MIM(Prisons) is a cell of revolutionaries serving the oppressed masses inside U.$. prisons, guided by the communist ideology of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism.
Under Lock & Key is a news service written by and for prisoners with a focus on what is going on behind bars throughout the United States. Under Lock & Key is available to U.S. prisoners for free through MIM(Prisons)'s Free Political Literature to Prisoners Program, by writing:
MIM(Prisons) PO Box 40799 San Francisco, CA 94140.
The refusal of this prison to meet all of the
five
demands has resulted in yet another hunger strike here in Pelican
Bay. The demand that was left untouched by prison officials was the
debriefing process. This debriefing process has forced people to either
snitch on someone or simply make up gangs in order to get out of the
torture chamber known as Security Housing Unit (SHU), and this has gone
on for decades.
Just think, most people in SHU are here for b.s. and are not even what
the prison claims they are, do not really belong to gang xyz, etc. And
so when someone can’t take the torturous conditions and wants to get out
of SHU, officials require them to debrief (inform) on others, yet this
person may not even know anything to tell about even if he or she wanted
to, so many times this persyn will make up his own random people while
at other times this may be the time for personal vengeance like how men
are sent to Gitmo often because their neighbor in Pakistan didn’t like
the loud music he played.
This pathetic way of “weeding out” supposed gang members or security
threats is broken and changes nothing, the truth is SHU is a racist
operation directed at the oppressed nations. In addition, guards are
getting paid higher salaries for working in these units. Of all the
people in SHU, none are the rich, the wealthy, no billionaire ever been
validated as a gang member, I have yet to meet a millionaire in SHU. We
are the poor, those coming from barrios and ghetto projects, those who
can’t even walk down the street in our hood without getting tracked by a
predator pig and slammed against the wall threatened, beaten, or worse
we of the oppressed nations are open game in the streets of the united
snakes.
Today is the fifth day into the strike and there is no light at the end
of the tunnel and most know this. Here in SHU conditions cannot possibly
get worse, we are stuffed into solitary confinement boxes, locked into
isolation for the rest of our days - what is worse than this existence?
I am a California State prisoner incarcerated in the Administrative
Segregation Unit (ASU) of Corcoran State Prison. The ASU where I am
housed is currently undergoing a hunger strike in support of the one
kicked off in the SHU. I am in support of it as well, for I believe
solidarity is needed amongst the oppressed to resist and fight against
the oppressor. Many people do not see that when it comes down to it,
there are only two sides, but these past few months have done a lot to
enlighten and educate many behind these concrete walls.
I’m reporting back to you about this fascist penal system here at Chino
minimum yard. They have put up a memo about the food strike and they are
threatening us by saying that if we participate, they will move us off
the yard and put us in Ad-Seg!
I told the comrades to keep on doing what we are doing and to hell with
the fascist pigs! We will not stop, until our comrades are let out of
the SHU! I told the comrades to keep the faith and if these pigs send us
to the hole or the SHU, always remember, it’s just another part of the
prison.
In the struggle, from the belly of the beast!
MIM(Prisons) adds: The list of facilities that have reported
hunger strikers reported by the
CDCR
does not include the California Institution for Men in Chino, bringing
into question their count of hunger strikes at 4252 as of Thursday,
September 29. There was not as much advance notice this time around, so
the word that the strike is back on is still spreading.
2 October 2011 UPDATE:Latest
reports are that around 12,000 prisoners were participating on
September 28. This higher number includes people who have participated
at any level, and includes prisoners transferred out of state.
I’m one of the prisoners struggling to stop the torturous Security
Housing Units (SHU) practice on prisoners in California. It is only
right. In Calipatria State Prison Ad-Seg they’re calling this peaceful
hunger strike a disturbance strike. A memorandum was passed to urge
prisoners to stop or else they would get a serious violation write-up.
The following day a large quantity of prisoners with a couple of serious
rule violations started accepting their trays in order to avoid getting
an indeterminate assignment in SHU. Which is understandable. But,
nonetheless a lot of prisoners are still going strong.
In Calipatria State Prison Ad-Seg, hunger strike prisoners are
participating peacefully. They’re in compliance with the COs and medical
staff, so this does not meet the criteria of a disturbance. The
memorandum was another tactic of reprisal towards the prisoners who are
participating. I hope for a positive outcome for all the prisoners in
SHU confinement and for all of us here in Calipatria Ad-Seg. Along with
the struggles of the SHU prisoners, we’re looking for something
positive. In Calipatria we’re asking for what Ad-Seg is supposed to
have. Nothing more, nothing less.
