MIM(Prisons) is a cell of revolutionaries serving the oppressed masses inside U.$. prisons, guided by the communist ideology of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism.
Under Lock & Key is a news service written by and for prisoners with a focus on what is going on behind bars throughout the United States. Under Lock & Key is available to U.S. prisoners for free through MIM(Prisons)'s Free Political Literature to Prisoners Program, by writing:
MIM(Prisons) PO Box 40799 San Francisco, CA 94140.
I was the vice president of an organization called the Long Term
Offenders (LTO) which was making a lot of progress with the people and
producing drastic change within the prison itself. Before my position
with the LTO I was receiving material from numerous groups and
corresponding with multiple movements, but as soon as I got into this
position and the watchdogs saw how the prison as a whole embraced our
platform and supported our cause, which was in the best interest of the
prisoners, the watchdogs began to keep a close eye on us, specifically
on me. I caught wind that the administration was inquiring about me and
I’m sure they received more than a few tips that “he’s radical” or “he’s
always talking about the Panthers,” from their in-house snitches.
The watchdogs began to monitor my calls and mail and saw that I
correspond with a lot of liberation movements which they’ve labeled as
“terrorist” groups. Then they began confiscating our mail (things I’ve
received for years) saying it’s promoting radical ideas about
overthrowing the government which is a “threat to security” and not
allowed.
In August 2014, the Security Threat Group inspection committee summoned
me to their office inquiring about the Black Panther Party and Maoist
material MIM(Prisons) sent me. I explained to them that I’m a
facilitator, therefore I have an obligation to be well versed on a
multitude of subjects. Because they weren’t satisfied with my response,
they stripped me of my clothes and examined my tattoos. They falsely
labeled me as a “Blood” because of a crown I have on top of the word
“King.” They knew they needed something to justify any further action
they choose to take on me, and by me being labeled as a gang member,
that’s all they need.
On 3 September 2014, I was placed in the hole under investigation
because they confiscated the article I wrote for you all in another Ohio
prison. They assumed it was me because of the content, but there were no
names written or printed to confirm their allegations. The day they
chose to label me falsely, they drew their weapons and aimed to kill
mentally and physically, but I will not die a slave, I will live long as
a revolutionary.
The watchdogs from Ohio’s Department of Rehabilitation Center came to
pay me a visit in the hole, hoping to scare me into submission by
throwing threats about how they’d send me to another state if I kept
“teaching/reading that bullshit” and they also claimed I was on the FBI
terrorist watchlist because of my affiliation with “anti-government”
groups.
After 2.5 months in the hole they transferred me again, claiming I was a
“threat to the order of operations.” I’ve been here almost a month and
have already started where I left off and have begun building the
movement! There are a lot of street tribes here (Bloods and Crips) but
few know they come from the Black Liberation Movements (BLM) or their
original goals and purposes. I need to be able to reach these cats on
that level so if possible could you send me materials on gang history
and their connection to the BLM. When I was in the hole, the watchdogs
confiscated all my reading material so I need you to help me recuperate
from my losses.
MIM(Prisons) responds: This comrade is experiencing the
repression that so many prison (and street) organizers face when they
start to become effective in educating and organizing the people for
revolutionary change. This was the focus of our last issue of Under
Lock & Key. As this example demonstrates, the gang validation
system is a tool of repression. It often has nothing to do with the
gangs they claim are security threats or with preventing crime or
violence. This is because they are not allowed to throw you in the hole
just for being Black anymore. The liberal left demands that the tools of
oppression must evolve for those in power to stay in power under
imperialism.
We condemn gang validations and long-term isolation aggressively because
they are two of the biggest weapons being used against the imprisoned
lumpen. And both of these weapons are contradictory to the principles of
this country’s founding documents. The government want to fool the
public into thinking prisoners are criminals and that is why they are
being treated this way. But this repression is directly related to how
the state handled the BLM of the 1960s and 70s, and to how they handle
oppressed people fighting for basic rights all over the world. It is all
about maintaining the imperialist system, where a minority prospers.
After being transferred here to Northwest Florida Reception Center -
Annex, I have been faced with a number of confinement injustices. First
of all I have written a number of grievance to the warden about food
service. We have received breakfast trays with roaches crawling in them.
If you report it to these pigs they don’t do anything about it. In
confinement with no food items we are left with no choice but to eat the
three trays that they give us even if they are infested with roaches.
That’s just one small example of the conditions here.
And recently we had a peaceful sit down. No one posed a threat to
security, and no one was injured. It happened after Ramadan, a month of
fasting for the Muslims. It all started when we were going to the chow
hall to eat lunch. The pig called out one brother for talking in line.
That’s when all the brothers were getting disruptive, and as Imam
(Islamic leader) my job is to calm them down. So, as I was calming them
down, the pig called me out of line for talking. Once I stepped out of
line 22 other comrades set out of line, along with me, which led to the
situation I am in confinement for. The pig saw the other 22 comrades
join me and he panicked. They saw that I had influence where comrades
move on my move. And they don’t like that.
Previously I had to speak to the Assistant Warden, because someone
snitched to the pigs about my leadership. And he told me that “no inmate
runs this prison”, and that if my name came up again he was “going to
get rid of us” referring to the Muslims. And that’s exactly what
happened. I am going to close management with no prior disciplinary
reports. The prison administration says that I don’t deserve to be in
general population because I am disruptive to security.
