claim this address is a mail drop, etc. The list goes on and
on. This is all done to get people to collaborate with the state in
order to get out of SHU.
So as people go about living their life, or even for people incarcerated
who have no idea of the active repression many face, I say it’s real and
be ready for the same repression. I have gone years having my literature
from MIM and ULK censored and I have learned not to rely solely on ULK
or MIM Distributors but to study on my own or with others. And when I do
receive some political science literature, some revolutionary history, I
read it over and over and discuss it with others so that I remember it
and expand my understanding of it.
What we are experiencing now in the SHU with the new censorship will
become common as prisoners in Amerika become more progressive and
revolutionary. It is for this reason that people should prepare for this
repression just as urgently as one would prepare for a hurricane or
earthquake or any other disaster. To disregard this will leave one with
nothing, no lifeline to truth, no theoretical nourishment, and most of
all no guidance.
MIM(Prisons) responds: This comrade raises an important point
about the value of political literature and the need to prepare for
censorship. We face censorship across the country in so many prisons it
is hard to keep track. But it is never sustained forever, sometimes we
can get past the censors after a few months of appeals, sometimes it
takes years and a court case, sometimes there is nothing obvious that
changes but suddenly literature is allowed back into a prison.
Regardless of the reasons for the censorship or the victories against
it, it’s clear that we need to get as many people as possible on the ULK
mailing list to maximize the distribution, and those receiving it and
other literature need to share it, create study groups, discuss what
they are reading, and spread the word.
With the passage of the National Defense Authorization Act, which allows
indefinite detention without charges or trial, the U.$. population is
becoming more aware of the emptiness of “constitutional rights.” There
are no rights, only power struggles, as this comrade explains.
Revolution is a must Without it, we will surely die It’s time for
the oppressed to rise Locked down there’s no trust Next man will
get ya head bust Maoist movement will get us liberty We can’t
achieve liberty If we don’t have unity I’ll fight til the death of
me Til the last breath that’s left in me Forever screaming
“Revolution!” This is the new world solution Fuck Uncle Sam and
his pollution Stand with your brothers in struggle Stand on top of
the rubble Remember Maoist movements For the struggle
I just wanna address the distress of the oppressed All flesh who
depend on the rest cuz no food is left Camouflage-dressed in green
and black Warring in Iraq praying that you live to come
back Distraught from Jihad attacks Can’t sleep and not
moving Sounds of gunfire in ya head even when they not
shooting The truth is as thin as foil Severed the head of Osama to
sign a deal and get oil Propaganda is spoil, I can see the
ballistics How you think gunz got into the hands of the children I
get it Thinking with the teaching they feed us, defeated Cuz we
don’t see hood politics come from politics Say we all free but free
as they want us to be State prison a new fashion of slavery Make
Obama just a racial distraction Say he fighting for all Stop it
that awkward like a dog wearing draws Pause, turn off the TV and open
a book Look and know the truth, be down for the cause Flow strong
like a bear paw, sharp like a bear claw Quick to sever the head of
the united law And brawl for revolution Speak the truth that they
not producing Until I achieve the conclusion The Maoist movement