MIM(Prisons) is a cell of revolutionaries serving the oppressed masses inside U.$. prisons, guided by the communist ideology of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism.
Under Lock & Key is a news service written by and for prisoners with a focus on what is going on behind bars throughout the United States. Under Lock & Key is available to U.S. prisoners for free through MIM(Prisons)'s Free Political Literature to Prisoners Program, by writing:
MIM(Prisons) PO Box 40799 San Francisco, CA 94140.
By Rassafidz of NCICO United Front & 5% N.G.E. Community Corcoron
Copied by Narobi Antori
It has been a hot few months for the prisoners of Corcoran Substance
Abuse Treatment Facility (SATF) California Department of Corrections
& Rehabilitations. After struggling against administrative
corruptions, to no avail, in local courts, over toxic prison conditions
that involve prison populations. Being forced to eat in dining hall
spaces that are infested with fungus/mold, in both serving and dining
areas. Prisoners still suffer in the environment that over looks the
presence of maggot containing prisoners food; However, a group of New
Afrikans, who organize under the flag of Natural Islam, Nation of Gods
& Earths, were able to come together to celebrate the birthdate of a
principle party of the New Afrikan liberation movement.
On August 17, 2019 approximately ten members of the N.G.E. community,
with guests, united in assembly to celebrate the life of Honorable
Marcus M. Garvey Sr. Though there be so much hate & false hope being
spread within the imprisoned New Afrikan community, & some of the
most powerful platforms developed to liberate New Afrikans are being
used by members of the amerikan society, who blood suck & exploite
the un-tapped mind resources of New Afrikans, all power to those who
struggle.
The men of CSATF, N.G.E., Carthage Community shared in a lecture
dialogue covering the birth of Marcus Garvey, his organizing of the 11
million Afrikans of the black diaspora into the Universal Negro
Improvement Association & Carribeans League, commonly referred to as
the U.N.I.A. There was live musiq played by one of the Rasta G-O-Ds
& discussions held on the subject of New Afrikan unity both inside
and outside the prisons in the U.S.
As we all suffer from a sort of social un-justice that disconnects
the New Afrikan man, woman, and child from any degree of social
equality, the movement of prison liberalist reform has begun to drown
out the voices of prisoner leadership who held a more un-popular
position as it relates to Justice for more than 2 million plus prisoners
in the custody of the amerikkkan prison system, not to mention all of
those of facilities & mental health hospitals. The G-O-Ds of
Corcoran decided that there was a need to develop a self-determined
event that drew attention to the New Afrikans getting back to the basics
of Nation building by the concept of:
One Love. One Nature. One Way.
There was open discussion on the need of more New Afrikan mentorship
programs led by the strong Brothers & Sisters who have determined
that the only change that should come to New Afrikans imprisoned is the
change WE ourselves cultivate, with or without the help, approval or
permission of the police & when WE say police, we mean the police in
all it’s forms, including the high rolling church peoples who want
nothing to do with US who have been marked with the triple brand of
Satan.
There was a simple meal of chips and burritos offered to all who
attended, the group went un-harassed by facility officers, who have
become accustomed to nicknaming the 57 N.G.E. community as the “Earth
Wind & Fire Group”.
One particular God made knowledge known on the need of New Afrikans
& all asiatics to be wise in the high sodium levels hidden inside
our food as a means to kill off our, “Third eye” capabilities, while
another God from Detroit & organizing a member of the NOI opened a
rap session performing a conscious rap song that he wrote in his early
years in the 90’s.
With all the talk of Juneteenth & Black August within the
California prison system, these New Afrikans did a great job of honoring
the living life objectives of Black Liberation. Concentrating on Peace,
Unity, Growth, Internatonalism & Independence, they used resources
at their disposal for the right reason, & many beautiful plans came
from the build of righteousness & destruction of evilness.
Though the Nation of God & Earth (N.G.E.) community, properly
referred to as the, “N.G.E., Carthage of el’Moraco New Afrika”, has
established much for itself with it’s weekly General Cipher of Saturdays
from 9:30AM-11:45AM, & the N.G.E. civilization class held on
Thursday 2:30PM-4:00PM where these New Afrikan Asiatic Study the Nature
of Moabite Ancestry & Islam as the culture of mathematics with the
guidance of “The Final Testament Quran,” Published by Rashad Khalifa
& the Masjid Tuscon International Community of Submitters. Gods
adopted plans to launch an Egyptian yoga group developing the principles
of the Maat, introduced by Dr. Muata Ashby, while also supporting a
facility gardening project that the youthful G-O-Ds figure that there be
no better way to celebrate the lives of our murdered Freedom Fighters
than to plant love, so G-O-Ds took part in de-weeding a particular patch
of the yard for their own civilization.
In closing, we invite the N.G.E, N.O.I & Moorish communities of
California & the west coast to reach out to our leadership as WE
organize for the Kwanzaa celebration in December with all praises be to
the Originals, Being the change we wish to see.
First and foremost, we would like to thank ULK for being a
platform to spread the message of prisoner united fronts and solidarity
within these dungeons. ULK has been a big part of helping in
reeducation and enlightenment. To us revolutionaries, who are the tip of
the spear here in Colorado, ULK is a great tool. We hope this
brief update gives encouragement to all of us conscious of our battle
against capitalism, its social-control mechanism – mass incarceration –
and use of prisons as modern day slave camps.
Here in Colorado, with hard work and much determination, many different
groups have come to the realization of subversive tactics the state and
badge engage in to divide and conquer. Exploiting gang rivalries,
perpetuating violence by manufactured conflicts through “set-ups” of STG
members, and at times, nation unrest. After years of watching the badge
laugh it up, get pumped off the live action, replaying videos of their
puppet mastery, enjoying their own pithy commentary for amusement,
pursuing judicial redress (criminal convictions) for violence they made
possible and encouraged, freely and gleefully using chemical warfare,
tazers and non-lethal weaponry (for some reason these always seem to be
headshots, although this is strictly against written policy!) – with the
help of many different group leaders, violence between rivals, L.O.s has
stopped, almost state-wide.
For us at the spear’s tip, some critics recriminate and admonish – we’ve
gone down in flames, being removed from population to areas sufficiently
isolated; all our privileges (telephone, canteen, TV, visits, etc.)
removed, subject to out-of-state transfer. The badge resort to textbook
“cointelpro” tactics: spreading misinformation, rumors, delaying or
stopping mail. Worker pigs, “porkers,” trying to revitalize dessicated
STG-conflicts to take the spotlight off of them. Any means necessary to
escape the repercussions. But, out of the ashes has risen a mighty
phoenix, one that has sent a cold chill down our oppressor’s back.
We’ve demonstrated that real leadership is based in action, not
handicapping our people, but rather in providing the knowledge, tools
and freedoms to act. Setting examples of sacrifice, tenacity and hard
work. Understanding that the struggle to change minds is hard even with
the truth staring some in the face; some would rather desperately clutch
at what’s most familiar and be a stubborn hindrance to those of us
conscious and progressing the movement. That is human nature, it will
take patience. No matter how many obstacles, as long as you keep the big
picture in your mind nothing else matters. Those of us answering the
call must cherish that we will never know the comforts of the meek. It
is a long, hard road, but we can be proud we are doing our part and did
not look away. If we are not willing to risk the usual, we will have to
settle for the ordinary. This would very much please capitalists and
their contributors, were we to become subjugated.
