MIM(Prisons) is a cell of revolutionaries serving the oppressed masses inside U.$. prisons, guided by the communist ideology of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism.
Under Lock & Key is a news service written by and for prisoners with a focus on what is going on behind bars throughout the United States. Under Lock & Key is available to U.S. prisoners for free through MIM(Prisons)'s Free Political Literature to Prisoners Program, by writing:
MIM(Prisons) PO Box 40799 San Francisco, CA 94140.
Jasiri X sides with the labor aristocracy in Wisconsin.
Jasiri X is a hip hop artist from Pittsburgh who raps the news over some
dope beats produced by The Grand Architect Paradise Gray of X Clan. The
two release these tracks as videos on
youtube.com in a
series titled “This Week with Jasiri X.” Jasiri X is popular in activist
circles, frequently performing and speaking at benefits and rallies.
We’ve been bobbing our heads to his tracks since the release of
OG3 - Oscar Grant
Tribute in January 2009, but in light of his most recent release,
American Workers
vs. Multi-Billionaires, we decided to take a closer look.
OG3 tells the story of the murder of Oscar Grant and the
rebellions following his murder, from the points of view of Oscar Grant
and the protesters. Although the facts aren’t 100% correct in
OG3, it is a good example of the many tracks Jasiri X has
released about police brutality and aggression against Black people in
Amerika. A track titled
Free the Jena 6
was one of the first that got peoples’ attention, and he continues to
shout out victims of police execution and violence by name.
When working on an international piece, Jasiri X correctly draws
connections between police brutality here and imperial aggression
against Third World peoples around the world. He recently released a
track about the uprisings in Egypt with M-1 of
Dead
Prez, titled We
All Shall Be Free!
Despite his revolutionary lean, Jasiri X still holds on to his
Amerikanism on several issues, which comes up big time in American
Workers vs. Multi-Billionaires. The video for this song was shot
inside the capitol building in Madison, Wisconsin, against a backdrop of
labor aristocrats raising a stink to keep their “fair share” of the
imperialist pie. The title implies that a line is being drawn between
Amerikan “workers” and the capitalist multi-billionaires with this union
busting legislation. However, as outlined in several articles and
books(1) Amerikan “workers” are actually fundamentally allied with the
imperialist, capitalist class on an international level. It is only
because of the pillage of resources and lives in the Third World that
the government employees in Wisconsin even have health care in the first
place. Defending this “right” to health care is essentially the same
thing as supporting Amerikan wars, which Jasiri X says he is against.
History has shown that the multi-billionaires won’t give up theirs
without a fight.
“When did the American worker become the enemy? Why is wanting a
living wage such a penalty?” - Jasiri X from “American Workers
vs. Multi-Billionaires”
The Amerikan “worker,” or labor aristocrat, is the enemy of the majority
of the world’s people because their lives are subsidized by the economic
exploitation of the Third World. Third World peoples’ sweat, blood, and
lives are wasted to pay for the Amerikan “worker’s” pensions and health
care. This is because most of the “work” that Amerikans do does not
generate value; we have a service-based economy. The only reason our
society has such a disproportionately high “living wage” (as if those
who make less die) is because we are comfortable swinging our
weight around in imperialist wars of aggression to extract wealth from
the Third World. Jasiri X seems to be opposed to this extraction of
wealth, but does not make the connection that Amerikan “workers” are
directly benefiting from it, and not just the multi-billionaires.
Jasiri X seems to adhere to an anti-racist model of social change.
Besides being supported by an incorrect analysis of history, it also has
him defending Obama as a Black man, rather than attacking him as the
chosen leader of the largest and most aggressive imperialist country in
the world. Jasiri X correctly pins Obama as an ally of the Amerikan
people; their key to a comfortable lifestyle and fat retirement plan.
But as an ally of the oppressed, Jasiri X should accept that Obama, and
the labor aristocracy, are enemies of the majority of the world’s
people, and leave patriotism behind. Agitating for the betterment of
people in Haiti, Palestine, Egypt, Iraq, etc. as Jasiri X does through
some of his raps, while at the same time defending Obama and the
Amerikan “worker,” is a recipe for stagnation. If we want to end
oppression the world over, we need to have a clear idea of who are our
friends and who are our enemies.
[Leaders] realize that the success of the struggle presupposes clear
objectives, a definite methodology and above all the need for the mass
of the people to realize that their unorganized efforts can only be a
temporary dynamic. You can hold out for three days – maybe even for
three months – on the strength of the admixture of sheer resentment
contained in the mass of the people; but you won’t win a national war,
you’ll never overthrow the terrible enemy machine, and you won’t change
human beings if you forget to raise the standard of consciousness of the
rank-and-file. Neither stubborn courage nor fine slogans are enough. -
Frantz Fanon, Wretched of the Earth, p. 136, chap. 2, paragraph 57.
Starting in Tunisia on December 17, and spreading across the region in
January and February, the people of north Africa and the Middle East are
taking to the streets to fight brutal dictatorships in their respective
countries. Taken by surprise by the force and longevity of these protest
movements, the various imperialist-backed regimes are working hard to
come up with changes that will pacify the people without fundamentally
changing the system. These just struggles of the people are primarily
targeting the figureheads in government, but the real problem lies in
the system itself and at this stage we are only seeing some shuffling of
the leadership.
Protests are sweeping across the region as the people are emboldened and
inspired by the actions and results of those in neighboring countries,
even moving further south into other parts of Africa. As this article is
being written, there are reports of people’s uprisings in Bahrain,
Libya, Iran, Yemen, Iraq, Kuwait, Algeria, Djibouti, Syria, Morocco and
Jordan. In other parts of Africa, less visible in the media, popular
revolts are also happening in Sudan, Gabon and Ethiopia.(1) Protesters
are facing violent repression by the governments in most of these
countries.
The response in the United $tates has been strong condemnation of
Mubarak and other leaders targeted by protests (among those paying
attention). Arabs may falsely look to Amerikans as friends in their
current struggles. But where was this Amerikan “support” for the last
thirty years as their country bank-rolled Mubarak with billions of
dollars? In reality, their reaction is a sick reminder of what went down
in Iraq. The same seething opposition to Mubarak was aimed at Saddam
Hussein, resulting in the deaths of millions of Iraqis and the
destruction of one of the most developed Arab countries. Iraq is just
one example to demonstrate how Amerikan racism quickly lends itself to
popular support for militarism, the savior of post-WWII U.$. global
dominance.
Economics of the People’s Struggles
There are many differences between these mostly Arabic-speaking
countries, but the one common enemy of the people there is the enemy of
the people throughout the world: imperialism. Capitalism is a system
that is defined by the ownership of the means of production (factories,
farms, etc.) by the wealthy few who we call the bourgeoisie, and who
exploit the majority of the people (the workers, also called the
proletariat) to generate profit for the owners. Imperialism is the
global stage of capitalism where the territories of the world have been
divided up and exploited for profit. Under imperialism, the economy in
each country no longer operates independently, and what happens in one
country has repercussions around the world. Because of this global
interdependence, events in the Middle East and north Africa are very
significant to the Amerikan and European capitalists, and are related to
events in the global economy.
The question of real change hinges on whether the exploited countries
that are now mobilizing stay within the U.$.-dominated economic
structure, or whether they look to each other and turn their back on the
exploiter nations. While militarily and politically controlled by the
United $tates, their economic relationship to imperialism is dominated
by the European Union who was responsible for 50% of trade for countries
in the southern Mediterranean region in 1998. A mere 3% of their trade
was with each other that year.(2) In 2009, these percentages had not
changed, despite the lofty promises of the Euro-Mediterranean Free Trade
Area to develop trade between Arab countries.(3) Tunisia, where the
first spark was lit, had 78% of its exports and 72% of its imports with
the European Union. Compare these numbers to the ASEAN and MERCOSUR
regional trade groups, also made up of predominately Third World
countries, which had about 25% of their trade internally.(4)
The problem with Europe dominating trade in the region is based in the
theories of “unequal exchange” that lead trade between imperialist and
exploited countries to be inherently exploitative. Part of this is
because the north African countries mostly produce agricultural goods
and textiles, which they trade for manufactured goods from Europe. The
former are more susceptible to manipulations in commodities markets
that, of course, are controlled by the imperialist finance capitalists.