“Power in defense of freedom is greater than power on behalf of tyranny
and oppression.” - Malcolm X
As most of you may know, we are engaged in a protracted struggle to
secure our liberation from perpetual torture and uphold our human
rights. On July 1st the Pelican Bay
SHU D-Corridor
Collective called for an indefinite
hunger
strike to peacefully protest the decades and decades of subhuman
conditions we have endured in these sensory deprivation torture units.
The NCTT, along with 6,600 other prisoners and untold thousands the
world over answered that call. We did not eat for 21 days. I personally
lost 42 pounds and had to be rushed to the emergency room at least once.
Men older and less physically resilient than myself, some with chronic
disease such as diabetes, asthma and cancer survivors, made these same
sacrifices, and we are prepared to make those sacrifices again, taking
them to their ultimate conclusion if necessary, to achieve what is by
right ours already.
This makes the events of 16 August all the more perplexing, even though
we were forewarned and expected it. At approximately 08:00 on 16 August
2011 some 20 to 25 Correctional Officers (COs) and some 10 to 12 ISU and
IGI [“gang intelligence”] officers converged on 4B1L-C-section under the
pretext that they’d received a “kite” alleging New Afrikan and/or
“southern” Mexican partisans in 4B1L-C-section were going to “assault
staff.”
For months, IGI has been attempting to manufacture fear and reactionary
resentment amongst building COs that New Afrikans were planning to
attack staff during Black August memorial. Mindful of the daily
injustices visited upon indeterminate SHU prisoners, and already fearful
of the dreaded retribution, some staff actually bought into this
absurdity. There was no threat, there was no “kite” found – this was
simple unadulterated retribution for the hunger strike and the unwanted
public attention it has brought to the domestic torture camps they are
managing at Pelican Bay, Corcoran and Tehachapi SHUs.
We were all stripped down and escorted out of the building and placed in
the small management yard caged (imagine a K-9 kennel cage – that’s what
our yard is). For approximately 6 hours they systematically tore our
cells up, cut open mattresses, tore down or trod upon personal photos,
confiscated any item they felt would hurt us on a personal level, with
abject disregard for personal property regulations. Coffee and tooth
powder was strewn over personal letters and laundry was taken or trod
underfoot. We were brought back to our cells only to find what I can
only describe as the leavings of a tornado of F-5 proportions.
That this was done as retaliation was itself insulting, how it
was done was blatant disrespect – but what perplexes the mind is what
did they hope to gain by such a transparent reactionary response? We
are, and have demonstrated historically, that we are fully prepared
to die to secure our human rights and dignity. So surely this
could not be some act to deter resistance. Perhaps it was an act of
provocation, an attempt to engender a reactionary military response to a
psychological and political attack? But no, this couldn’t be the case
because unlike the blindly violent monsters they would make us out to
be, the truth of the matter is that we are men of principle who believe
in self-defense and clearly exhausting all legal and peaceful means of
protest. Unlike the state, for us violence is a last resort and
we are not, and cannot be, compelled to react to provocation or allow
such to deter us from the legitimate struggle for our, and the people’s
human rights and dignity.
So this leaves us with the obvious conclusion that like a petulant child
or a bully who’s been exposed for the sadist they are, they strike out
blindly, to inflict whatever discomfort they can in an act of impotence
and frustration; an acknowledgment of their weakness in the face of the
people’s power.
Men in ernest are not afraid of consequence. There exists no set of
retaliatory actions, no sanctions they can bring to bear, that will
deter our course, as long as we have you, the people,
supporting us we will win. Together we can attain even greater
victories than these. It is our sincerest hope that you continue to
support this effort and open yourselves up to the prospect of more
progressive initiatives to come. Stand with us and we will forge a
brighter tomorrow.
As thousands of prisoners wrap up day five of round two of the
California Food Strike, the California Department of Corrections and
Rehabilitation (CDCR) has stepped up its repression and propaganda in
response to prisoners’ demands for basic humyn rights. They have even
declared it a punishable offense to peacefully campaign the state for
these rights by refusing state-issued food.
The bourgeois press has been repeating the CDCR’s ridiculous claim that
if prisoners went on strike again it might delay reforms in the SHU
system. Their audacity is laughable. We all know the strike is nothing
but a scapegoat, and not the cause of their “delay.”
Meanwhile, they have indicated that they will make conditions worse on
three main points of the original
Five
Core Demands. All three points address the systematic repressiveness
of the whole California prison system.
