MIM(Prisons) is a cell of revolutionaries serving the oppressed masses inside U.$. prisons, guided by the communist ideology of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism.
Under Lock & Key is a news service written by and for prisoners with a focus on what is going on behind bars throughout the United States. Under Lock & Key is available to U.S. prisoners for free through MIM(Prisons)'s Free Political Literature to Prisoners Program, by writing:
MIM(Prisons) PO Box 40799 San Francisco, CA 94140.
The declining rate of profit is an unavoidable problem under capitalism,
and a move toward fascism among the imperialists is primarily a result
of this declining rate of profit. Some could interpret this to mean that
fascism is an inevitable outcome of late-stage imperialism. But fascism
isn’t actually in the interests of most imperialists, if they can avoid
it. And today, most are in denial that the declining rate of profit is
even a problem. In the 1930s such illusions were smashed by the
realities of the Great Depression. Since then, the imperialist countries
have managed to put off any comparable economic collapses at home.
Barring such extreme conditions, most imperialists don’t want fascism.
The protectionism and extreme militarism that come with fascism are bad
for most capitalists’ profits. Militarism is good for increasing demand
by destroying capital and infrastructure, and creating a market for very
expensive military hardware. And some imperialists are just
ideologically geared towards fascism for subjective reasons. But the
problem is, imperialism is also bad for profits in that the rate of
profit declines as capitalism advances. This is an inherent
contradiction in capitalism. Profits come only from the exploitation of
humyn labor. And so, as more efficient equipment is built, and worker
productivity is increased, and automation is expanded, profit margins
fall. Similarly, when the proletariat rises up, capitalist profits are
also impacted. Both of these contradictions can push the imperialists
towards fascism.
With the global markets entirely divided up under imperialism, there
isn’t any easy way for the capitalists to increase their individual
profits. Only with the destructiveness of world war and re-division of
territories can this be changed.
While most imperialists do not favor fascism in their own countries
under normal conditions, they do readily export it to the Third World to
maintain imperialist interests there. The United $tates is the main
force behind fascism in the Third World. These countries are not
imperialist so they can not be fascist independently. However, their
imperialist masters can and do impose fascism from the outside when they
deem it necessary to retain control. We have seen this over and over. In
Latin America, where the United $tates fears any sign of bourgeois
nationalism, there is a particularly brutal history. Just two examples
are seen in the coups to overthrow Allende in Chile and Arbenez in
Guatemala. After the coups, the U.$.-backed replacement governments
massacred supporters of the democratically-elected governments as well
as other activists and communists.
The u.$. economy has succeeded in stabilizing itself, at least for the
near future. As reported previously (1,2), the majority of amerikans are
prospering; their pockets lined with the bribes of imperialism, the
labor aristocrats of the united $nakes are unlikely to support genuine
socialism any time soon.
In 2007, amerika faced an economic downturn. Excessive lending allowing
amerikans to buy overvalued houses, which led banks to the point of
collapse when debts could not be repaid. As the effects of the crisis
spread, stocks fell, jobs were lost and the economy began to contract.
The financial crisis has been rightly recognized as the worst to affect
the First World since the Great Depression. However, it has also been
rightly recognized as being of lesser severity, earning it the moniker
the Great Recession.
And since then? The state of the amerikan economy has been not that of
crisis but of recovery. Unemployment peaked in October 2009 at 10.0%.
After that, it steadily declined. In early 2019, almost a decade later,
unemployment now sits at 4.0%. In fact, by this measure the u.$. economy
is doing better than ever. Monthly unemployment figures in 2006, before
the crisis, were around 4.5%, 4.4% at the lowest. In 2018, they were
around 4.0%, with the highest being 4.1% in the beginning of the
year.(3) Labor force participation has decreased 2% since October 2009,
but is at an average value over the last 65 years.(4) Another indicator
of economic prosperity, the Dow Jones Industrial Average, has grown over
the past five years, surpassing 25,000 points and setting 15 all-time
record highs in 2018.(5) The bull market does not just enrich a few
bourgeoisie: with 55% of amerikans owning stocks, the majority of the
u.$. population is petty-bourgeois and benefits from rising stock
market. (6)
In 2017, Amerikans spent, on average, more than five hours a day
pursuing leisure, a number essentially constant over the preceding
decade.(7) Between 2009 and 2018, average wages increased by 23%, faster
than the rate of inflation.(8,9) As 2018 drew to a close, the average
hourly wage in amerika was $27.53 (median hourly wages have seen similar
steady increases to just over $23).
Contrast this state of affairs with China, where the hourly wage in
2016, adjusted for purchasing power parity, was $6.39. Or India where it
is $3.10.(10) In China, hourly pay is less than a quarter of that in the
u.$. In India, it is less than an eighth. It is clear that this wage
disparity can only exist because amerikans benefit from the exploited
surplus value of Third World labor.(11) So-called socialist groups in
amerika “fight for 15,” ignoring both the low wages paid in other parts
of the world and the fact that many workers inside u.$. borders are, by
virtue of nationalist immigration policies designed to preserve
amerikkkan wealth, considered “illegal” and unable to benefit from a
higher minimum wage.
Despite the fact that the numbers above have been adjusted for inflation
and geographical differences in purchasing power let’s entertain the
supposition that some aspect of the cost of living has not been
accounted for and that amerikan workers are still being exploited. If
amerikans were truly being exploited, then they would have little to no
property or wealth of their own. However, 64% of amerikans own a home,
about the same as in the mid 1990s.(12) This number is fairly stable;
since the 1960s, homeownership rates have fluctuated in a fairly narrow
range, peaking close to 70% in 2004 and never falling below 62.9% since
1964.(13) In 2018, the average u.$. home had an asking price of over
$200,000.(14) Many amerikans own their homes outright, while others may
have a mortgage and look forward to outright ownership in the future. An
amerikan with a 30-year mortgage, for example, expects that they will
pay off their home in 30 years and enjoy a comfortable retirement in it.
Ignoring issues of credit, interest and down payment that would
automatically exclude Third World workers, a Chinese worker attempting
to buy the same house with a quarter of the income would need to spread
out payments over 120 years, while an Indian worker would need to labor
for literal centuries. The average amerikan dwelling, leaving out
furniture, cars and other luxuries, already represents a greater
accumulation of wealth than the typical Third World worker could make in
eir lifetime.
And it is not a question of a vast economic divide within the U.$. Even
among amerikans with an income below the national median, over half
owned a home in 2018.(15) The majority of amerikans are therefore in
possession of considerable wealth, which they invest in assets and spend
on plush accommodations. The typical amerikan acts more like a member of
the bourgeoisie than of the proletariat.
There remain significant economic differences between the wealth of
whites and the wealth of New Afrikans and Chican@s within U.$. borders.
But even with that disparity, the vast majority of U.$. citizens are
profiting from the exploitation of the Third World, giving them a solid
economic interest in imperialism. In a future article we will provide an
update on the economic status of oppressed nations within U.$.
borders.
