MIM(Prisons) is a cell of revolutionaries serving the oppressed masses inside U.$. prisons, guided by the communist ideology of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism.
www.prisoncensorship.info is a media institution run by the Maoist Internationalist Ministry of Prisons. Here we collect and publicize reports of conditions behind the bars in U.$. prisons. Information about these incidents rarely makes it out of the prison, and when it does it is extremely rare that the reports are taken seriously and published. This historical record is important for documenting patterns of abuse, and also for informing people on the streets about what goes on behind the bars.
Originally, I wrote you being interested in the study. But I have looked
up the meaning of “Maoist” it says communism, and the things I have
heard about communism hasn’t been in good light. Can you explain to me
what a “Maoist” is? Cause you see, I know in fact that dictionaries can
be misleading. And further, from what I’m reading of your introduction
letter, you are fighting for the right things. Besides, I’m down with
fighting against any tyrannical system and political repression.
Texas is truely a state of political repression. They have started by
taking tobacco, then porn magz, then stationary, & now action
pictures that don’t show any sexual parts. The parole system is
monopolizing and slavery oriented. You will find that most parolees have
had many major disciplinary cases in the last 6 months to a year &
still was allowed to parole. But those prisoners who are working, doing
what they are suppose to be doing, and staying out of trouble and case
free are mostly being denied parole. Parole denials almost always use
the same excuse each time, but the most extraordinary is the ones where
prisoners are denied due to so called “manipulating” the system because
they’ve remained disciplinary case free for 2-4 years. They say it’s
impossible for a prisoner to do that because the system is made so that
you will get disciplinaries. What!?!
So, I find that I’m interested in being a part of your movement.
Especially concerning the “Indigent Supplies & Mailing limitation.”
They have gone from 5 letters and supplies per week to once a month.
Talk about repressions.
[In December 2014 MIM(Prisons) received this petition against the Tier
II program from two different comrades, with almost thirty signatures.
Considering these prisoners are organizing in extreme conditions of
isolation and sensory deprivation, that number of signatures is
impressive. We publicize this petition as part of our overall struggle
to shut down Control Units in prisons across the country.]
We the People petition
We the people (jointly and severally) come together to petition the
government for a redress of grievance, pursuant to the Bill of Rights,
“Amendment I” of the Constitution for the United States of America.
Furthermore, we the people assert the rights set forth in “the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights” (UDHR), adopted by the UN General Assembly
on December 10, 1948. More specifically, we assert the rights set forth
at Article 1-8, 18-22, 26 and 28 of the UDHR.
We the people now move to set forth the factual basis for this petition.
Fact, on December 7, 2014, at approximately 10:45pm, a man [inmate]
“died” inside of the J-1 dormitory (cell #124) at Smith State Prison. It
is stated that the man/individual committed suicide. The examiner and/or
coroner pronounced the man officially dead between 11:30pm and 1am.
We the people believe (with strong conviction) that the Tier II Program
(behavior modification program) is the root and cause of the death.
During our examination it has been determined that there are numerous
“factors” that must be evaluated, and has been evaluated in reaching our
conclusion that the tier II program is the “root and cause” of the
“death.”
Factor #1: The Tier II program is a mind and behavior control
program for prisoners, via long term deprivational isolation and
segregation, which is a form of psychological, mental and emotional
torture/suffering.
Factor #2: The Tier II program is intellectually, mentally and
creatively stagnating. People/human-beings [prisoners] are prohibited
from receiving any and all books, magazines, newspapers, novels,
articles, etc. We are forbidden to read any and all books, magazines,
newspapers, novels, articles, and all other forms of reading material
[the only exception being a bible or Qur’an; either or, but not both; we
may choose one or the other]. This prohibition on reading causes
“stagnation” of the mind, which in turn, turns man back into what men
were before civilization [barbarians, cavemen, and savages]. To not want
people/human beings to read and or have access to divers reading
materials is self evident that the goal of this program is not
progressive and rehabilitating, but instead, by design it is regressive
and debilitating. Reading is fundamental [fundamental to growth,
improvement, learning, success and life itself, etc.] No one can put
forth a logical explanation for prohibiting reading and forbidding
reading. No one can provide evidence that prohibiting reading serves
some good cause or rehabilitation. All evidence is contrary to that
thesis/theory.
Factor #3: The Tier II program isolates and separates us from our
families and loved ones. Most individuals/people placed on the program
cannot receive visitation because of the way the program is designed.
Most people cannot use the telephone because of how the program
operates. For a vast majority of us, the “only way” to contact and or
connect with our families or loved ones is the letters. We must write
letters; we correspond through the mail back and forth. Mail
correspondence is the only form of communication for the majority of us.
Factor #4: The Tier II program is a health hazard. The conditions
of confinement are a violation of the 8th amendment (cruel and unusual
punishment clause) of the Constitution for the United States of America.
