MIM(Prisons) is a cell of revolutionaries serving the oppressed masses inside U.$. prisons, guided by the communist ideology of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism.
Under Lock & Key is a news service written by and for prisoners with a focus on what is going on behind bars throughout the United States. Under Lock & Key is available to U.S. prisoners for free through MIM(Prisons)'s Free Political Literature to Prisoners Program, by writing:
MIM(Prisons) PO Box 40799 San Francisco, CA 94140.
19 April 2012 - Greetings comrades in struggle. Here in Texas at
Clements Unit I am engaging in a hunger strike in protest of the gang of
racist officers systematically targeting New Afrikan prisoners with hate
as a mechanism to control or punish us. I’ve sent in numerous grievances
and complaints to the administration to no avail.
I’m in the high security building as an administrative segregation
prisoner for a weapon planted in my cell by one of these racist
officers. They have done cell searches to steal my legal documents,
destroy my property, defile my religious books and prayer rug, and leave
obscene drawings of monkeys or apes being hung or impaled with a KKK
cross. They have been doing this to the New Afrikans here for a while
and are getting more and more violent and vindictive.
As a political prisoner, I’ve been targeted not only because of my ebony
hue, but for my constant struggle to enlighten these slave-mentality
prisoners to unite and take a stand. I’ve been told by Sergeant
Mondragon and Correctional Officer Ruiz that they will make sure I die
in this cell. Captain Boland, Major Hardegree, Lieutenant Hancock and
Warden John Adams have created this kind of fractal injustice as there
is not one New Afrikan officer/employee on 2-Card/1st Shift High
Security.
Comrades this is only the beginning of my hunger strike - 2nd day - and
wish for your support and solidarity to keep me strong and vigilant. I
can only hope to force a change and get outside recognition to the abuse
and hate crimes committed by these racist gangs in the guise of
correctional officers.
MIM(Prisons) responds: We stand behind this comrade’s fight
against racist injustice. But we don’t fight to add more Black officers
in the prison. We know oppressed nation pigs are still pigs. This kind
of integration is not progressive. We encourage our comrades to explore
all non-violent methods of struggle, including hunger strikes when
necessary. But these actions should not be taken without building
necessary support for success. Even in California where thousands of
prisoners joined the
hunger
strike, the victory has resulted in few immediate changes, while at
least one comrade died in that struggle. These movements require careful
planning by an organized leadership and time spent building mass
support.
Below is a response to
“Validation
Leads to Longer Sentences for Oppressed Nations” from ULK
24. I would like to say first and foremost that I feel for these
brothers in the state of California. From what I can tell the gang
validation program in California is what the Department of Corruptions
(DOC) in Connecticut call Security Risk Group (SRG). Our system is also
corrupt but the process seems harder in this state. We also have a
Safety Threat Member (STM) designation, which is a more severe version
of an SRG. STM is for someone with a leadership role, or a repeat
offender.
I believe if the California comrades looked at the DOC’s model over here
it would help in presenting a more productive model for them to use in
reform. They used to be able to designate us at will with no evidence.
Now it goes by a point system. A tattoo is not enough to designate you
alone. And when you finish the program here, there’s no debrief. You
just have a piece of paper of renunciation; no information is needed.
They have found ways to corrupt this process, of course, but it is a
step up from what California is doing to our comrades.
Our mission is to put an end to these methods altogether, but I believe
there are steps in that process. Not only should we be giving a list of
demands, but also presenting a model for reform that honors our human
rights as well as our due process rights.
MIM(Prisons) responds: California Prison Focus, a reformist
organization focused on issues related to SHU prisoners, recently put
out an issue of their
newsletter almost entirely devoted to analysis and criticism of
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation’s (CDCR’s)
proposal for a new gang validation system.(1) The CDCR’s proposal rests
on a point system similar to the one used in Connecticut. A point system
might make it more challenging for prison staff to frivolously send
someone to a control unit indefinitely, but only if the evidence used to
calculate the points is disclosed. Another key difference in the
Connecticut DOC’s system is that it lacks a debriefing process, and is
therefore not as self-perpetuating as the CDCR’s.