A Boom in False Consciousness
In the bourgeois media we’ve seen a recent uptick in pieces examining
the growing generational divide. Older commentators bemoan the laziness
and entitlement of millennial (born in 1981-1996), while younger
commentators decry the indulgence and thoughtlessness of baby boomers
(born 1946-1964) who have depleted the Earth’s resources and left no
economic opportunities for future generations. The former is the typical
“kids these days” grousing. Disproving the latter: homeownership among
people aged 35 and under has gone from 64.0% in 1994 to 64.4% in
2018.(16) In other words, economic opportunity has actually increased
for younger amerikans. Millennial wealth has more than doubled since
2007, with the other generations seeing either a net increase in wealth
or a partial recovery in the value of their sizable assets since the
financial crisis.(17)
Any discussion of a generational gap in economic opportunity is false
consciousness. Nothing could underscore this point further than the fact
that any generational disparity in wealth will be rendered moot when the
millennial children of bourgeois boomers receive their inheritances. In
fact, it will not even take that long. Just as aristocratic scions of
yore could remain resident in the family manor, or plantation, and not
have to worry about actually working for a living, young “professionals”
(i.e. those tasked with administrating the parasitic U.$. economy) can
buy large homes in expensive metropolitan areas because they receive
financial assistance from their parents.(18)
Amerikans, as a whole, enjoy high wages and a comfortable lifestyle not
available in the Third World. The majority of amerikans possess
considerable wealth in the form of houses and are closer to the
petty-bourgeois than the proletariat in their economic position. Because
of this economic interest, the Amerikan populace is unlikely to support
a genuine communist revolution. Without a solid internationalist
perspective, any talk of socialism within amerika will be a phony
national “socialism,” at best redistributing from one tier of the labor
aristocracy to another and at worst heightening the violence inherent to
international superexploitation.
There was a significant increase in white supremacist activism in
response to the election of President Obama. And another upswing around
the election of President Trump. We see this as a cultural phenomena, as
economic conditions for the Amerikan nation are not declining.(see
economics article, this issue) These activists are not part of the
imperialist government. We want to distinguish between fascism as state
power, a terroristic dictatorship of imperialism, and the ideology of
white supremacy and extreme national chauvinism. In this article we will
look more closely at the latter phenomenon in Amerikan society. As
revolutionaries we need to think about what the rise in white supremacy
means and what we can do to fight for a scientific understanding of the
equality of all nations.
Defining White Supremacy
The white supremacists often look to Nazi Germany as an ideal society,
and promote white nationalism. We see these views in a range of
right-wing organizations calling themselves neo-Nazis, white
supremacists, white nationalists, and some even calling themselves
revolutionary anti-capitalists. We use the term fascist to
identify these organizations as they all espouse the genocide of, or
forcible separation of oppressed nations from Amerikan prosperity, as a
way of promoting the superiority of white people within Amerika.
The vast majority of politics in the United $tates are white
nationalist. We will use the term white supremacist here to refer
to those who explicitly believe that white people are a separate race,
and this racial category denotes inherent superiority.
White Supremacy Rising
The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) monitors what they call “hate
groups” and “hate crimes,” releasing an annual summary report and
keeping public dossiers of organizations and individuals on their
website. The SPLC includes oppressed-nation nationalist organizations in
this definition, including some revolutionary nationalist groups. In
spite of this major ideological error, we can use their data to get a
picture of what’s going on.
In 2017, a post-Charlottesville Washington Post/ ABC News
survey found that 9% of Americans (22 million people) thought it was
fine to hold neo-Nazi or white supremacist views. And according to the
Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism at California State
University at San Bernardino, hate crimes in the six largest U.S. cities
were up 20% from 2016.(1)
In 2017, in the early months of Trump’s presidency, there was an upswing
in white nationalist activism. Online organizations like the Daily
Stormer and Stormfront saw dramatically increased interest (Daily
Stormer: 2016 summer 140,000 views per month up to 750,000 in August
2017; Stormfront gained 30,000 new users between January and August
2017). This lines up with the SPLC findings that neo-Nazi groups grew
22% in 2017. At the same time they recorded a 20% increase in Black
nationalist groups. The SPLC correctly identifies this as a reaction to
rising white supremacy.(1) In 2018 the SPLC again reported an increase
in white nationalist groups, up 50% from 2017. The previous all-time
high number of “hate groups” identified by the SPLC was in 2011, shortly
after Obama took office as President. 2018 marked the fourth year in a
row of increased numbers of “hate groups” after a decline over the
previous four-year period.(2)
Our observation of white supremacist activism affirms the SPLC
statistics on the growing membership and popularity of these
organizations. And we conclude that there is in fact a rising sentiment
of Amerikan nationalism in this country. The conditions of the
petty-bourgeoisie have not worsened, so this is not a response to
declining economic status.(See: “Economic Update: Amerikans Prospering
in 2019,” this issue)
Culture Driving Reactionary Shift
Conditions for oppressed nations have changed over the past few decades.
This is seen in laws preventing various forms of overt discrimination,
affirmative action in college admission, and growing opportunities for
petty bourgeois New Afrikan and Chican@ advancement. Further, culturally
overt racism is considered unacceptable by a growing segment of the
population. The white population in the United $tates will soon be less
than 50% of the total. And Obama was elected president. While not truly
impacting their economic situation, the culture created by these changes
is seen as a threat by many in the white nation. The rise in
white-supremacist sentiments is in part a response to a cultural
phenomenon. Trump’s campaign slogan has been understood by people on all
sides to really mean “Make America White Again.”
Along with the material shift in national makeup of the population has
come phenomena in the culture that have made many young white males
defensive, and wanting to retreat into that identity of being a white
male. Bourgeois ideas of race, identity and individualism have shifted
the legitimate critique of a white male power structure to one of
micro-managing behaviors. The petty-bourgeois obsession with lifestyle
politics and its unscientific distortions of the analysis of oppression
made by revolutionaries has contributed to the recent popularity of
white supremacist ideas, especially in online forums.
In research for eir book Bring the War Home: The White Power Movement
and Paramilitary America, Kathleen Belew found that throughout
Amerikan history post-war periods corresponded with rises in white power
vigilantism and radical violence more than other factors, such as
immigration, economics, or political populism. In other words, the
experiences of being an occupying force in the Third World brings people
over to violent white supremacy. This is a validation of Zak Cope’s
thesis that white nationalism cannot be abolished within the imperialist
system dominated by the United $tates. It may be tempered at home, in
times of stability, among those who never think about the brutal
slaughter their country is waging against people of the oppressed
nations. But those doing that killing must come up with ideological
justifications for their actions.
We’ve discussed previously that
identifying
as white is to identify as oppressor.(3) To deny this is to deny the
structure of imperialism in the world today. It is the task of
communists and progressives in European/Euro-settler countries to
discourage people from identifying with white pride, and celebrating the
genocidal, colonial, and settler behavior of eir respective nations.
Currently, there is a growing population of young petty-bourgeois white
men who feel persecuted in a racist and determinist way. The fact that
the dominant ideology being presented against white supremacy is
bourgeois identity politics has led to a heightening of conflict,
without any real solutions on the table.
As contradictions heighten, people will pick sides. That is inevitable.
But some of the contradictions that are feeding white nationalism in the
United $tates should be avoidable. The lack of a scientific,
internationalist voice in the mainstream dialogue is pushing this
country in dangerous directions.
Labor Aristocracy and White Nationalism
The labor aristocracy, the class of people in imperialist countries who
have been bought off with spoils of the exploitation of Third World
peoples, is a critical group in our analysis of white supremacy and
fascism within the United $tates. We distribute H.W. Edwards’ book
titled Labor Aristocracy: Mass Base of Social Democracy.(4) Yet,
in 2005, MIM passed a resolution titled,
“The
labor aristocracy is the main force for fascism.”(5) How can one
class be the mass base for two different systems? Especially a
petty-bourgeois class, which Marxism has seen as not having the strength
to impose its will on other classes.