The food that is served is nutritionally inadequate. Everyone (all of
us/all the people) that are on the Tier II program has and/or is losing
weight. Some of us have lost a lot of weight, while other have only lost
10-15 pounds (since being on/in the Tier II program). But all of us are
losing weight, and have lost weight. Also, the food that is served is
often unclean and thus unhealthy. The milks are often spoiled. The
“meat” is often raw or old (spoiled). The food in general is old (half
of the time). The trays that the food is on are always filthy/nasty, as
if they have not been washed. The filthy ways contaminate the food that
is placed on them. We have no choice but to eat it or starve. (On phase
1 and 2 of the program we cannot purchase any food items from the
commissary/store.) No clean water is passed out or given to us. We are
forced to drink out of old, nasty sinks, with rusty spicket/faucet.
Sanitation: The showers are always filthy and disgusting. When I/we
enter into the showers, often there is hair (shavings), urine, semen,
(sometimes) blood, feces and other bodily filth. Cells have bugs, rats,
roaches, ants, spiders, and other unknown species of insects or bugs. In
the summer time the flies and gnats are overwhelming. We are only
allowed to clean out the cells 1 time a week and sometimes 1 time a
month. (But according to GDOC standard operating procedure cells are
supposed to be clean at all times.)
Exercise (yard call/outdoor recreation): We are denied and or deprived
the opportunity to go to outdoor recreation and exercise (which is a
judicial-constitutional guarantee - for prisoners; see Spain v.
Procunier, 600 F. 2d 1490 (9th Cir. 1984) and a plethora of other
federal cases). Yet and still they deprive us of outside
recreation/exercise for months and months at a time (case to case
basis). Some of us are deprived for days, and some for months and/or
years. The bottom line is, they deprive us of exercise. On phase 1 (of
the Tier II program) we are not allowed to buy any hygiene from the
commissary. We are prohibited form buying hygiene for months at a time.
Yet, they take all our hygiene items. The list on conditions of
confinement goes on and on, so for time sake we must proceed.
Factor #5: Many of us are put on the Tier II program without due
process of law (procedural due process of law, as set forth by the
Supreme Court on Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 563-655 (1974)). We
were put on the Tier program without receiving written notice; we were
not given a constitutional hearing; we were not allowed to call
witnesses; we were not provided an opportunity to present documentary
evidence or any other form of evidence; we were not provided an
opportunity to be heard/to speak; we were not provided an “advocate” to
assist us, or to put up a defense (of any kind) or to investigate (into
the alleged matter); thus, no due process of law.
Factor #6: When we were put on the Tier II program, all of our
property was confiscated illegally (confiscated without due process).
Property that was taken include: all our CDs, CD players, headphones,
earphones, all pictures and/or photos, all books, magazines, novels,
articles, newspapers, and all other reading materials (except a bible or
Qur’an), lotion, deodorant, soap, toothpaste, grease, toothbrush,
hairbrush, nail clippers, comb, dental floss, soap dish, photo album,
free world clothes (tshirts, socks), pajamas, wave cups, thermals, etc.
All food items purchased from commissary, be it soups, honeybuns, buddy
bars, chips, drinks, etc. The property/items they took/confiscated
include the above mentioned things, but are not limited to those
things/items. Other personal property was taken that is not on this
list.
Factor #7: Some people are on the Tier II program for an
indefinite period of time which could last many years. Others will
remain on the Tier II program within the time line specified in the SOP
(ITB09-0003), which is 9 months - 2 years.
Factor #8: Whenever we are taken out of the cells, we are
mechanically restrained (handcuffed and/or shackled and/or waist
chained) and escorted by two or more guards.
Factor #9: If there is an emergency, such as death in the family
(or something of that nature), we are not allowed to attend the funeral
or memorial services, because of the Tier II program.
Factor #10: Because of the Tier II program, we can not look at TV
or listen to the radio. For some of us it has been over 22 months since
we last seen TV, seen a movie, or even seen a commercial, or heard the
radio.
Factor #11: Some of us, they will not let out the hole
(segregation/isolation) even when we may have earned and received a
certificate (and or receipt) stating “successfully completed the Tier II
program.
Factor #12: We are deprived of almost any environmental or
sensory stimuli and of almost all human contact.
Factor #13: The conditions of confinement are an “atypical and
significant hardship” upon us.
Factor #14: The above mentioned deaths, is not the 1st death this
year, that was caused by the Tier II program. Earlier this year (on or
around February 12, 2014) in J-2 dormitory, cell #240. On 2/12/14,
another man dead on the Tier II program. This man was killed by his
roommate. Currently his real name is unknown but he was known as
Sa-Brown. Sa-Brown was murdered, stabbed to death by his cell mate. We
believe and/or it is believed that the Tier II program drove the man
crazy/insane, then he murdered Sa-Brown.
