MIM(Prisons) is a cell of revolutionaries serving the oppressed masses inside U.$. prisons, guided by the communist ideology of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism.
www.prisoncensorship.info is a media institution run by the Maoist Internationalist Ministry of Prisons. Here we collect and publicize reports of conditions behind the bars in U.$. prisons. Information about these incidents rarely makes it out of the prison, and when it does it is extremely rare that the reports are taken seriously and published. This historical record is important for documenting patterns of abuse, and also for informing people on the streets about what goes on behind the bars.
I’m reporting back to you about this fascist penal system here at Chino
minimum yard. They have put up a memo about the food strike and they are
threatening us by saying that if we participate, they will move us off
the yard and put us in Ad-Seg!
I told the comrades to keep on doing what we are doing and to hell with
the fascist pigs! We will not stop, until our comrades are let out of
the SHU! I told the comrades to keep the faith and if these pigs send us
to the hole or the SHU, always remember, it’s just another part of the
prison.
In the struggle, from the belly of the beast!
MIM(Prisons) adds: The list of facilities that have reported
hunger strikers reported by the
CDCR
does not include the California Institution for Men in Chino, bringing
into question their count of hunger strikes at 4252 as of Thursday,
September 29. There was not as much advance notice this time around, so
the word that the strike is back on is still spreading.
2 October 2011 UPDATE:Latest
reports are that around 12,000 prisoners were participating on
September 28. This higher number includes people who have participated
at any level, and includes prisoners transferred out of state.
“Power in defense of freedom is greater than power on behalf of tyranny
and oppression.” - Malcolm X
As most of you may know, we are engaged in a protracted struggle to
secure our liberation from perpetual torture and uphold our human
rights. On July 1st the Pelican Bay
SHU D-Corridor
Collective called for an indefinite
hunger
strike to peacefully protest the decades and decades of subhuman
conditions we have endured in these sensory deprivation torture units.
The NCTT, along with 6,600 other prisoners and untold thousands the
world over answered that call. We did not eat for 21 days. I personally
lost 42 pounds and had to be rushed to the emergency room at least once.
Men older and less physically resilient than myself, some with chronic
disease such as diabetes, asthma and cancer survivors, made these same
sacrifices, and we are prepared to make those sacrifices again, taking
them to their ultimate conclusion if necessary, to achieve what is by
right ours already.
This makes the events of 16 August all the more perplexing, even though
we were forewarned and expected it. At approximately 08:00 on 16 August
2011 some 20 to 25 Correctional Officers (COs) and some 10 to 12 ISU and
IGI [“gang intelligence”] officers converged on 4B1L-C-section under the
pretext that they’d received a “kite” alleging New Afrikan and/or
“southern” Mexican partisans in 4B1L-C-section were going to “assault
staff.”
For months, IGI has been attempting to manufacture fear and reactionary
resentment amongst building COs that New Afrikans were planning to
attack staff during Black August memorial. Mindful of the daily
injustices visited upon indeterminate SHU prisoners, and already fearful
of the dreaded retribution, some staff actually bought into this
absurdity. There was no threat, there was no “kite” found – this was
simple unadulterated retribution for the hunger strike and the unwanted
public attention it has brought to the domestic torture camps they are
managing at Pelican Bay, Corcoran and Tehachapi SHUs.
We were all stripped down and escorted out of the building and placed in
the small management yard caged (imagine a K-9 kennel cage – that’s what
our yard is). For approximately 6 hours they systematically tore our
cells up, cut open mattresses, tore down or trod upon personal photos,
confiscated any item they felt would hurt us on a personal level, with
abject disregard for personal property regulations. Coffee and tooth
powder was strewn over personal letters and laundry was taken or trod
underfoot. We were brought back to our cells only to find what I can
only describe as the leavings of a tornado of F-5 proportions.