It may be a tactical advantage to model our reforms off of those which
have led to some improvements in other localities. This would depend on
the conditions in each location and time. A point system is slightly
more objective than the CDCR’s earlier protocol of identifying just
three pieces of evidence, which were often kept secret as
“confidential.” But as Ed Mead reports in Prison Focus,
The stated purpose [of CDCR’s proposal] is still to “prohibit inmates
from creating, promoting, or participating in any club, association, or
organization, except as permitted by written instructions.”(1)
MIM(Prisons) stands in strong opposition to this stated goal of the CDCR
in our efforts to support prisoners in organizing themselves for
democratic rights as a class and for self-determination of the oppressed
nations.
The U.$. government uses the domestic injustice system to justify the
denial of democratic and Constitutional rights to a growing segment of
its internal semi-colonies. The recent CDCR proposal refuses to
eliminate the use of secret evidence to put people in SHU, which is a
denial of due process. Meanwhile, not only is SHU used to punish people
for associating with others, but the recent proposal includes plans to
expand the range of Security Threat Groups targeted for repression. If
these policies were implemented for the overall population we would call
it fascism. Organizing strategies of our comrades behind bars should
reflect this reality.
What is so sinister about the
debriefing
process, why it has been a primary target of the anti-SHU struggle,
is because the statements given are used as secret evidence to put
others in SHU for indefinite sentences, translating to years if not
decades, in long-term isolation torture cells. As long as this
continues, and as long as prisoners are denied basic First Amendment
rights of association then we see no progress in the “new” proposal.
MIM(Prisons) calls for the abolition of long-term isolation, as it is a
form of torture that destroys humyn beings. In addition, the way it is
used attacks whole nations by targeting leaders of the oppressed and
isolating them from the masses. There are reforms that could weaken the
second effect, but people would still be tortured unless control units
are abolished completely. The proposed point system barely puts a dent
in either problem and can hardly even be considered a reform. Therefore
we stand with the broad consensus among prisoners opposing the proposal,
and call on supporters on the outside to do the same to remove all
legitimacy from the government’s attempts to keep the oppressed from
organizing for any purpose.
When Republican Bill Haslam was elected Governor of the $tate of
Tennessee, he appointed Derrick D. Schofield as Commissioner of the
Tennessee Department of Corrections (TDOC). I assume the “D” in
Schofield’s middle name stands for either dumbass or dickhead, because
since then the conditions in prison have deteriorated. Schofield is one
of the $nakes that was instrumental in causing the largest prison
sit-down in United Snakes hystory.
It is no doubt that the Governor brought this individual to cause chaos
and mayhem to the captives at all the prisons in Tennessee. They do this
in the hopes of enticing the captives to riot so that they can receive
federal funds and justify turning the state plantations over to
Correctional Corporation of America (CCA). This way they can pad their
pockets and implement new legislature that will rob the captives of what
little dignity they may have left.
Many of your politicians have stock in CCA as well as political
allegiance to their dubious goals. Recently it was revealed that CCA had
sent
letters to
most state governments offering to buy up prisons on the condition
that the state contracts with them for at least 20 years, and that the
state keeps the prison at a 90% occupancy rate or more. Such a move
would further cement the prison industrial complex that profits off
humyn suffering while lessening government oversight in how prisoners
are treated.(1)
Schofield has attempted to remove all identity and dignity from all
captives. His agenda is to persecute instead of rehabilitate the
captives. His tactics have been to disregard policies and procedures
that have been in place for years and implement unwritten rules. He has
caused an atmosphere of hate, discontent and danger for both his
employees and the captives.
