MIM(Prisons) is a cell of revolutionaries serving the oppressed masses inside U.$. prisons, guided by the communist ideology of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism.
I didn't receive Under Lock & Key 39 - they stated it had inflammatory content, so i appealed it to the compliance division and also treatment coordinator.
Letter to Director regarding censorship at multiple facilities
Show Text
Director S.A. Godinez
Illinois Department of Corrections Illinois Department of Corrections
1301 Concordia Court James R. Thompson Center
P.O. Box 19277 100 West Randolph
Springfield, IL 62794-9277 Chicago, IL 60601
March 25, 2014
RE: Illegal censorship of mail at Hill Correctional Center and Sheridan Correctional Center
Dear Director Godinez,
This letter is regarding the illegal censorship if mail at Hill Correctional Center and Sheridan Correctional Center. Enclosed are letters I have sent to the Wardens and Publication Review Committee at these respective facilities. We have not received responses from administrators at the facilities themselves, and hope that your office can help end their illegal practice of censoring mail without cause or process.
Do not hesitate to contact me if you need further information.
Sincerely,
MIM Distributors
CC: Affected parties
03/25/2014
MIM Distributors protests censorship for spiral bound books
Show Text
Publication Review Committee
600 South Linwood Road
P.O. Box 1327
Galesburg, IL 61402
March 25, 2014
RE: Illegal censorship of mail to Mr. x
Dear PRC,
This letter is regarding the illegal censorship if mail to Mr. x, a prisoner housed at Hill Correctional Center. On February 16, 2014, MIM Distributors mailed Mr x an envelope via Media Mail with the USPS. This envelope contained at least one spiral-bound book, among others. The envelope was returned, unopened, to MIM Distributors with "Spiral bound book" written on the outside. We were not sent a Publication Receipt and Course of Action Form DOC0211 regarding this incident.
In Title 20: Corrections, Criminal Justice, and Law Enforcement, Chapter I: Department of Corrections, Subchapter e: Operations, Part 525 Rights and Privileges, there is no mention made of spiral bound books and whether they shall be permitted or censored. The instructions that are provided in Title 20 for handling of this material are in direct conflict with the actions of the Mailroom staff at Hill Correctional Center.
Your Administrative Code Title 20, Part 525 Rights and Privileges, Section 525.140 Incoming Mail at point d) that "All incoming non-privileged mail, including mail from clerks of courts, shall be opened and inspected for contraband."
and at point h), "When an offender is prohibited from receiving a letter or portions thereof, the committed person and the sender shall be notified in writing of the decision."
As you are likely aware, the U.S. Supreme Court also has clearly stated that both the sender and the prisoner have a right, under the First Amendment and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, to receive notice and an opportunity to be heard when prison administrators or staff prevent the sender?s expressive materials from reaching their intended recipients (Procunier v. Martinez, 416 U.S.396. 94 S.Ct 1800, as reaffirmed on the point by Turner V. Safley, 482 U.S. 78 (1987) and Thornburgh v. Abbott, 490 U.S. 401 (1989) and Montcalm Publ'g Corp. v. Beck, 80 F.3d 105, 106 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 928 (1996)). In plain and striking contradiction with these principles, neither the prisoners, nor MIM Distributors were notified of the censorship decision or actually of any decisions that the Mailroom staff has made with regard to the letter in question.
In refusing to provide notice and an opportunity to be heard to both the prisoner and the sender, under local policies and/or practices, prison administrators and staff violated clearly established constitutional law and acted under color of state law for purposes of 42 U.S.C. ? 1983.
Please provide us with a copy of the administrative code that dictates spiral bound books should be disallowed at Hill Correctional Center. We would appreciate if you took any necessary, appropriate and advisable measure (such as internal investigations, proper employees? training and similar) to stop this illegal ban on all mail coming from MIM Distributors, and start determining the allowance of mail based on Illinois Department of Corrections policy, not superfluous, illegal restrictions.