Really, social democracy and fascism are just two sides of the same
coin. This was seen practically in 1930s Germany, where both forces
vehemently opposed the communists. These systems align with both the
left and right wings of white nationalism in the United $tates. The left
wing struggles with the imperialists for more handouts, while the right
struggles against the oppressed nations to extract more wealth, leading
to outright theft and other forms of primitive accumulation. The
majority petty-bourgeois classes in the imperialist countries may rally
to the right for fascism because the falling rate of profit leads the
imperialists to share less of the spoils of imperialism with this class.
Social democracy is also a push for more sharing from the imperialists,
even when conditions are not particularly getting worse. As such, the
Amerikans rallying for more pay are reactionary nationalists, even if
they disavow overt racism of the fascist type.
Some of the most radical elements of fascist mass organizations present
themselves as anti-capitalist in these early stages, so it is not
uncommon for people to mistake fascism for a movement of the
petty-bourgeoisie to overthrow the bourgeoisie. The ascent of full-blown
fascism is dependent on the ability to rally a relatively privileged
homecountry working class to the cause of fascism. But fascism is
inherently a movement for capitalism. The goal may be to put different
people in power, but they are still the bourgeoisie once they take
power, because they will have control of the means of production.
And in spite of the aspirations of some, the petty-bourgeoisie is not
going to rally enough power to overthrow the imperialist bourgeoisie. At
best, they can hope to embolden and support the wing of fascist
imperialists in their battle against the democratic imperialists. This
is the historic role of the petty bourgeoisie; they are not a decisive
class in the capitalist system. This doesn’t mean we should ignore them.
As an imperialist country edges towards fascism, it is well worth the
revolutionary’s time to try to push the petty-bourgeoisie away from
fascism. But we should do this with our eyes wide open, aware of their
class interests and cultural influences.
Fight with Science
We are anti-imperialists first and foremost. Imperialism embodies the
principal contradiction that must be resolved to move society forward
the fastest. For some, anti-fascism is principal in their lives because
white supremacists are actively targeting their bourgeois democratic
rights. And in prisons, oppressed people find themselves having to deal
with fascists in their daily lives, whether working for the state, as
fellow prisoners, or both. As a matter of self-defense, obviously
anti-fascism against non-state actors can become primary for some. But
for our movement overall, as internationalists in the First World,
anti-imperialism must be our priority.
In Germany leading up to Hitler and the Nazi party taking power,
conditions for the German workers declined greatly. These workers were
already part of the privileged class that we call labor aristocracy. But
after World War I the German economy was devastated and the result was
this severe decline in economic privileges. In spite of these
conditions, the majority of German people did not rally against fascism.
There was a relatively strong communist movement in Germany at the time,
but even they could not win over the masses to the side of anti-fascism.
The German communists made serious mistakes.(6) We must study those
mistakes, but we also need to understand that we can’t count on the
proletarianization of the petty bourgeoisie pushing them to communism.
We need to work now to push the petty bourgeoisie in imperialist
countries on the road towards revolutionary thought, even while
recognizing that their class interests will keep the majority firmly in
the imperialist camp. We are targeting the scientific non-voter: those
who might be rallied to the scientific-sounding arguments of white
supremacy, and who are pushed towards fascist ideology by all the
idealism/metaphysics spouted by people claiming progressive politics.
As a group, the white nation is reactionary because their economic
interests are tied up with imperialism, but this does not mean that all
white individuals are reactionary, especially youth. And we want to push
for accountability among the white nation. With this in mind, we see the
need for a mass organization that will focus on targeting
oppressor-nation audiences and directly working to prevent the rise of
fascist ideology.
As an alternative to white supremacist views, there needs to be a
culture of taking responsibility among the imperialist-country
populations. We should be working hard to make imperialist-country
populations take responsibility for what their nations have done and
continue to do to oppressed nations around the world, perhaps in the
form of calls for reparations. The goal is to increase scientific
thinking, increase persynal responsibility for one’s nation’s behavior,
and push the oppressor nation away from white supremacist views, toward
action in the form of nation suicide.
The communists in Germany admonished their fellow Germans after World
War II for not heeding their warning that a vote for Hitler was a vote
for war. To date, the Maoist Internationalist Movement (MIM) has never
promoted one U.$. Presidential candidate over another. In some ways the
last two presidents have been notable, as Barack Obama was the first
not-white President, and Donald Trump has made some openly chauvinist
statements and received support for them. Both elections elicited
participation from those who may have been closer to the MIM position of
“it’s all the same imperialist brutality” in previous elections.
During the 2012 presidential election in France, MIM talked about
Jean-Marie Le Pen as part of the fascist camp. Ey was a far-right leader
of the “National Rally” party. While Trump doesn’t lead any particular
white supremacist organization, ey certainly makes clear eir support for
such groups, and they reciprocate in kind. Trump is very open in
promoting various forms of oppression, to the point of promoting
terrorism against oppressed peoples.
There are examples of politicians openly supporting the ideologies of
white supremacism and neo-nazism from both the Democrats and the
Republicans and from the earliest beginnings of Amerikan politics. David
Duke, a former Grand Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan, is a modern example of
this. A former Republican Louisiana State Representative, Duke was a
candidate in the Democratic presidential primaries in 1988 and the
Republican presidential primaries in 1992, showing how this ideology
crosses party lines and infuses mainstream politics. In 2016, Duke
celebrated the presidential victory of Donald Trump, and the vision of
his chief advisor Steve Bannon. Bannon’s openly xenophobic and
chauvinist Breitbart News Network contributed to Trump’s campaign
success, building an alliance of “Alt-Right” forces behind the
president. These were many of the same forces that would later lead the
infamous march with tiki torches in Charlottesville, Virginia, chanting
Nazi slogans and starting street fights with counter-protestors. These
are some of the highlights of the Trump presidency phenomenon that have
rightly elicited discussions around whether fascism and white supremacy
are seated in the highest office of the United $tates.
Yet we must remember that the history of Amerika is a history of white
supremacy. The country was built on the genocide of indigenous people
and the stealing of land and resources. Then came the enslavement,
exploitation and mass slaughter of Africans. Later, the U.$.
Constitution codified New Afrikans as inferior to whites. Former
Senator, Vice President, and Secretary of War John C. Calhoun blocked
the annexation of Mexico on the grounds that only white people could be
free, writing “we have never dreamt of incorporating into our Union any
but the Caucasian race.”(1) This explains why Puerto Rico never became a
state, why the First Nation state of Sequoyah was not accepted until it
was subsumed into a white-dominated Oklahoma, and why the admission of
Hawaii faced great resistance that was mitigated by accepting a
predominantly white Alaska at the same time.(2)
In this article we offer our analysis of the difference between
bourgeois democratic imperialism and fascist imperialism. And we will
discuss some of the implications of a shift towards fascism for our
organizing work. In “Fighting White Supremacy in Amerika” (this issue)
we go deeper into the cultural shift towards increasing white supremacy
and our thoughts on ways revolutionaries should respond. We hope this
analysis helps others think scientifically about oppression and
resistance and the best strategies for organizing in 2019.