MIM(Prisons) adds: Control units are often used to isolate
leaders in prison, even when those leaders are involved in keeping the
peace. This is because the prisoncrats don’t actually want peace. The
prisoncrats frequently encourage violence between prisoners, because
that provides an excuse to lock more prisoners on higher security units,
and because it prevents leaders from organizing unity against the
criminal injustice system. So when they see an Imam with influence the
prison moves to isolate him. This use of close management in Florida
mirrors the use of control units for social control throughout the
Amerikan prison system. Our best weapon is our unity. We need many
leaders so that the isolation of one will not cut off our work.
The Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) was signed into law in 2003.(1)
National prison and jail standards were enacted in 2012, nearly a decade
after passage of PREA, and inexplicably late for the U.S. prison system
which is long plagued by a sexual violence crisis.(2) PREA national
standards carve a benchmark for prison administrators to prevent, detect
and respond to prison sexual violence (PSV). Most significant are
sweeping changes affecting documentation, accountability,
confidentiality, post-sexual-assault medical care, testing for sexually
transmitted infections (STIs) and mental health counseling for PSV
survivors.(3)
The PREA audits began in August 2013, and are supposed to occur at every
youth and adult, state and private prison, jail, and holding facility
every three years, with punitive forfeiture of federal funding at stake
for lack of compliance. With 50% of documented PSV perpetrated by staff,
prison administrators face greater liability through the transparency
now mandated by PREA.(4)
One in ten prisoners are sexually abused, which is more than 200,000
youth and adults in prisons, jails and juvenile detention each year.(5,
6) Many are left to march the road to recovery, while coping with HIV,
other STIs, mental trauma – the morbid souvenirs of rape.(7)
With PREA, the New York Department of Correctional Services (DOCS)
started promoting “zero tolerance” propaganda. I felt (foolishly) that
we were on the same side for once. I formed and launched a non-profit
project with the goal to support, educate and advocate for PSV
survivors, and those at risk. I especially focused on LGBTQI (Lesbian,
Gay, Bisexual, Transgender/sexual, Queer, Intersex) prisoners who are at
10-13 times higher risk to be victim of PSV, according to Department of
Justice statistics. Not thinking I was doing anything “disallowed,” I
conducted this openly with no attempts to hide my activities.
However, DOCS took a radically different view, and launched an Inspector
General Office investigation, forcing me (under duress) to cease and
desist further activity with the project. But unable or unwilling to
issue writeups on this issue, they instead launched a salvo of
“unrelated” administrative charges, resulting in 18 months of keeplock
(isolation). They also transferred me multiple times. I’m now serving 5
months keeplock time, which I’d already served at the last jail.
All this has only served to strengthen my commitment and resolve. Our
efforts, in concert with NY ACLU, have yielded a settlement with DOCS to
reduce the use of SHU/long-term isolation, with caps on sentences and
exempting non-violent/safety-related offenses. It’s a start but I’d have
preferred a court ruling to this “voluntary” settlement, which the state
can renege on.
PREA mandates the first round of audits as of August 2014, with
statistics to be published online. This increased transparency is
progress. Our Constitution and Bill of Rights are little more than an
ideal or paper unless we facilitate their power through litigation,
demanding compliance with these standards. PREA can be just a stack of
papers and “feel good” hot wind, signifying nothing. Or it can be a keen
sword to excise the cancers of prison sexual violence and prison staff
corruption and negligence. The burden falls to us to proactively
safeguard our interests, and our futures. Fight to Win!
MIM(Prisons) adds: We regularly receive reports of sexual assault
from prisoners across the country. In September 2013, one year after the
PREA standards were finalized, Prison Legal News published an
article detailing incidents of PSV all across the country. This article
underscores the futility of federal laws to actually protect people in
custody of an oppressive state.
The
2013-2014
PREA Resource Center (PRC) report was just released this week. It
contains no statistics on the efficacy of the project, but does contain
a lot of fluff about the trainings and webinars that the PRC has been
hosting.
It is a step in the right direction that this comrade, with the help of
NY ACLU, was able to place some restriction on the use of isolation to
protect prisoners from rape. The use of isolation has been reported by
the American Friends Service Committee to have an even worse affect on
the victims of prison rape, causing negative psychological effects due
to isolation, and making the prisoner even more vulnerable to abuse by
prison staff.(8)
While we can and should make use of laws to stop prison staff sexual
violence when possible, we call on prisoners to step up and put an end
to sexual violence among themselves using their own inherent power as
humyn beings. The issue of prison rape is one that activists must tackle
head on, as it impacts our ability to build unity behind prison walls,
and is indicative of a wrongheaded line on gender oppression overall.
Take an example from
Men
Against Sexism (MAS), an organization in Washington State Prison in
the 1970s. MAS pushed men to treat each other with respect, opposed all
prison rape even of very unpopular prisoners, and defended weaker
prisoners against attacks by stronger ones.(9)
Gender oppression is a product of our patriarchal society, and neither
federal laws nor prison organizations will put an end to all gender
oppression in prison on their own. This gender oppression is another
tool used to control oppressed nationalities, and won’t be done away
with until we overthrow the systems that require the oppression of
entire groups of people – imperialism and capitalism. Only through
revolution can we start to build a society where gender oppression, like
class and national oppression, are torn down in our culture, economics,
and all levels of social relations. For a basic study of gender under
imperialism, we recommend the magazine
MIM
Theory 2/3, which we distribute for $5 or equivalent work trade. And
see the 1998 MIM Congress resolution
“Clarity
on what gender is” for a more theoretical discussion on the origins
of patriarchy and its structure today.
I am housed at Suwannee Correctional Close Management Unit, which is the
Florida Department of Corruption’s equivalent of the SHU or AdSeg. On 4
August 2014, myself and several other political prisoners on my cell
block were targeted for repression during a shakedown which was
conducted by the pigs. This shakedown was in retaliation for several
grievances/complaints being filed about the corrections officers denying
us outdoor yard access and indoor day room activities, including access
to the phones.