Conclusion:
According to the Georgia Department of Corrections Standard Operating
Procedures (SOP) II B09-0003, Section I, Policy (page 1) states: “This
program is an offender management process and [supposedly] is not a
punishment measure… The Tier II program is a behavior modification
program.” The truth is - this offender management process/behavior
modification program induces death (whether directly or indirectly). And
we believe those that are responsible for the deaths are the creators,
maintainer(s), operator(s), and manager(s) of the Tier II program; that
would be: Brian Owens (GDOC commissioner) and Randy Tillman - the
authors/creators; and Stanley Williams (Warden of Smith State Prison)
and Eric Smokes (the unit manager of the Tier II program). These
individuals (Owens, Tillman, Williams and Smokes) are responsible for
the Tier II program and are responsible for the deaths (whether directly
or indirectly).
The above mentioned factors are not the only relevant factors to be
examined and evaluated in determining our conclusion. The above
mentioned factors are included (in the examination and evaluation
process), but are not limited to those factors (mentioned above). But
for time sake, we will cease to elaborate on the numerous factors.
The Declaration of Independence (in relevant part) We the people
inhabiting the North American continent, freemen, “…hold these truths to
be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed
by their creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are
life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness…” having been granted by our
creator dominion over all the earth, reserve our right to restore the
blessing of liberty for ourselves and our posterity, under necessity,
that I/we declare, “that, to secure these rights, governments are
instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the
governed…” and as declared in many states constitutions; “we declare
that all men, when they form a social compact are equal in right: that
all power is inherent in the people” … and “that, whenever any form of
government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the
people to alter or abolish it, and to institute new government, laying
its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such
form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and
happiness.”
Therein, the greatest rights of the people is the right to abolish
‘destructive’ government, those administrating as trustee, or those
institutions that have become destructive and/or corrupted.
We the people call for an end to the Tier II program!
La recurrencia de la brutalidad policial y los prejuicios raciales
contra grupos nacionales oprimidos en los EE UU ha capturado atención
general y elevado la cuestión nacional. Cada vez más, grupos y
comunidades nacionales oprimidas están expresando su descontento con un
sistema de opresión que los deshumaniza y marginaliza. Se han realizado
protestas masivas, la incertidumbre se ha apoderado de las ciudades, y
se han formado movimientos organizados como respuesta directa a estas
injusticias. O sea, los reclamos por parte de las naciones oprimidas en
los EE UU comienzan a definir la cuestión nacional.
Estos eventos señalan una conciencia entre los grupos nacionales
oprimidos en los EE UU de que el sistema actual no representa sus
intereses, y que de hecho, funciona en su contra. Aunque los indicadores
socioeconómicos revelan iniquidades en las comunidades donde residen los
grupos nacionales oprimidos, estos indicadores no pueden comunicar las
dimensiones de miseria y sufrimiento que resultan del racismo
institucionalizado y la discriminación. Así como la conciencia de clases
comienza a echar raíces y a crecer entre los trabajadores explotados al
cuestionar y compartir sus experiencias unos con otros – dando lugar a
organizaciones y movimientos diseñados para combatir esta realidad — de
igual manera la conciencia nacional sigue este proceso a medida que las
naciones oprimidas lidian con la realidad de la opresión nacional.
El movimiento Black Lives Matter (Las Vidas Negras Importan) o BLM, es
una indicación de este proceso. Este activismo reanudado se ha dado, no
solo por los asesinatos sancionados de jóvenes de naciones oprimidas,
sino por la acumulación de opresión nacional que ha ocurrido por años.
El desarrollo cuantitativo de la cuestión nacional en relación al
imperialismo social en los EE UU ha alcanzado un punto crítico. Las
semi-colonias y naciones oprimidas en los EE UU tendrán que disputar su
liberación o buscar un camino de reforma y mayor integración. Entonces,
la pregunta importante es, ¿Cómo es que nosotros, los Maoístas, vamos a
alimentar esta semilla emergente a través del nacionalismo
revolucionario?
En última instancia, el punto de este artículo es el explorar brevemente
como la opresión nacional informa la conciencia de las naciones
oprimidas dentro de las condiciones únicas de una sociedad imperialista
en los EE UU e identifica las implicaciones claves que resultan del
movimiento BLM y que son relevantes al movimiento de liberación nacional
a mayor escala. Es importante notar que el movimiento BLM no es una
organización revolucionaria. Aun así, BLM es una enseñanza para nuestra
causa, ya que demuestra el potencial de las semi-colonias internas y las
naciones oprimidas internas en los EE UU de poder organizarse en base a
los problemas relacionados con opresión nacional.