What’s in a label? Should we call Trump fascist?
MIM(Prisons) leans towards caution in the use of the term
fascist. First, we don’t want to oversell the distinction between
the Trump government and the Obama government. Normalizing imperialism,
as if it is progressive, or as if the Hillary Clinton brand would have
been less viciously militaristic and brutal for the people of the Third
World, is a dangerous outcome of this sort of distinction. And we don’t
want to confuse people about the potential for progressive results from
imperialist elections. We need to be clear that imperialism is brutal
and murderous; it is not a kinder gentler condition entirely distinct
from fascism. With integration, it is only in the last 50 years that
Amerika has even begun to be conceived of as anything but a white
settler nation, and the brutal history of that white settler nation is
imperialism, but not fascism. We are entering a period where the
majority of politically active people in this country have not lived in
an openly racist political system for the first time in this country’s
history.
Based on our analysis of the current stage of imperialism, and our
caution using the term fascist, we don’t campaign against the
Trump regime because it holds and acts on fascist ideology. We campaign
against the U.$. imperialist government because it is imperialist and it
is the enemy of the majority of the people in the world. We think that
this is an important point to emphasize in our organizing today. We
don’t want to campaign to change the president, and we don’t want to
mislead people into thinking what we really need to do is get these
fascists out of office. At this point, our other options of Mike Pence,
Bernie Sanders, Barack Obama, and Hillary Clinton all have approximately
the same enmity toward the Third World and oppressed peoples.
Sometimes we need to be alarmist about terms like fascism. Right
now, we see the danger of misleading people on this strategic question
to be the greater danger. In our work organizing the petty bourgeoisie
towards socialism there might be a time when calling parts of the
Amerikan government fascist will help to clarify the contradictions.
Imperialism is National Oppression
In recent years there has been a rise in white nationalism and white
supremacy among Amerikans. (See: “Fighting White Supremacy in Amerika”
this issue) We should not be surprised that racist ideas are growing
again; society’s ideas reflect its structure. And the structure remains
one of national oppression until imperialism is overthrown. It’s very
hard to justify imperialism without a sense of superiority of some sort.
There has to be some reason why virtually everyone in the United $tates
is in the top 10% by income globally, and saying it’s because we steal
wealth from the rest of the world doesn’t go over as easily as just
claiming we’re more productive (read: superior).
Imperialism is the advanced stage of capitalism where a few powerful
nations divide up and colonize the world for profit. It is manifested
today most violently against Third World peoples who suffer under brutal
dictatorships, which serve their Amerikan imperialist masters. These
dictatorships ensure the United $tates access to cheap labor and raw
materials.
“Whether it is Iraq, Afghanistan or the West Bank, it is clear that
without openly adopting fascism, the essence of U.$. imperialism and its
allies today is genocide and any tally of the victims of U.$.
imperialism will show that it has implemented much more of Hitler’s
genocidal plans than Hitler did.”(3)
Why Identify Fascism?
Imperialism is a global system of exploitation requiring war, forced
starvation and murder through denial of medical care and other basic
needs. Imperialism kills millions! Fascism is imperialism without the
cover. Fascism is more overt. When the imperialists are forced to turn
to fascism, we can win more of the middle forces to our side as they
revile in disgust.
So we need to know when we are approaching fascism (and of course when
we are in it) because our strategy and tactics will change to address
this new situation. In both bourgeois democracy and fascism our overall
orientation focused on overthrowing imperialism is the same. Yet we see
two likely changes: 1. Our definition of who are our friends and
who are our enemies will likely change as we make alliances with
anti-fascists among the classes that are not anti-imperialist under
bourgeois democracy. 2. Our organizing strategy and tactics will
change to focus on the fight for democratic rights and defend the
targets of fascist brutality.
“The difference between bourgeois democracy and fascism is a matter of
quantitative changes leading to a qualitative change. The qualitative
differences are relevant to us in terms of their effect on our policies
towards non-proletarian classes.”(3)
The key is defining when that qualitative change takes place, so we can
prevent it or, failing that, appropriately respond to it. And in
anticipating the qualitative change we need to ask if we are currently
seeing an increase in quantitative changes. In terms of sustained
quantitative changes within U.$. borders, a few things might be
happening that would be important to note. None of these are required
for a shift to fascism, but they are still potential identifiers.
Declining economics of the majority, the petty bourgeoisie. As the
petty-bourgeoisie loses the economic privileges that put them firmly in
the supporting-imperialism camp, they will have more potential to
embrace communism as being in their material interests. But they will
also be more easily rallied to fascism as an ideology that demands those
privileges as a birthright.
We might see increasing incidents of white supremacy as quantitative
changes leading towards the qualitative change to fascism.
Heightened class struggle is a likely precursor to fascism. This
presents such a risk to the imperialists that they use fascism to put
down the struggle.
“Democratic” Imperialism or Fascist Imperialism
Communists define fascism as a form of imperialism. This is based in our
study of the history of fascist systems. There are two forms of
imperialism: “democratic” imperialism and fascist imperialism. Fascist
imperialism is a dictatorship of the most extremely reactionary elements
of finance capital. When talking about governments and countries, we do
not use the term “fascist” unless they are imperialist (see our article
“The
Strategic Significance of Defining Fascism” for more on why this is
important.(4)) The exception is that fascism can be imposed by an
imperialist government from the outside through a puppet government. But
the key point here is that fascism is imperialism. A fascist state power
is a capitalist state power.
Including “imperialist” in our definition of fascist states excludes
some countries and governments from the label, but it doesn’t help us
identify what we should call “fascism.” Our most commonly-used reference
on this comes from Dimitrov: Fascism is “the open terroristic
dictatorship of the most reactionary, most chauvinistic, and most
imperialist elements of finance capital.”(5) The dictatorship of the
bourgeoisie is not open when the people are allowed redress, through the
courts, etc. In the open terroristic dictatorship you stop raising money
for legal fees, and start stockpiling supplies.
So what will fascism look like? Will we just know it when we see it?
(See the article “(Mis)use of the fascist label in the United $tates”
for more historical context on this question). Certainly the suspension
of bourgeois democratic rights should be a sign that we are no longer in
a bourgeois democracy. But sometimes this is insidious. Bourgeois
democratic rights don’t exist for migrants. They are severely limited in
oppressed nation communities with large lumpen populations. And many new
laws, such as the Patriot Act, have been passed to limit civil liberties
in recent decades. The Trump administration is continuing this trend,
stepping up voter suppression while also attempting to add a census
question about citizenship. But unlike these moves, which target the
rights of oppressed-nation people, the fascist suspension of bourgeois
democracy will be felt by all segments of society. In that sense we can
ask ourselves, “is a white petty-bourgeois persyn likely to be killed or
imprisoned just for advocating communism?” If the answer is “no,”
bourgeois democratic rights are still in place.
I received your response to my
article
on the wonderful achievements of the Black Panther Party.(1) In this
article, I articulated how fascism has taken possession of this country,
and what should be seen as its most advanced form. This is the form that
comrade George L. Jackson spoke of in Blood in My Eye, “the third
face” in power and secure. I also share this opinion, and it is rooted
in my philosophy about the obvious place to start and end the colonial
war, which will result in the independence of not only our brothers and
sisters in the third world, but also the sleeping giant right here in
Amerika.