Self-determination is our only path. Take up one cause (i.e. removing
capitalism), make that one cause your life, think of it, dream of it,
live on that cause, let the brain, muscles, nerves, every part of your
body be full of that cause, and just leave every other idea alone. This
is the way to success. Success is walking from failure to failure with
no loss of enthusiasm. One or many defeats in battles do not constitute
loss of the war; remember the big picture. Great minds discuss ideas,
average minds discuss events, small minds discuss people. Of the latter
there are two kinds who will tell you that you can not make a
difference: 1) those who are afraid to try; and 2) those who fear you
will succeed where they can not. (1)
We suggest, start where you are, use what you have, do what you can. It
is not the critic who counts, not the one who points out how the strong
stumble, or where and how a doer of deeds could have done them better.
The credit belongs to the man in the arena, whose face is marked by
dust, sweat, blood; who strives valiantly, who knows the great
enthusiasms, the greater devotions, who spends himself in a worthy
cause, who at best, knows in the end the triumph of high achievement,
and who, at worst, if he fails, at least, fails while daring greatly, so
that his place shall never be among those cold, sententious, timid souls
who have never known victory nor defeat.
To those who, like us revolutionaries here in Colorado, understand and
struggle for a united prisoner movement: We tip our hats to you all. The
fight is hard, and well worth the effort, sweat, blood, deprivations and
temporary setbacks. Change is happening, change is coming.(2)
Is it possible to defeat gangster mentality in ourselves? The short
answer is: Yes. There is plenty of solid individuals who have turned
their back on the thug life and criminal thinking. But, is that what is
needed when building a revolutionary cadre organization? Instead,
perhaps we should attempt to harness and direct our vision of
revolutionary social force into a hammer to first shatter the old
imperialist system. And then from the ashes and rubble shape a new and
better society that will serve the masses free of exploitation.
As members of the revolutionary cadre organization, each of us has to be
a leader, a teacher, an activist, a soldier and represent the future by
our conduct. Individual members must take the initiative to bring
together various organizations for a united front. For this to happen
our members have to think beyond their neighborhood, set or clique. All
of us are already soldiers of battles that take place right under the
nose of pigs. The system does not care if we kill each other. Actually
they encourage warfare between lumpen organizations. When we fight each
other we do their job for them.
Fight the imperialist system by making peace in prison and on the
street. Educate the young, think on an international level, and lead by
example. Evolve from a gangster into a hardcore communist revolutionary.
Consider your time fighting for your neighborhoods as basic training for
the real battle yet to come.
Fifteen years ago she was in a desperate situation and in an unfortunate
set of circumstances. From afar we have watched Comrade Brown show and
prove to the world over that consistency, education, solidarity and a
set of principles not unlike our own can literally tear down the walls
of the oppressive state apparatus.
Most peoples and folks would overlook the struggle of a misled youth in
favor of the more traditional political prisoner, but, when we saw that
our comrade was free we had to inform the masses of eir struggle. #she2
is Legion.
To be Legion you must have been about that life at one point. To
be Legion you must have become the change you wanted to see. You
could be a Freed Cyntoia Brown or a captive ME.
She beat the patriarchal system that told her that she would do 51 years
for killing a trick who tried to rape her while under capitalism. She
was forced into prostitution by a pimp that coerced her into the
underground commercial sex economy without any input from her.
While she sat in prison she didn’t waste time. She got her education,
she got a degree, she advocated for her freedom turning her cell into
her dormitory. She went from the state pen to Penn State.
We hope for the best for Comrade Brown as she begins her life on
release. She too knows the struggle the pain of the road less traveled,
and we humbly salute her with universal greetings of PEACE!
MIM(Prisons) adds: Cyntoia Brown is an inspiration as to what the
oppressed nation lumpen youth can overcome and accomplish. Her case is
one where gender, class and national oppression all came into play
leading Cyntoia to the traumatic experiences of her early life. These
experiences were a consequence of gender oppression on her as not only a
biological female, but also a young persyn. The lack of development of
youth make them more subject to gender oppression in patriarchal
society. Such experiences will often mark and change a persyn’s life.
And we celebrate those like Cyntoia who come out of those experiences as
a strong, educated organizer for the interests of the oppressed.
Unfortunately, we know countless Cyntoia Browns as Legion implies. And
they do not have celebrities working on their freedom campaign. Some of
them will spend the rest of their lives in prison. This is the
difference between the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie, that we live
under now, which keeps the leaders of the oppressed locked up; as
compared to the dictatorship of the proletariat, that we need, which
will recognize those who take up the cause of the oppressed to be
reformed contributors to society.
The risk is cases like Brown’s making it look like the U.$. injustice
system also recognizes such contributors, as if Brown was released
because the government recognized eir value to society, and not simply
because of public pressure. Again, there are many Browns who are still
languishing in prison because they didn’t get the public support,
weren’t “newsy” enough, etc. And there will be many more if we don’t put
an end to the patriarchal society that so often leads youth into
dangerous situations.
We are grateful Comrade Brown is released and still fighting the good
fight, and we have a lot more work to do.
“We find ourselves today forced into a re-examination of the whole
nature of black revolutionary consciousness and its relative standing
within a class society steeped in a form of racism so sensitized that it
extends itself even to the slightest variation in skin tone.” - Comrade
George (B.I.M.E.)
Almost 50 years after the assassinations of our comrades W. L., George,
Khata-Ri, etc, etc. and the enemy has totally disseminated our party and
reinforced their system to potentially negate our future revolutionary
movements! What do we do now?
Our demand for narcotics to temporarily numb the pain of half life in
capitalist U.$. is helping to fuel our distraction. Half of us sell dope
and the other half use it!! Killing our unity and revolutionary
potential! Now here we are, in capitalist U.$. torture chambers! Many of
us are addicts, chasing a high right now! Some of us “claim a set” and
from this identity cannot see being cool with the brotha of another
“set.” Some are lifers, who are weary of sacrificing themselves for the
reactionaries to benefit! Some have already fallen too far (i.e. KKKop
collaborators), and in turn, work covertly to undermine our movement!
Others are poltroons, and out of their fear(s), they knowingly sabotage
our progression as a U.$. disfavored minority. Many of us are “armchair
revolutionaries” in that our practice(s) never match our stated militant
goals. Others see control of the “underground economy” as being
revolutionary. I do not have the answers. I am simply a New Afrikan man
seeking community input as I continue to stride firmly. My questions
are:
How is the “revolutionary consciousness” developed in a time of
reactionary gangsterism?
At what point does this so called “revolutionary theorist” have
to put his theories into practice?
How can we ever trust a cat who has ever worked as an informant
or jail house rat? By his very obvious individualism he has demonstrated
his priority is ideal of “me first.” Which, to us, says that once the
pressure(s) of isolation, pig abuse(s), additional time, etc. comes into
play, he will tell again. Setting us back even further!
MIM(Prisons) responds: This comrade and eir questions posed was
one of the inspirations for the topic of this issue of ULK. And
we hope we have at least begun to provide some answers and guidance for
those of us struggling with these questions.