The latter are priced high enough to pay European wages, resulting in a
transfer of surplus value from the north African nations to the European
workers.
In order to develop industries for the European market, these countries
have been forced to accept Structural Adjustment Programs (SAPs) from
the various world banking systems (World Bank, International Monetary
Fund). This has further tied the governments to imperialist interests
over the years, as SAPs have many strings attached. The loans
themselves, which are larger in this region than for the average Third
World country (5), serve to transfer vast amounts of wealth from the
debtor nations to the lender nations in the form of interest payments.
Countries in the Middle East and north Africa generally have greater
relative wealth compared with Third World countries in the rest of
Africa, Asia and Latin America. As a result the people in these
countries enjoy higher levels of education, better health and fewer
people living in poverty.(see World Bank, World Health Organization and
CIA statistics) General trends since WWII are a growing middle class
with an emigrant population that expanded and benefited from European
reconstruction up to the 1980s. Since then immigration restrictions have
increased in the European countries, particularly connected to
“security” concerns after 9/11. The north African countries relate to
the European Union similar to how Mexico does to the United $tates, but
Mexico remains more economically independent by comparison. These
uprisings are certainly connected to the growing population and the
shrinking job market with slower migration to the EU.
Locally, there are economic differences within the region that are
important as well. Other than the stick of oppressive regimes, some
governments in the region have been able to use their oil revenues as a
carrot to slow proletarian unity. Even so, extreme international debt,
increasing unemployment with decreasing migration opportunities and the
overall levels of poverty indicate that these countries are part of the
global proletariat.
The recent economic crisis demonstrates the tenuous hold the governments
of the Middle East and north African countries had on their people.
Because imperialism is a global system with money, raw material and
consumer goods produced and exchanged on a global market, economic
crises happen on a global scale. The economic crisis of the past few
years has affected the economy of this region with rising cost of living
and increased unemployment rates. In particular food prices have reached
unprecedented highs in the past few months.(6) One might think this
would help the large agricultural sectors in these countries. However,
food prices affect the Third World disproportionately because of the
portion of their income spent on food and the form their food is
consumed in. On top of this, all of these countries have come to import
much of their cereal staples as their economies have been structured to
produce for European consumption.
Reliable economic statistics are difficult to find for this region.
Estimates of unemployment in any country can range from under 10% up to
40% and even higher, and there is similar variability in estimates of
the portion of the population living below the poverty level. But all
agree that both unemployment and poverty have been on the rise in the
past two years. We suspect this trend dates back further with the
decrease in migration opportunities mentioned above.
In Egypt about two-thirds of the population is under age 30 and more
than 85% of these youth are unemployed. About 40% of Egypt’s population
lives on less than $2 a day.(7)
The middle class in these countries, who enjoy some economic advantages,
are sliding further into poverty. This group is particularly large in
Tunisia and Egypt compared to many other countries in the region.(8) In
Egypt the middle class increased from 10% to 30% of the population in
the second half of the 20th century, with half of those people being
“upper” middle class.(9) This class has been closely linked to the rise
of NGOs encouraged by the European-led Euro-Mediterranean Free Trade
Area. They know that it is possible for them to have a better standard
of living and enjoy more political freedom without a complete overthrow
of the capitalist system. And so we saw many of the leaders and
participants in the recent protests demand better conditions for
themselves, but generally leave out the demands of the proletariat.
In fact, some middle class leaders, like Wael Ghonim (an Egyptian Google
employee who was a vocal leader in the fight against Mubarak), are
calling for striking workers to go back to work now that Mubarak has
stepped down, effectively opposing the demands and struggles of the
Egyptian proletariat. Without the leadership of the proletariat, who
have never had significant benefits from imperialism, these protests end
up representing middle class demands to shuffle the capitalist deck and
put another imperialist-lackey government in place. The result might be
a slight improvement in middle class conditions but the proletariat ends
up right back where they started.
In Tunisia and Egypt, where the uprisings started, the leadership and
many of the activists were from the educated middle class youth.(10) In
Tunisia people were inspired to act after the suicide of Mohammed
Bouazizi, an impoverished young vegetable street seller supporting an
extended family of eight. He set himself on fire in a public place on
December 17 after the police confiscated his produce because he would
not pay a bribe. Like many youth in Tunisia, Bouazizi was unable to find
a job after school. He completed the equivalent of Amerikan high school,
but there are many Tunisian youth who graduate from college and are
still unable to find work.
The relative calm in the heavy oil producing region that includes Saudi
Arabia, UAE, Oman and Qatar underscores the key role of economics and
class in these events. These countries enjoy a much higher economic
level than the rest of the region, as a direct result of the consumerist
First World’s dependence on their natural resources. Only Libya joins
these countries in having a Gross National Income (GNI) per capita above
$5000, while all others in the region are below that level.(11) That’s
compared to a GNI in the U.$ of $46,730.(12)
One economic factor that has not made the news much and which does not
seem to be a focus of the protesters so far, is the importing of foreign
labor to do the worst jobs in the wealthy oil-producing countries. In
the Gulf Cooperation Council (consisting of Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the
UAE, Bahrain, Kuwait and the Sultanate of Oman) there are an estimated
10 million foreign workers and 3 million of their family members living
in these countries.(13) This was used as a carrot to the proletariat who
were losing opportunities to work in the European Union. Egypt in
particular encouraged this emigration of workers.
Revolutions or Unrest?
To belittle the just struggles of people around the world, typical
imperialist media is referring to the recent uprisings as “unrest,” as
if the people just need to be calmed down to bring things back to
normal. On the other side, many protesters and their supporters are
calling these movements revolutions. For communists, the label
“revolution” is used to describe movements fighting for fundamental
change in the economic structure. In the world today, that means
fighting to overthrow imperialism and for the establishment of socialism
so that we can implement a system where the people control the means of
production, taking that power and wealth out of the hands of just a few
people.
The global system of imperialism puts the nations of the Middle East and
north Africa on the side of the oppressed. These nations have comprador
leaders running their governments, who get rich by working for
imperialist masters. Yet these struggles are very focused on the
governments in power in each country without making these broader
connections. Until the people make a break with imperialist control,
changes in local governments won’t lead to liberation of the people.
Further, we have heard much from both organizers and the press about
social media (Twitter, Facebook, etc.) as a tool of the revolution.
These tools are celebrated as a replacement for leadership. It is true
that the internet is a useful tool for sharing information and
organizing, and decentralization makes it harder to repress a movement.
But the lack of ideological unity leads to the lowest common
denominator, and very few real demands from the people. No doubt
“Mubarak out” is not all the Egyptian people can rally around, but
without centralized leadership it is hard for the people to come
together to generate other demands.
Related to the use of social media, it is worth underscoring the value
of information that came from
Wikileaks
to help galvanize the people to action in these countries; the
corruption and opulence of the leaders described in cables leaked at the
end of 2010 no doubt helped inspire the struggles.(14)
Egypt provides a good example of why we would not call these protest
movements “revolutions.” The Egyptian people forced President Mubarak
out of the country, but accepted his replacement with the Supreme
Council of the Military - essentially one military dictatorship was
replaced by another. One of the key members of this Council is Sueliman,
the CIA point man in the country and head of the Egyptian general
intelligence service. He ran secret prisons for the United $tates and
persynally participated in the torturing of those prisoners.
Tunisia is also a good example of the lack of fundamental revolutionary
change. Tunisia’s president of 23 years, Zine El Abidine Ben Ali,
stepped down on January 14 and fled to Saudi Arabia. But members of Ben
Ali’s corrupt party remained in positions of power throughout the
government and protests continue.