The fact that Amerika has never entered a revolutionary situation is
amazing to say the least. However, it does not mitigate the arrival of
fascism. This country is indeed a police state wherein the political
ascendancy is tied into and protects the interest of the upper class. It
is very much characterized by militarism, imperialism, and racism. By
those very definitions it would be silly for intellectuals to continue
to ponder on the presence of fascism and its shock troops.
Our new “pigs are beautiful” President Donald Trump is trying to reverse
the constitution in order to make Amerikkka an all-white nation as the
“Founding Fathers” intended for it to be. But in determining this
birthright claim, does this not automatically push out the European
colonial master? This would seem to be a true statement, but if we look
at fascist predatory culture, it shows that anything of any great value
that ever traded hands between the Europeans was taken by a force of
arms. History in itself is indeed economically-motivated class struggle.
We also have the situation of Mexico being seen as a villain of white
Amerikkka to glean from. This is the same stance that the earlier
Europeans used to justify the extermination of the Indians and the
racist attacks against black brothers and sisters who had already
suffered the worst form of slavery in history.
There is much truth in your analysis. However, some truths have been
mitigated or omitted to fit your contention. The earlier vanguard
party’s insistence to only beg for tokens, or to beg for an expansion of
the system to include all of us, even after numerous failed attempts,
clearly shows their ignorance of the capitalist masters. In a
capitalistic society, there must always be an upper, middle, and
especially lower class. Asking the government to make certain areas
better is the equivalent of making other segments of society a ghetto
(poor whites, Asians Amerikans, etc.). This environment is all about
winners and losers, which furthers the individualism that destroys
trust.
The fact that the vanguard parties rallied around such issues as women’s
rights, prisoners’ rights, etc. should not be ignored. However, those
rights are still virtually ignored. Women still do not enjoy the same
rights as men (i.e. #MeToo), and the prison industrial complex is still
part of the imperialist plan to use our bodies as sources of cheap raw
materials to build and expand capital. The 13th Amendment even legalizes
slavery in the event that one commits a crime. So yes, Amerika is a
fascist country. They use the argument of being “humane imperialists,
enlightened fascists.” The vanguard parties, instead of pushing for
judicial redress which once again failed, should have ushered the
populace to go to war against the capitalist masters. Anything less than
that is reform.
MIM(Prisons) responds: It’s unclear if this author is arguing
that the United $tates has been fascist from the start. Or if there is a
change we are seeing recently that marks a new fascist government. The
former is an interesting argument. This comrade agrees that imperialism
and militarism are part of fascism. And from that basis, one could argue
that the genocidal foundations of Amerika look at lot like “the open
terroristic dictatorship of the most reactionary, most chauvinistic, and
most imperialist elements of finance capital” as Dutt defined fascism.
[See intro article]
But we make a distinction between the repression of imperialism against
oppressed nations, a feature of the brutality of imperialism, and the
terroristic dictatorship of fascist imperialism. This is important
because of the strategic implications. If the United $tates has been
fascist from foundation, during World War II we would have to argue that
the United $tates was not a potential ally in the fight against Hitler’s
Germany. History does not support this interpretation.
If the author is arguing that there has been some change in the United
$tates since World War II, and it is only more recently fascist, then we
want to respond to the definitions ey offers more directly. Defining
fascism as “militarism, imperialism, and racism” raises the question of
how to distinguish that from good ’ole bourgeois democratic imperialism?
Imperialism is characterized by militarism and national oppression (and
by association, racism). And imperialism is all about protecting the
interests of the ruling class. As we discussed in “Fascism, Imperialism,
and Amerika in 2019”, white nation supremacy is an inherent part of
Amerikan imperialism. So that too is not, in and of itself, a good way
for us to distinguish fascist imperialism from bourgeois democratic
imperialism. In fact, the author is correct that the “founding fathers”
of this country intended for it to be a white nation. Unless we want to
argue that the United $tates was fascist from the start, throwbacks to
previous policies are not inherently signs of a new fascist government.
Before we speak on fascism in Amerika and its awesome powers in
centralizing authority over all lower disenfranchised segments of the
population, we must first see how it developed and evolved as an
international movement intended for the ruling classes. Fascism is a
form of totalitarian dictatorship that flourished between World War I
and World War II. Similar governments, some modeled after the Italian
system, were established later in countries of Europe, Asia and South
Amerika.
Fascism as a world political movement is said to have ended with the
close of World War II, which ended in the defeat of fascist Italy and
National Socialist Germany. However it is my opinion that after the
close of WWII, fascism did indeed emerge and consolidate itself in its
most advanced form in Amerika. There are also other fascist countries
still in existence, that are in open opposition to the instituted
government, and in others as an underground movement fighting the
government by employing guerilla tactics.
In general, fascism was the effort to create, by authoritarian means, a
viable national society in which competing interests were to be adjusted
by being entirely subordinated to the service of the nation. The
following features have been characteristic of fascism in its various
manifestations:
An origin at a time of serious economic disruption and of rapid and
bewildering social change
A philosophy that rejected democratic and humanitarian ideals, however
glorifying the absolute sovereignty of the state, the unity and destiny
of the people, and the unquestioning loyalty and obedience to the
dictator
An aggressive nationalism, which called for the mobilization and
regimentation of every aspect of national life and made open use of
violence and intimidation
The simulation of mass popular support, accomplished by outlawing all
but a single political party and by using suppression, censorship, and
propaganda
A program of vigorous action including economic reconstruction,
industrialization, pursuit of economic self-sufficiency, territorial
expansion, and of course war, which was dramatized as bold, adventurous,
and promising a glorious future
Although fascist movements often grew out of socialist origins (for
example, in Italy), fascism always declared itself the uncompromising
enemy of communism, with which, however, fascists’ actions have less in
common. The propertied interests, fearful of revolution, often gave
their support to fascism on the basis of promises by the fascist leaders
to maintain the status quo and safeguard property. Once established,
fascist regimes ruthlessly crushed communist and socialist parties as
well as democratic opposition, regimented the propertied interests, and
won the potentially-revolutionary masses to the fascist programs.
Thus, fascism may be regarded as an extreme defensive expedience adopted
by a nation faced with the, sometimes illusory, threat of communist
subversion or revolution. In 1922 Benito Mussolini set up the first
successful fascist regime which initially had about 320,000 members. The
party was supported at this stage of its development principally by a
number of large landowners and industrialists, high-ranking army
officers, subordinate government officials, and the bulk of the police.
Oppressed to the fascist party were liberals, and democrats who were
impotent to cope with it.
Toward the end of 1922 the fascists occupied police headquarters,
railway stations, telegraph offices, and other public buildings in the
northern cities of Italy. Although the constitutionally-installed
government requested Victor Emmanuel III, King of Italy, to proclaim
martial law in order to crush the fascists, the King decided to
collaborate with Mussolini and invited him to come to Rome to form a
government. Mussolini arrived in Rome 29 October 1922. This was known as
the fascists’ March on Rome.
After Mussolini’s elevation to power, fascism became totalitarian.
Expansion was the keynote of Mussolin’s foreign policy. Among the
specific aims of Italian fascist foreign policy were control of the
Adriatic Sea, increase of the European area of Italy, enlargement of
Italy’s Afrikan empire, and domination of the Mediterranean Sea, which
Mussolini called “mare nostrum.”