That this was done as retaliation was itself insulting, how it
was done was blatant disrespect – but what perplexes the mind is what
did they hope to gain by such a transparent reactionary response? We
are, and have demonstrated historically, that we are fully prepared
to die to secure our human rights and dignity. So surely this
could not be some act to deter resistance. Perhaps it was an act of
provocation, an attempt to engender a reactionary military response to a
psychological and political attack? But no, this couldn’t be the case
because unlike the blindly violent monsters they would make us out to
be, the truth of the matter is that we are men of principle who believe
in self-defense and clearly exhausting all legal and peaceful means of
protest. Unlike the state, for us violence is a last resort and
we are not, and cannot be, compelled to react to provocation or allow
such to deter us from the legitimate struggle for our, and the people’s
human rights and dignity.
So this leaves us with the obvious conclusion that like a petulant child
or a bully who’s been exposed for the sadist they are, they strike out
blindly, to inflict whatever discomfort they can in an act of impotence
and frustration; an acknowledgment of their weakness in the face of the
people’s power.
Men in ernest are not afraid of consequence. There exists no set of
retaliatory actions, no sanctions they can bring to bear, that will
deter our course, as long as we have you, the people,
supporting us we will win. Together we can attain even greater
victories than these. It is our sincerest hope that you continue to
support this effort and open yourselves up to the prospect of more
progressive initiatives to come. Stand with us and we will forge a
brighter tomorrow.
This strike is being done peacefully, but yet one of my fellow prisoners
in support of the hunger strike was assaulted by IGI [Institutional Gang
Investigations]. Not once did he try to resist, and everywhere we go we
are in restraints.
I’ve already lost 2 pounds, which is nothing yet, but I’m a man who will
see this through till my body seizures. I’m well aware that my medical
disorder (seizures) is something not to be playing with. I will stay
positive and focus on the big picture of what’s important: change. I’m
not in Pelican Bay, but I’ve been validated and since March of 2009 I
have yet to receive what I got coming.
This
memo
was given to us on September 27. No advance directive was given to any
of us who are food striking [an advance directive form allows food
strikers to designate a person to make health care decisions on their
behalf in case they become seriously ill]. I requested an advance
directive and submitted it on September 26. I also sent a copy to my
family.
I’m not alone here in Calipatria fighting the struggle. There are over
70 of us validated here who have been stuck here for over two years.
Last year there were over 80 cell extractions here in ASU. This was for
TVs, jackets and laundry they are not providing us. Nothing is being
fixed here. All Calipatria administration did was ship out 12 prisoners
who they considered the organizers.
I know the Calipatria administration isn’t taking this hunger strike
seriously. And in response to the September 27
memo
some prisoners got intimidated and decided to eat. Many do not see the
bigger picture and feel it is a lost cause.
After we stopped the first strike in July all we got was harassment,
cold food and laundry messed with even more. I’ve been asking about
receiving some disinfectant and was informed that we are not going to
get it anymore. And we get hand soap, watered down, in a milk carton
once a week per cell. We live in dirty filth here.
The CDCR just had the accompanying (Sept 27)
memos
delivered to the prisoner population here at CSP-LAC. With respect to
the memo titled “Review of Security Housing Unit and Gang Policies” I
have to say that this is obviously a victory for all California
prisoners and a victory wholly owed not just to the thousands of CA
prisoners who participated in the mass hunger strike and various outside
organizations who helped bring publicity and additional weight to bear
to the states deplorable actions, but a victory which could never have
come about if those courageous prisoners currently held in the SHU
hadn’t come together with their strong showing of unity of the
oppressed. Indeed, we hope to see more of this in the future.
With that being said, I find it odd that the memo states that CDCR has
been in the process of reforming its gang validation process since May
2011, well before the strike. Piece of shit Kernan is trying to give the
impression that the reforms have been in the works since before the
hunger strike, thereby attempting to deny the SHU prisoners their hard
fought victory by making it seem that the reform were inevitable. Ha!
Kernan fools no one. The capitulation to the prisoners righteous demands
only helps prove MIM(Prisons)’s long standing line and materialist
interpretation of history that there are no rights only power struggles.