In State and Revolution Lenin wrote that the revolution must
set a goal “not of improving the state machine, but of smashing and
destroying it.” The protests and peoples’ struggles in the Middle East
and Africa reinforce the importance of this message as we see the
sacrifice of life in so many countries resulting in only cosmetic
changes in governments.
What is the United $tates interest?
The United $tates is the biggest imperialist power in the world today;
it controls the largest number and most wealth-producing territories in
the world. Just as the economic crises of imperialism affect the rest of
the world, political uprisings around the world affect the United
$tates. The capitalist corporations who have factories and investments
in this region have a strong financial interest in stability and a
government that will allow them to continue to exploit the resources and
labor. And with capitalism’s constant need to expand, any shrinking of
the imperialist sphere of influence will help trigger future crises
faster.
The Amerikan military interest in this region relies on having some
strong puppet governments as allies to defend the interests of Amerikan
imperialism and hold off the independent aspirations of the regional
capitalists. This includes managing the planet’s largest oil reserves,
which is important for U.$. control of the European Union, and defending
their #1 lackey - Israel.
Tunisia is a long-standing ally of the United $tates, cooperating with
Amerikan “anti-terrorism” to maintain Amerikan imperialist power in the
region. Other imperialist powers also have a strong interest in the
dictatorships in Tunisia including France whose government shipped tear
gas grenades to Tunis on January 12 to help Ben Ali fight the
protesters.(15)
Bahrain is a close U.$. ally, home to the U.$. Navy’s Fifth Fleet.(16)
Egypt has been second only to Israel in the amount of U.$. aid it gets
since 1979, at about $2 billion a year. The majority of this money,
about $1.3 billion a year, goes to the Egyptian military.(17) Further,
the United $tates trains the Egyptian military each year in combined
military exercises and deployments of U.$. troops to Egypt.(18) So for
Amerika, the Supreme Council of the Military taking power in Egypt is a
perfectly acceptable “change.” To shore up the new regime and its
relationship with the United $tates, Secretary of State Clinton
announced on February 18 that the United $tates would give $150 million
in aid to Egypt to help with economic problems and “ensure an orderly,
democratic transition.” In exchange, the Council has already pledged to
uphold the 1979 peace accords with Israel. Prior to 1979, much of the
Arab world was engaged in long periods of wars with the settler state.
United $tates aid to countries in this region is centered around Israel.
The countries closest geographically to Israel are the biggest
recipients of Amerikan money, a good way to keep control of the area
surrounding the biggest Amerikan ally. In addition to Egypt and Israel,
Jordan ($843 million) and Lebanon ($238 million) received sizable
economic and military aid packages in 2010.(19) Compared to these
numbers, “aid” to the rest of the region is significantly smaller with
notable recipients including Yemen ($67M), Morocco ($35M), Bahrain
($21M) and Tunisia ($19M). The United $tates gives “aid” in exchange for
economic, military and political influence.
Is Wisconsin the Amerikan Tunisia?
The global economic crisis clearly affects imperialist countries like
the United $tates just like it does other countries of the world, but we
don’t see the people in this country rising up to take over Washington,
DC and demanding a change in government. Like the Middle East, the youth
of Amerika are having a harder time finding jobs after graduation from
college. But unlike their counterparts in the Middle East, Amerikan
youth and their families do not face starvation when this happens.
Some people are drawing comparisons between the widespread protests by
labor unions in Wisconsin and the events in Tunisia and Egypt. These
events do give us a good basis for comparison to underscore the
differences between imperialist countries and the Third World. Amerikan
wealth is so much greater than the rest of the world (U.$. GDP per
capita = $46,436); even compared to oil-rich countries like Saudi Arabia
(GDP = $24,200). GDP does not account for the distribution of wealth,
but in the United $tates the median household income in 2008 was
$52,029. This number is not inflated by the extreme wealth of a few
individuals, it represents the middle point in income for households in
this country.
On the surface, unemployment statistics for the United $tates appear
similar to some numbers for countries in the Middle East and north
Africa. In 2008, 13.2% of the population was unemployed in the United
$tates based on the latest census data.(20) However, with income levels
so much higher in Amerika, unemployment doesn’t mean an immediate plunge
into poverty and starvation. For youth in this country, there is the
safety net of moving back in with parents if there is no immediate
post-college job.
Similarly, U.$. poverty statistics appear quite high, comparable to
rates in the Middle East and north Africa, at 14.3% in 2009. But this
poverty rate uses chauvinistic standards of poverty for Amerikans. The
U.$. census bureau puts the poverty level of a single individual with no
dependents at $11,161.(21) Much higher than the statistics that look at
the portion of the population living at $2 or $1.25 per day (adjusted
for differences in purchasing power). Wisconsin public teachers average
salaries of about $48k per year.
The Leading Light Communist Organization produced some clear economic
comparisons between Egypt and the U.$.: “The bottom 90% of income
earners in Egypt make only half as much (roughly $5,000 USD annually) as
the bottom 10% of income earners in the U.$. (roughly [$]10,000), per
capita distribution. Depending on the figures used, an egalitarian
distribution of the global social product is anywhere between $6,000 and
$11,000 per capita annually. This does not even account for other
inequalities between an exploiter country and an exploited country, such
as infrastructure, housing, productive forces, quality and diversity of
consumer goods, etc.”(22)
In the United $tates it is possible for the elite to enjoy their
millionaire lifestyles while the majority of the workers are kept in
relative luxury with salaries that exceed the value of their labor. This
is possible because other countries, like those in the Middle East and
Africa, are supplying the exploited workforce that generates profits to
be brought home and shared with Amerikan workers. Even Amerikan workers
who are unemployed and struggling to pay bills are not rallying for an
end to the economic system of capitalism. They are just demanding more
corporate taxes and less CEO bonuses. In other words they want a bigger
piece of the imperialist pie: money that comes at the expense of the
Third World workers. These same Amerikan workers rally behind their
government in wars of aggression around the world, overwhelmingly
supporting the fight against the Al-Qaeda boogeyman in Arab clothing.
Down with Amerikanism, Long Live Pan-Arabism
Whether in Madison or Cairo, signs implying that Wisconsin is the
Tunisia of north Amerika are examples of what we call “false
internationalism” on both sides of the divide between rich and poor
nations. Combating false internationalism, which is inherent in any
pro-Amerikanism in the Third World, is part of the fight against
revisionism in general.
What no one can deny is the connection between the mass mobilizations
across the Arab world. That this represents a reawakening of pan-Arabism
is both clear and promising for the anti-imperialist struggle. Even
non-Arab groups in north Africa that have felt marginalized will benefit
from the greater internationalist consciousness and inherent
anti-imperialism with an Arabic-speaking world united against First
World exploitation and interference.
Of course, Palestine also stands to benefit from these movements. The
colonial dominance of Palestine has long been a lightning rod issue for
the Arab world, that only the U.$. puppet regimes (particularly in
Egypt) have been able to repress.
Everyone wants to know what’s next. While the media can create hype
about the “successful revolutions” in Tunisia and Egypt, this is just
the beginning if there is to be any real change. Regional unity needs to
lead to more economic cooperation and self-sufficiency and to unlink the
economies of the Arab countries from U.$. and European imperialism.
Without that, the wealth continues to flow out of the region to the
First World.
As Frantz Fanon discussed extensively in writing about colonial Algeria,
the spontaneous violence of the masses must be transformed into an
organized, conscious, national violence to rid the colony of the
colonizer. Unfortunately, his vision was not realized in the
revolutionary upsurge that he lived through in north Africa and
neo-colonialism became the rule across the continent. Today, the masses
know that imperialism in Brown/Black face is no better. As fast as the
protests spread, they must continue to spread to the masses of the Arab
world before we will see an independent and self-determined people.