Captives are required to walk single-file under escort on the compound,
a specified distance apart. Captives are not allowed to talk or have
their hands in their pockets while under escort, even during cold
weather, and the TDOC has not issued gloves to all captives. Captives
must be neatly dressed and keep their cells in an orderly condition with
beds made, and must stand at attention during morning inspections
without speaking, engaging in any other activity or making eye contact
with the inspectors. This includes captives who work night shifts who do
not get off work until early in the morning, yet must be out of bed for
inspection. When captives are called to meals, they are required to line
up and wait outside until it is their turn to go to the dining hall,
even when it is pouring rain. Captives must keep their property in
specific locations in their cells, and property storage rules have been
changed multiple times in an arbitrary manner, leading to confusion and
frustration among both captives and staff. Captives may no longer
possess coat hangers, which makes it difficult to dry wet towels.
Permissible items on the property list have been changed and, rather
than be grandfathered in, items that are no longer allowed have been
confiscated or required to be mailed out.
Wardens have been transferred to different facilities, and it has been
stated that Schofield intends to continue transferring Wardens every few
years, which may have an adverse impact on institutional stability.
There are daily cell inspections, including by Wardens and deputy
Wardens, which means that all of a facility’s highest-ranking
administrators are on the compound at the same time, which may
constitute a security risk.
The policy changes that Schofield has implemented have significant
consequences. This is not a concern that is only an opinion of the
captives. At least four Wardens have resigned or retired since Schofield
was appointed commissioner, some due to the implementation of
Schofield’s new unwritten policies. Also, a number of TDOC staff, from
the Warden level down, have contacted the Human Rights Defense Center to
express their concerns about the effect Schofield’s policy changes have
had on both captives and staff in terms of frustration and discontent
among prisoners and decreased morale among employees. None of the staff
members who spoke with Human Rights Defense Center were willing to
publicly identify themselves, citing fear of retaliation. The atmosphere
here is very vile and becoming extremely dangerous. As is the case in
the state of Georgia, the fights, assaults on captives and assaults on
staff have gone up significantly, all because of Schofield’s silly
unwritten rules.
At Turney Center Industrial Prison (TCIX), captives are targeted to fill
up the hole commonly known as segregation. It once held Close Security
captives, and once they were transferred to other plantations, the
oppressors began to target captives by issuing both arbitrary and
capricious disciplinary reports for so-called infractions that the
captives have never been informed of, not to mention the unwritten rules
are as silly as the individual who implemented them. The ridiculous
rules have no penological interest. Moreover, most of the disciplinary
infractions issued are fraudulent and without legal authority.
Within the masses of captives at TCIX, you would be hard pressed to find
many that are willing to fight against their oppressors for the
liberation of the basic human rights. I call them the “i can’t crew.” I
like to say that i am part of the “i can crew.” There is a famous
saying, which goes like this, “if you won’t stand for something, you
will fall for anything.”
Since the atmosphere here and at all the prisons has become vile, a few
of us decided to get together and address our concerns in a petition. We
recognize that the oppressor wants for us to riot and that we must first
put our struggle out there before we start busting heads.
We got together and put all our concerns down on paper. We then found
someone with a typewriter and asked him to type up our concerns. After
this petition was typed up it was given to a person in each pod to go
door-to-door asking individuals to sign. The only ones not asked to sign
were known rats. The signatures were then sent out to be copied and we
sent copies to many organizations, State Senators, State
Representatives, Turney Center Warden, Commissioner Schofield and
Governor Bill Haslam. The petition has also been placed on the internet
and Facebook.
To protect the large number of captives who participated in
brainstorming this movement, we submitted our demands in the petition.
The demands included and were not limited to a meeting between the
Warden, Commissioner, Governor and various other officials, with the
Captive Counsel Members and different religious organizations. The
purpose of having the other organizations present at such a meeting is
because the individuals who go to counsel are generally intimidated by
the current Warden. Even if they were allowed to speak freely, they are
ill-equipped to speak on matters they have no interest in or have no
knowledge about. As in the past, a majority of them cannot be trusted.