All power to the oppressed.
The second memo titled “Inmate Programming Expectations Relative to
Hunger Strikes” is nothing more than the Killafornia Department of
Corruptions attempt to threaten and discourage future hunger strikers
and leaders from such actions as well as their attempt to encourage
divisions within for defensive actions, but the CDC’s posturing and
threatening memos are futile because as long as there is oppression
there will be resistance.
I am a prisoner at Pelican Bay State Prison in the ASU stand alone. As
such, we are allowed no TVs and no radios as there are no electrical
outlets. I am participating in the hunger strike. I had started July
1st, 2011 but took a step back and allowed the prison and the whole of
the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation a chance to
conform to the demands/requests made. As you know, none of the core
demands were addressed. Just more of the same old same old, hurry up and
wait. Because of that, the hunger strike has started again, but I have
no way to know the latest as I have no TV and no radio. Then like a
godsend I receive your latest newsletter letting me know if I need
updates, hey just write my friends at MIM(Prisons) and they will make me
feel not at all alone!
As thousands of prisoners wrap up day five of round two of the
California Food Strike, the California Department of Corrections and
Rehabilitation (CDCR) has stepped up its repression and propaganda in
response to prisoners’ demands for basic humyn rights. They have even
declared it a punishable offense to peacefully campaign the state for
these rights by refusing state-issued food.
The bourgeois press has been repeating the CDCR’s ridiculous claim that
if prisoners went on strike again it might delay reforms in the SHU
system. Their audacity is laughable. We all know the strike is nothing
but a scapegoat, and not the cause of their “delay.”
Meanwhile, they have indicated that they will make conditions worse on
three main points of the original
Five
Core Demands. All three points address the systematic repressiveness
of the whole California prison system.
MORE GROUP PUNISHMENT - Not only has the CDCR threatened that reforms
will be slowed down by another round of hunger striking, but they have
implied that non-striking prisoners will also lose their programming as
a result.(1) This is in direct contradiction to the first demand.
MORE SECURITY THREAT GROUPS - While the prisoners have demanded an end
to the arbitrary and secretive system of giving people endless sentences
in the Security Housing Units (SHU, long-term isolation) for “gang
affiliation,” the CDCR has publicly discussed broadening the “Security
Threat Group” category to include street organizations. This will mean
more people in SHU for indeterminate sentences.
MORE LONG-TERM ISOLATION - The third demand calls for an end to the
torturous practice of long-term isolation. While the state has continued
to assert that these practices are constitutional based on court
rulings, they have promised to send more prisoners to Administrative
Segregation and SHU just for participating in the hunger strike!
As laid out in the Five Core Demands, these are parts of a system of
oppression that affects all prisoners. While comrades in SHU have the
drive to put it down hardest because of their living conditions, the
CDCR is making it clear that the implications will affect the whole
system.
Even the reforms offered in the Gang Management Policy Proposal of 25
August 2011 allow the continued practice of keeping the most progressive
and politically active prisoners in isolation indefinitely.(2) While
this would put California more in line with what is done in most other
parts of the country, it is hardly progress. This proposal highlights
the political nature of the injustice system.
Even the Eight Short-term Action Items affecting prisoners in Security
Housing Units listed in a 27 September 2011 CDCR memo(3) may not be
granted to prisoners refusing to eat state-issued meals. They hope that
by granting the more petty demands that they can break up the unity of
California prisoners, convincing some to give up while they are ahead.
The unreasonable actions of the CDCR during this whole conflict should
convince any prisoner that such a move would be a mistake. There is no
indication that California will be reducing its repression, and every
indication that it hopes to heighten Amerika’s war on oppressed nations.
State of California
Memorandum
Date September 27, 2011
To All CDCR Inmates
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Subject- INMATE PROGRAMMING EXPECTATIONS RELATIVE TO HUNGER STRIKES
Information has been received that a number. of inmates have engaged in
behavior consistent with initiating a demonstration/hunger strike event.