During the shakedown the pigs read some notes I had written down from
studying politics, history, and communism. These notes contained some
commentary that wasn’t very patriotic or friendly toward the Amerikan
imperialist regime. When the pigs ordered me to explain the notes I told
them that “I like to take notes on politics and current events,” and “I
like to keep tabs on what’s going on in the outside world.” The sergeant
then held up one of the notes referring to “sovereignty” and said “so
you’re a sovereign citizen?” To which I replied, “No, I’m just a normal
human being.” Then he told me to explain why I had notes on weapons. I
told him how I was in the U.$. army and developed a fascination for
firearms, and he responded by saying, “so now you’re a domestic
terrorist?” I then told him that the average Amerikan citizen is more
likely to be terrorized by their own local law enforcement than by
so-called “terrorists.”
Myself and three other prisoners were placed in confinement after the
shakedown and we were charged with the disciplinary infraction of
“Possession of Gang Related Paraphernalia.” They tried to validate me as
a member of a Security Threat Group (STG) on the basis that in the notes
I made a reference to “Popular Sovereignty” and that therefore I was in
possession of documents related to the sovereign association, which the
imperialist bureaucrats view as a STG because sovereign citizens are not
compelled to abide by U.$. laws.
When I went to my disciplinary hearing I told these pigs that the
so-called evidence they have against me (the “gang paraphernalia”) is
merely a bunch of notes I copied from social studies. I explained that
“Popular Sovereignty” is (supposed) to be one of the five basic
principles of Amerikan government and that anyone who claims to be a
patriotic Amerikan citizen should at least know this.
I used this argument to beat this charge and I also presented my own
evidence as a defense – part of a social studies assignment on Amerikan
government from FDOC’s very own educational department which explains
(what is supposed to be) the Five Basic Principles of Amerikan
Government; 1) Federal System, 2) Popular Sovereignty, 3) Separation of
Powers, 4) Checks and Balances, and 5) Limited Government. In real life
these “principles” hold no valuable meaning, just as the U.$.
constitution is merely a piece of paper.
It seems evident that anyone making an attempt to educate themselves is
viewed as a threat by the imperialist bureaucrats and anyone who is
against oppression and imperialism is a “domestic terrorist.” As
revolutionaries, it is imperative that we educate ourselves and our
fellow comrades and expose the true terrorists for who they really are:
the terrorists in pig clothing, masquerading as those who “protect and
serve” and provide “care, custody and control.”
We shall prevail in our struggle against imperialist oppression.
MIM(Prisons) adds: We have heard from some comrades that even
writing to MIM(Prisons) or participating in our correspondence study
groups can be used as evidence for STG validation. We know there is a
risk to corresponding and working with MIM(Prisons) but the education
and organizing opportunities are great. We hope others will take this
comrade’s example to fight false validation attempts made against them
and stay active in political work and study. For those not yet involved
in political study, write to us to join our next introductory study
group.
Community Bulletin from the Pelican Bay Human Rights Movement - First
Amendment Campaign
This bulletin is to alert and update the community on the current
fascist offensive that is being waged by one sadistic pig named S.
Burris of the Pelican Bay State Prison - Prison Intelligence Unit (aka
IGI). Officer S. Burris is going through some very drastic measures to
try and criminalize the W.L. Nolen Mentorship Program (WLNMP). This is
typical of any fascist!
For example, within the WLNMP’s Mission Statement, it states that our
objective is to provide the community with alternatives to joining
gangs, along with tools of violence prevention and intervention. Only a
complete idiot would insist that this constitutes gang activity!
Officer S. Burris is attacking the WLNMP, not because we’re involved in
criminal activities, no! The WLNMP has been placed under attack because
it possesses the potential of educating and unifying the oppressed
masses to their real purpose in life. And this truth makes the WLNMP a
viable threat to the prescribed social order of U.$. capitalism.
I have provided the community with factual evidence, wherein the courts
have determined that George Jackson and W.L. Nolen were not Black
Guerilla Family “prison gang members.” They were actually members of the
Black Liberation Movement. To receive a copy of this documentation,
write to the below address and ask for the Request for Judicial Notice
dated February 24, 2014 in the legal case of Marcus L. Harrison v.
S. Burris, et al. - Case No: C-13-2506.
Attn: Central Texas ABC c/o John S. Dolley PO Box 7187 Austin,
TX 78713
In the month of April 2014, I was issued four Stopped Mail Notices
and one CDC 115 Rules Violation Report for communications relating to
the WLNMP. For example, a comrade of the Maoist Internationalist
Movement has contributed to the WLNMP by typing some of our study
documents. I personally wrote these study documents and sent it to our
MIM comrade via regular mail, but when s/he attempted to send me a copy
it was disallowed on the grounds that W.L. Nolen and George Jackson are
“prison gang members.”
In conclusion, it must be noted that this contradiction is a continued
manifestation of the Dred Scott court decision from 1857, wherein the
U.$. Congress announced to the world:
“The negro lies so far below whites on the scale of created beings that
they have no rights that whites are bound to respect.”
We New Afrikans have committed to absolving ourselves from this
contradiction via our collective efforts to restore and protect our
human rights with the creation of the Pelican Bay Human Rights Movement
- First Amendment Campaign. We urge the community to get involved and
check out
our
mission statement in the SF Bayview.