La opresión nacional y el derecho de una nación a la auto-determinación
En cuanto a las semi-colonias internas y a las naciones oprimidas de los
EE UU, la cuestión nacional debe de basarse en reconocer sus derechos a
la auto-determinación. Las naciones oprimidas están sujetas al
semi-colonialismo, y por lo tanto, no pueden controlar su propio
destino. Debido a que la supremacía de los blancos domina cada aspecto
de la nación oprimida, la existencia material de dicha nación toma un
plano secundario dentro de la estructura de poder regida por la raza
blanca.
Más aun, la nación-estado blanca-dominante ha creado mecanismos de
control social para mantener el dominio de las naciones oprimidas.
Encarcelamiento masivo, la disfunción comunitaria y de familia, la
cultura de estereotipos y estigmas, entre otros, son algunos de los
medios que utiliza para no perder de vista a dichas naciones oprimidas.
Un ejemplo relacionado con el punto anterior son las restricciones
sistemáticas que impiden el acceso a una educación reconocida y que
limitan el acceso a oportunidades de empleo significativas. La falta de
trabajo significa pobreza y los males sociales que la acompañan. Además,
el racismo institucionalizado y la discriminación promueven actitudes y
comportamientos que continúan formando una cultura de inequidad dentro
de las comunidades de las naciones oprimidas. Como resultado, algunos
miembros de las naciones oprimidas se ven obligados a perseguir un
estilo de vida criminal, exponiendose al represivo sistema de injusticia
criminal.
Aunque la situación descrita no es una representación de la nación
oprimida en su totalidad, si nos presenta la necesidad de una liberación
nacional y la ejecución del derecho de una nación a la
auto-determinación. Es cierto que las semi-colonias internas en los EE
UU y las naciones oprimidas gozan de estándares de vida y privilegios
que sus compatriotas del tercer mundo morirían por tener. Aun así, la
realidad de la opresión nacional no es menos perjudicial para la nación
oprimida estadounidense. El dolor y sufrimiento asociados con las
injusticias a causa del semi-colonialismo no dejan de ser menos reales.
Estas experiencias sociales de opresión nacional afectan emocionalmente
a las naciones oprimidas. Cada día y cada instante de opresión nacional
que los miembros de dichas naciones tienen que soportar deja una
impresión en su conciencia. Eventualmente, los mismos empiezan a
conectar los puntos y a reconocer lo injusto de su situación en la
sociedad estadounidense.
¿Qué significa la conciencia nacional?
El punto central de este artículo es el ayudar a que las naciones
oprimidas desarrollen una conciencia de su situación debido a la
opresión nacional. Esta conciencidad no es revolucionaria ni es
substantiva. Para aclarar, cualquier situación material que los humanos
viven provoca la conciencia correspondiente y refleja su situación de
vida. Rashid Johnson nos dice en su libro, “Historical and Dialectical
Materialism: The Science of Revolution points,” que la conciencia es un
producto de la materia; del mundo físico. La casa-prisión que resulta de
una sociedad imperialista en los EE UU es el mundo físico, y las
relaciones e interacciones económicas, políticas, y sociales que lo
forman envuelven actividad física.
En este sentido, las naciones oprimidas en los EE UU están sujetas a
este proceso dialéctico a medida que estas relaciones e interacciones
acondicionan su conciencia. La actividad en la vida diaria dentro de la
sociedad imperialista en los EE UU deja una impresión en el estado
mental. Y como demostramos anteriormente, la opresión nacional es una
parte fundamental de la vida diaria de las naciones oprimidas en los EE
UU. Además, la conciencia nacional es similar a la clase nacional en que
durante el ajetreo de la vida diaria las personas intercambian y
comparten ideas en cuanto a su situación material, sus condiciones de
vida. Comienzan a buscar maneras de resolver los problemas a los que se
enfrentan. Los intelectuales se reúnen a discutir, teorizar, y buscar la
solución a problemas comunes. Pero más importante aún, se fundan
instituciones y organizaciones para ayudar en el empuje de sus agendas.
Todas estas acciones toman lugar a medida que las personas se reúnen
después de reconocer el problema.
Entonces, cuando los marxistas de antes hablaban en cuanto a construir y
profundizar la conciencia de clase entre los trabajadores explotados, se
estaban refiriendo al proceso por el cual la gente comienzaba a darse
cuenta del predicamento en que se encontraban, pero de una manera
revolucionaria. Para nosotros, los Maoístas, nuestro trabajo en este
punto histórico es el de mover hacia adelante las luchas de liberación
nacional dentro de las naciones oprimidas con nacionalismo
revolucionario. Debemos construir conciencia nacional entre las naciones
oprimidas para que estos grupos entiendan que los conceptos tales como
raza son falsos y que Amérika no vela por sus intereses. Estos grupos
tienen que llegar a entender que las naciones existen y que su
respectiva nación se merece el poder ejercer su derecho a la
auto-determinación.