The Department will not condone organized inmate disturbances.
Participation in mass disturbances, such as hunger strikes or work
stoppage will result in the Department taking the following action:
Inmates participating will receive disciplinary action in accordance
with the California Code of Regulations.
Inmates identified as leading the disturbance will be subject to removal
from general population and placed in an Administrative Segregation
Unit.
In the event of a mass hunger strike, additional measures may be taken
to more effectively monitor and manage the participating inmates’
involvement and their food/nutrition intake, including the possible
removal of canteen items from participating inmates.
All inmates are encouraged to continue with positive programming and to
not participate in this or any other identified mass strike/disturbance.
These types of disturbances impact inmate programming and day-to-day
prison operations for the entire population. While every effort will be
made to continue normal programming for nonparticipating inmates, a
large scale disturbance of this type will unavoidably impact operations.
The Department will notify inmates and families when and if normal
programming is impacted.
SCOTT KERNAN Undersecretary (A), Operations
cc: Terri McDonald George J. Giurbino R. J. Subia Kelly Harrington Tony
Chaus Wardens
State of California
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Memorandum
Date : September 27, 2011
To : All CDCR Inmates
Subject: REVIEW OF SECURITY HOUSING UNIT AND GANG POLICIES
In May 2011 the Department began the complex process of assessing the
policies and procedures associated with the Gang Validation Process,
Indeterminate Gang Security Housing Unit (SHU) Program, as well as
privileges associated with inmates on Indeterminate SHU status. The
purpose of the review is to improve our policies by adopting national
standards in gang/disruptive group management. Before commencing this
review, the Department received input from internal and external
experts, other state and federal correctional systems, inmates, and
other stakeholders While the process of policy review and change will
take several more stakeholders to implement, much has already been done.
In fact, a draft of the new policy should be ready for stakeholder
review next month. In addition, several changes have already been made
by the Department, including:
Short-term Action Items:
Authorization of watch caps for purchase and State issue. Authorization
of wall calendars for purchase in canteen.
Authorization of exercise equipment in SHU yards (installation of
permanent dip/push-up bars is still under review).
Authorization of annual photographs for disciplinary free inmates.
Approval of proctors for college examinations.
Use of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation’s (CDCR)
Ombudsman for monitoring and auditing of food services.
Authorization of sweat pants for purchase/annual package.
Authorization of Hobby items (colored chalk, pen fillers, and drawing
paper).
Mid-term Action Items:
As noted above, the Department is conducting a comprehensive review of
SHU policies that includes behavior-based components, increased
privileges based upon disciplinary free behavior, a step down process
for SHU inmates, and a system that better defines and weighs necessary
points in the validation process. The initial policies will be completed
shortly and upon Secretary approval will be sent for stakeholder review
and comment. Upon receipt of this input, the Department will initiate
any regulation changes in the administrative law process necessary and
implement the first major changes to the validation process in the last
two decades. Of course this work may be delayed by large-scale inmate
disturbances or other emergency circumstances.
SCOTT KERNAN Undersecretary (A), Operations
cc: Terri McDonald George J. Giurbino R. J. Subia Kelly Harrington Tony
Chaus Wardens
Desde el 9 al 13 de septiembre 2011, marcamos el 40 aniversario de la
rebelión de Attica. Fueron 1200 presos que actuaron como una sola
fuerza, se organizaron y colectivamente ocuparon la correccional de
Attica en el estado de Nueva York. El motín resultó en lo que un
comisionario del estado describió como “el encuentro más sangriento
entre estadunidenses desde la guerra civil […] con excepción de la
masacre de los indios nativos en el siglo diecinueve”.
En 1991, MIM escribió un suplemento especial para conmemorar el 20
aniversario, que documenta el evento histórico y su legado. Este mismo
año presos en Nueva York, Nueva Jersey y Maryland boicotearon todos los
programas del 12 de septiembre para “rendir homenaje a los martirios y
guerreros que sufrieron, y quienes siguen sufriendo, bajo la represión
del sistema penal de los Estados Unidos”.