This comrade also mentions a serious side-effect of the current gangster
era, which is propped up by the drug economy. This reality serves as a
material incentive in the form of profits for the seller and in the form
of chemical triggers in the brain of the buyer. We addressed this
situation in more depth in ULK 59 where we recognized the
challenges in even questioning the drug economy in today’s prison
environment. It will require progress on other fronts to make a dent on
the struggle against the poisoning of oppressed communities.
So what is to be done today?
Build a Revolutionary Culture on the Streets
USW30: Recently I heard of my older brotha/comrade’s passing and
it has me wondering… how do the brothas/sistas, who’ve embraced
revolutionary consciousness inside, transition to outside struggles?
Taking into consideration that the lumpen are in a state of defeatism
and quite fratricidal!
I personally exited Federal Bureau Of Prisons after 17 calendars. I
jumped right into local progressive politics and organizational
volunteer work, serving the lumpen! Yet, seemingly at every outing one
was forced to repel some form of gang reactionary threat(s). Most of
which, stern chastisements sufficed. However, all B.S. aside, I guess
what I’m saying is, without a “progressive culture” in play within the
“hood” We are at risk of A) being victimized by our misguided lumpen,
conditioned by capitalism to fratricidal violence, B) or we ourselves
react to reactionary threats and in turn reinforce the lumpen’s
perceptions of us, “prison revolutionaries” that return to “gangster”
conduct once out.
In truth, the only communities I saw which had requisite support
systems; minimal threat of intra-national violence, and universal code
of community morality were Islamic. I continually read pieces in
ULK, where cats profess to be “materialist dialecticians” and as
such, against “spirituality.” What I suggest to those living in New
Afrikan areas in particular is to analyze the impact of Islam on it.
Contrast that with that of the so-called revolutionaries. We must figure
out more effective ways to bring unity, as we methodically strive to
bring Babylon down. Rather than spit unproductive rhetoric which
services interests of the pigs by dividing militants from one another.
Those who are truly analyzing the body of facts (i.e. U.$. history)
would have to acknowledge that those of Afrikan ancestry have always
held spiritual connections and/or beliefs in a higher power/creator.
Upwards of 40% of enslaved Afrikans were Muslim. Leading many slave
captors to recommend traffickers firstly “break” them (i.e. torture
Islam out of them) prior to bringing these known rebels to the United
$tates and England. My point being those who truly work to build
revolutionary culture must work with Muslims and in turn find common
ground to then gain traction in revolutionary culture building.
Materialists must dialectically look at U.$. history and correspond
tactics to today’s realities confronting historically oppressed peoples!
Teach Christians examples of Nat Turner, Denmark Vesey, etc. Teach
Muslims about El Hajj Malik Shabazz (Malcolm X), etc. That even though
we may come from varying socio-cultural backgrounds, we have the very
same oppressors and system. That the Muslims, Christians, Buddhists,
Atheists, Communists, etc. who live within U.$. borders all share the
same injustices, inequalities, and pig brutalities on a daily basis. As
such, we must cast side the divisive rhetoric and build class unity or
die. As a Muslim of New Afrika, I am obligated to fight all oppressors.
Personally, I could care less if the askari at my side believes or not.
Long as he/she is committed to struggle…to death or death row. Does it
matter if I must make Salah, before we run towards our oppressors? Well,
that’s my take and regardless, I will continue fighting, organizing, and
striving! Peace.
MIM(Prisons) responds:We agree with this author’s point that
we should be working with the left wing of the Muslim movement, and
other religions. We addressed this question in depth in ULK 48.
As communists we embrace materialism and encourage scientific thinking
about the world. But this does not prevent us from uniting with all who
can be rallied against imperialism. And the rabid anti-Muslim sentiments
coming from the Amerikan imperialists creates fertile breeding ground
for anti-imperialism.
Although we cannot find evidence of such a high percentage of Muslims
among enslaved Africans. At the time that slaves were captured from
Africa indigenous religions were the most common practice. But
traffickers (and slave owners) attempted to break slaves of all their
practices that tied them to their homeland, regardless of what religion
or other cultural norms.
While we often talk about the imprisoned lumpen as being one of the most
revolutionary populations in the United $tates, it is also in a
backwards state of affairs. Meanwhile, the last time we saw a strong
revolutionary consciousness penetrate the prison population was when
there were strong vanguard organizations in the oppressed nations on the
streets. We must recognize that part of building a strong revolutionary
movement in prisons is building an even stronger one on the outside.
United Struggle from Within serves as a conduit for connecting the two,
via prisoners who are released. MIM(Prisons)’s Re-Lease on Life Program
attempts to provide support to those who are struggling with these
challenges after release. But we have a lot of work to do to build
strong revolutionary communities for comrades around the United $tates.
Revolutionary Theorists or Revolutionaries
USW30: Within the context of criticism-self-criticism, I am
wondering when we as revolutionary theorists on the inside, shall
righteously analyze the definition(s) of “revolution”/“revolutionary”?
And in turn, be honest with ourselves (within the New Afrikan community)
about if we are truly on that path that Col J (RIP), W.L. (RIP) etc.
strode. I am questioning myself as well?! As the
Kentucky
comrade pointed out on p. 8 of ULK 65.(1)
Many of us claim to be revolutionaries, but have yet to truly embrace
the reality of revolution! Or, shed the ethos of Gangsta. We create
plethora of revolutionary documents in prisons, only to return to
society and criminality. Recently a young New Afrikan referred to a
fellow rad as “homeless dopefiend!” This made me think back.
The economy of capitalism murders millions daily. We have seemingly been
co-opted by enemy cultural tenants! We have comrades embracing drug
dealing as acceptable conduct! Poisoning our communities, profiting off
of the destruction of our underklass citizenry! Then, returning to
prison in turn advocating for addicted rads to be cast aside! We have
rads claiming revolutionary authenticity, that have yet to stand against
the real enemy, yet take pride in shopping blood of their own! The
contradictions are glaring and I believe these are just a few of the
things which have a real progressive and revolutionary movement
stagnating!
Perhaps a retracing of steps is needed? As in… acknowledgement of
enemy’s defeat of the revolutionary movement in the 60s! That the “Black
Power” of the 70s was a reformist attempt(s) to somehow safeguard some
aspect of sociocultural pride, while rejecting the dominant amerikkkan
kapitalist culture! Which in turn, led to the 80s crack epidemic and
subsequent abandonment of all things revolution. For a “piece of the
pie!”
These cats coming into prison today… fratricidal, apolitical, and
addicted! Are the effects of our failures as leaders, in our
communities! How can he claim Col J (RIP), when our day to day conduct
is a reactionary affirmation of “Superfly” and “the Mack?” These youth
see the hypocrisies, and this is why we cannot gain their support! To
speak about revolution and yet not live a revolutionary example is
unacceptable! And fraudulent in the 1st degree! I am no longer going to
refer to myself as a revolutionary until I engage in revolution! Nor
will I reference Col J(RIP) as my “comrade,” until I follow his
examples!
I thank the Kentucky comrade for eir critiques in the last two
paragraphs, as they struck home for me! We must reform the “gangstas”
within our movement… or destroy them! As their overt materialistic
individualisms will destroy us… or, turn the progressives back into
elements of reaction!
MIM(Prisons) responds: There is a bit of an existential crisis
for the revolutionary in non-revolutionary times. We don’t take on the
term “revolutionary” as if we were superheroes, but merely to describe
our political goals and ideology. But, it does bring us back to question
2 above. And we’d say that a revolutionary must always be putting eir
theories into practice. And that includes not waging revolutionary war
in a non-revolutionary situation. That is a basic principle of the
guerilla.