¿Por qué las vidas negras importan?
El movimiento BLM no es nada diferente al compararlo con el movimiento
chican@ que exigió la revocación de la legislación chauvinista, racista,
dura-contra-inmigrantes en Arizona unos años atrás.
En las comunidades chican@s, la inmigración es un problema
extremadamente decisivo. Las pólizas chauvinistas de Obama han deshecho
familias, el maltrato de los trabajadores migrantes en el campo laboral
se ha hecho demasiado frecuente, y en general, las comunidades chicanas
sin servicio ni recursos continúan creando iniquidades y pobreza. El
hecho de que Arizona estaba tratando de pasar—y eventualmente pasó—leyes
anti-inmigratorias, fue la última gota que llenó la copa, lo cual
movilizó a la comunidad chicana. De igual manera, la opresión nacional
ha causado estragos en la comunidad Nuevos Africanos (New Afrikan o NA),
siendo dicha comunidad la cara de la inequidad y la injusticia en los
Estados Unidos. Los NA, particularmente los jóvenes, están cansados del
maltrato. El movimiento BLM, aunque surgió como resultado de la
brutalidad policiaca, personaliza el rencor y la angustia de la nación
oprimida de NA ante la marginalización y represión que han sufrido por
años.
Debemos tomar ventaja de movimientos como estos ya que demuestran la
frustración de las personas oprimidas con el sistema, como también su
disposición a comprometerse y cambiarlo.
Una implicación clave que surge de esto es la recurrencia de las
naciones oprimidas a querer superar la opresión nacional. ¿Competirán
las naciones oprimidas en los EE UU por su liberación o se conformarán
con una reforma, y por extensión, una asimilación e integración parcial?
Los medios convencionales proveen cobertura de estos eventos para
controlar un grupo que de otra manera seria una amenaza a su situación
vigente (status quo). Por lo tanto, actúan como supervisores en vez de
reporteros objetivos con el propósito de formar una opinión pública y
debilitar la idea de una revolución organizada. Esto tiene consecuencias
serias para el movimiento de liberación nacional en los Estados Unidos
en conjunto. Por eso es que el movimiento BLM es tan crítico, porque no
podemos permitir el mismo resultado que ocurrió al final de la era
radial en el año 1960.
Conclusión
En pocas palabras, el impacto de la opresión nacional en las
semi-colonias internas y naciones oprimidas de los Estados Unidos ha
comenzado a empujar hacia adelante la cuestión nacional. Hemos comenzado
a ver una realización emergente entre las naciones oprimidas de que la
sociedad imperialista en los EE UU esta cundida de inequidades e
injusticias. Solo el nacionalismo revolucionario puede nutrir y ayudar a
crecer la semilla de la conciencia. Y si nuestra meta es la liberación
de las naciones oprimidas dentro de los Estados Unidos, entonces debemos
de formar nuestra conciencia nacional como preparación. Los movimientos
como el de BLM ilustran el potencial y el activismo que está vivo dentro
de las naciones oprimidas. La responsabilidad cae sobre nosotros quienes
debemos de capitalizarlo.
In December 2015 i forwarded you guys a letter in which i informed you
all that i was battling my protracted Tier II segregation through
litigation. My civil action cite is Nolley v. Nelson, et al,
5:15-CV-75-CAR. The case was filed in Macon division of the United
States District Court for Middle District of Georgia circa March 2015.
It can be accessed electronically at ecf.gamd.uscourts.gov.
The defendant prison officials, after the initial screening process,
moved for dismissal on several grounds (see docket entry no. 22 in above
referenced case). The court, however, in declining to dismiss my
complaint, just recently issued an order condemning the Tier II
practices as an overt violation of the cruel and unusual punishment
clause of the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution (see
docket entry no. 50, p. 29). And, judging from the court’s order, my
case appears to be somewhat the “vanguard” case of cases attacking the
Tier II program. I say this, chiefly, because the court did not cite
circuit precedent in its assessment of my claims.
Of equal interest to the favorable court ruling is the court’s detailed
layout of the general confinement conditions characteristic of the Tier
II program. In any case, now that the court has explicitly held such
conditions to be “unconstitutional.” I am seriously contemplating adding
Governor Nathan Deal as a defendant party to my suit. I’m thinking i can
base his liability on “endorsement of state-sponsored torture” theory.
What was the basis of liability for California’s Governor in the
Ashker v. Brown case?
It would seem as though the court’s condemnation of Tier II practices
amounts to headway in our efforts to expose – and hopefully abolish –
the unchecked, torturous treatment of Georgia prisoners. As always, i
will be diligent to keep you updated.
Our struggle against imperialism and toward communism is a long,
protracted struggle. It is carried out over decades and even centuries,
with long-term (strategic) planning and lifetime commitment. Many who
fight for communism give up their lives, not just through martyrdom but
also through a lifetime of dedication. In such a long-term project, it
is dangerous to lose sight of the larger context of our struggle.