Las demandas de los presos de Attica en 1971 incluyeron cosas como el
derecho de los presos de Nueva York a mantener una vida política sin
temor de intimidaciones y represalias, el fin de censuras del correo
personal y de los medios de prensa, la exigencia por más oportunidades
de educación y trabajo de salario mínimo, y la liberación de presos sin
condiciones de libertad. Además de estas demandas rectas, los presos
emparentaron su lucha con aquella del pueblo del Tercer Mundo. La
Historia condena la reforma de correccionales de MC11:
“Los presos de Attica en el año 1971 no estaban pidiendo el tipo de
reforma que liberales ahora, y entonces, están ansiosos por implementar
para hacerse sentir mejor. Los presos de Attica reconocieron el sistema
de justicia criminal como una arma poderosa en el arsenal de la clase
capitalista y querrían voltear esa arma contra sus opresores”.
“Hemos descubierto…la frustración de intentar de negociar con un sistema
político empeñado en el genocidio”, escribieron los presos de Attica en
una declaración que fue pasada por contrabando durante la semana después
del masacre.
“Se están cometiendo asesinatos no sólo en Vietnam, sino también en
Bangladesh, África y Sudamérica. ¿Y qué no es cierto que nuestra
declaración de independencia nos otorga el derecho de anular un gobierno
que opresa a su pueblo y crear un gobierno nuevo? ¡Pues, nosotros aquí
en Attica como todos los revolucionarios de toda la nación estamos
ejerciendo ese derecho! ¡El tiempo es ahora para que todas las personas
del Tercero Mundo reconozcan el verdadero opresor y lo expongan al resto
del mundo!” (1)
En el articulo principal de las notas suplementarias de MIM, un preso
menciona que Attica marcó un surgimiento fuerte en el movimiento por los
derechos de los presos durante los primeros años de los años 70. En el
último año hemos visto huelgas en los estados de Georgia y California
donde miles de presos han participado en varias prisiones. Pero aún así
parece que el movimiento todavía tiene que escalar aún más alto para
poder llegar al mismo punto álgido de nuestra lucha que alcanzamos en
aquellos días.
Mirando hacia atrás a Attica y las rebeliones antepasadas, podemos ver
el principio y el final del periodo en el cual la contradicción entre
los presos y el estado estaba a la vanguardia. La lucha durante este
periodo trajo un poco de progreso para los preso en la forma de derechos
temporales, concesiones y el apoyo del mundo libre para los cautivos.
Pero aún más importante, miramos organizaciones colectivas juntarse en
masa, uniendo a presos por su sufrimiento y abuso común por todo el
alrededor del sistema de prisiones en los Estados Unidos. Esta unidad y
lucha logró empujar al estado hacia atrás. Pero al mismo tiempo, también
provocó que el estado desarrollara un plan para los reclusorios de
aislamiento permanente y también pólizas que empojan drogas sicotrópicas
a los presos mientras nuestros programas están nuevamente suspendidos,
reafirmando la futilidad de la reforma de prisiones. Incluso en estos
días cuando el estado se enfrenta a una resistencia significativa, se
presenta en forma de demandas en los tribunales y huelgas de hambre
donde se controla todo medio de comunicación y negociación muy
firmemente. Todavía estamos en la etapa de jugar sus juegos con sus
reglas y sus condiciones.
Hace solamente dos años, el 17 de septiembre 2009, que nuestro camarada
Amare (Ra’d) Selton de “United Struggle from Within” se murió en Attica.
Selton era un contribuidor regular de “Under Lock & Key” y también
participaba en grupos de estudio de MIM, y con frecuencia tenia
confrontaciones con los guardias de la prisión. No sabemos las exactas
circunstancias de su muerte, pero MIM(Prisons) mantiene al estado de
Nueva York responsable. Él es uno de muchos compañeros que han
desaparecido después de ser enviado a Attica en los últimos años,
demostrando el legado de represión que no ha disminuido.