As USW30 says, the youth can detect the phony revolutionaries who just
talk the rhetoric while acting out the negative aspects of the gangster
role. We can act as revolutionaries, as individuals, in our day-to-day
behavior in interacting with, serving, and standing up for the people.
There’s a reason we get letters regularly mentioning the comrades who
died in the struggle 50 years ago. Their legacy lives on because they
stood up as examples. And even if our names don’t become legendary, we
will inspire the youth and the masses around us through our correct
actions.
If we accept MIM(Prisons)’s line and analysis that U.$. prisoners –
lumpen prisoners of oppressed nations – have the most objective
class-nation interest in anti-imperialism, then of course the validity
of this analysis can be tested in practice, whereby objective organizing
factors-forces would be evident. MIM(Prisons), to its credit of
remarkable theoretical leadership, has already outlined in its article
on prison organizing what the principal contradiction is driving the
Prison Movement.(1) MIMP also challenged its prison cadre (of prisoner
study groups) to do the same for their own specific state prison
conditions. While these theoretical tasks are undoubtedly necessary,
they don’t really instruct us on whether the Prison Movement is actually
moving, or better yet whether there is even a Prison Movement to move.
Thus, it is the aim of this article to look deeper into the question of
prison organizing, to determine what fundamental factors-forces need to
be in evidence for there to be a viable Prison Movement, and above all
to give an honest assessment of the U.$. lumpen prisoner’s potential to
be leaders of any progressive movement, least of all, one of
anti-imperialism or national liberation. However, it should be noted
that the conclusions reached in this article are specific to Washington
state prisons. It is the hope of the author that other cadre across U.$.
prisons will pick up the pen and conduct their own serious and sober
investigation.
For MIM(Prisons), the principal contradiction determining the
development and direction of the Prison Movement is expressed in terms
of consciousness, not class or nation. With individualistic (petty
bourgeois) attitudes and behavior occupying one pole of the
contradiction, the other pole is occupied by more group-oriented
(progressive) conduct and concern. And at this time, as it has been for
some time, individualistic consciousness is the dominant pole of the
principal contradiction. In other words, within a given prison
environment, most prisoners view their interests (short-term,
medium-term, and even long-term) being realized through individualism
(and opportunism). Accordingly, group-oriented thinking and action are
rarely seen and therefore have little-to-no impact on the Prison
Movement.
Washington state is no different in this regard. In fact, it is
exceptional in a level of individualism, opportunism, and soft-shoe
parasitism that prevail among its prisoners. Sure, the anti-people
behavior of snitching, drug culture, extortion through manipulation,
etc. is not exclusive to Washington prisons. Such behavior can be seen
in just about any U.$. prison, in settings where violence and
viciousness are the only coins with purchasing power. And yet, in
Washington prisons, extremely adverse conditions are pretty much
nonexistent, and with it a large part of the basis for prison
organizing.
To explain further, Washington state has created a new, depoliticized
prison environment, one in which traditional prison politics are not
tolerated. While prison politics of old were reactionary and
self-destructive, depoliticization has anesthetized the Washington state
prisoner to the contradictions that come with imprisonment. With the
Washington prison of today being somewhat safe, devoid of the
ever-present threat of physical and sexual violence, and other forms of
overt predatory behavior, the prisoner is no longer forced to question
and think critically about the conditions of incarceration. Indeed,
today the prisoner is numb to the political dimensions of incarceration.
There are essentially three ways in which Washington has managed to
accomplish this. First, it has all but institutionalized snitching,
allowing for the systematic abuse/misuse of protective mechanisms (such
as PREA and other federally-mandated laws) by prisoners and staff.(2)
And because consequences for snitching went out with the old prison
politics, this encourages more prisoners to join the growing horde of
informants. This results in more and more prisoners seeing their
interests protected by the state, when unfortunately, it only reinforces
the status quo of their imprisonment.
Conversely, those prisoners who refuse to be pawns of the system isolate
themselves within their own close-knit groups and factions. They sit
back and lament about how so-and-so is telling or they talk fondly about
how things used to be. In reality, these prisoners are only engaging in
their own form of individualism by resurrecting old myths or fashioning
new ones from their false consciousness. Ultimately, these prisoners are
just as bad as the snitches, because they are paralyzed to act or think
critically (and scientifically) by the possibility of being told on. At
least the snitch snitches, that is to say, “acts.”
The second way WA State has sanitized its prisons of organizing
conditions is by institutionalizing privileges. WA State has done a
phenomenal job in this respect. Prisoners can join culture groups where
they have activities and functions. There are a bunch of special jobs as
well as the most coveted Correctional Industries job. Programs range
from education and vocational to religious and community support. Of
course, cable TV, J Pay, food fund raisers, and quarterly food packages
contribute to the sanitization of the prison environment. All of these
taken together allow the prisoner to carve out eir own specialized niche
of doing time, whereby ey becomes a better inmate instead of a better
person. More importantly in the eyes of WA State ey becomes reliable
because eir behavior is predictable. In other words, WA State doesn’t
have to worry about “model inmate” given that ey is lost in doing easy
time.
Finally, the third and most important way WA State created a
depoliticized climate within its prisons was to dismantle and discredit
the old guard. The old guard represented a collection of old-school
prisoners, who were versed in prison politics of both revolutionary and
reactionary iterations. (The term “prison politics” originated during
the late 60s and 70s, as a liberation ideology beyond the walls found a
home behind the walls. But just as the reactionaries beat back the tide
of social change, those revolutionary prisoners under lock and key
suffered similar fate. What was left in the walk was the same predations
and parasitism we saw in lumpen communities of oppressed nations at that
time. Today, most prisoners erroneously believe prison politics to mean
prison LO’s pushing the line behind telephones and tables or checking in
prisoners who’s paperwork didn’t check out.) Sadly, most of these
prisoners have given up on handing down “game” to the younger
generations, least of all organizing for better prison conditions. They
are either bought off with a special status within prison reserved only
for old timers, or become victims/hostages of their own vices. Those who
have maintained a militant posture, over time, have their characters
impinged in a pig-led campaign to discredit them and their organizing
efforts. It is this dearth of political leadership and guidance that is
most responsible for the depoliticization within WA State prisons.
But such a situation isn’t as discouraging when we look at the WA State
penitentiary. The state penitentiary or West Complex is a closed
(maximum) facility, housing lots of young lumpen org members looking to
wild out. So at the West Complex it is common to have race riots or
prison LO rivalries. Fights are an everyday thing creating an atmosphere
electric with tension. And at just about any moment staff can be
victimized too. Yet, in a seemingly chaotic environment, where WA State
has not eradicated “prison politics,” that is the West Complex
group-oriented action based on principled unity among all the prisoners
resulted in concessions from the state. In early 2018, West Complex
prisoners got fed up with the poor food (pun intended) they were being
served, and as a collective group decided to go on a hunger strike. It
became such a big ordeal in the state that the governor, Jay Inslee,
visited the facility to speak with a few prisoners who registered the
grievances of the population. Of course, the visit by the governor was
more show than a show of concern. The point is, such group-oriented
action actually resulted in some of the grievances of the prisoners
being addressed. Most notably was the addition of a hot breakfast to the
menu where previously it was a cold sack.