Some are sincere, but most are there to be close to the oppressor to
feel some sort of worth.
If the oppressor does not acknowledge or dialogue with us, we will be
forced to conduct a sit-down. The sit-down will consist of all of us
refusing to go to work, and refusing to purchase commissary items or use
the phone. The oppressor can serve the food and make the beds in the
metal plant for the new prison that they have built in Bledsoe County.
We want all of the captives held against their will in all the prisons
in the State of Tennessee to stand up for themselves, before they are
unable to fight for their dignity, identity, freedom and justice.
What the captives don’t realize is that the fiscal year for the TDOC is
July of each year. They can expect more legislation coming that will
give the bourgeoisie more authority to take more inmate property and
continue to deprive us of basic human rights. The food will become worse
than it is presently; there will be less opportunity to access the fresh
air; it will be mandated for all to cut our hair in a military fashion,
including facial hair; and visits will be by monitor, thus denying human
contact with your family, friends and loved ones. There is a laundry
list of atrocities that are on the way, and instead of complaining about
them, the captives must rise up and do something about it, in every
single death camp in this state. If anyone wants to help in the cause
and has ideas, please contact MIM(Prisons).
Warden Jerry Lester recently told one of his minions that he does not
have to respect the captives. Is this a directive from Schofield, or is
this the Warden’s mentality and/or the result of Schofield’s
intervention that is causing this oppressive thinking?
The captives cannot change their condition until they want to change
themselves. Every captive needs to realize who their real enemy is and
come together so that they can maintain what dignity, respect, manhood
and rights they have left.
I recently received MIM Theory #9 about the psychology of imperialism.
This magazine has so much eye opening knowledge in it! I am very
grateful for my copy and for helping me understand myself. I have been
labeled as insane for so long and looked down on because of it.
I have been tortured in mental hospitals for refusing to take medication
that caused me such very painful side affects. I was billed 29 thousand
dollars for a few days of treatment. I was told I had to take medication
that was given to make me unhealthy. This medication was priced at
thousands of dollars a month.
I was told that my vision of a new world was psychotic delusion. I was
told that wanting to have revenge for what was done to the natives of
this land was threatening to myself and others. That since I was having
vision that I was just a nigger slave on a plantation in chains that I
was crazy. That my fear that these damned imperialists might just start
a war that will kill us all was not rational.
Many people can’t see the world as a whole so it doesn’t affect them.
Others just need to take a pill for their nerves. I know this enemy of
the people and I will expose it. From now on I have pledged to fight for
freedom. My next move is to educate myself so I can use my mind as a
tool to end injustice. I plan to study law so I can help others. I will
try to serve the rest of my time without violence.
MIM(prisons) adds: We agree with this comrade, psychology is used
as a tool to control people who do not conform to the norms of
imperialist culture. We do not agree with the oppressor’s definition of
mental
health. It is healthy to question the oppression and exploitation of
the world’s people. It is correct to want to challenge inequality and
injustice. And those who are truly in need of help are the ones who
think it is ok to profit off the suffering of others. Under communism we
can re-educate these people and help them understand the need for a
world system that works for the interests of all people.