MORE GROUP PUNISHMENT - Not only has the CDCR threatened that reforms
will be slowed down by another round of hunger striking, but they have
implied that non-striking prisoners will also lose their programming as
a result.(1) This is in direct contradiction to the first demand.
MORE SECURITY THREAT GROUPS - While the prisoners have demanded an end
to the arbitrary and secretive system of giving people endless sentences
in the Security Housing Units (SHU, long-term isolation) for “gang
affiliation,” the CDCR has publicly discussed broadening the “Security
Threat Group” category to include street organizations. This will mean
more people in SHU for indeterminate sentences.
MORE LONG-TERM ISOLATION - The third demand calls for an end to the
torturous practice of long-term isolation. While the state has continued
to assert that these practices are constitutional based on court
rulings, they have promised to send more prisoners to Administrative
Segregation and SHU just for participating in the hunger strike!
As laid out in the Five Core Demands, these are parts of a system of
oppression that affects all prisoners. While comrades in SHU have the
drive to put it down hardest because of their living conditions, the
CDCR is making it clear that the implications will affect the whole
system.
Even the reforms offered in the Gang Management Policy Proposal of 25
August 2011 allow the continued practice of keeping the most progressive
and politically active prisoners in isolation indefinitely.(2) While
this would put California more in line with what is done in most other
parts of the country, it is hardly progress. This proposal highlights
the political nature of the injustice system.
Even the Eight Short-term Action Items affecting prisoners in Security
Housing Units listed in a 27 September 2011 CDCR memo(3) may not be
granted to prisoners refusing to eat state-issued meals. They hope that
by granting the more petty demands that they can break up the unity of
California prisoners, convincing some to give up while they are ahead.
The unreasonable actions of the CDCR during this whole conflict should
convince any prisoner that such a move would be a mistake. There is no
indication that California will be reducing its repression, and every
indication that it hopes to heighten Amerika’s war on oppressed nations.
State of California
Memorandum
Date September 27, 2011
To All CDCR Inmates
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Subject- INMATE PROGRAMMING EXPECTATIONS RELATIVE TO HUNGER STRIKES
Information has been received that a number. of inmates have engaged in
behavior consistent with initiating a demonstration/hunger strike event.
The Department will not condone organized inmate disturbances.
Participation in mass disturbances, such as hunger strikes or work
stoppage will result in the Department taking the following action:
Inmates participating will receive disciplinary action in accordance
with the California Code of Regulations.
Inmates identified as leading the disturbance will be subject to removal
from general population and placed in an Administrative Segregation
Unit.
In the event of a mass hunger strike, additional measures may be taken
to more effectively monitor and manage the participating inmates’
involvement and their food/nutrition intake, including the possible
removal of canteen items from participating inmates.
All inmates are encouraged to continue with positive programming and to
not participate in this or any other identified mass strike/disturbance.
These types of disturbances impact inmate programming and day-to-day
prison operations for the entire population. While every effort will be
made to continue normal programming for nonparticipating inmates, a
large scale disturbance of this type will unavoidably impact operations.
The Department will notify inmates and families when and if normal
programming is impacted.
SCOTT KERNAN Undersecretary (A), Operations
cc: Terri McDonald George J. Giurbino R. J. Subia Kelly Harrington Tony
Chaus Wardens
State of California
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Memorandum
Date : September 27, 2011
To : All CDCR Inmates
Subject: REVIEW OF SECURITY HOUSING UNIT AND GANG POLICIES
In May 2011 the Department began the complex process of assessing the
policies and procedures associated with the Gang Validation Process,
Indeterminate Gang Security Housing Unit (SHU) Program, as well as
privileges associated with inmates on Indeterminate SHU status. The
purpose of the review is to improve our policies by adopting national
standards in gang/disruptive group management. Before commencing this
review, the Department received input from internal and external
experts, other state and federal correctional systems, inmates, and
other stakeholders While the process of policy review and change will
take several more stakeholders to implement, much has already been done.
In fact, a draft of the new policy should be ready for stakeholder
review next month. In addition, several changes have already been made
by the Department, including:
Short-term Action Items:
Authorization of watch caps for purchase and State issue. Authorization
of wall calendars for purchase in canteen.
Authorization of exercise equipment in SHU yards (installation of
permanent dip/push-up bars is still under review).
Authorization of annual photographs for disciplinary free inmates.
Approval of proctors for college examinations.
Use of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation’s (CDCR)
Ombudsman for monitoring and auditing of food services.
Authorization of sweat pants for purchase/annual package.