Our enemies, the imperialists and anyone who’s with them, will do
everything they can to wear us down. They will drag us through the mud
as much as possible, in the hopes that we’ll get frustrated and give up,
or frustrated and sacrifice ourselves on the focoist cross.
A typical reader of Under Lock & Key has committed some
“crime” (as defined by the imperialists), and is imprisoned. The social
conditions that lead to imprisonment are an essential part of the
imperialists’ protracted struggle to maintain power. As a means of
keeping the internal semi-colonies under their boot, our enemies set up
any number of false pretenses for putting as many of our potential
comrades behind bars as possible.
Once turned on to ULK, a subscriber might start participating in
United Struggle from Within campaigns. Or ey might start learning more
about Maoism: the most effective threat to imperialism shown in humyn
history to date.
While participating in the anti-imperialist struggle definitely makes
one’s efforts at social change worthwhile, it does nothing to help a
comrade make parole. It doesn’t help you fly under the pigs’ radar. It
doesn’t keep you out of the hole. Naturally, identifying with the
struggle against the United $nakes government makes one a target for
that government’s boldest repression. Our comrades are constantly denied
parole, are constantly having their cells tossed, and are targeted for
forced psychotropic druggings and other methods of mental deterioration.
Their food is tampered with, they are beaten, and any tactic that may
wear down and frustrate our comrades is employed.
In these social circumstances, we need to consider how are we going
sustain our movement. How are we to make the most of the repressed and
limited time and energy we do have? How can we protect ourselves from
attacks on our physical and mental health, while locked in a tiny room
with complete sensory control? How can we build ourselves up, not just
for the day-to-day struggle, but for the long haul?
This issue of Under Lock & Key is on the topic of survival
and stamina, focusing on some things subscribers can do to better their
chances of survival, both mentally and physically, and make it possible
to do their most for the anti-imperialist struggle. There is much
important political work to be done, and a healthy body and mind is
important for long-term sustainability of our contributions to the
revolutionary struggle.
On survival, there are fights we must engage in for basic rights behind
bars: the fight for medical care and other needs often denied through a
corrupt grievance system, the struggle for access to education, and the
battle against classification in mentally and physically dangerous
long-term control units. Many campaign updates in this issue provide
practical tactics for these battles as a part of our overall strategy.
Survival behind bars also requires the struggles for peace and unity
among prisoners to build a situation of mutual respect, aid and
cooperation. Several articles remind readers that this fight against
repression requires united action. Building unity will help us win
victories to improve our organizing conditions while we build the
longer-term struggle. California prisoners write about the struggle to
maintain the Agreement to End Hostilities, while the essay on lumpen
class consciousness points to broader strategies we need to employ to
unite lumpen organizations (LOs) for both survival and advancement.
There is also work that individuals can do to improve their outlook,
education and use of time while behind bars. This is addressed in
articles on how to be disciplined in your day-to-day life, focusing on
study and organizing rather than watching TV, educating yourself, and
fighting alienation and individualism. Education in particular is
critical to survival in prison as it opens eyes and minds to the reality
of prison conditions and the broader struggle that can unite and give
purpose and direction to prisoners’ lives. As a Pennsylvania comrade
wrote: “The pigs try to stop real education in the gulags, because they
know that when we have a true education and know the truth about the way
things really are, they are defeated.”
A life of survival without political struggle is just survival of the
status quo. The most basic survival and stamina tactic is always
understanding the connection between our lives, as anti-imperialists,
with the lives of oppressed people all over the world. Our struggle is
made of many actions over a long period of time, and every contribution
has value. If we can maximize these contributions by taking care of
ourselves and each other as best we can, our internationalist struggle
will be all the better for it.
This month the Brown Berets - Prison Chapter (BB-PC) honors Mary Crow
Dog, born Mary Blue Bird. She was a resident of a town called Saint
Francis on the reservation of Rosebud during 1973 at the siege of
Wounded Knee.