Mail the petition to your loved ones and comrades in High Desert State
Prison’s Z-Unit (administrative segregation) who are experiencing
brutality and cruel living conditions. Send them extra copies to share!
For more information on this campaign, click
here.
Prisoners should send a copy of the signed petition to each of the
addresses below. Supporters should send letters on behalf of prisoners.
Prison Law Office General Delivery San Quentin, CA 94964
Internal Affairs CDCR 10111 Old Placerville Rd, Ste 200
Sacramento, CA 95872
CDCR Office of Ombudsman 1515 S Street, Room 540 N Sacramento,
CA 95811
U.S. Department of Justice - Civil Rights Division Special
Litigation Section 950 Pennsylvania Ave, NW, PHB Washington DC
20530
Office of Inspector General HOTLINE PO Box 9778 Arlington,
VA 22219
And send MIM(Prisons) copies of any responses you receive!
MIM(Prisons), USW PO Box 40799 San Francisco, CA 94140
Mail the petition to your loved ones inside who are experiencing issues
with the grievance procedure. Send them extra copies to share! For more
info on this campaign, click
here.
Prisoners should send a copy of the signed petition to each of the
addresses below. Supporters should send letters on behalf of prisoners.
Warden (specific to your facility)
Oklahoma State Jail Inspector, Don Garrison 1000 N.E. 10th
St., Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73117-1299
ODOC Office of Internal Affairs Oklahoma City Office 3400 Martin
Luther King Avenue Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73111-4298
Office of Inspector General HOTLINE P.O. Box 9778 Arlington,
Virginia 22219
United States Department of Justice - Civil Rights Division Special
Litigation Section 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, PHB Washington,
D.C. 20530
Oklahoma Citizens United for Rehabilitation of
Errants (OK-CURE) P.O. Box 9741 Tulsa, OK 74157-0741
And send MIM(Prisons) copies of any responses you receive!
MIM(Prisons), USW PO Box 40799 San Francisco, CA 94140
Mail the petition to your loved ones and comrades inside who are
experiencing issues with the grievance procedure or censorship of music
and literature. Send them extra copies to share! For more info on this
campaign, click
here.
Prisoners should send a copy of the signed petition to each of the
addresses below. Supporters should send letters on behalf of prisoners.
Tom Clements, Director of Adult Institutions P.O. Box
236 Jefferson City, MO 65101
Chris Pickering, Inspector General (MO DOC) P.O. Box 236
Jefferson City, MO 65101
U.S. Department of Justice PhB 950 Pennsylvania Ave,
N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530
Marianne Atwell, Director of Offender Rehabilitative Services
(Missouri) P.O. Box 236 Jerrerson City, MO 65101
And send MIM(Prisons) copies of any responses you receive!
MIM(Prisons), USW PO Box 40799 San Francisco, CA 94140
The Real Life of Alejandro Mayta Mario Vargas Llosa Aventura
press, 1986
Peruvian author Mario Vargas Llosa won the Nobel Prize for Literature in
2010. Widely known as an author who writes about political events in
Peru, and takes a vocal position on politics throughout Latin America,
this review only addresses one of the many books he has written. But it
is a good example of the political views of Vargas Llosa whose politics
have made him an enemy of the people for many years. Vargas Llosa claims
that he supported revolutionary politics earlier in his life, but if
true, he firmly and thoroughly changed that and works hard as a critic
of people’s movements and a supporter of imperialist so-called
democracy. He has written many works of both fiction and non-fiction,
and lost a bid for president of Peru in 1990, during the height of the
Peruvian Communist Party’s fight for liberation of the Peruvian people,
to Alberto Fujimori.
After being named the Nobel winner, Vargas Llosa said, “It’s very
difficult for a Latin American writer to avoid politics. Literature is
an expression of life, and you cannot eradicate politics from life.”(1)
We would agree with that statement, and as we demonstrate in this
review, The Real Life of Alejandro Mayta is a good
demonstration of Vargas Llosa’s reactionary politics.
In his acceptance speech for the Nobel prize, Vargas Llosa commented
extensively on the “terrorists” in the world today who are the enemy of
what he calls “liberal democracy” (capitalism). Spouting the best
pro-imperialist rhetoric, Vargas Llosa makes the case for imperialist
militarism with lies about the freedom and beauty of capitalist
so-called democracy:
“Since every period has its horrors, ours is the age of fanatics, of
suicide terrorists, an ancient species convinced that by killing they
earn heaven, that the blood of innocents washes away collective
affronts, corrects injustices, and imposes truth on false beliefs. Every
day, all over the world, countless victims are sacrificed by those who
feel they possess absolute truths. With the collapse of totalitarian
empires, we believed that living together, peace, pluralism, and human
rights would gain the ascendancy and the world would leave behind
holocausts, genocides, invasions, and wars of extermination. None of
that has occurred. New forms of barbarism flourish, incited by
fanaticism, and with the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction,
we cannot overlook the fact that any small faction of crazed redeemers
may one day provoke a nuclear cataclysm. We have to thwart them,
confront them, and defeat them. There aren’t many, although the tumult
of their crimes resounds all over the planet and the nightmares they
provoke overwhelm us with dread. We should not allow ourselves to be
intimidated by those who want to snatch away the freedom we have been
acquiring over the long course of civilization. Let us defend the
liberal democracy that, with all its limitations, continues to signify
political pluralism, coexistence, tolerance, human rights, respect for
criticism, legality, free elections, alternation in power, everything
that has been taking us out of a savage life and bringing us closer –
though we will never attain it – to the beautiful, perfect life
literature devises, the one we can deserve only by inventing, writing,
and reading it. By confronting homicidal fanatics we defend our right to
dream and to make our dreams reality.”
Vargas Llosa went on to talk about his political views:
“In my youth, like many writers of my generation, I was a Marxist and
believed socialism would be the remedy for the exploitation and social
injustices that were becoming more severe in my country, in Latin
America, and in the rest of the Third World. My disillusion with statism
and collectivism and my transition to the democrat and liberal that I am
– that I try to be – was long and difficult and carried out slowly as a
consequence of episodes like the conversion of the Cuban Revolution,
about which I initially had been enthusiastic, to the authoritarian,
vertical model of the Soviet Union; the testimony of dissidents who
managed to slip past the barbed wire fences of the Gulag; the invasion
of Czechoslovakia by the nations of the Warsaw Pact; and because of
thinkers like Raymond Aron, Jean Francois Rével, Isaiah Berlin, and Karl
Popper, to whom I owe my reevaluation of democratic culture and open
societies. Those masters were an example of lucidity and gallant courage
when the intelligentsia of the West, as a result of frivolity or
opportunism, appeared to have succumbed to the spell of Soviet socialism
or, even worse, to the bloody witches’ Sabbath of the Chinese Cultural
Revolution.”
Finally, Vargas Llosa made clear his support for the neocolonial
governments in Latin America, pretending that they represent
“functioning” democracy in the interests of the people and “supported by
a broad popular consensus.”:
“We are afflicted with fewer dictatorships than before, only Cuba and
her named successor, Venezuela, and some pseudo populist, clownish
democracies like those in Bolivia and Nicaragua. But in the rest of the
continent democracy is functioning, supported by a broad popular
consensus, and for the first time in our history, as in Brazil, Chile,
Uruguay, Peru, Colombia, the Dominican Republic, Mexico, and almost all
of Central America, we have a left and a right that respect legality,
the freedom to criticize, elections, and succession in power. That is
the right road, and if it stays on it, combats insidious corruption, and
continues to integrate with the world, Latin America will finally stop
being the continent of the future and become the continent of the
present.”