Less than two months from my release date, I was maliciously scapegoated
for my actions in reporting a continual, inhumane practice of Central
Maryland Correctional Facility (CMCF). CMCF is a supermax camp that
houses minimum and pre-release security inmates under Maryland’s
Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services (DPSCS, formerly
DOC). As you may imagine, there isn’t much effort put forth by convicts
to struggle (peacefully or otherwise) against administrative injustices,
due to short release dates and the strict guidelines of the residential
substance abuse program (RSAT), which half of the jail is binded by. For
the vast majority of those assigned to RSAT by case management, it is
mandatory under DPSCS policy that they complete the program or they
receive a notice of infraction (ticket) in which all good days given to
you at the beginning of your bid may be taken if found guilty. Needless
to say, I’m hoping I can dodge that ticket somehow. But with the
aforementioned in mind, you can understand the lack of political
involvement at CMCF.
CMCF is a dorm setting and down in the RSAT building the bunk area is
separated from everything (bathroom, TV, microwave, etc.). During count
time the Correctional Officers (COs) are supposed to keep the doors
locked only until they are finished counting the other side and then
return to open the doors so prisoners can utilize the bathroom, two at a
time. Most prisoners are frustrated by this “supermax-like” procedure of
a pre-release camp because they were of the belief that the closer to
getting home that you are, the easier your bid got. Getting to the
issue, every now and then a CO will leave the doors locked for excessive
time, consequently forcing us to hold our bladder and bowels.
When a legitimate situation arose, I felt it was imperative for someone
to take up the vanguard so we could do some agitating of our own. This
particular instance, the doors were locked for an hour and a half (no
exaggeration), leaving some to piss in cups, while the officer
bullshitted and remained in the bubble acting oblivious to the kicks on
the doors and prisoners pressing the buttons that lets them know that
someone needs to get out. A strong Black brother from the FOI (Fruit of
Islam), me, and two other conscious brothers struggling to ameliorate
the Black man’s plight, encouraged our dorm mates to write it up so
administration would know that we are sick and tired. Twenty five out of
a dorm of 61 people filing grievances for the same reasons is abnormal
to say the least, for that jail.
As a result of this protest I have been placed on Administrative
Segregation pending adjustment (hearing) for four charges (most serious
to least): engaging in a disruptive act, interfering with officer’s
duties, coercions, and forging documents. They alleged that I forced
people to sign some grievances, signed others myself, and intimidated
ALL participants with my STG status (I am validated as Blood). They
needed what seems like a feasible explanation to dismiss the grievances
filed - thus scapegoating the “intimidating, coercing, Blood member who
had a vendetta against Officer D. Brown.” But this route wasn’t taken
until after the THIRD attempt to get inmates to withdraw complaints
using their usual bribery and manipulative tactics: promises of yard
every night in exchange for signing off, saying the grievances wouldn’t
accomplish anything, etc.
There are lessons to be learned in every situation, this in particular
being, not giving administration an easy target, as a conscious brother
warned me of just before I got this ticket. For those who wanted to
contribute but just didn’t know how to write the complaint or were just
too lazy, I wrote their grievances for them, all the exact same way that
I wrote mine - this was a crucial mistake. I also spoke out more than
others when administration came to convince us to withdraw our
complaints - another vital mistake, giving them an easy target again. If
found guilty of this ticket I face 180 days lockup, 246 days loss of
good time, a year loss of visits and my security going to medium.
Whatever the outcome, I will be seeking justice!
MIM(Prisons) adds: This story of punishment for filing grievances
is echoed across the United $nakes prison system. And it is one of the
reasons prisoners have initiated a
campaign to
demand grievances be addressed in many states. We have petitions
that prisoners can use to fight the denial of grievances, though
Maryland is one state where we still need someone to customize the
petition for use. These campaigns are important for two reasons: first,
they give prisoners a way to fight back against unjust denial of
grievances and demand the prison respect their rights, and second, they
provide an educational opportunity for prison activists. As a common
battle faced by all prisoners, the struggle to get grievances heard can
be used to unite many for a common battle, while educating all about the
limitations of our struggle within the system and the need for an
anti-imperialist movement for long-term and systemic changes. Write to
MIM(Prisons) for a copy of the grievance petition for your state, or if
one does not exist volunteer to customize the petition from another
state to be used there.
My most sincere revolutionary greetings to all strugglers. Just a short
note informing the world on the haps here on master Martin’s plantation.
On Thursday, 27 February 2014, during Black history month a white
Christian band was brought in to perform on the rec yard. Upon attending
the function, prisoners were ordered to sit on the grass by staff. By
the time the show began only about 30 prisoners stayed sitting on the
ground. The whole compound went back inside. Feeling insulted and
embarrassed, the administration took dictator-style action. They entered
the dorms where the prisoners had already been placed on lock down for
not participating in a religious event. The officers announced loudly in
the dorm that “all who refuse to participate in the religious event on
the yard will not only be kept on lock down, but their cells will be
shook down and their personal property will be ransacked.” So to avoid
our personal property from being ransacked and thrown away, everybody
from every dorm went to the yard and sat on the ground. How is that for
the First Amendment?
Martin Correctional Institution happens to be one of the plantations at
which the Veteran’s Program is allowed. Not a problem, except that when
the U.S. flag is being risen and put down with the sounding of the
trumpet, all prisoners on the walkway must stop walking in honor of the
flag or be disciplined, even placed in confinement. Dead-ass serious.
Enclosed is a disciplinary report (D.R.) written by Martin CI mail man
Mr. Payne, accusing me of mail violation because I wrote a letter to
Boston ABC some time in early 2013 concerning a petition regarding the
Keefe Commissary network. The letter mentions that I stated that I
placed a petition online. This must be a mistake considering the fact
that the petition had been online long before I was informed of it and
promoted it. It’s also a known fact that I did not post or initiate the
petition. Be that as it may, I pleaded no contest and was sentenced to
30 days on D.R. confinement, which I’m currently serving.
