On May 19th, 2008 I received the book that you sent me, Schooling the Generations in the
Politics of Prison edited by Chinosole. I really enjoyed this
book, especially the section called, “Genocide waged against the Black
Nation,” which starts on page 174. I totally agree with the theory that
psychological warfare is being waged against political prisoners in an
effort to get them to comply with brainwashing objectives of the U$
penal and imperialist system.
Dr. Edward Schein mentions 24 strategic techniques that prison officials
use in order to break and dehumanize political prisoners. However, there
is one strategic technique that Dr. Schein fails to mention that I would
like to address in full detail: the sexual exploitation and manipulation
of young and political prisoners by female staff sexual perpetrators.
This technique leads to false disciplinary and criminal charges being
filed against political prisoners who pose the greatest threat to the
prison’s use of oppression and most importantly have the potential to
lead other prisoners to fight the system.
Let me briefly explain how this is done. First, prison officials
determine which prisoners have the greatest leadership potential and
pose the greatest threat to the prison - politically speaking.
Once this is determined, prison officials will try numerous
psychological mind-breaking techniques to disrupt and strip the
political prisoner of his focus and will, and at the same time
dehumanize him by making him subservient.
Once a political prisoner proves to be too strong mentally and once the
prison officials techniques fail, prison officials will place these
political prisoners in an ambiguous and pressure-filled situation. The
high-ranking prison official will order a female staff member to
play sexual manipulation games with this political prisoner, while at
the same time putting pressure on them to conform and comply with what
is desired by the female staff in order to win favor and to have the
pressure lifted.
If the political prisoner does not agree to comply with the female
staff’s sexual advances, then the female staff will create false claims
of harassment against the political prisoners, which will result in
false disciplinary and maybe criminal charges. If the political prisoner
does agree to comply with the female staff’s sexual advances, then he
risks being set-up and retaliated against by jealous male staff members.
This will likely lead to physical assault of the prisoner by male
guards, in addition to false disciplinary and criminal charges.
It’s a dirty game and this technique by prison officials is typically
used against political prisoners who have the greatest potential for
awakening and organizing the rest of the prison population.
Often, if the political prisoner chooses to have the sexual relationship
with the female staff member, high-ranking prison officials will lift
the pressure from the political prisoner, thinking that the prisoner has
been neutralized and has become subservient to the wills of the
administration. Once a political prisoner loses his focus and allows
himself to be sexually exploited and manipulated, he dehumanizes himself
and basically strips himself of his unique individuality and becomes
neutralized, ineffective, psychologically incompetent and easy to
control.
This prisoner basically becomes a slave to the female staff member,
because the female staff is allowed to act aggressively sexually toward
the prisoner. But once the prisoner tries to act aggressively, he will
be beaten by the jealous male staff. This game is normally played on
younger prisoners, but it is a tactic that works on all prisoners
because it’s a no-win situation.
MIM adds: In an article entitled,
Gender
Oppression in u$ Prisons we quoted a study that found that, “In
State and Federal prisons, 65% of inmate victims of staff sexual
misconduct and harassment were male, while 58% of staff perpetrators
were female”.
Maoists have long explained that gender is not about genitalia, but
about power and relations between groups in leisure time activities. The
Abu Ghraib photos were a clear lesson in this reality. Since then, it
has become well established that amerikan bio-wimmin were used as gender
oppressors against Arab biomen in prisons in Iraq and elsewhere. The use
of sex in political repression within the u$ described above is another
example of this theory in practice. Just as we say that sex cannot be
consensual under patriarchy where gender is defined by power, there can
be no consent between prisoners and prison staff.