Although highly suspicious and jealous of the German dictator Adolf
Hitler, Mussolini found himself pushed into an alliance with Germany in
the so-called Rome-Berlin Axis. The alliance led to Italy’s entry into
World War II on the side of Germany, which proved to be a fateful
mistake. Throughout the war the fascist regime was dependent for
survival on the superior military and economic resources of Germany. As
a result, the German influence became predominant, and in effect, Italy
became a vassal of Germany. When the Allies invaded Italy in 1944, the
Italian population turned against the fascist regime and its German
overlord. The people rose in revolt in 1944-45, abolished the monarchy,
and established a republic.
Amerika has established itself as the mortal enemy of all socialist
activity on earth. Remember that fascism allows no genuine opposition to
its rule. It is a geopolitical arrangement where only one political
party is allowed to exist aboveground, and no oppositional political
activity is allowed. Despite the presence of political parties, there is
only one legal politics in the U.S. – the politics of corporatism. The
hierarchy commands all state power.
Donald Trump’s documented congratulatory messages to Putin are not
simply diplomatic gestures. Trump is a fascist. Trump, like FDR, was
born and bred in a ruling class of families. His role is to form a new
fascist regime, much like the “new deal,” to merge the economic,
political and labor elites. Extreme nationalism has prompted a national
emergency to fund a wall to keep Mexicans out. This is much like the
violence that was geared at the Indians and against us as blacks.
In my view, worrying who to elect will do us no good. With people like
Trump in office the lower class should become more aware of their class
enemies. In my view our only recourse is a highly orgnanized class war
and then we go on to the restructuring of society. That is the answer.
MIM(Prisons) responds: This author takes a scientific approach to
defining fascism. Ey offers five points which define fascism which
include economic expansionism and domestic repression along nationalist
lines. The first point is of great interest to us: does fascism require
a time of serious economic disruption? If so, what does this look like?
We didn’t see serious economic disruption with the election of Trump,
but this author implies that Amerika has been fascist for longer than
the Trump administration. So we ask the question: when did this
disruption happen and when did Amerika become fascist?
While we find this author’s history of fascism on point, we wouldn’t say
that “fascist movements often grew out of socialist origins” but instead
acknowledge that some fascist leaders started off in socialist movements
before changing political direction and becoming fascist. This is not
surprising as the mass base for fascism is a group communists will also
be recruiting from, and we need to be careful that our messages to these
people don’t push them in the wrong direction of reactionary national
self-interest.
Finally, we’re unsure about what this “new fascist regime” is that the
author suggests Trump is building. It doesn’t fit into the five defining
points the author offers above, if this is a change from democratic
capitalism. In fact, as the author points out, the building of a wall to
keep Mexicans out of the United $tates isn’t particularly different from
the historic violence against indigenous people or the enslavement of
Africans and more recently the oppression of New Afrikans. So we are not
seeing the change in Amerikan society that would merit now calling it
fascist under Trump.
The colloquial use of the term fascist in the United $tates has
become something like, “My boss will write me up if I’m 5 minutes late;
he’s a real fascist.” Fascism here is equated with controlling and
domineering. And this is exactly how the Liberal bourgeoisie
distinguishes their system from others; through freedoms and persynal
liberties. The narrative of the Liberal bourgeois governments following
WWII attempted to merge the defeated enemy of fascism with the rising
enemy of communism, by depicting them both as being bad because they
supposedly wanted to control every aspect of your life. The Amerikan
system was upheld as far superior and joyous because of the vast array
of choices of consumer products (and thereby, lifestyles and
appearances). They also claimed to address the necessities of food,
clothes and shelter, but these are almost afterthoughts given the
opulence of the imperialist countries, particularly the United $tates,
following WWII.
A more correct application of the term fascist comes from the
likes of prisoners. In the context of prisons, this term is used to
describe the concentration camps in the United $tates today, the regular
torture and brutality that takes place in these institutions, and the
effects of the criminal injustice system on reducing reproduction within
the oppressed nations. This is a strategic use of the term in an attempt
to win over the more progressive of the bourgeois Liberals who don’t
want these more fascistic aspects of imperialism in their country.
George Jackson, and many other Black Panthers, used the word
fascist to describe the United $tates government in the late
1960s. At that time the country was facing a major crisis, a
revolutionary upsurge, that connected communist governments such as
China, resistance movements that were demolishing the U.$. military in
countries like Vietnam, and internal semi-colonies fighting for
liberation from within the United $tates such as the Black Panthers. At
this time Panthers and other revolutionary leaders within the United
$tates were murdered in cold blood. Even some white students were killed
by the state, indicating the seriousness of the crisis. When your
leaders are being killed by the state, and you are not engaging in armed
struggle, that is a strong sign that fascism is on its way. The Panthers
decided to form the United Front to Combat Fascism, to ally with
democratic forces, especially within white Amerikkka, which marked the
end of the rise of revolutionary struggle in this country. We won’t try
to explain that here, but mention it to say that the Panthers’s shift in
strategies to address what they saw as a fascist threat proved wrong in
practice.
Political assassinations became a definite tactic of the U.$. government
in the 1960s, but the scope was still quite limited. After this period
of struggle peaked, the main reason why things turned so quickly in the
United $tates is that the white nation was not facing an insurmountable
crisis. Their crisis was one of war, a losing war, with a large draft
that was impacting the oppressor nation greatly. The imperialists were
able to cede this war to the Vietnamese, in a way that saved some face,
while appeasing the demands at home. The imperialists learned from this
war, and went on to carry out countless counter-insurgency operations
throughout the Third World (with far less blood shed by Amerikan
soldiers) that continue to this day. The crisis that will bring fascism
to the United $tates will likely need to be an irreconcilable economic
contradiction within the imperialist system itself; one that normal
shifts in policy and resources cannot address.
Also remember that the parents of the Black Panthers lived in a
completely segregated Jim Crow society, where New Afrikans were often
killed for far less than trying to lead a revolutionary overthrow of the
U.$. government. This was during a time when millions lost their lives
fighting fascism around the world, but no one was calling the United
$tates fascist.