MIM(Prisons) responds: The political repression this comrade is
currently facing for authoring an article protesting high commissary
costs is a good example of why we do not print prisoners’ names in
Under Lock & Key. The pigs have too much control over our
comrades’ lives to let them know who is doing what all the time and not
have it come back to bite us.
We can also add a concerted effort to censor Under Lock &
Key to the list of political repression going on in Florida
recently. They do things that piss people off, and then censor
ULK for being “inflammatory” by reporting on it.
por un@ prisioner@ en California March 2014 permalink
El mayor propósito de la publicación #7 de Bajo Llave &
Candado es el mostrar quién y quienes no quieren la paz. También
nos enfocaremos linea ya - sostenida - por tiempo de que los presos no
logran nada desuniendose y peleando entré sí mismos o con el personal de
la prisión. Cada prisión que censura este boletín reconoce que la paz
entre los presos va en contra de su meta la cual según llaman
“seguridad,” y además sostiene nuestra tesis presentada abajo.
El tiempo ha comprobado … que la deferencia ciega a los oficiales de las
correccionales no les hace un verdadero servicio. El asunto judicial con
la regularidad de procedimiento tiene relación directa sobre el
mantenimiento de la orden institucional; el cuidado ordenado con el cual
las autoridades de la prisión haces sus decisiones esta íntimamente
relacionado al nivel de respeto con el cual los prisioneros observan esa
autoridad.
No hay nada más corrosivo a la estructura de una institución pública,
como una prisión, que aquellos a los que contiene tengan el sentimiento
que están siendo tratados injustamente.” Palmigiano v. Baxter, 487 F.2d
1280, 1283 (CA1 1973). Como lo notó el Juez Principal en Morrissey v.
Brewer, 408 U.S. @ 408 U.S. 484, “Tratamiento justo…aumentará la
oportunidad de la rehabilitación evitando reacciones de arbitrariedad.”
- opinión disentido de Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539 (1974)
Nuestros registros de rastreo hablan por si mismos. Por lo menos docenas
de presos y ex-prisioneros han dejado esas vidas que alguna vez incluían
ataques físicos a los policías, y a menudo peleas contras personas,
después de haber tomado la lucha anti-imperialista mediante MIM.
Desafortunadamente, nuestra información esta un poquito desertada pues
solo podemos hablar por los prisioneros con los que estamos en contacto.
Depende de un investigador ambicioso el demostrar estadísticamente que
esos envueltos en el anti-imperialismo son menos violentos que aquellos
que no. (o más así como las oficinas de correo de las prisiones a lo
largo del país sostienen en este caso).
Mientras tanto, hay una abundancia de estudios que enseñan como todo
tipo de programas educacionales y familiares ayudan a reducir la
violencia y el carácter anti-social. (1) Desafortunadamente, en un
sistema enfocado en el castigo y a condenar al ostracismo a grupos de
personas, estos programas son usados para manipular en vez de
rehabilitar. Las prisiones de EE.UU. que ofrecen estos programas lo
hacen con el esfuerzo de tentar a los presos con una zanahoria. Tomando
este enfoque individualista ellos no están verdaderamente invirtiendo en
paz o progreso. Cuando las prioridades cambian y un preso pierde su
trabajo, o ya no puede ver a sus seres queridos, entonces ya no existe
el incentivo para ser pacifico. En contraste, una dedicación a la lucha
por un mundo sin opresión no puede ser quitado por administradores
futuros de la prisión.
Verdades:
En décadas de trabajo el Movimiento Internacionalista Maoista nunca ha
roto leyes burgueses. En años de trabajo, tampoco MIM(Prisiones) lo ha
hecho.
Miembros de MIM y miembros de MIM(Prisiones) siempre se les ha prohibido
el romper la ley.
La literatura de MIM nunca ha promovido romper la ley o tomar armas en
contra del gobierno de los EE.UU. o algún gobierno u organización local
de hecho.
Cada publicación de Under Lock & Key, el periodico de
MIM(Prisiones), anima a que los presos obedezcan las leyes y evadir
conflictos físicos.
La experiencia anecdótica provee evidencia de un modelo de violencia
reducida entre prisioneros que se han envuelto en programas educativos
guiados por el MIM y/o compañías organizacionales.
A pesar de las verdades enlistadas arriba, nuestros programas y
materiales son rechazados rutinariamente a los presos a lo largo de los
EE.UU. A finales del 2007, lanzamos nuestra página de internet donde
hemos grabado 509 incidentes de censura. La mayoría de esa censura es
para MIM(Prisiones). De estos, 11 dicen STG - “Grupo de Amenaza a la
Seguridad,” 34 dicen “Seguridad” en general, 14 dicen una amenaza de
“violencia,” y 26 dicen de nuestra amenaza a la “ley” como la razón de
la censura. Además, 164 tomaron lugar en California, donde todo el
correo de MIM fue prohibido porque supuestamente “aboga el tomar el
poder público mediante lucha armada y derribar las administraciones de
las prisiones”quitandoles el control.”(2) Mientras que las luchas
legales recientes de un camarada en California han traído a la luz un
documento que inválida esta prohibición, esta aún se sigue aplicando en
muchas de las prisiones donde MIM(prisiones) tenía una multitud de
lectores. La mayoría del resto de los incidentes de censura caen bajo
varias categorías de “inaceptable,” “no permitido,” “no
autorizado:,”rechazado” o no se daba ni siquiera una razón.