Authorization of Hobby items (colored chalk, pen fillers, and drawing
paper).
Mid-term Action Items:
As noted above, the Department is conducting a comprehensive review of
SHU policies that includes behavior-based components, increased
privileges based upon disciplinary free behavior, a step down process
for SHU inmates, and a system that better defines and weighs necessary
points in the validation process. The initial policies will be completed
shortly and upon Secretary approval will be sent for stakeholder review
and comment. Upon receipt of this input, the Department will initiate
any regulation changes in the administrative law process necessary and
implement the first major changes to the validation process in the last
two decades. Of course this work may be delayed by large-scale inmate
disturbances or other emergency circumstances.
SCOTT KERNAN Undersecretary (A), Operations
cc: Terri McDonald George J. Giurbino R. J. Subia Kelly Harrington Tony
Chaus Wardens
I am a prisoner at Pelican Bay State Prison in the ASU stand alone. As
such, we are allowed no TVs and no radios as there are no electrical
outlets. I am participating in the hunger strike. I had started July
1st, 2011 but took a step back and allowed the prison and the whole of
the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation a chance to
conform to the demands/requests made. As you know, none of the core
demands were addressed. Just more of the same old same old, hurry up and
wait. Because of that, the hunger strike has started again, but I have
no way to know the latest as I have no TV and no radio. Then like a
godsend I receive your latest newsletter letting me know if I need
updates, hey just write my friends at MIM(Prisons) and they will make me
feel not at all alone!
The CDCR just had the accompanying (Sept 27)
memos
delivered to the prisoner population here at CSP-LAC. With respect to
the memo titled “Review of Security Housing Unit and Gang Policies” I
have to say that this is obviously a victory for all California
prisoners and a victory wholly owed not just to the thousands of CA
prisoners who participated in the mass hunger strike and various outside
organizations who helped bring publicity and additional weight to bear
to the states deplorable actions, but a victory which could never have
come about if those courageous prisoners currently held in the SHU
hadn’t come together with their strong showing of unity of the
oppressed. Indeed, we hope to see more of this in the future.
With that being said, I find it odd that the memo states that CDCR has
been in the process of reforming its gang validation process since May
2011, well before the strike. Piece of shit Kernan is trying to give the
impression that the reforms have been in the works since before the
hunger strike, thereby attempting to deny the SHU prisoners their hard
fought victory by making it seem that the reform were inevitable. Ha!
Kernan fools no one. The capitulation to the prisoners righteous demands
only helps prove MIM(Prisons)’s long standing line and materialist
interpretation of history that there are no rights only power struggles.
All power to the oppressed.
The second memo titled “Inmate Programming Expectations Relative to
Hunger Strikes” is nothing more than the Killafornia Department of
Corruptions attempt to threaten and discourage future hunger strikers
and leaders from such actions as well as their attempt to encourage
divisions within for defensive actions, but the CDC’s posturing and
threatening memos are futile because as long as there is oppression
there will be resistance.
This strike is being done peacefully, but yet one of my fellow prisoners
in support of the hunger strike was assaulted by IGI [Institutional Gang
Investigations]. Not once did he try to resist, and everywhere we go we
are in restraints.
I’ve already lost 2 pounds, which is nothing yet, but I’m a man who will
see this through till my body seizures. I’m well aware that my medical
disorder (seizures) is something not to be playing with. I will stay
positive and focus on the big picture of what’s important: change. I’m
not in Pelican Bay, but I’ve been validated and since March of 2009 I
have yet to receive what I got coming.
This
memo
was given to us on September 27. No advance directive was given to any
of us who are food striking [an advance directive form allows food
strikers to designate a person to make health care decisions on their
behalf in case they become seriously ill]. I requested an advance
directive and submitted it on September 26. I also sent a copy to my
family.
I’m not alone here in Calipatria fighting the struggle. There are over
70 of us validated here who have been stuck here for over two years.
Last year there were over 80 cell extractions here in ASU. This was for
TVs, jackets and laundry they are not providing us. Nothing is being
fixed here. All Calipatria administration did was ship out 12 prisoners
who they considered the organizers.
I know the Calipatria administration isn’t taking this hunger strike
seriously. And in response to the September 27
memo
some prisoners got intimidated and decided to eat. Many do not see the
bigger picture and feel it is a lost cause.
After we stopped the first strike in July all we got was harassment,
cold food and laundry messed with even more. I’ve been asking about
receiving some disinfectant and was informed that we are not going to
get it anymore. And we get hand soap, watered down, in a milk carton
once a week per cell. We live in dirty filth here.