19 de Octubre 2018 – Una semana después de las festividades en México
del Día de La Raza, una caravana de 3 o 4 mil hombres, mujeres y niños
emigrantes (formando parte de lo que se apodó el Éxodo Centroamericano),
tomaba por asalto la frontera Mexicana-Guatemalteca en Chiapas, un
estado sureño Mexicano, exigía salvoconducto a través de México para
llegar a los EE.UU. Los emigrantes habían pasado siete días andando
desde Honduras, donde originaba la caravana, hasta Guatemala, donde
aumentó a causa de que se unieron los guatemaltecos. Al llegar a la
frontera de México-Guatemala, los emigrantes fueron detenidos por las
Fuerzas Armadas Mexicanas que llevaban equipo contra disturbios,
vehículos blindados y helicópteros del modelo Black Hawk, provistos por
los estadounidenses. El gobierno neo-colonial Mexicano estuvo actuando
bajo órdenes del presidente estadounidense, Donald Trump, quien emitió
la amenaza de sanciones económicas contra México, además de advertir que
podría enviar tropas a la frontera conjunta de los EUA y México, si
México no evitaba que la caravana legase a los EUA. Se dieron órdenes
similares a Guatemala y a Honduras,quienes ignoraron las órdenes al
principio. Como resultado, el Presidente Trump amenazó con cortar la
ayuda económica a los países reacios.(1)
Con hambre, sed y cansancio, la caravana atravesó la reja de la frontera
y entró a México en oleadas, donde las Fuerzas Armadas Mexicanas
dispararon gas lacrimógeno y tuvieron que usar sus bastones contra los
emigrantes a fin de hacer retroceder a la caravana. Mientras algunos
emigrantes empezaron a lanzar rocas contra la policía, el acontecimiento
alcanzó un punto principal cuando un@s jóvenes empezaron a trepar las
puertas del puente, donde los detuvieron, así que empezaron a saltar
hacia el río bajo de Suchiate. Después de fallar en disuadir de saltar a
la gente, un reportero presente, preguntó ¿Porque saltar? Un emigrante
respondió que lo hacía por sus niños, y aunque no quería morir, el
riesgo valía la pena si podía alimentar a su familia. Otros respondieron
que preferían morir en vez que volver a la pobreza oprimente y a la
violencia pandillera dominante que les aguarda de regreso a casa. “Sólo
queremos trabajar”, otros emigrantes dijeron. Cuando todo ya había
terminado se reportó que había muerto un niño debido a inhalación del
gas lacrimógeno.(2)
Desafortunadamente, los problemas de la caravana no se acabaron allí. 48
horas después de haber sido detenida en el Rio Suchiate, casi la mitad
de la caravana fue eventualmente admitida en México, mientras que un@s 2
mil optaron por subiese a los buses de regreso a Honduras. El 22 de
octubre, los miembros restantes de la caravana se juntaron con con otros
refugiados centroamericanos ya en Chiapas, que resultó en el aumento de
la caravana de 7 a 8 mil. Esto incluyó a 2 mil niños entre la caravana
junto con la organización de los derechos para los emigrantes, Pueblo
Sin Fronteras (People Without Borders). Miembros de la caravana hicieron
una petición pública a las Naciones Unidos para que declaren al éxodo
centroamericano como una crisis humanitaria. Le pidieron a las N.U. que
intervinieran y enviaran unos emisarios y una escolta militar para que
vigilaran el pasaje de la caravana por México, al que se refirieron como
el “Corredor de la Muerte.” Representantes de la caravana acusaron al
gobierno Mexicano de perpetrar abusos de los derechos humanos contra
ellos. Dijeron que las mujeres habían sido violadas y que habían
secuestrado menores. Además, contaron sobre niños en la caravana que de
pronto viajaban solos porque sus padres habían desaparecido.(3)
Entretanto, más hacia el sur del hemisferio, la actriz Angelina Jolie,
quien es una embajadora especial de la Comisión por los Derechos Humanos
para refugiados de las N.U., viajó a Perú para llamar la atención a la
“crisis humanitaria” que se está dando en el país vecino de Venezuela,
donde la inflación y falta de comida ha conllevado a migraciones en masa
hacia Perú, Brasil y Colombia.(4) L@s migraciones fuera de Venezuela han
sido ampliamente cubiertas por los medios estadounidenses junto con una
retórica cada vez más hostil por parte de políticos para derrocar el
régimen de Nicolas Maduro, el cuál se ha manifestado en contra del
control imperialista del país. En comparación, la petición de la
caravana Hondureña apenas ha recibido atención por parte de los medios
de difusión de habla inglesa, exceptuando por su influencia en las
elecciones intermedias aquí en los E$tados Unidos. ¿Podría esto deberse
a que el gobierno Venezolano ha sido una espina en el costado del
imperialismo estadounidense por los últimos 20 años, mientras que los
gobiernos de México, Guatemala y Honduras han sido sirvientes leales,
tal vez reacios, de ese mismo poder imperialista?
Desde 2005, la cifra oficial de refugiados en el mundo aumentó de 8,7
millones a 214,4 millones en 2014.(5) Sin embargo, visto que la propia
definición y criterios para calificar como refugiado están dictados por
los propios imperialistas, y por lo tanto, políticamente motivados,
estamos seguros de que la cifra real es mucho más alta. Por ejemplo,
según a las N.U., Honduras no se considera si quiera como un país de
origen para refugiados. Tampoco lo es México, y aún así la mayoría de
gente emigrando a los E$tados Unidos viene de México, y ciertamente, la
gente de Honduras y Guatemala están huyendo de condiciones bastante
peores que la reciente crisis en Venezuela.(6)
Ya en 2014, habían 11,2 millones de emigrantes indocumentados en los
EE.UU.; 67% venían de México y Centroamérica. De estos 11,2 millones de
emigrantes, el 72% vive en cuatro de los 10 estados con las poblaciones
más grandes de indocumentados. De estos 10 estados, 4 son Aztlán, ej.,
California, Texas, Arizona, y Nevada.(7) Las estáticos también
demuestran que los emigrantes centroamericanos de Guatemala, Honduras y
El Salvador se incorporarán a Aztlán y sus niños serán asimilados por la
nación Chican@.(8)
A medida que la contradicción principal del mundo (el imperialismo
contra las naciones oprimidas, principalmente el imperialismo
estadounidense) sigue desarrollándose y la crisis empeora, podemos
anticipar más de estos éxodos en masa en el futuro cercano. Ya hay
reportes de otra caravana de al menos 1000 emigrantes saliendo de
Honduras. De seguro que para los estadounidenses esto debe parecer una
pesadilla hecha realidad, literalmente miles de refugiados del tercer
mundo golpeando las puertas de su ciudadela imperialista. Tan trágico
como todo esto parece, es tan sólo un vistazo de cómo las masas del
Tercer Mundo se levantarán al fin, y en su desesperación, terminarán con
el imperialismo una vez por todas. Curiosamente, las fuerzas
revolucionarios en México todavía no han aparecido a ayudar a la
caravana, mientras que gente normal trabajadora ya ha dado un paso
adelante para ayudar. ¿Cómo responderán l@s Chican@s? Eso está por
verse.
¡Raza si! ¡Muro no!
MIM(Prisiones) agrega: El Fondo Nacional de los E$tados Unidos
para la Democracia estuvo implicado tanto en el golpe de 2009 para
derrocar a Zelaya en Honduras y en el golpe de 2002 para derrocar a
Chavez en Venezuela (posteriormente revocado). Hillary Clinton
tristemente ayudó también a orquestar el golpe en Honduras. Desde
entonces, generales asesinos entrenados por la Escuela Estadounidense de
las Amerikkkas han aterrorizado a la población, matando a gente
indígena, campesinos y activistas ambientales. Los EUA ha establecido
una presencia militar grande en Honduras desde el golpe, apoyando el
robo de tierras a campesinos indígenas pobres y a campesinos de
descendencia africana.(9)
The United $tates has been waging a low-intensity war in Somalia for
over a decade, and it’s only getting worse. U.$. bombings in Somalia
have tripled since Trump took office. These bombings generally go
unreported in the Amerikan press, but investigative journalist Amanda
Sperber has helped bring what little information there is to light.
According to her report, the administration has refused to explain to
Congress its reasoning for the increased bombing campaign. The United
States’s Africa Command (AFRICOM) reports claim only terrorists have
been killed in these “targeted attacks,” while Sperger has spoken with
victims on the ground who list young children and civilians as being
killed. This has become the common result of the U.$. drone wars.