Security Threat Group (STG) o “Grupo de Amenaza a la Seguridad,” es la
palabra de moda adquirida en los años 1990 que se aplica a
organizaciones políticas y callejeras por igual, muchos según llamados
“profesionales correccionales” afirman que MIM(Prisons) es un STG. Pero
exactamente, ¿para quién somos una amenaza a la seguridad? Copiando el
lenguaje del precedente marco de jurisprudencia, se usa frecuentemente
como “perjudicial a la seguridad, buen orden, o disciplina de la
institución o […] que facilitaria actividad criminal.” El problema con
el fraseo de la decisión de esta corte es que muchas prisiones
interpretan que significa que si tu le dices a prisioneros que presenten
demandas, escriban a la prensa, que se unan a organizaciones o entablar
un juicio en respuesta a la tortura, abuso físico, falta de cuidado
médico, censura, etcétera, entonces tu estas amenazando el buen orden o
disciplina de la institución. (THORNBURGH v. ABBOTT, 490 U.S. 401
(1989))
Revisiones de esta y otra jurisprudencia demuestran que bajo capitalismo
en America, prisioneros realmente tienen derechos y la interpretación
dearriba es una violación a ellos. El real significado de esta ley sería
permitir a administradores de las prisiones a censurar materiales que
fomentan real e inmediatas amenazas de riesgo y seguridad, tal como
planear atacar a alguien más en la prisión o contrabandear armas. El
caso más reciente condenando encerrocratas por prevenir a prisioneros
recibir materiales que promueven resistencia legal, fue justo el año
pasado cuando un camarada en Wisconsin, ganó su pleito en la corte
federal.(3)
En algunos casos la administración de la prisión ha interpretado la ley
de la misma manera que nosotros lo hacemos, pero todavia afirma que
violamos esta al representar una amenaza de riesgo y seguridad. El
boletin de prohibición de California, citado arriba es un ejemplo de
esto. En estos casos además, no estamos de acuerdo hasta el punto de
llegar a involucrar a las cortes burguesas.
El memorándum de Octubre del 2006 del Director del CDCR Scott Kernan
prohibiendo publicaciones de MIM (supuestamente no todo nuestro correo)
tiene completamente inexactas declaraciones en este, tales como el
citado arriba. Si fuera posible demostrar que MIM fomento o violó la ley
sin mentir, uno de los abogados del estado ya habría hecho esto. Su
defensa favorita en muchos estados es esconderse detrás de las paredes
de la prisión, en vez de mentir como Scott Kernan lo hizo. Por eso es
que oficiales del estado necesitan ser públicamente responsables en
cualquier sociedad que alega democracia en cualquier forma.
Desde oficiales de corrección hasta el director, desempeñan el papel al
pie de la letra del burócrata intentando defender su institución
corrupta, y para poder actuar en el nombre de trabajos lucrativos.
Nosotros admitimos ser una amenaza a los trabajos de oficiales corruptos
e instituciones abusivas, como cualquier consciente ciudadano debe ser.
En esta edición leerás historias de planes frustrados de paz, violentos
montajes, y riesgo de pago para los C.O.s. Varios de los sindicatos
representando a los así llamados oficiales de paz, son algunos de los
mas fuertes en el país y su principal herramienta de influencia es la
seguridad personal. Ellos dicen “estamos poniendo nuestras vidas en
juego para proteger tus mierdas, es mejor que nos paguen bien.” Por lo
tanto la inherente motivación por más violencia, más motines, más
miembros de gangas “validados” y más máxima seguridad y prisiones
supermax. Todo esto significa más dinero en sus bolsillos.
Por lo general, Amerikanos en su totalidad se benefician de sus
posiciones de poder sobre los oprimidos. Ciudadanos Estadounidenses de
clase media se benefician por ser miembros del grupo de gente quienes
pueden ser policías o que pueden consiguen trabajos similares como
opresores en el sistema de injusticia criminal, y se benefician de los
servicios que los policias proporcionan manteniendo lineas entre los
grupos sociales.
Esto no es solo una motivación individualista de un pago más alto, esto
es además una conciencia nacional que es necesaria para crear la
mentalidad de “Nosotros vs. Ellos,” que es necesaria para dirigir
prisiones de la manera que ellos lo hacen en los Estados Unidos. Un
ejemplo esta conciencia surgió durante el reinado de terror de Guiliani
en la ciudad de Nueva York en los años 1990s, cuando el New York Times
reportó que la mayoría de residentes blancos estaban conformes con la
conducta de la policía que ellos veían, mientras que nueve de diez de
Negras sintieron que “la policía se dedicaba en la brutalidad contra
Negras.”(4)
Estas normas nacionales de “ellos contra nosotros” fueron creadas por
los colonizadores blancos y esta profundamente dentro de la historia de
arrebatos de tierras y comercio de esclavos. Después del tiempo esto
forzó al oprimido a ver el mundo de una manera similarmente dividida,
dejando a los opresores con dos alternativas; ellos pueden retractarse y
usar esto como una justificación para su propia brutalidad o pueden
disminuir la contradicción. Nuestro análisis de imperialismo y la
contradicción principal predice que Amerikanos no pueden disminuir la
contradicción, y hasta ahora hemos probado tener la razón. Y eso es
porque prisiones de Estados Unidos llegaron a ser un pequeño mundo
perversamente violento de la sociedad Amerikana.
Mientras que creemos que policías y oficiales correccionales en general
tienen intereses conferidos para oponerse a nuestros esfuerzos para
promover paz, estamos actuando en un Frente Unido con algunos empleados
del enorme sistema de justicia criminal quienes están mas interesados en
llegar a casa con sus familias cada noche, que consiguir una chance de
pago y nuevos juguetes de alta tecnología para jugar. Esto es poco
probable en lugares como California donde la historia ya ha mostrado que
les pasa a los empleados de las prisiones que hablan contra estos
intereses. En una nota asociada, MIM(Prisons) no amenaza las vidas de
las personas ni induce gente al suicidio, ni lleva a cabo asesinatos.