In 1971 Mary joined the American Indian Movement (AIM). During the siege
at Wounded Knee Mary was tasked with organizing the women to do the
cooking, cleaning and communications. She organized food running and
getting in and out of Wounded Knee to get much-needed supplies. The
siege lasted 73 days, with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms
(ATF) and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) using armored personnel
carriers and Huey helicopters. Mary helped keep morale up among everyone
at the camp. Her bravery and courage is why my family in Pine Ridge and
Rosebud have the freedoms we do today.(1)
MIM(Prisons) responds: The BB-PC sent us these words on Mary Crow
Dog, along with some notes on the
documentary
on the Black Panthers that we reviewed in
ULK 49. We
thought it appropriate to print something on the AIM in this issue, as
they are very relevant to understanding the conditions in the United
$tates during the time of the Black Panther Party. While the BPP can
brag of having most of the FBI actions of the time targeting them, this
is probably due mostly to the size of the New Afrikan nation and their
mass base, compared to the First Nations who have been decimated by
genocide. And while Panthers engaged in long shoot outs with police,
nothing compared to the U.S. Army invasion of Wounded Knee:
“In the first instance since the Civil War that the U.S. Army had been
dispatched in a domestic operation, the Pentagon invaded Wounded Knee
with 17 armored personnel carriers, 130,000 rounds of M-16 ammunition,
41,000 rounds of M-1 ammunition, 24,000 flares, 12 M-79 grenade
launchers, 600 cases of C-S gas, 100 rounds of M-40 explosives,
helicopters, Phantom jets, and personnel…”(2)
Churchill and Vander Wall document the details of the intensive war the
FBI led against AIM. They write about the pursuit of AIM founder Dennis
Banks as having “garnered the dubious distinction of becoming the most
sustained attempt at a federal prosecution in the history of American
jurisprudence.”(3) While on the run from the state in 1976, Banks is
reported to have been hidden by Chican@ leader Corky Gonzalez, and
members of the Crusade for Justice working with local AIM members. Later
that year, Corky Gonzalez was falsely accused by the FBI of possessing
“a rocket launcher, rockets, M-16 automatic rifles, and hand grenades,”
intended to use in combination with AIM and others to kill police.(4)
Such rumors were part of the FBI’s public relations war against
liberation movements, attempting to distract from the fact that the U.$.
government is the real perpetrator of violence.
The American Indian Movement was formed in 1968, in a rising movement
for national liberation among First Nations that paralleled that in New
Afrika. Forming two years after the Black Panther Party, like many, they
were inspired by and modeled themselves after the BPP, though not taking
up the explicit Maoism of the BPP or the Young Lords Party. Like the
Panthers, AIM saw chapters pop up across the country soon after its
founding. And like the Panthers, AIM promoted armed self-defense of its
people and territory.
It is worth noting the different conditions faced by First Nations
compared to other internal semi-colonies. The threat of annihilation,
and the clear recognition of territory rights, lead to a more advanced
national consciousness and more advanced conditions for national
struggle. While we take lessons from the BPP’s ultra-left tendency to
pick up the gun too soon, the conditions of the time – from the First
Nation reservations in the United $tates to Vietnam to China – makes
their decision much more understandable than it would be today. Even
today, we recognize the objective conditions among First Nations overall
to be more advanced and armed struggle to be a correct path for them
before it would be in other parts of the United $tates.
Agent provacateurs’ glued to my cell door i can smell they stench on
my vents They strategically placed snakes Opportunist of the
information age Institutional Gang Investigators screening my
mail For intelligance files on Maoist Study Group cells
Screening my phone calls, collecting my convo FBI spy satellites in
the heights i hate this “Matrix” we enslaved in Communalist
ambitions got them worried 5.62 mm rounds thrown in flurries So
they plans to get us buried Liberation in a hurry; about to
Enlighten my mind In amerikkka it’s a crime and a fine Doing
little petty shit to make me push up my time Not even aware of our
destiny to tear this shit down!
Here at the McConnell Unit things have been real tough for us prisoners.
In January 2016 an inmate died of an aneurism after being denied medical
attention. During the investigation they blamed on the inmate that he
refused medical attention. That’s a lie because the inmate is the one
who requested medical attention.
I myself on 28 January 2016, at around 1 p.m. all of a sudden almost
blacked out while I was in the dayroom. Immediately my whole body broke
out in a sweat, fever, trembling, chills, broke out in fever blisters on
my fingers, real bad nausea, on my feet broke out in red patches, and my
eyesight would get very blurry on and off. I was allowed to go to the
infirmary. At the infirmary I was first seen Nurse Vicky Crumbliss, who,
after looking at my ears and throat, was very alarmed. She said that
they were very very red. It looked like I was coming down with
something. But what I’m about to tell you is what’s most shocking of
all.
The nurse then tried to convince me that I was a diabetic. When she
couldn’t convince of that, she went and brought another nurse by the
name of Ms. Snyder. When they couldn’t convince me that I was a diabetic
(which until this day I’m not) they went and got the P.A. Echavarry
(who’s got a grudge against me because I’ve 2 different complaints with
the Texas Board of Examiners in Austin, TX). Well, to make a long, long
story short, I was forced to take 500mgs of Metaformin for 4 days
because supposedly I was a diabetic. But on February 1 I was seen by
another P.A., Ms. Corbett. She took me off the meds. She said, straight
out, “you are not diabetic!” She didn’t know what I was sick of but yet
refused to do any lab work to determine what I was sick of.