In 2017, President Trump issued a directive allowing AFRICOM to
assassinate anyone it identified as a member of
Al
Shabaab. The new president of Somalia, Mohamed Abdullahi Mohamed, is
an Amerikan-trained puppet who has allowed AFRICOM to operate freely
within the country. It is little wonder that Al Shabaab garners support
with calls for national liberation in a country that has no free will
independent of U.$. imperialism.
In addition to AFRICOM, it has been reported that the CIA is also
assassinating people in Somalia, and their requirements for transparency
are even more limited. While there are reportedly 500 Amerikan troops in
Somalia these days, almost all operations, including the CIA, are run
from the safety of the “Green Zone.” They use drones to do the killing,
and then claim that everyone killed was a terrorist.
Southern Somalia is just one hotspot for AFRICOM-operated warfare on the
continent of Africa. It is these secret imperial wars that comrades in
United
Struggle from Within are standing up against by joining the campaign to
Shut Down AFRICOM. We must work to lift the veil of secrecy around
these wars, and build an anti-imperialist movement that is capable of
challenging these unnecessary deaths from within the belly of the beast.
As this issue of Under Lock & Key goes to print we will be
tallying up the final count of petition signatures from our readers.
These petitions will be submitted to the Congressional Black Caucus by
the Black Alliance for Peace in April.
As Venezuela commemorates Hugo Chavez’s socialist revolution of 20 years
ago, bourgeois reactionary elements from within, with imperialism
support, work to sabotage Venezuela’s self-determination. Another case
of u.s. imperialist aggression, and on a continent most dominated by it:
South America.
While the self-declared president of Venezuela, Juan Guaidó, has been
receiving support from the united tates, actual elected President,
Nicolas Maduro, has been the target of u.s. imperialism for some time
now. Are we truly to believe that Venezuela’s recent issues are entirely
the fault of the Maduro regime? It should not be overlooked that the
problems in Venezuela, declared in the news as a humanitarian crisis,
seem to have occurred around the same time economic/trade sanctions were
imposed.
The United States and its South American followers, through the
Organization of American States(OAS), an organization formed at the
behest of the united states over 50 years ago in order to consolidate
geo-political influence and quash revolutionary movements and
too-far-left regimes that were spreading throughout Latin America at
that time) have largely created Venezuela’s most pressing issues with
their refusals to do fair business in the form of trade and diplomatic
cooperation which has left Venezuelans lacking many necessities.
The United States and OAS have been making it very difficult for the
Maduro administration to help the people to properly live, let alone
develop. So outside looking in, to the unaware, it may seem as if Maduro
is “the bad guy” and this Guaidó character is “the good guy” and that
u.s. support for him looks righteous, even humanely necessary, to oust
this “corrupt socialist dictator” and “rescue the Venezuelan people.”
But understand that the Venezuelan situation is a product of u.s.
imperialism. The same u.s. imperialism that caused the people of Cuba to
suffer for over 50 years by the trade embargo and dictation that the OAS
cronies turn their backs on Cuba as well or suffer the same fate. This
all because Cuba fought to break the chains of neo-colonial dependency.
Helping to frame the narrative of Maduro being a “brutal dictator who
refuses to treat the Venezuelan people humanely” is the reactionary
propaganda machine: u.s. news media. Daily they broadcast images of
shipments of supplies going into, and remaining at the border of,
Colombia, where u.s. politicians and reporters give interviews in front
of the supplies they call “aid” that “Maduro refuses to allow to enter
into Venezuela.” Maduro said that he will not accept this “aid” because
it is “tainted;” he understands that this “aid” is not aid, it is
imperialist bribery of the Venezuelan people.
Now footage of deadly clashes with police at the border, along with
reports of Venezuelan police and soldiers defecting, are being shown on
a loop, further destroying Maduro’s legitimacy and portraying the united
states as “the good guys just trying to help while Maduro continues to
brutalize the people.” If you ruin peoples lives and then offer some
handouts, that doesn’t make you a hero.
This type of economic imperialism being so effective is a consequence of
the interdependency of economies (especially those of the
undeveloped/developing nations battling with neo-colonialism) due to the
globalization of capitalism and consolidation of a world market. Now an
empire like the U.S. can destabilize an entire nation’s internal
economy, causing mass chaos, without invading and plundering it. Mere
trade imbalances (unequal exchange) and economic sanctions can have the
imperialist-desired effect of social upheaval, causing the targeted
nation to look at the leadership as the cause, and welcome foreign
intervention to come and save them from a situation created by
imperialist aggression.
We can’t know for certain what the reasons for this aggression are, but
we can make informed speculation based off of historical analysis. Could
it be that Maduro has instituted too many socialist-like policies, like
nationalizing much of Venezuela’s oil production? Or because Venezuela
does too much business with Russia, China, and Cuba? Does the united
states want to own oil firms there and is upset that Maduro won’t allow
that? Past u.s imperialist endeavors point to the latter as the primary
motivation for its efforts toward regime change in Venezuela.
These efforts to destabilize and destroy a regime’s credibility and
ultimately to overthrow it is nothing new, especially in this
hemisphere. Panama, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Dominican Republic, Chile,
just to name a few of the more known and overt examples of u.s.
imperialism in the Americas. If these actions prove to be successful
then a puppet government of the united states, via Juan Guaidó, will
most certainly be the outcome. But if these current actions don’t
produce the desired effect of regime change, then, as per usual, a
military invasion seems to be next.
It doesn’t help Venezuela’s cause that no one seems willing to come out
against this aggression and show solidarity with the president elected
by the people. It is these times when we most lament the fall of the
Socialist Bloc and its global influence and support for oppressed
peoples. Cuba, only 90 miles from the united states, was only able to
withstand imperialist aggression and resist capitulation to demands
because it had socialist solidarity coming from China and the Soviet
Union. But who will support Venezuela??
It shouldn’t come down to a military invasion (as it did in Iraq and
Vietnam) to raise people’s consciousness and get them to mobilize to
demand an end to imperialist aggression. It should be called out and
reacted against now. We must articulate to the people the real forces at
play here, because they won’t learn it from the news. Support has to be
mustered to oppose these types of actions from the united states. The
unconsciousness of people in the world, and the united states in
particular, that allows these things to go unchecked, is support for
imperialism itself. As Fidel Castro put it: “to cease solidarity with
the revolutionary movement does not mean to deny a pretext but actually
to show solidarity with yankee imperialism and its policy of domination
and enslavement of the world.”
Venezuela’s cause may not be a revolutionary one, but it is a victim of
imperialism from an empire incessantly working to consolidate its
influence and turn every nation that it can benefit from into a
neo-colony, which requires us to raise this truth as a common cause
worthy of the most support. Defend Venezuela’s self-determination!
Facts: Oil revenue is about 90% of Venezuela’s revenue. The United
States is the #1 buyer of Venezuelan oil at over 400,000 barrels, per
day.
MIM(Prisons) responds: Our
recent
article on Venezuela very much agrees with this writer’s analysis.
While Venezuela was never a socialist country in the Marxist sense,
Maduro implemented many reforms in the interests of the people, and is
staunchly fighting neo-colonialism. This government represents the
national bourgeoisie and continues to operate within the capitalist
system. It is an ally of the oppressed in this fight against
imperialism. The imperialists are the real murderers and destroyers of
planet Earth that we must stand against. And we stand with the
Venezuelan people and their elected government against the U.$. coup
efforts.