This book is indicative of Vargas Llosa’s work which does greater
disservice to the revolutionary movement in Peru than those who write
bourgeois fiction without pretending to have historical context or
political purpose. The novel reviews the life of a fictional
revolutionary activist in Peru in the 1950s who participated in a small
focoist uprising before ending up in prison. The book describes
revolutionary parties as all small marginalized groups wasting their
time studying dead guys and debating theory. And it leaves the reader
questioning the commitment of all who participate in revolutionary
politics, assuming that everyone sells out somehow to pursue their own
interests in the end. The peasants and workers are virtually ignored in
the book, portrayed only as pawns in the work done by activists.
This novel focuses on a small Trotskyist party, the product of several
splits in previous Trotskyist groups, and specifically on one of the
party members, Alejandro Mayta. Interestingly, in a brief description of
how Mayta ended up in this party, Vargas Llosa describes his movement
from group to group, each time rejecting the previous one as not correct
enough politically, until he ended up with the Trotskyists as the most
pure political line he could find. MIM(Prisons) has some agreement with
this description in that Trotskyism is pure idealism and it appeals to
those who don’t like to get their hands dirty with the realities of
revolutionary politics.
Eventually Mayta deserts the Trotskyists to join up with a focoist
movement in the mountains that is going to take armed action. He is
galvanized by the idea of real action rather than the talk that his
Trotskyist group has been engaging in for years. He is kicked out of his
party, who consider the action premature, and also because Mayta has
approached the Stalinists to participate in and support the focoist
action.
Focoists believe that the armed actions of a small group of people will
spark the masses to join the revolution. This is an incorrect view of
revolutionary strategy. History has demonstrated that small groups of
insurgents are not sufficient to bring about revolution; successful
revolutions have come through the hard work of organizing the masses. As
inspiration, many focoists look to the Cuban revolution, and Castro is
mentioned repeatedly in the book. But the Cuban revolution is the only
example focoists have of anything resembling success, and while that
revolution did deliver a blow to U.$. imperialism, it created a
state-capitalist country dependent on the Soviet Union.(2) Like other
focoist actions, Mayta’s small group is captured during their armed
insurrection. And there is much debate about whether desertion,
betrayal, or just poor planning led to their failure.
A recurring theme in this book is the claim by the narrator that the
truth of history is impossible to determine. In interviewing people
about the life of Mayta the narrator gets conflicting stories from
everyone he talks to, and is unable to figure out exactly what happened.
This nihilist position encourages people to just give up rather than
seeking to understand and interpret history to help forward progress in
the future. Ironically Vargas Llosa thinks he knows the definitive truth
about the history of politics in many countries as he interprets history
through the lens of the imperialists.
Through this fictional novel, Vargas Llosa manages to attack a vast
range of revolutionary theories and practices, and leave the reader
disillusioned and without hope for a better future for the people of
Peru. He does not try to hide the poverty and despair that is the
everyday reality of life for the Peruvian people, but condemns
revolutionaries, politicians, and everyone else to failure in a maze of
corruption, collaboration and irrelevant theories. There is no redeeming
political value to this book which could depress even the most militant
of activists.
This article is aimed particularly at the young reader born into the
current culture of mass communication. The concepts aren’t new. We just
want to highlight the implications of state surveillance, which is a
reality for anyone seeking social change in a state whose primary
concern is maintaining the oppressive social order under imperialism.
One of the important tasks of intelligence is to develop a map of the
networks of those being surveilled. This simple fact is too often
ignored in our culture today, where technology has electronically and
permanently connected us. What used to at least require a warrant sent
to your phone company is now public information for most people in the
United $tates today who regularly use social networking through the
internet and their cell phones.
To an extent, the omnipresence of these technologies in Amerikan lives
have made people more conscious of this vulnerability. Yet, very few
involved in voicing opinions in favor of a world without oppression
actually incorporate this knowledge into their practice. Largely this is
a class issue where the petty bourgeoisie feels safe living in a
bourgeois democracy. In much more remote parts of the world, there is a
greater understanding of the need for encryption and shielding one’s
identity because the consequences are life and death.
MIM(Prisons) doesn’t engage in baseless alarmism to mobilize people, but
this is a case where you should be considering worst case scenarios,
like how a fascist government might carry out a witch-hunt for
“communists” and “terrorists” using public information on the internet.
When struggling with allies about security, we regularly get the
response, “I’m already on all their lists.” It’s often a point of pride
to say this. But the oppressed know that getting on a list has
real
consequences. In addition, anyone who has studied COINTELPRO knows
that the government is interested in more than just your name, but our
sense of comfort here in the belly of the beast leads to lazy practices
and nihilistic attitudes towards security.
Like we said, this isn’t about persecuting people for thought crimes,
though that has happened countless times to U.$. citizens as a result of
information posted on the internet. COINTELPRO was about disrupting
movements. It is far too easy for a fat pig sitting at his desk to know
who young activists are in touch with, and what they are doing when and
where. Using this information the imperialist state can be very
strategic in how it uses its various tools of repression. With the
current state of security culture, technology has given the oppressor
the advantage, but this does not have to be the case.
After All the Tweeting, Now What?
As we work on finishing the first draft of this article, the U.$. media
is talking about popular demonstrations against governments in Tunisia
and Egypt and their use of Twitter and Facebook. Tweeting is a good way
to mobilize a flash mob; it is not a good way to build people’s power.
It is about as effective as banging a pot in the street. While we don’t
mean to dismiss these recent movements in particular, there is plenty of
history to show that spontaneous demonstrations do not save lives or
improve conditions – capitalism continues on.
We’ve already addressed some of the class issues surrounding the
dependence on technology like Twitter
elsewhere.
Twitter is also an example of corporations defining cultural trends. It
almost seems there was a law passed last year that every corporate media
entity had to mention Twitter once every 20 minutes on their
programming. This free advertising should raise questions around a
company that has already openly worked with the U.$. government to
overthrow foreign regimes and repress resistance within this country.
Despite arrests for such activities, people continue to use Twitter to
report from protests in the U.$. without any attempt to cloak the
identities of themselves or others involved. Meanwhile, Twitter remains
mainly a tool to promote capitalist consumption through advertising.(1)
Speculation aside, it is not the intents of the corporations that we
should fear (or rely on); it is the nature of the technology that makes
us vulnerable. An independent, nonprofit, open-source social network
does not address the main problem here, which is internet-based, public
social networking itself.
More recently, the trend is to be able to Tweet, Facebook and Google on
your phone. Mobile phones are generally attached to our identity and
track your location at all times, while allowing remote monitoring of
voice, video (which is generally ubiquitous on phones these days) and of
course any worldwide web traffic. While this information would nominally
require a warrant, in recent years AT&T has complained that the
National Security Agencies requests for these wiretaps have become
overly burdensome on the monopolizing telecommunications company,
indicating that such wiretapping is far from rare.
Other than building networks, spies like to build profiles of
individuals. Today’s mobile phones and computers are walking profiles on
many Amerikans. Even if you don’t use a “smart” phone, if you don’t
separate your work from your persynal life you are exposing yourself.
Every time you do a Google search while logged into Gmail, or access
information through Facebook, your activity is connected to your
identity. And of course, any internet activity from home is connected to
your IP address.
Stop Worshipping Bourgeois Culture
There is a tendency that jumps on every trend, saying “if only we could
get an ad that looks like that, if only we could get a Facebook group,
if only we could produce hot music” then the masses would listen. A real
revolutionary culture needs to be setting the trends and not just
copying bourgeois forms and relying on bourgeois institutions. Without
independent institutions of the oppressed we have no power over the
message we put out and the work that gets done in the name of social
progress.
Again, for those who were born into this culture of social networking
through the internet, you need to rethink your relationship to the
bourgeois institutions that shape your life.
We are not arguing against using the internet or other technology. We
are only pushing people to understand the potential and likely
consequences before they use it. MIM made great inroads by being a
trendsetter in online publishing. Today’s technology makes it easier and
safer to use the internet, if you study how to do it correctly.
If you don’t have the patience to learn internet security or don’t
believe in it because “Big Brother knows all,” then don’t go online.