The point that this example serves isn’t that reactionary prison
politics work or that violent prisoners are more suited for
group-oriented action. No, the point here is that a repressive
institution such as a maximum facility creates and nurtures violence; it
promotes the continuation of reactionary prison politics. And as
violence occurs and politics are pushed, the repressive nature of the
institution tightens evermore. Eventually, prisoners are forced to deal
with the meager, spartan existence the institution provides them. Some
choose the path of more self-destructive behavior, but it is ALL who
opts for the path of collective-oriented action when the conditions are
ripe.
This isn’t exactly a glowing endorsement of the maximum prison. Too much
reactionary stuff occurs behind its walls by too many prisoners with
reactionary consciousness. Leadership must be in place, the issue to
organize around must be important to most if not everyone. And more
importantly, there can be no hesitation once the wheels move forward and
gains momentum. The organizing effort is too delicate of a process
within the WA State prison environment, which is why more often than not
conditions are left to rot.
The one definite conclusion reached about organizing in WA State prisons
is that the max prison fosters a rebellion among its prisoners that has
the greatest potential to serve the Prison Movement. There is a level of
seriousness and critical awareness seen in the West Complex that is just
nonexistent in other WA State prisons, due to the depoliticization
program. This isn’t to say that there aren’t some enlightened comrades
on WA State medium and minimum mainlines sprinkled here and there. It is
precisely this “sprinkling here and there” of righteous comrades that
the cacophony of “doing easy time” drowns out their leadership, however.
MIMP has already reached the theoretical conclusion that the lumpen
prisoners (of oppressed nations) will make up the vanguard of the Prison
Movement. But here in WA State, unlike most other states, it is the
labor aristocratic and petty-bourgeois oppressor nation prisoners who
are in the majority on most mainlines. And given this group’s
inclination toward fascism, it poses an obstacle to organizing in many
respects. Those oppressor nation prisoners who do not flirt with fascist
politics are generally sex offenders and thus seen as even more taboo to
unite with. This is an interesting dynamic for lumpen prisoners’ (of
oppressed nations) role within the WA State Prison Movement. It must not
only overcome oppressor nation fascism but also violate prison norms set
by politics.
Granted, prison politics have been eliminated on most WA State
mainlines, but they have yet to be eliminated from the hearts and minds
of both lumpen prisoners (of oppressed nations) and oppressor nation
prisoners (fascists). Consequently, the stage of struggle with respect
to the WA State Prison Movement is at the level of disunity and
distrust. Coupled with the very real fact that the lumpen prisoners (of
oppressed nations) are fractured into their own constituent prison and
street LO’s, their leadership in the movement is without a doubt
questionable at this point. For lumpen prisoners (of oppressed nations),
caught in the depoliticized zones of Washington State prisons, the only
objective interest for organizing is for their freedom. Everything else
for this group is about drug culture, checking for wimmin, and
establishing and maintaining a credible prison reputation to take with
them to the street. To this point, the potential for the relatively few
lumpen prisoners (of oppressed nations) to lead or even support a Prison
Movement exists within the WA State closed custody institution, West
Complex.
While such a conclusion is discouraging for WA State revolutionary
prisoners, the hope lies in defining–maybe redefining–what the aims of
the Prison Movement are relative to the specific conditions of the WA
State. If, in general, the Prison Movement is about improving prison
conditions, agitating and educating the larger population on the
systemic injustices of mass incarcerations, or challenging the
legitimacy of the prison, then the WA State Prison Movement must focus
most of its effort on agitating and educating, challenging the growth of
the prisons, etc. The basis for improving prison conditions has become
an exclusive endeavor for the typical “legal beagle” in search of a big
payday. The average prisoner has it too good to want to organize for
better.
In conclusion, it is the overall contention of this article that the WA
State Prison Movement exists, but solely in the individual practices of
the few righteous comrades throughout the system.
MIM(Prisons) responds: This writer demonstrates how to study
local prison conditions to determine the contradictions and where to
best focus our organizing energy. This is something that has to be done
from within each state by people who live there and know the conditions.
It can’t be done from the outside. With this analysis we can compare
conditions, learn from best practices in other similar prisons, and
build our organizing work in a scientific way. We welcome comrades in
other states to follow this example and send in your own analysis of
your state or prison conditions. We also hope other WA prisoners will
respond to this analysis with your thoughts and observations.
In the February 2019 issue of the SF BayView there was a headline
that read, “California Prisoners endangered by forced merger of Snitch
Yards.” And it dawns on the world, how can a prisoner in the prison
state capitol affect change on a national, and international level, if
they can not find unity as a population suffering under the exact same
conditions of: Police Brutality, Don’t ask Don’t Tell, Code of Silence
Policies, Corrupt Administrative Justices, and Counterfeit Social
Justice/Prison Reform Advocates. Prisoners in California suffer, as a
whole, under these conditions, yet the leaderships of the most
politically advanced wrestle over popularity contests between who is
“active” and who is non-active, who is with the business and who is not.
Just what business is it that defines whether a person in prison is
active or not? Is it not the Freedom of All Persons in Prison we
struggle for, or is it but a select few?
Aren’t we all political prisoners, under these current conditions? Of
course, there are those amongst the population of prisoners who are
deserving of a bit more popularity than others. Those who carry the
publicity of high profile cases as social justice activist, militants
and radicals. All in all however, do we not share the similar suffering
under this condition called imprisonment?
In California, leaders must really mature themselves and their followers
to the level of love and reconciliation, this be prisoners and former
prisoners. The time is: N.O.W.
Headlines like this one in the SF BayView, designating all
Sensitive Needs Yard (SNY) facilities as “snitch yards,” are not only
mis-leading the public support of the California abolitionist
population, but also an abuse of power that promotes dis-unity amongst
the prison populations. Prisoner leaderships must be wise in the manner
with which we allow for our movement to be represented by members of the
public. The most important aspect should be the information that leaders
allow to be published on the state of population affairs. It must be
accurate information, based on facts, that the leaders use when
representing the movement, or its population.
It is a fact, not all prisoners housed at SNY Facilities are snitches.
So for the headline, “…Forced Merger of Snitch Yards” to be presented by
the SF BayView does a (dis)service, to not only one of the
strongest vehicles and stages for the prison abolitionist movement, but
it hurts the movement as a whole. What, social justice and prison reform
for all but SNY prisoners?
Prisons across North America are faced with a similar issue to the SNY
facilities. Those who benefit the most from the all-too-common misnomer
that all SNY are snitches, child molesters, sexual deviants, are the law
enforcement agencies. This too includes mainstream corporate news
reporting agencies. #Fakenews. There are individuals who testified in
the event of their commitment offense all over prison, not just SNY. And
what is to be said about leaderships within prisons affiliated with drug
operations, serving poison to the community, gun violence involving
non-combative casualties of peoples, kids, grandparents, relatives? And
what about the big homies on the line affiliated with pimping, pandering
and prostitution. How many underage homegirls have we condoned being out
in the trap after curfew?