En las notas de MIM, MC67 entrevistó a Akil Aljundi, uno de los hermanos
de Attica que presentó una demanda, que finalmente ganó, contra el
estado de Nueva York tras el asesinato de 32 de sus camaradas y 10
rehenes, y tras el embrutecimiento y negación de asistencia medica a
cienes de otros.
MC67 concluye preguntándose cuales son las lecciones que se pueden
extraer de la sublevación de Attica, a la que Aljudi responde: “Nunca
confíen en el estado. Siempre estén preparados para lo peor. Sean firmes
con sus demandas. Sean claros con sus objetivos. Pero también sepan que
el estado puede ser malicioso”.
I’m writing to inform you about the food strike here in Pelican Bay.
Everyone around ASU (administrative segregation) has been passing your
articles around and I’d like to thank you and all of the protesters for
showing us love and supporting us prisoners in PBSP. The strike has
started and there’s been a lot of traffic in ASU lately. We received a
memo from undersecretary Scott (the liar) Kernan on September 27
stating:
“information has been received that a number of inmates have engaged in
behavior consisting with initiating a demonstration/hunger strike event.
The department will not condone organized inmate disturbances.
Participation in mass disturbances, such as hunger strikes or work
stoppage will result in the department taking the following action:…
[See a complete copy of this memo in
another
article here.]”
Tomorrow, Friday [September 30], ASU stand alones start a stand and
people here will be striking.
I’ve been put in ASU because when I was in the CTC a nurse disrespected
me and I took a stand and received a false 115 for indecent exposure
which never happened. I am currently in the 602 process of filing sexual
harassment against resident nurse Joe Carr.
Let me take you on a step-by-step retelling of that fucked up day. After
lunch time in the CTC infirmary I was being housed for a fractured jaw
but after lunch I observed nurse Joe Carr making rounds so I called him
over and asked nicely did he watch the game (football) on Sunday. I’m a
big Raiders fan so I wanted to ask him the score. Carr got hostile and
told me “none of my fuckin business, I went home on Sunday, that’s what
I did jack ass.” Now I lost my cool and cussed him out so Carr tells me
“You better get off your door or I’m gonna put you on strip cell suicide
watch.” I rebelled more and Carr said “get off your door or I’ll write
up some paperwork saying I seen you with your penis out masturbating.” I
told him he’s a fuckin’ liar and he says “my word against yours” and
laughs.
The living conditions in ASU are those of a caveman: 3 showers a week,
no phone calls, yard in a human dog cage, and no TVs because there are
no plugs.
Quick note P.S.: Today, September 30th, while at yard in our cages, the
police came and retaliated at the south siders in the strike. They
denied yard and came in their cells and took magazines, books,
toothpaste, deodorant, and shampoo. The police are inhumane and this
proves it.
I have enclosed the
latest
attempt by Scott Kernan to run the same ol’ mumbo jumbo about the
gang policies and procedures/validation process, being reviewed. The
trivial concessions are just things that we should already have. The
food remains disproportionate, cold, and of poor quality. All the items
one can purchase well that’s all good for those with money. People like
me who are indigent won’t be affected at all. Our concern is that of the
re-validation based on b.s. evidence, which for years under the
Castillo settlement had been banned. Those same policies
continue to remain the same. I’m on the third day of strike and everyone
in my area will hold out until we get some concrete clarity from those
who are informed directly. Meanwhile thanks for sharing all and anything
on your end!
This place has again changed procedures, despite verbally declaring I’m
on “hunger strike” and not accepting a food tray on September 26th, they
are not recognizing my declaration after 3 days, to monitor my health!
Procedures state 3 meals. They continue to make up procedures as they
go.
MIM(Prisons) adds: This is one of a number of comrades we have
been in touch with that are not being counted by the CDCR as being on
hunger strike, indicating their counts don’t reflect the real level of
participation.