There should be Maoist work that is not known to the internet. We must
combat the thinking that “it can be Googled, therefore it exists.” The
internet should be a place to study, to find answers, to debate and to
agitate in the realm of ideas. It should not provide a quick and easy
snapshot of who we are, what we’re doing, when, where or how many we
are.
Wannabe Documentarians
While cell phone cameras were celebrated in the exposure of the
assassination of
Oscar
Grant by BART police in Oakland, California, they are also helping
the police do their job every day. It is hard to go to any sort of
political event without being surveilled by dozens of unidentified
people. This means that 1) the pigs can sit on their asses looking at
Indymedia websites and watching amateur videos on YouTube to see who is
frequenting what events, and 2) undercover (or not) pigs can be very
open in their efforts to record people at these events.
Closed meetings should not even allow cell phones in the proximity of
the meeting. That may be difficult for events open to the public, but
people should not be able to come in and record without any
accountability. And if you want to record your own events for later use,
don’t record people that have not given their permission. People
recording the audience should be treated with suspicion and should be
stopped.
All of this is connected to who are our friends and who are our enemies.
Anti-imperialist comrades should weigh the costs and benefits of doing
outreach at events that are swamped with strong Amerikanism. The
cell
strategy should be studied and applied in a way that one only
organizes with those one knows. And one should learn to swim in the sea
of people they find themselves amongst. The sea we have to swim in in
North America is a sea of white nationalism, so blending in isn’t always
appealing, but it is that much more important. Relying on the masses
means looking to the world’s majority who have an interest in
overthrowing imperialism. Being part of the struggles of the real masses
cannot happen through Tweets and Facebook groups. Building a strong
movement requires keeping a distance from these institutions of the
oppressor and building our own infrastructure.
For our own sanity, and for freedom, we must recognize that there are no
rights, only power struggles. As the articles in this issue of ULK
demonstrate, so-called “rights” on a piece of paper are only a point of
reference for debate. Their enforcement will depend on the actions of
the different forces, groups, classes involved.
We hope that after reading this issue you are inspired to know that we
are all struggling against the same oppressor in very similar ways. Some
may use these stories to justify not rocking the boat, but they would be
wrong. These are stories of people who are merely trying to educate
themselves, or obtain basic respect, and they are attacked. These
stories were hand-picked to demonstrate the political motivations of
state employees, and to disprove the theory that repression is only used
when necessary to prevent crime and control “trouble makers.”
While we haven’t received any reports directly from the comrades
involved, a couple of organized collective struggles have created
headlines over the last month in U.$. prisons. The Georgia strike was an
historical event that involved thousands of prisoners from four
different facilities who were responding to the lack of pay for labor,
visiting rights and other abuses. One participant reported:
“On December 9, Georgia state prisoners stuck together and learned what
their togetherness could do. They learned that they could get more
accomplished being unified than they ever could being separated. For
this day, Black, White, Brown, Red and Yellow came together. This day
saw the coming together of Muslim and Christian, Protestant and
Catholic, Crip and Blood, Gangster Disciple and Vice Lord, Nationalist
and Socialist. All came together. All were together. The only
antagonistic forces were the Oppressors and the Oppressed.”(1)
These peaceful protesters faced lockdown, followed by brutal
beatings for many, and dozens remain disappeared to unknown
locations.(2) It is struggles like this during the 1960s that led to the
rise of the
Black
Panther Party within the Black nation, and other revolutionary
organizations. Prisoners are well organized internally, and working with
many on the outside, so they are clear that this battle is not over.
Meanwhile, in the Ohio State Penitentiary Supermax, four comrades
protested years of torture by engaging in a hunger strike. These
comrades continue to be persecuted for their participation in the famous
Lucasville uprising in 1993. As we go to print, we’ve heard reports that
after a two week strike, their demands for semi-contact visits, real
rec, access to legal materials, and commissary were granted. In a
statement from one of the participants, the message of this issue of
Under Lock & Key is echoed:
“If justice as a concept is real, then I could with some justification
say, ‘Justice delayed is justice denied.’ But this has never been about
justice, and I finally, finally, finally understand that. For the past
16 years, I (we) have been nothing more than a scapegoat for the state,
and convenient excuse that they can point to whenever they need to raise
the specter of fear among the public or justify the expenditure of
inordinate amounts of money for more locks and chains.
“And not only that, but the main reason behind the double penalty that
we have been undergoing is so that we can serve as an example of what
happens to those who challenge the power and authority of the state. And
like good little pawns, we’re supposed to sit here and wait until they
take us to their death chamber, strap us down to a gurney, and pump
poison through our veins. Fuck that! I refuse to go out like that:
used as a tool by the state to put fear into the hearts of others while
legitimizing a system that is bogus and sold to those with money. That’s
not my destiny.”(3)
Finally, over 150 prisoners , imprisoned for alleged involvement in
the Maoist movement, from a number of prisons in India went on hunger
strike this week in response to the killing of unarmed villagers.(4)
While the imperialists want to demonize the alleged violence of those
struggling for basic rights in U.$. prisons, they engage in mass murder
across the Third World to ensure the flow of profits to this country.
Today, many oppressed nation men in the United $tates find themselves in
situations where even possessing books or affiliating with each other is
against the law. This isn’t just in prisons, but in oppressed nation
communities on the outside as our comrade in Texas
describes
(see page XXX). As another example, within the struggle for justice for
Oscar Grant, gang injunctions were used against young Blacks to declare
it illegal to affiliate in any way with the Black Riders Liberation
Party. Faced with such obstacles, we continue to learn what struggle is,
and what is really necessary to obtain the conditions that all humyn
beings deserve.
Defying the Tomb: Selected Prison Writings and Art of Kevin “Rashid”
Johnson, Featuring Exchanges with an Outlaw by Kevin “Rashid”
Johnson, Minister of Defense, New Afrikan Black Panther Party- Prison
Chapter December
2010 Kersplebedeb CP
63560, CCCP Van Horne Montreal, Quebec Canada H3W 3H8
also available from: AK Press 674-A 23rd Street Oakland, CA
94612
This book centers around the political dialogue between two
revolutionary New Afrikan prisoners. The content is very familiar to
MIM(Prisons) and will be to our readers. It is well-written, concise and
mostly correct. Therefore it is well worth studying.
Rashid’s book is also worth studying alongside this review to better
distinguish the revisionist line of the New Afrikan Black Panther Party
- Prison Chapter (NABPP-PC) with the MIM line. While claiming to
represent a dialectal materialist assessment of the world we live in,
the camp that includes the NABPP-PC, and Tom Big Warrior’s (TBW) Red
Heart Warrior Society have dogmatically stuck to positions on the
oppression and exploitation of Amerikans that have no basis in reality.
We will take some space to address this question at the end, as it has
not been thoroughly addressed in public to our knowledge.
Coming Up
Both Rashid and Outlaw preface their letters with their own
autobiographies. Rashid’s in particular is an impressive, almost
idealized story of lumpen turned proletarian revolutionary. The simple
principle that guides him through prison life is standing up to the pigs
every time they violate a prisoner. At times he has inspired those
around him to the point that the pigs can’t get away with anything. The
problem, he later points out, is the others are inspired by him as an
individual. So when he was moved, or sent to a control unit, their unity
crumbled.
At first, control units seemed an effective tool to control his
resistance. But it is then that he found revolutionary theory. Rather
than stay focused on combating minor behavior issues of the COs, he
began to learn about societies that didn’t have cops and prisons, and
societies where the people rose up to transform the whole economic
system. It is through ideology that you can build lasting unity that
can’t be destroyed by transfers and censorship.
Both Rashid and Outlaw conclude their autobiographies saying they have
nothing to lose. They are two examples of the extreme repression felt by
the lumpen of the oppressed nations. As a result, state terrorism no
longer works to intimidate them, leaving them free to serve the people.