We are the ones who verbally say the least Comrades who march from
the east Challenging what southerners accept as the norm We rain
on their parade, like an unsuspecting storm
Beyond colors, a nation of one Time is short, so much to be
done Blood and bullets worked in the past Knowledge and education
are meant to last
We are comrades who possess the plan to overthrow and change this
capitalist land The politicians are dangerous to our own Devious
acts we don’t condone
Bogus laws, misled justice If we don’t unite now, they’ll imprison
all of us We fondly believe it’s a tragic fate Unite now, before
it’s too late
Real criminals go free, while we rot in jail In capitalism, even
freedoms are for sale Pen and paper are the weapons to use If we
pull together, we definitely won’t lose
Remove crime and corruption from your sight Standing in solidarity,
it’s our right Each of us harbors a leader deep within Improve
ourselves, but they’ll never permit us to win
To comrades in the state of Tax-us, it’s a wake up plea Even locked
down, we can seek to be free This is national oppression induced by
the man Masking themselves as the Kool Kolored Klan
Grievances are one of the only administrative remedies we have against
unjust treatment and staff misconduct. In Oregon we also have
discrimination complaints, the right to attempt petition, a department
of corrections ombudsman and (any prisoner in any state or federal
facility can also do this next step) the ability to file with no fee a
Department of Justice (DOJ) civil rights complaint.
In Oregon, grievances come with two appeals. Then you have exhausted the
process and can go to further discrimination complaint with one appeal
and then that process is exhausted. Using either/or you can lay the
groundwork for a federal civil suit and meet the requirements of the
1997 Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) providing you exhaust all
administrative remedies available to you. So, you must either exhaust
all of your grievance appeals or discrimination complaint appeals to
file suit. You may not file a grievance and a discrimination complaint
on the same issue. I always advise that you exhaust every grievance and
discrimination complaint so you retain your ability to file suit.
You can file a DOJ civil rights complaint at any time with or without
exhausting either administrative remedy. However, showing you have tried
to address the issue with no satisfaction will help your DOJ complaint.
Always create a paperwork trail. Always!
If you are having ongoing issues of some type, but can A) document a new
incident of the same type has occurred and B) have new information about
the issue, you may file another grievance under OAR 291-019-0140 (6) or
another discrimination complaint under OAR 291-006-0015 (6). However,
expect the grievance coordinator will try and stop you claiming you have
already filed a grievance/discrimination complaint on the same issue
previously. This is one of their tactics to keep you from proving an
issue is persistent and is ongoing. This is currently happening to me at
Two Rivers Correctional Institution. Ms. Reynolds, the grievance
coordinator is stopping valid grievances and discrimination complaints
when I can clearly prove the Oregon administrative rules are being
properly followed.
Always know the rules and laws you are evoking. I suggest you read up on
them and copy them so you can cite them in your grievance/discrimination
complaint process.
If your process is blocked you can take it to the Oregon DOC ombudsman
or internal affairs - or both, to keep the issue alive. Make copies of
everything you do and make sure you have followed all processes to the
letter of rule before you go to this level. As a last resort per OAR
291-107, you can attempt a petition process as well.
You may face uphill battles but if you are going to use the
grievance/discrimination complaint process, so do it right the first
time and be persistent. You may not win but you can keep the struggle
alive.
MIM(Prisons) adds: Information like this is key to push forward
our battle
demanding
our grievances be addressed. We don’t yet have a petition for
Oregon, but for many other states we have petitions prisoners can
request to push this grievance battle on the political front while
filing administrative appeals and working your way into court. For those
states that don’t yet have a petition, request the generic version and
help us customize it to your state.
In the course of my imprisonment at this facility we’ve been on a
perpetual lockdown induced by the administration to conserve the limited
resources and money appropriated to operate the facility. We’re
currently in our cells 24/7 and are only afforded escorted showers every
few days. We have been denied yard, dayroom, phone calls, visits, law
library access, adequate and nutritious food, education, and work.
I recently came in contact with a camarada who referred me to your
organization and I would like to contribute any way I can to unify peace
in prisons. Over the last few months, I’ve organized a campaign to bring
change to our conditions and have been utilizing the administrative
process to seek relief, which has been otherwise unsuccessful and only
brought about the “privilege” of purchasing items from their canteen and
the order of items through package companies who extort our family
members by making them purchase luxury items at a 500%-1000% mark up, so
that their private industry of capitalist pigs can profit from our poor
families. I’m moving for a boycott on such items and to not put any more
money in their fat pockets.