Prisoners across the United $tates in the states of TX, OH, LA, AL, NY,
PA, FL, VA, NC, and SC have begun concerted efforts to consolidate the
various factions of their prison populations, scattered across the
board, for the sake of unity. This effort is known as the National
Freedom and Justice Movement. If the leaderships, and their followings
within California prisons do not cease in their petty quarrels and
name-calling skirmishes on both sides, SNY and GP, those who have often
been at the center of the global discussions for prison reform and
abolitionism might find themselves on the wrong side of history. This is
a most sincere call for prisoners in California, whether it be former
prisoners, juvenile lifer prisoners, non-violent offender prisoners,
level 4, 180 & 270 prisoners.
See, the one thing you all have in common? You’re prisoners. There may
be some who hold strictly to the Agreement to End Hostilities while
others will develop under the United Front for Peace in Prison. Wherever
it be, get in where you fit in and carry love first of all. The movement
is larger than all of us, none is without error, thus there must always
be room for reconciliation.
I for one beg your mercy In struggle and strength
MIM(Prisons) comments: The BayView article in question was
written by someone, who, despite our disagreements on questions of
Marxism, has done a lot to advocate for people in the California
Security Housing Unit (SHU) system. The anti-SNY attitude is still the
status quo among the lumpen organizations (L.O.s) that were once the
main targets of the SHU. And some supporters of those who spent years
and decades in those torture cells parrot the disparaging attitudes
towards SNY, which peaked at almost one third of the California prison
population before the forced integration began.
We stand with the families who are concerned about the safety of their
loved ones, and who are exposing the state for using the NDPFs as
coercive tools of violence against those who don’t just go along with
the state’s program. Our approach remains one of advocating for and
supporting comrades in these NDPFs who are advocating for the principles
of the United Front for Peace in Prisons(UFPP). While the forced
integration currently serves the state, this is only true as long as
prisoners stay divided. By building the UFPP in the interests of all
imprisoned people, we can turn this tool of oppression into an
opportunity to transform decades-long divisions in the California prison
system. We have a long way to go, but some day these divisions must
fall.
The latest reports from withing the NDPFs are included below.
A California prisoner reports on integration at California
Correctional Institution: In CCI-Tehachapi level III, the prisoners
who challenge the status quo are quickly transferred out to the
so-called Non-Designated Programming Facilities (NDPF). There they will
become targets due to our SNY status. This is how CDCR has been
rehabilitating California’s enslaved population. If we don’t jump when
they tell us to jump, or crawl on our knees and hands, we are considered
program failures.
The same type of racist rehabilitation that George Jackson found in the
1960s, I found it myself in 2018 at CCI-Tehachapi. CDCR is creating
monsters, on purpose. This is why many of us come out hating society and
would rather die off than return to prison.
A prisoner in California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility reports
on 1 May 2019: Here at SATF-D facility these guys’ eyes are wired
shut. We have been receiving a flux of prisoners from Soledad and New
Folsom EOP facility. These individuals are New Afrikan and Chican@, they
come from what are known as mainline soft yards, or 50/50 yards. These
are facilities where there is very little to zero accountability to the
post-George Jackson structure of prison politicking. Where most mainline
facilities there will be paperwork checking (investigations into a
prisoner’s commitment offense by other prisoners to determine the
internal social status of prisoners on new arrival), or orchestrating
the ostracizing of a persyn who co-operated with the police in their
commitment offense. Although 50/50 facilities are considered mainline
facilities, they don’t engage in much of this sort of behavior. Now they
are being introduced to SATF-D facility, which is supposed to be a
Sensitive Needs Yard (SNY).
There have been a few fist fights, but overall the masses don’t even
care where these new arrivals are coming from. The leaderships within
the facility are already on the look out for particular type of
behavior. We ain’t tripping on an individual’s paperwork, one’s sexual
gender, or activity. Even if one transfers in and is a member of an STG,
we are not ostracizing people here. Give it enough time, most guys are
rolling it up and having admin rehouse them, rather than come with the
police tactics. One of the strongest instruments being used is the
United Front for Peace in Prisons statement, the Unity Principle.
I have persynally used the works of Larry Hoover and the “Blueprint from
Gangsters Disciple to Growth and Development” by Ron Erwin to spread the
truth to all G.D.s, and all who have been affiliated, influenced or
associated with and by our movement. From Crips of various subsets like
the Five Deuce, One-O-Seven and Seven Four Hoovers. To the Bloods of
various subsets like the Black P. Stones, Four Deuce Brims, Anthens,
these prison politiks, that are spread by gladiator wars, all have a
root. At this local level we are spreading awareness of the liberation
struggle of freedom fighters like: Leonard Peltier, Mutulu Shakur and
Red Fox Falcon, drawing connections between them and the fathers (and
mothers) of our movements.
19 de Octubre 2018 – Una semana después de las festividades en México
del Día de La Raza, una caravana de 3 o 4 mil hombres, mujeres y niños
emigrantes (formando parte de lo que se apodó el Éxodo Centroamericano),
tomaba por asalto la frontera Mexicana-Guatemalteca en Chiapas, un
estado sureño Mexicano, exigía salvoconducto a través de México para
llegar a los EE.UU. Los emigrantes habían pasado siete días andando
desde Honduras, donde originaba la caravana, hasta Guatemala, donde
aumentó a causa de que se unieron los guatemaltecos. Al llegar a la
frontera de México-Guatemala, los emigrantes fueron detenidos por las
Fuerzas Armadas Mexicanas que llevaban equipo contra disturbios,
vehículos blindados y helicópteros del modelo Black Hawk, provistos por
los estadounidenses. El gobierno neo-colonial Mexicano estuvo actuando
bajo órdenes del presidente estadounidense, Donald Trump, quien emitió
la amenaza de sanciones económicas contra México, además de advertir que
podría enviar tropas a la frontera conjunta de los EUA y México, si
México no evitaba que la caravana legase a los EUA. Se dieron órdenes
similares a Guatemala y a Honduras,quienes ignoraron las órdenes al
principio. Como resultado, el Presidente Trump amenazó con cortar la
ayuda económica a los países reacios.(1)
Con hambre, sed y cansancio, la caravana atravesó la reja de la frontera
y entró a México en oleadas, donde las Fuerzas Armadas Mexicanas
dispararon gas lacrimógeno y tuvieron que usar sus bastones contra los
emigrantes a fin de hacer retroceder a la caravana. Mientras algunos
emigrantes empezaron a lanzar rocas contra la policía, el acontecimiento
alcanzó un punto principal cuando un@s jóvenes empezaron a trepar las
puertas del puente, donde los detuvieron, así que empezaron a saltar
hacia el río bajo de Suchiate. Después de fallar en disuadir de saltar a
la gente, un reportero presente, preguntó ¿Porque saltar? Un emigrante
respondió que lo hacía por sus niños, y aunque no quería morir, el
riesgo valía la pena si podía alimentar a su familia. Otros respondieron
que preferían morir en vez que volver a la pobreza oprimente y a la
violencia pandillera dominante que les aguarda de regreso a casa. “Sólo
queremos trabajar”, otros emigrantes dijeron. Cuando todo ya había
terminado se reportó que había muerto un niño debido a inhalación del
gas lacrimógeno.(2)
Desafortunadamente, los problemas de la caravana no se acabaron allí. 48
horas después de haber sido detenida en el Rio Suchiate, casi la mitad
de la caravana fue eventualmente admitida en México, mientras que un@s 2
mil optaron por subiese a los buses de regreso a Honduras. El 22 de
octubre, los miembros restantes de la caravana se juntaron con con otros
refugiados centroamericanos ya en Chiapas, que resultó en el aumento de
la caravana de 7 a 8 mil. Esto incluyó a 2 mil niños entre la caravana
junto con la organización de los derechos para los emigrantes, Pueblo
Sin Fronteras (People Without Borders). Miembros de la caravana hicieron
una petición pública a las Naciones Unidos para que declaren al éxodo
centroamericano como una crisis humanitaria. Le pidieron a las N.U. que
intervinieran y enviaran unos emisarios y una escolta militar para que
vigilaran el pasaje de la caravana por México, al que se refirieron como
el “Corredor de la Muerte.” Representantes de la caravana acusaron al
gobierno Mexicano de perpetrar abusos de los derechos humanos contra
ellos. Dijeron que las mujeres habían sido violadas y que habían
secuestrado menores. Además, contaron sobre niños en la caravana que de
pronto viajaban solos porque sus padres habían desaparecido.(3)
Entretanto, más hacia el sur del hemisferio, la actriz Angelina Jolie,
quien es una embajadora especial de la Comisión por los Derechos Humanos
para refugiados de las N.U., viajó a Perú para llamar la atención a la
“crisis humanitaria” que se está dando en el país vecino de Venezuela,
donde la inflación y falta de comida ha conllevado a migraciones en masa
hacia Perú, Brasil y Colombia.(4) L@s migraciones fuera de Venezuela han
sido ampliamente cubiertas por los medios estadounidenses junto con una
retórica cada vez más hostil por parte de políticos para derrocar el
régimen de Nicolas Maduro, el cuál se ha manifestado en contra del
control imperialista del país. En comparación, la petición de la
caravana Hondureña apenas ha recibido atención por parte de los medios
de difusión de habla inglesa, exceptuando por su influencia en las
elecciones intermedias aquí en los E$tados Unidos. ¿Podría esto deberse
a que el gobierno Venezolano ha sido una espina en el costado del
imperialismo estadounidense por los últimos 20 años, mientras que los
gobiernos de México, Guatemala y Honduras han sido sirvientes leales,
tal vez reacios, de ese mismo poder imperialista?