Democratically Centralized Organizing
In the foreword, Russell “Maroon” Shoats says his reason for not joining
the NABPP-PC was that it claimed to operate under democratic centralism,
which he believes is impossible for prisoners. We agree with his
assessment, which is why we do not invite prisoners to join MIM(Prisons)
even when their work and ideological development would otherwise warrant
it. The benefits of having a tight cadre organization are lost when its
inner workings are wide open to the pigs. Maroon points out that certain
leaders will end up with absolute power (with the pigs determining who
leads, we might add), and much resources are wasted just trying to
maintain the group.
For the most part, there is nothing a comrade could do within prison as
a member of MIM(Prisons) that they can’t do as a member of USW. There is
much work to be done to develop this mass organization, and we need
experienced and ideologically trained comrades to lead it. When the
situation develops to the point of having local cadre level
organizations within a prison, then we would promote the cell structure,
where democratic centralism can occur at a local level, just as we do on
the outside.
In the last essay of the book, Rashid finally answers Maroon by saying
that the NABPP-PC is a pre-party that will become real (along with its
democratic centralism) outside of prisons.
The Original Black Panther Party
The main criticism of the original
Black
Panther Party (BPP) in Rashid’s essay on organizational structure is
their failure to distinguish between the vanguard party and the mass
organization. Connected to this was a failure to practice democratic
centralism. How could they when they were signing up members fresh off
the street? These new recruits shouldn’t have the same say as Huey
Newton, but neither should Huey Newton alone dictate what the party
does. We agree with Rashid that the weakness of the BPP came from these
internal contradictions, which allowed the FBI to destroy it so
quickly.(p. 353)
It’s not clear how this assessment relates to an earlier section where
he implies that an armed mass base and better counterintelligence would
have protected the BPP. Rashid criticizes MIM’s line, as he sees it,
that a Black revolutionary party cannot operate above ground in the
United $tates today.(p. 133) Inexplicably, 15 pages later he seems to
agree with MIM by stating that Farrakhan would have to go underground or
be killed the next day if he opposed capitalism and promoted real New
Afrikan independence.
He also criticizes MIM on armed struggle and their assessment of George
Jackson’s foco theory.
Mao
applied Sun Tzu’s Art of War to the imperialist countries
to say that revolutionaries should not engage in armed struggle until
their governments are truly helpless. Rashid says that he agrees with
MIM’s criticism of the Cuban model that lacked a mass base for
revolution. But he supports George Jackson’s “variant of urban-based
focos, emphasiz[ing] that a principal purpose of revolutionary armed
struggle is to not only destroy the enemy’s forces, but to protect the
political work and workers…”(p.134) He goes on to criticize MIM for a
“let’s wait” line that ends up promoting a bloodless revolution in his
view.
He complains that the U.$. military was already overextended (in 2004)
and MIM was “still just talking.” But Mao defined the point to switch
strategies as when “the bourgeoisie becomes really helpless, [and] the
majority of the proletariat are determined to rise in arms and fight…”
MIM(Prisons) agrees with Mao’s military strategy, and one would have to
be in a dream world to imply that either of these conditions have been
reached, despite the level of U.$. military involvement abroad. Rashid
is saying that we need armed struggle regardless of conditions to defend
our political wing. Despite his successes with using force to defend the
masses in prison, we do not think this translates to conditions in
general society. Guerrilla theory that tells us to only fight battles we
know we can win also says not to take up defensive positions around
targets that we can’t defend.
Another criticism made by Rashid is that the BPP didn’t enforce a policy
of members committing class suicide, and he seems to criticize their
self-identification as a “lumpen” party in 1970 and 1971. Interestingly,
he foresees a “working-class-conscious petty bourgeois” leading the New
Afrikan liberation struggle.(p.232) He comes down left of the current
New
Afrikan Maoist Party (NAMP) line by condemning the call for
independent Black capitalism as unrealistic, and requiring the petty
bourgeoisie to commit class suicide as well.(p.177) Whether the vanguard
is more petty bourgeois or lumpen in origin is a minor point, but we
mention all this to ask why all the class suicide if all Amerikans are
so exploited and oppressed as he claims elsewhere (see below)?
Tom Big Warrior
In contrast to Rashid, except for some superficial mentions of Maoist
terminology, we don’t have much agreement with Tom Big Warrior (TBW) in
his introduction or his afterword to this book. In both, he states that
the principal contradiction in the world is internal to the U.$. empire,
and it is between its need to consolidate hegemony and the chaos it
creates. This implies a theory where imperialism is collapsing
internally, and will be taken down by chaos rather than the conscious
rising of the oppressed nations as MIM(Prisons) believes. He speaks
favorably of intercommunalism, as has Rashid who once wrote that “the
old definitions of nationalism no longer apply.” We see intercommunalism
as an ultra-left line that undermines the approach of national
liberation struggles.
Speaking for the NABPP-PC on page 380, TBW states that they want a
Comintern to direct revolutionaries around the world. We oppose a new
Comintern, following in the footsteps of MIM, Mao and Stalin. In the
past, TBW has taken up other erroneous lines of the rcp=u$a such as
accusing Third World nations of “Muslim fascism.” He also talks out of
both sides of his mouth like Bob Avakian about Amerikan workers
benefiting from imperialism, but also being victims of it. He has openly
attacked the MIM line as being “crazy,” while admitting to have never
studied it. This is the definition of idealism, when one condemns
theories based on what one desires to be the truth.
Wait, Are Whites Revolutionary?
After reading this book, you might ask yourself that question. Comrades
have already asked this question of NABPP-PC and TBW in the past and
received a clear answer of “yes.” This debate is old. The former Maoist
Internationalist Movement (MIM) had it with the so-called “Revolutionary
Communist Party (USA)” (rcp=u$a), among others, for decades before
denouncing them as a CIA front. Interestingly, Rashid and TBW both like
to quote Bob Avakian but fail to provide an assessment or criticism of
the rcp=u$a line in this 386 page volume.
Most of these writings predate the formation of the NABPP-PC, but are
presented in a book with the NABPP-PC’s name on it, so we will take it
as representative of their line. The history of struggle with the MIM
camp dates back to the original writing of much of the material
presented in this book. Comrades in the MIM camp, including United
Struggle from Within, the emerging NAMP, and a comrade who went on to
help found MIM(Prisons) engaged in debates with all of the leading
members of the party, as well as TBW, shortly after their formation.
The point is that not only had at least two of the NABPP-PC’s leaders
studied MIM line prior to forming their own, but they openly opposed
this line following their formation. While not addressed directly, it
seems that the only line dividing the NABPP-PC from joining the rcp=u$a
is its belief in the need for a separate vanguard for the New Afrikan
nation.
Contradictory Class Analyses: Economics
On pages 205-6 Outlaw asks Rashid:
“But from your analysis of these classes who do you consider to be the
most revolutionary, considering the majority of workers in empire are
complacent to some degree or another, due to the international class
relationships of empire to the Third World nations, and the conveniences
proletarians, and even lumpen-proletarians, are afforded as a result of
that international situation and relationship?”
Rashid responds on pages 208-9 by stating that our class analysis is
“mandatory for waging any successful resistance” but
that he is only able to give a general analysis due to his lack of
access to information. He does say:
“[T]he US is neither a majority peasant nor proletarian society. It is
principally petty bourgeoisie. It has an over 80% service-based economy…
So the US proletarian class is small and growing increasingly so, while
the world proletariat is growing and becoming increasingly
multi-ethnic.”
On page 122 he also upholds this line that all non-productive workers
are petty bourgeois, and not exploited proletarians. On page 232 he
expands this analysis to explain the relationship between the
imperialist nations, who are predominantly petty bourgeois, and the
Third World that is mostly exploited. But in a footnote he takes it all
back saying, “modern technological advances have broadened the scope of
the working class” and clearly states, “[t]he predominantly service
sector US working class is in actuality part of the proletarian class.”