But on February 3 after one of brothers called to complain that I was
being denied the proper medical attention I again saw P.A. Echavarry who
was very pissed off, and supposedly scheduled me for some lab work (that
was not done until this past March 17, 2016). Which is kind of too late
now because I’ve gotten better from whatever had me sick which started
on January 28 and lasted for almost a month.
On a daily basis prisoners are written up on bogus disciplinary cases.
For example: A friend of mine got written up a bogus case that allegedly
he painted his cell table and window red and blue. Even though his cell
mate spoke to Assistant Warden Putnam and confessed that he had been the
one who had painted the table and cell windows, my friend still got
written up and punished and they gave him restrictions on commissary,
recreation, suspended contact visits, and dropped his line class status.
I helped him file both Step 1 and 2 grievances and we submitted evidence
of his cellmate confessing at the disciplinary hearing. Both my friend’s
Step 1 and 2 grievances response stated that “there were no due process
violations and that punishment was within agency guidelines.”
Can you believe that? Here at the McConnell Unit we need someone to
advocate for us. Our civil and constitutional rights are violated. I
just helped my friend file a citizen’s complaint. Hopefully that will
help get back his line class. I could go, on and on. I thank you, for
all of your help!
I have enclosed copies of letters a comrade wrote to secure his
position, ensure his safety, among many who are undergoing a mass hunger
strike thie 23rd day of March 2016, to fight perpetually against the
injustice we are receiving here at Lucasville. I will pass out your
address to the rest of the brothers who will be fighting as well. I will
remain on the compound to be the legs and voice to services and family
on the streets of the brothers undergoing this battle.
Our basic human rights are being denied here! A shortage in food from
Aramark. Our religious accommodations are being refused. Medical
attention is being refused to those in dire need. And the majority of
the minority population is being discriminated against and abused.
Together we take a stand and organize against the administration today.
I’ll write to keep you updated and give awareness. Expect much more
letters.
MIM(Prisons) responds: We have not yet received an update on this
hunger strike, but these comrades are taking a correct tactical
approach. Engaging in such a protest as a unified group, and engaging
outside media and supporters, have been shown to be important aspects
for the success of hunger strikes in the past.(1) We are eagerly
awaiting more information on the progress of this protest.
As the comrade states in eir letter, attached to this article, ey do not
want to go on a hunger strike. Ey is being compelled to put eir life on
the line because ey has tried all other avenues available, to no avail.
The attached letter contains the demands of one prisoner. In
negotiations with the state, it will be important to develop a clear
list of demands that represent the entire population at Southern Ohio
Correctional Facility (SOCF). The comrade who wrote to us, the “legs and
voice” on the unit, outlined some clear complaints which could be made
into specific demands of the administration and prison staff. Without
this clarity, the unity of the strikers may be compromised, as it leaves
the group vulnerable to divide-and-conquer tactics.
We do hope this strike brings needed remedies for prisoners held at
SOCF. The state has shown time and time again that agreements it makes
with prisoners (or even its compliance with established laws) is
unreliable, so the strikers should be prepared to defend any victories
tooth and nail. In the end, whether the administration cooperates or
not, using this struggle to build long-term unity amongst prisoners at
SOCF is the real prize. Strengthening unity amongst prisoners will bring
much more long-term remedy than a few token individuals who are
permitted to receive medical treatment. Clarify your goals, unite around
them, and prepare to defend them!
Other publications routinely and completely banned are: Black and Pink
(newspaper), Community Church of Boston (we grieved the rejection, now
get 1 or 2 then start over again), and Prison Legal News newsletter is
banned outright.
Although ULK48 is still officially rejected, it was delivered to
me today. Note: the petition about Florida grievances you provided to me
was sent to all provided addresses and have been ignored. Any hints as
to what’s next?
MIM(Prisons) responds: We appreciate this update from one of the
many comrades in Florida who have tried to use the petition to demand
their grievances be addressed. We are unfortunately not surprised to
hear that there has been no response to these petitions. There is no
real justice in an imperialist system that locks up oppressed nations
and resisters while giving big payouts to the criminals who run the
government and corporations. The system is not set up to provide rights
to prisoners. However we can sometimes gain small victories by using the
imperialists’ laws and regulations against them. And in this case, with
campaigns like the demand for grievances to be addressed, we can also
use this opportunity to educate people about the system that we are
fighting.
Because of this we do not expect instant results, and in fact can not
expect that campaigns such as this one provide relief to people after
just sending in a few protest letters. However, the collective force of
many people sending these to the same addresses might have an impact on
conditions prisoners actually face. We ask our comrades to send us an
update in every state where we have a grievance campaign so that we can
assess if there is further action that can be taken. If anyone else in
Florida has had success, write in and tell us what you have done so that
this comrade and others can learn from your experience. If you have
received no response, let us know that as well. And if you have other
ideas about next steps for this campaign, please share them with us so
that we can continue this fight.