Desde 2005, la cifra oficial de refugiados en el mundo aumentó de 8,7
millones a 214,4 millones en 2014.(5) Sin embargo, visto que la propia
definición y criterios para calificar como refugiado están dictados por
los propios imperialistas, y por lo tanto, políticamente motivados,
estamos seguros de que la cifra real es mucho más alta. Por ejemplo,
según a las N.U., Honduras no se considera si quiera como un país de
origen para refugiados. Tampoco lo es México, y aún así la mayoría de
gente emigrando a los E$tados Unidos viene de México, y ciertamente, la
gente de Honduras y Guatemala están huyendo de condiciones bastante
peores que la reciente crisis en Venezuela.(6)
Ya en 2014, habían 11,2 millones de emigrantes indocumentados en los
EE.UU.; 67% venían de México y Centroamérica. De estos 11,2 millones de
emigrantes, el 72% vive en cuatro de los 10 estados con las poblaciones
más grandes de indocumentados. De estos 10 estados, 4 son Aztlán, ej.,
California, Texas, Arizona, y Nevada.(7) Las estáticos también
demuestran que los emigrantes centroamericanos de Guatemala, Honduras y
El Salvador se incorporarán a Aztlán y sus niños serán asimilados por la
nación Chican@.(8)
A medida que la contradicción principal del mundo (el imperialismo
contra las naciones oprimidas, principalmente el imperialismo
estadounidense) sigue desarrollándose y la crisis empeora, podemos
anticipar más de estos éxodos en masa en el futuro cercano. Ya hay
reportes de otra caravana de al menos 1000 emigrantes saliendo de
Honduras. De seguro que para los estadounidenses esto debe parecer una
pesadilla hecha realidad, literalmente miles de refugiados del tercer
mundo golpeando las puertas de su ciudadela imperialista. Tan trágico
como todo esto parece, es tan sólo un vistazo de cómo las masas del
Tercer Mundo se levantarán al fin, y en su desesperación, terminarán con
el imperialismo una vez por todas. Curiosamente, las fuerzas
revolucionarios en México todavía no han aparecido a ayudar a la
caravana, mientras que gente normal trabajadora ya ha dado un paso
adelante para ayudar. ¿Cómo responderán l@s Chican@s? Eso está por
verse.
¡Raza si! ¡Muro no!
MIM(Prisiones) agrega: El Fondo Nacional de los E$tados Unidos
para la Democracia estuvo implicado tanto en el golpe de 2009 para
derrocar a Zelaya en Honduras y en el golpe de 2002 para derrocar a
Chavez en Venezuela (posteriormente revocado). Hillary Clinton
tristemente ayudó también a orquestar el golpe en Honduras. Desde
entonces, generales asesinos entrenados por la Escuela Estadounidense de
las Amerikkkas han aterrorizado a la población, matando a gente
indígena, campesinos y activistas ambientales. Los EUA ha establecido
una presencia militar grande en Honduras desde el golpe, apoyando el
robo de tierras a campesinos indígenas pobres y a campesinos de
descendencia africana.(9)
What is a gangster? Simply a word, an idea? No Gangster is a psychology,
a mentality.
Six things, in varying degree, regardless of locale, are always present
in penal institutions: authorities (the badge), prisoners (captives),
oppression, resistance, manipulation and violence. Oppression and
manipulation are the badges’ primary tools for controlling prisons.
Captives have recourse to resistance and violence. The gangster is both
target and aspiration for the badge and captives alike; if only for
different reasons.
The badge sees gangsterism as a necessary evil. The “convict code” is
based on gangsterism. The badge uses this to great effect. For example,
misinformation offered by a “friendly” badge. There is no doubt a badge
can call any captive a snitch, or worse, and be believed. Many reason
that the badge does have access to every captive’s file. What possible
purpose could they have in lying to a gangster?
The badge’s main concern is control. Controlling prisoner populations is
most effective when the system can take advantage of pre-existing
mechanisms, such as gangsterism or convict code. In such cases
oppression seems organic, correct course of action instead of
manipulation. More often than not a gangster learns information,
suspicions emerge, questions asked, investigations follow. At the very
least a captive’s credibility is destroyed; at the extreme are
ostracization and violence. This is not only true for the badge.
Captives also manipulate gangsterism. A gangster’s word has merit, more
so than the badge’s. Here too manipulation appears organic. A gangster’s
suspicions sway other captives’ opinions so that character assassination
due to personal enmity is all too familiar. The issue is not the
manipulation but rather the lack of resistance.
Gangster is the pillar of lumpen communities. Eir honor, integrity are
above reproach. Knowing this the badge whispers in the right ears and
later watches captives eating one another like sharks in a small pond.
At present, the rules of gangsterism are at the service of the badge.
Changing the prevailing culture of captive vs. captive violence and
badge collaboration is a serious problem to be resolved in prison today.
Does this mean abandoning gangsterism? Gangsterism is tied up in all
kinds of capitalist principles: machoism, classism, patriarchy, etc.
Yet, it is based in resisting the system: noble seed of revolutions.
Understanding the forces at play is necessary for combating corrupted
gangsterism, because gangsterism can be a stepping stone to
revolutionary mentality.