Muchos empleados de las prisiones afirman que MIM(Prisons) es una
amenaza porque animamos a prisioneros a organizarse. Miramos a la
historia otra vez, y ayudamos a sofocar esos temores tomando una mirada
a dos de los mas grandes ejemplos de prisioneros organizadose ellos
mismos: Attica y Walpole. En la rebelión de Attica en 1971, no fueron
asesinados oficiales correccionales hasta que la Guardia Nacional entró
y baleó a muerte a 11 empleados junto con 29 prisioneros. Hasta ese
punto los prisioneros de Attica habían organizado una sociedad dirigida
democráticamente dentro de las paredes de la prisión, incluyendo cosas
tales como su propia comida y servicios médicos, mientras que estaban
negociando con el Estado en nombre de todos los prisioneros. A los
guardias se les dio trato superior todo el tiempo.
Un par de años más tarde, prisioneros en Walpole se les fue permitido
dirigir la prisión ellos mismos cuando el sindicato de los guardias se
fue a la huelga. Ellos crearon servicios similares como los prisioneros
de Attica, y en realidad incrementaron la eficiencia de operación de la
prisión con los guardias y burócratas fuera del camino. Esto mostró que
tan pronto como a principios de los años 70s, que a los guardias de
prision se le pagaban altos salarios por hacer nada. Desde entonces la
población de la prisión se ha incrementado ocho veces, haciendo engordar
la labor aristocrática con trabajos de salarios más altos a lo largo del
camino.
Los prisioneras funcionando pacíficamente sin supervisores impactó a los
puercos, quienes entonces empezaron a correr rumores acerca de motines
dentro de Walpole. Los motines nunca sucedieron, y de hecho hubo a fin a
toda violencia y violaciones durante la semanas en que los guardias de
la prisión estuvieron ausentes, y por algún tiempo después. Esta clase
de rumores continuos no es única a un grupo particular de guardias
malévolos. En vez de eso, ellos estaban representando el mismo interés
heredado de esta clase de gente. En los últimos 15 a 20 años en
California, ellos han tenido éxito en crear una atmósfera de disturbios
y violencia. Unicamente la minoría lleva a cabo su-mismo-interés en paz,
porque esta es una amenaza a sus trabajos como clase.
Desafortunadamente, podemos esperar mucha violencia de los opresores
antes de que podamos esperar un honesto juicio de lo que esta pasando en
estos reservados calabozos. La gente quiere paz ahora. Comunidades que
están siendo ocupadas, encarceladas y bombardeadas quieren un inmediato
fin a la violencia.
Huey P. Newton dijo que le corresponde al opresor decidir si satisfacer
tales demandas del oprimido pasan de una manera pacifica o de una manera
violenta. Frantz Fanon dijo que la violencia es parte del desarrollo
humanista y nueva conciencia entre la gente. Aún si Fanon esta en lo
correcto, toma mucho para presionar a las multitudes hasta el punto de
violencia como Huey lo indicó. Esto es obvio con la tanta gente que ha
pasado más días en sumisión pacifica que estos quienes no. Resistencia
violenta de la gente surgirá como esta sea necesitada por los que
monopolizan violencia a través de su propio poder.
MIM(prisons) únicamente entabla y promueve medios legales para combatir
injusticia. Cuando el personal de las prisiones reprime cada salida
educacional y legal para prisioneros para reparación de sus quejas,
entonces se hace claro que clase de estrategias están promoviendo. En
esas prisiones, predecimos que habrá violencia, y ellos no pueden
culparnos de esto porque ellos nos han mantenido fuera.
Esto es igual a lo que decimos de todas las luchas por justicia
alrededor del mundo. Creemos que la violencia es necesaria para acabar
con la injusticia porque la historia ha mostrado que el opresor nunca
para de oprimir de una u otra manera. No queremos fomentar violencia,
estamos simplemente declarando nuestra conclusión leyendo la historia.
En cada caso de guerra revolucionaria, dependió del opresor decidir si
la violencia fuera usada o no. La historia muestra que lo mismo ha sido
verdad en el movimiento de los derechos en la prisión; la lucha por los
derechos de los prisioneros ha llegado a ser únicamente
violenta cuando el Estado ha iniciado la violencia.
Vea además The Nation, March 4, 2005: “Estudios claramente han mostrado
que participantes en educación dentro de la prisión, vocación y
programas de trabajo tienen índices de reincidencia de 20 a 60 por
ciento más bajos que los no participantes. Otro reciente y mayor estudio
de prisioneros encontró que participantes en programas de educación eran
29 por ciento menos probables de terminar de regreso a prisión, y que
participantes han ganado un salario más alto en libertad.” 2. El
texto completo de esta carta esta disponible en nuestro sitio web a lo
largo con ciento de toneladas de otros documentos relacionados a la
prohibición de California:
https://www.prisoncensorship.info/campaigns/ca/
(si tu eras un preso de California probablemente ya la has visto.) 3.
Lorenzo Johnson v. Rick Raemisch, Daniel Westfield, and Michael Thurmer,
Case No. 07-C-390-C US District Court Western District of Wisconsin.
Disponible pronto en nuestra página de archivo. 4. Hayden, Tom.
Street Wars. The New Press, 2005, p.108.