He justifies this by saying that the income of these service workers is
no different than the industrial proletariat. Yet he takes an obviously
chauvinist approach of only comparing incomes of Amerikans. The real
industrial proletariat is in the Third World and makes a small fraction
of what Amerikan so-called “workers” do.
We agree that it is dogmatic to say this persyn is proletariat because
she makes the tools and this persyn is not because she cleans the
factory. But this is a minor point. The real issue is that whole
countries, such as the United $tates, are not self-sustainable, but are
living on the labor and resources of other nations. A country that is
made up of mostly service workers cannot continue to pay all its people
without exploiting wealth from somewhere else, since only the productive
labor creates value.
A less disputed line put forth by Rashid and TBW is that U.$. prisoners
are exploited. We have put forth our
thesis
debunking the exploitation myth, and exposing the prison system as an
example of the parasitic “service” economy built on the sweat and blood
of the Third World.(see
ULK 8) More
outrageously, in an article on the 13th Amendment, Rashid says that over
1/2 of Amerikans are currently “enslaved” by capitalism. This article
contains some unrealistic claims, such as that no one could possibly
enjoy working in the imperialist countries, and that these workers do
not have freedom of mobility. Over half of Amerikans own homes. Not only
are these alleged “slaves” landowners, but in the modern imperialist
economy real estate has become more closely related to finance capital
in a way that super-profits are gained by owning
real
estate in the First World. (see
ULK 17)
Both Rashid and Outlaw demonstrate an understanding of the relationship
between imperialist countries and the Third World, with Rashid going so
far to say that reparations to New Afrika outside of a war against
imperialism would mean more exploitation of the proletariat. While
contradictory, Rashid’s economic analysis in the original letters is
more correct than not. In his treatment of history we will see more
confusion, and perhaps some reasons why he ended up finding the
“multi-national working class” to be the necessary vehicle for
revolution in the United $tates despite his focus on single-nation
organizing.
Contradictory Class Analyses: History
While repeatedly recalling the history of poor whites becoming slave
catchers, marking the first consolidation of the white nation, Rashid
lists “join[ing] their struggle up with the Israeli working class” as
one of the strategies that would have led to greater success for
Hamas.(p.50) This schizophrenic approach to the settler nations is
present throughout the book. He echoes J. Sakai on Bacon’s Rebellion,
but then discards the overall lessons of Sakai’s book
Settlers: The
Mythology of the White Proletariat. While Sakai argued that these
poor, former indentured servants had joined the oppressor nation in
1676, Rashid argues that modern-day Israelis and Amerikans, most of whom
are in the top 10% income bracket globally, are exploited proletarians
and allies in the struggle for a communist future.
Later in the book he goes so far as to say that white “right-wing
militias, survivalists and military hobbyists” are “potential allies”
who “have a serious beef with imperialist monopoly capitalism.” This
issue came to the forefront with the “anti-globalization” movement in
the later 1990s. Both
MIM
and J. Sakai(1) led the struggle to criticize the anti-imperialist
anarchists for following the lead of the white nationalist organizations
calling for Amerikan protectionism. These groups are the making of a
fascist movement in the United $tates which is why the distinction
between exploited and exploiter nations is so important.
In the discussion of the Republic of New Afrika (RNA) we gain some
insight into Rashid’s contradictory lines on who our friends and enemies
are. Here he correctly explains that European countries bought off their
domestic populations with wealth from the Third World, to turn those
working classes against the Third World workers and peasants. But his
turn from the MIM line takes place in attempting to address the strategy
of the RNA. He sees a strong danger of neo-colonialism in the RNA
struggle for national liberation, as happened in the numerous liberation
struggles in Africa itself. So he talks about how ultimately we want a
world without nations, so let’s put class first to solve this problem
(and he assumes most white Amerikans are proletariat). This is an
ultraleft error of getting ahead of conditions. He goes on to say that
the imperialists would easily turn the white population against a
minority New Afrikan liberation movement trying to seize the Black Belt
South. Here you have a rightist justification for pragmatism.
This is not to dismiss either of those concerns, which are very real.
But his solution in both cases is based in a faulty class analysis. This
book paraphrases Mao to point out that your class analysis is your
starting point, and that your political line determines your success.
Liquidating a New Afrikan revolutionary movement into a white class
struggle over superprofits will not succeed in achieving his stated
goals of a world without oppression. While the
original
Black Panthers themselves put forth different class analyses of Amerika
at various points, they proved in practice that developing strong
Black nationalism will bring out those sectors of the white population
who are sympathetic. We must not cater to the majority of white people,
but to the world’s majority of people.
Dangers of Revisionism
The danger of revisionism is that it works to lead good potential
recruits away from the revolutionary cause, both setting back the
movement and discouraging others. The fact that Rashid sounds like MIM
half the time in this book makes it more likely he will attract those
with more scientific outlooks. We think those familiar with MIM
Theory, or who have at least read this review could find this book
both useful and interesting. However, the NABPP-PC and TBW are actively
promoting a number of incorrect lines under the Panther banner, to the
very people who need the Panthers’ correct example of Maoism the most.
An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure and it is far beyond
time that we bring these criticisms into the open to advance the
ideological understanding of the whole movement.
Legend of the Guardians: The Owls of Ga’Hoole (2010)
We have to give props to a kids’ movie that can portray an anti-fascist
struggle, while downplaying the glamor of war. Soren is a young owl who
dreams of meeting his heroes, the Guardians of Ga’Hoole, who are
legendary for defending the owls against evil forces. He and his brother
Kludd are kidnapped by the fascist owls, “The Pure Ones”, who recruit a
select few from their species of owls to join their army and enslave all
other species of owls. Soren escapes and flees to find the Guardians for
help while his brother joins the Nazi owls.
Soren’s journey to the Guardians requires him to learn to fly and take a
difficult trip with a few fellow travelers who believe in the mission.
As the Guardians gather information and prepare for battle with the
fascists they learn that one of their leaders is working for the enemy
and has betrayed them. This is a good lesson in the need for vigilance
against spies and turncoats in the anti-fascist struggle.
Kludd’s decision to join the fascists is played as a simplistic need for
recognition after a childhood of struggling to achieve next to his
brother. But this is not so far off. Fascism appeals to people who are
easily convinced that their lack of success can be overcome at the
expense of others. In Amerika we have a large labor aristocracy who are
paid more than the value of their labor with profits brought home from
exploitation of Third World workers; these workers have a material
interest in imperialism. Those who are in the lowest stratum of the
labor aristocracy look around and see that they are not achieving the
same wealth as their peers. This group of people are the most likely to
go for fascist rhetoric that blames their failures on immigrants and
Third World workers with promises of greater wealth for those who
deserve it (i.e. the white nation). There was no labor aristocracy in
The Owls of Ga’Hoole but the oppressed nations were represented by the
different species of owls who, just by nature of birth, were considered
inferior to “The Pure Ones.”
When Soren meets the Guardians he gets to know one who is somewhat crazy
and a bit of an outcast, only to learn that he was the heroic leader in
previous battles. From this owl Soren learns that war is not all glamor
and has real consequences. The decision to fight the fascists was taken
seriously with this in mind.
For a kids’ movie, Legend of the Guardians has a lot to offer, but we’d
rather see the oppressed nations (or species in this case), organize to
rise up and fight for themselves. The movie makes that impossible by
drugging all the slaves and implying that the rest of the owls from
other species were completely in the dark about the fascist plot to take
over the world. This plot twist might have been possible if they had
gone further and The Pure Ones struck out in battle so that other
species realized what was happening.
That a group of heroic owls had to save the world and defeat the
fascists was made somewhat better by their failure due to turncoat
betrayal requiring Soren and his fellow travelers to join the battle and
save the day. At least this reinforced that anyone could be a heroic
part of the anti-fascist struggle, not just the special heroes of
Ga’Hoole.