Every social environment evinces a subjection-manipulation cycle:
subjection to rules, norms, expectations, and manipulation through
rewards and negative consequences. Prisons are no different, neither is
criminal intercourse. Capitalism for general society, gangsterism for
captives. To bring gangsterism back to its revolutionary core we can
turn to the democratic method – unity, criticism, unity.
Gangsterism is at the badge’s service not only because of manipulation
disseminated through gangsters but by lumpen divisions. In prison, far
more than in society, lumpen become isolationists and separatists.
Latinos with Latinos, further segregated by northern or southern
affiliations or otherwise. Identical processes follow for all other
lumpen. These divisions create barriers to communication, distrust and
steady tensions. The badge plays on STG (Security Threat Group, a
Homeland Security terrorist categorization term, also found in FBI
documents referring to Brown Berets and Black Panther Party members or
supporters) affiliations and nation prejudices as much as they do
gangsterism and with the same end in view – greater control. Unity is
the only real response. The badge is unified against us captives in
their efforts. We, on the other hand, are barely unified against each
other. First and foremost, gangsterism should be centered on opposition
and resistance to the badge. Captive vs. badge.
Gangsters must be extra critical with all information received from the
badge. Nine out of ten times the badge doesn’t tell you anything for
your benefit. Information disseminated in the service of penological
interests. Consider how many times the badge has warned you about a
major shake down or offered to hold your contraband? They are always
engaged in exercising more control. Beginning from a united oppositional
front – captives vs. badge – it becomes possible to derail the
subjection-manipulation cycle. Criticism is the second stage in this
process; one must analyze eir motive, endgame and method of
manipulation.
From unity in opposition and criticism of intelligence being gifted us
we turn to unity in response. This last stage of the democratic method
is determined on a case by case basis. Every prison is distinct in
character. Gangsterism is not corrupted everywhere in the exact same
degrees. In some facilities badge collaboration is excessive, in others
captive vs. captive violence is the commanding concern. In progressing
the struggle, captives must be able to unite against the badge. This
means moving beyond nation prejudices and STG allegiances. This
constitutes the hardest step in our struggle.
First and foremost, allow me to debunk an ever-present myth; one that
continues obscuring and detracting from debates about prison. Prisons
are NOT profitable businesses, at least, not in the manner of the Exxon
Mobiles, Sam’s Clubs, Wynn Resorts and Carls Jr.’s of the world. While
there are “for-profit” prisons in existence, they constitute an extreme
minority within what many refer to as the Prison Industrial Complex (a
mistaken belief). Reality is that 92-98% of all prisons are state-run
entities. This means they are appendages of the state/federal government
in whose territory they operate. Prisons are no more for-profit than is
the local police department, courthouse, legislature or DMV (although
the latter is debatable).
Now we turn to the heart of the matter. If prisons aren’t
profit-generating behemoths, then why do they proliferate in
capitalistic societies like rabbits in heat? The penal institution, as a
system, is the direct byproduct of capitalism. I don’t mean
commodity-centrism in economic terms. Rather, prisons came about to
address political fallout consequence of a poli-economic ideology; let’s
nickname it “Haves and Have Nots Syndrome” (Hahn Syndrome, for short).
It is clearer and clearer, day after day, generation following
generation, that Hahn Syndrome is progressively worsening. As the
syndrome advances in stages, the Haves become narrower in number.
Contrarily, the Have Nots expand. Haves being not only those with wealth
sufficient to manage life as they see fit, more or less. Haves are also
those with authority over the processes of production, modes of
exchange, political/social landscape, those with an appreciable amount
of influence, power normally aligned to capitalist interests. Have Nots
being not merely those without an over-abundance of wealth, but also
those marginalized, disenfranchised and excluded from the
political/social landscape. Have Nots are volatile, excluded masses. Of
course, these must be attended to in earnest as the minority comprehends
the masses’ threat. Thus, a complex inter-dependent, self-perpetuating
social control mechanism: the penitentiary.
Looking at the global picture of capitalism, we can identify trends:
inequality (social, economic, gender), formal systems (justifying
abuses, discrimination, prejudice), excluded masses, and above all,
penal institutions. No coincidences there. These are all byproducts of
capitalistic systems making it all-but-inevitable that such behemoths
must be employed. Capitalism has, in “civilized” society, resorted to
far more effective measures than good, old fashioned plomo (read:
marginalization, isolation, disenfranchisement, invalidation,
forfeitures, imprisonment).
What does this do for capitalism? Take an undocumented immigrant. Ey is
not a citizen – meaning without rights or validation – which translates
to being exploited for labor or political ends. Trumpists push for wall
funding on the political side; harvesters, nannies, etc. on the laboral.
Exploited for labor when profitable and politics whenever convenient.
This is only one example of Hahn Syndrome in action on Have Nots.
First World lumpen can, due to their best interests, be counted among
Have Nots; especially considering they are prime targets for prison.
Hence, 2-million-plus incarcerated and over 6 million under state
management (according to BOP.gov and U.S. Census Bureau statistics). For
those who don’t become good capitalist contributors, prison is their
final or eventual destination.
An ignorant mass is the mob. The mob is easily swayed this or that way.
An excluded, disaffected, educated mass means a rebellion, a resistance,
a real opponent for capitalism. Something capitalists will do anything
to avoid. Why spend ill-gotten gains educating disorganized, excluded
masses, turning them into a potential usurper, when you could just lock
them up? While penitentiaries do not generate super earnings, they are
necessary for any capitalistic ideology and society to function. Such
behemoths swallow whole dangerous sections of the mob resulting in its
impotency.
The mob’s ignorance is bliss for capitalists. Why waste millions,
billions, building behemoths to swallow the mob? Why do you avoid giving
a gun to somebody who wants to kill you? Self-preservation. And
capitalist logic is no different. If the central issue can be distracted
from (not discussing capitalism and the role of prisons in perpetuating
it) then every effort within the bounds of capitalistic systems will
fail. This is why the mass must be educated, because then we’ll realize
the system is just a game of smoke and mirrors. Reform? The Behemoth
keeps devouring.
MIM(Prisons) responds: We agree with this author on eir
fundamental point that prisons are not for profit, but rather for social
control. We want to offer some clarification on the sectors of society
discussed above.
First, the definition of Haves and Have Nots might seem obvious, but
this is actually a point of much debate among activists. We see many
so-called leftists claiming that workers in the United $tates are part
of the oppressed group (the Have Nots) but we see that their wages are
artificially inflated with the profits of exploitation of the Third
World. And so these folks are very much the Haves on a global scale.
In general we look at the oppressed nations within U.$. borders as the
groups with the greatest interest in fighting imperialism. But with the
class focus that Haves and Have Nots implies, we would define the Have
Nots to include undocumented immigrants and the First World lumpen. The
lumpen is defined as the class of people in the First World who are
excluded from the productive process. By virtue of living in the First
World, this class, on average, receives more material benefits from
imperialism than the global proletariat. As such their interests are not
the same as the exploited classes and we do not include them in the
“lumpen-proletariat.” But their conditions in many ways parallel those
of the lumpen-proletariat, standing in stark contrast to the majority of
the First World populations.
MIM(Prisons) published a pamphlet
“Who is the Lumpen in the United States” which includes our
contemporary class analysis of this group. We do not see evidence to
suggest this group is growing. Send in $3 or equivalent work-trade to
the address on p. 1 for your copy.