I wanted to write a few words concerning the
new
step down program that the California Department of Corrections and
Rehabilitation (CDCR) has begun to implement. There is nothing new
about this brainwash program because brainwash kamps are tools learned
in the “School of the Americas” (aka Western Hemisphere Institute for
Security Cooperation), which was founded in 1946. Brainwash kamps were
unleashed on the Vietnamese by the French, on Jews and communists by the
German Nazis before the gas, and the Koreans tasted these kamps by their
Japanese colonizers. In fact, all colonized people experience some form
of brainwashing by the oppressor. Security Housing Unit (SHU) prisons
are examples of U.$. imperialism following this tradition.
First we should keep in mind that many folks captured in these SHUs are
not guilty of what they are accused of. So long as information is
extracted via torture, i.e. years of solitary confinement, then false
information will be provided to the torturers. It is a fact that some
humyn beings will say or do anything to stop the torture, and
as a result many prisoners will be subjected to torture for false
accusations.
We happened to get our hands on one of the journals that are used in the
step down program. A guard slid one of them into our pod by “accident”
and as you could imagine it was heavily scrutinized.
This brainwash manual has quotes of nameless supposed prisoners
sprinkled throughout saying things to the effect that the supposed
prisoner once blamed the system or other elements but has now realized
it was her/his own fault. Each page has the following words on the
bottom, “It is illegal to duplicate this page in any manner.”
The supposed purpose of this program is for prisoners to work their way
out of the SHU. This will supposedly be done to allow prisoners a way,
outside of informing on people, to get back to the general population.
What they don’t tell you is that you will have to now go through their
brainwash course. Even then they can deny you if they feel you are not
sincere. But my question is, why do I have to undergo a deprogramming
when I am the torture survivor? Why shouldn’t my torturer have to take
classes on why it’s wrong to torture?
In the “journal,” each page asks questions, such as for the reader to
list wrongdoings you have done and then asks what caused you to
make these choices. Examples are given of different crimes the supposed
prisoner committed. They then ask for pros and cons of crimes one
committed and one is even asked if you feel sly or manipulative when you
deceive people.
All these questions are asked in a way that implicates you and attempts
to blame you for not just being in prison but in SHU as well. At no time
is the possibilty even hinted of someone being in SHU for false
allegations. There are lists of good habits and “criminal” behavior. But
good habits like “caring” or “responsibility” are what we already showed
in the strikes, and “criminal” behavior listed like “dishonesty” or
“irresponsibility” is exactly what the state has done. Yet this
brainwash journal wants us to say we are criminal if we want to
advance in this de-programming or de-revolutionizing program. There is
no way I will even act or role play with my torturers just to go to
general population. What they are doing is wrong and rather than take
them off the hook by falsely admitting to criminal behavior I will
refuse their brainwash program and continue to publicize this torture
and agitate for resistance in these death kamps!
MIM(Prisons) adds: This comrade asks a good question as to why it
is not the torturer who has to take classes to help them understand that
what they did was wrong. Of course there is a class character to every
justice system, and in the United $tates we have a bourgeois state. When
there was a proletarian-led state in China it was the torturers,
landlords and spies for the imperialists that underwent re-education in
what might be called a brainwashing program by the imperialists. The
difference in the class character of the Chinese prison system and the
Amerikan one is that those deemed criminals were put in communal living
situations, where they had to learn to live and work together with
others, where they were given reading materials, and required to study.
So while the ultimate goal of getting the criminals to recognize that
what they did was wrong was similar, this was done through group study
and struggle, rather than long-term isolation and torture as is common
for the oppressed languishing in U.$. prisons.
We do not oppose re-education as we are all products of our environment.
Even in U.$. prisons, many of the oppressed locked up have committed
(relatively minor) crimes as they emulate the values of the bourgeoisie.
What we do oppose is torture, wasting of humyn lives, and a justice
system that prioritizes profits over humyn life.
Background on Campaign to Resist Restrictions on Indigent Correspondence
In a move that caught some of us off guard, the Texas Board of Criminal
Injustice has issued an order to drastically change the indigent mail
policy within the Texas Department of Criminal Injustice, which runs
over 111 Texas state prisons. In August 2013 the board convened and
decided that starting October 1, 2013, indigent prisoners will only be
allowed to mail 5 general correspondence letters per month! Indigent
prisoners were previously allotted 5 letters per week. The primary
reason cited for the drastic cut is the financial costs involved in
providing postage for the tens of thousands of indigent prisoners housed
in Texas prisons. However, there is a very real attack being aimed at
the growing number of revolutionary voices that are popping up around
Texas to expose the barbaric treatment and inhumane conditions that
exist in Texas. It is validation to many of us that our voices are being
heard by outside supporters, and this new policy is definitely a
retaliatory reactionary response to our activism.
Just this year alone has exposed so many major problems in Texas:
Texas surpassed 500 executions of human beings on June 26 2013.
A wrongful death lawsuit was lodged against Texas in regards to the
extreme heat (and the pigs joined the prisoners!)
Texas leads the nation in prison sexual assault and abuse cases
Rashid of the New Afrikan Black Panther Party - Prison Chapter was
moved to Texas from Oregon and the internet is buzzing with his detailed
report of the mistreatment and abuse he has incurred since arriving in
Texas.
Comrades, the U.S. Department of Injustice doesn’t give a shit about us.
In order to actuate change for ourselves we must unite in solidarity,
get active with USW and MIM(Prisons), link up with sincere activists and
media outlets who are sympathetic to our cause and “mash the gas” on
these oppressors. Texas hates media coverage, so now we are forced to
really make our correspondence count. Drop all the letters to
organizations that are only offering lip service with no action and get
with this movement! Share Under Lock & Key, increase your
political study, stand up to the pigs. Don’t let the comrades in
California be the only true revolutionary soldiers.