MIM Distributors appeals censorship to Deputy Director
Show Text
DAI Deputy Director
Department of Corrections
2729 Plaza Drive
Jefferson City, MO 65109
16 June 2014
RE: Censorship of Under Lock & Key Issue 37
Dear Mr. Dormire,
Warden Troy Steele recently sent a notice to MIM Distributors notifying us of the censorship of Under Lock & Key No. 37 at Potosi Correctional Center. He did not specify what contents triggered this censorship, except to state that he felt it could ?be used to instill violence or hatred among? prisoners. I am requesting an independent review of this decision.
I hope you also received my recent letter regarding the difficulties we've been having in getting staff at some facilities to abide by the review decisions made by your office to allow certain issues of Under Lock & Key to be delivered to Missouri prisoners.
MIM Distributors appeals censorship to Deputy Director
Show Text
DAI Deputy Director
Department of Corrections
2729 Plaza Drive
Jefferson City, MO 65109
16 June 2014
RE: Censorship of Under Lock & Key Issue 37
Dear Mr. Dormire,
Warden Troy Steele recently sent a notice to MIM Distributors notifying us of the censorship of Under Lock & Key No. 37 at Potosi Correctional Center. He did not specify what contents triggered this censorship, except to state that he felt it could ?be used to instill violence or hatred among? prisoners. I am requesting an independent review of this decision.
I hope you also received my recent letter regarding the difficulties we've been having in getting staff at some facilities to abide by the review decisions made by your office to allow certain issues of Under Lock & Key to be delivered to Missouri prisoners.
Thank you,
01/08/2015
Prisoner still has not received approved publication
Letter to Warden asking for policy on Signature Confirmations
Show Text
Warden Stu Sherman
SATF-CSP
PO Box 7100
Corcoran, CA 93212
18 November 2014
RE: Refused mail for Signature Confirmation
Mr. Sherman,
On 4 November 2014 MIM Distributors sent a priority mail package to Mr. XXXXXX XXXXXX with USPS Signature Confirmation. This is normal practice when mail has gone missing without explanation from the facility. The mailroom staff at CSATF used the USPS Signature Confirmation to justify the censorship of MIM Distributor's mail stating, ?REFUSED: Inmate Unable to Sign for Mail at Post Office.?
It is not USPS policy that the recipient of the mail must be the person that the mail is addressed to. In the case of PO Boxes, which CSATF mail is sent through, anyone with access to the box is considered an authorized agent who can sign for the mail. Yet, the label on the mail returned to MIM Distributors seems to indicate that it is regular practice of CSATF to not sign for mail.
My question for you is whether it is CSATF's policy to refuse any mail with signature confirmation? If so, what is the best method to ensure delivery to prisoners held at CSATF when mail goes missing without notice from your staff? If not, can you assure me that this will be addressed with mailroom staff so that future Signature Confirmation mail is delivered as it should be?
Thank you for taking the time to look into this matter,
12/22/2014
Custody Captain says signature can not be required for prisoner mail Download Documentation
01/04/2015
No Response from Warden, Wrote again and cc'ed state Ombudsman
Show Text
Warden Stu Sherman
SATF-CSP
PO Box 7100
Corcoran, CA 93212
4 January 2015
RE: Refused mail for Signature Confirmation (2nd attempt)
Mr. Sherman,
In mid-November I wrote you regarding the refusal of mail from MIM distributors to someone being held prisoner at your facility. The mail was rejected for the reason, ?REFUSED: Inmate Unable to Sign for Mail at Post Office.? I have not received a response to my inquiry and am unsure how to have MIM Distributors proceed in ensuring that their mail is delivered moving forward.
To reiterate, the questions that I had posed to you were: whether it is CSATF's policy to refuse any mail with signature confirmation? If so, what is the best method to ensure delivery to prisoners held at CSATF when mail goes missing without notice from your staff? If not, can you assure me that this will be addressed with mailroom staff so that future Signature Confirmation mail is delivered as it should be?
Thank you for taking the time to look into this matter,