I’ve also been educating those who wish to learn and build up their
minds. Since coming in contact with your
newsletter, I’ve
taken the liberty to expand your mailing list by assisting a few
comrades in contacting you and have shared ULK with comrades
who have been interested.
Currently I’m on a level 5/5 maximum security yard in Florence AZ called
central unit, and here we only receive two meals a day, a sack breakfast
with 6 slices of bread and 2 or 3 slices of some processed meat, maybe
peanut butter, 2 slices of cheese and a state tea, salad dressing and
mustard pack around 6:45 a.m. Then we get a hot dinner with small
portions around 8 p.m. at night. That’s 10-14 hours almost between
meals.
We get recreation in single man recreation cages for two hours every
Monday, Wednesday and Saturday and receive showers on the same day. The
rec cages are filthy. Some filled with bird (pigeon) feces and have been
swept out only once my entire year at this facility. We can only take
one water bottle to rec with us, and we never see another correction
officer until rec is over; which sometimes lasts 3-4 hours in the heat
due to shift change or count movement.
We don’t get any chemicals to clean and sanitize our cells (which are
one man) or toilet and usually have to use our own store bought or
indigent soap to do so, and for those of us without money that’s a
costly procedure. I’ve been sitting in this cell for a minute and this
yard is fucked up. My ceiling is cracked and falling apart, my paints
peeling and these pigs always say “I’ll put in a work order” and we
never hear from them again unless we stay on their asses. These pigs got
many convicts scared to act in any way (unless it’s a racial offense)
and scared to lose their good time or eligibility to go up in phases, or
get STGd.
MIM(Prisons) responds: These conditions, which amount to nothing
short of torture, in prison control units are common across the country
and a driving force behind our
campaign to
shut them down.
I am writing to ULK to keep readers informed about what is
going on inside the federal prison system. After receiving the last
issue, I was enlightened to the status of a movement that is going on in
South
Carolina state prison system. I have spent a long time in the lock
units of the SC state prisons and know them very well.
I have firsthand knowledge about the very beginning of the
United
Gangster movement that is growing in the prison system of that
state. I am glad to hear that it’s becoming more organized because I
didn’t have good expectations that it would make it this far.
I know how fearful the administration was about a movement taking place
inside the prison, and how the SHU was used to stop prisoners who were
supposed to be involved in this movement. I will continue to fight
censorship of everything associated with anti-imperialism and the prison
industry.
MIM(Prisons) responds: There are many lumpen organizations with
origins in the streets and prisons focused on getting what they can for
their members, often at the expense of the people. But these
organizations can refocus and develop correct political leadership. We
look to unite with all LOs who can get behind
the
five points of the United Front for Peace in Prisons. This does not
require organizations to take up Maoism, but the points are a minimum
basis for anti-imperialist unity in our prisons organizing.
Recently there was a victory for Oklahoma’s prisoner population, with
respect to the difficulty of having grievances heard and adequately
addressed. On February 29 2012, a magistrate judge held that Director
Justin Jones “wrongfully established, maintained and enforced the
grievance policy and authorized punishment for inmates who show
disrespect to staff.” The magistrate further held that Director Justin
Jones had: “failed to establish an available administrative remedy on
the claim involving the policy on grievance restrictions and disregarded
the claim against Mr. Jones for the disciplinary policy involving
disrespect to staff.”
On February 2 2011, the Plaintiff in this case filed a grievance
challenging his placement on a grievance restriction. Five days later,
the grievance coordinator returned the grievance and checked the box for
“Not an issue grievable to the Oklahoma Department of Corrections
(Private Prisons property, misconduct, see OP-090124, Section 11.B.1.),
litigation pending, not within/under.”
In response to a complaint made by the Plaintiff, Director Jones argued
that the he had “failed to exhaust his administrative remedies.”
Director Jones’s argument consisted of the following sentence: “Here the
prison’s administrative records demonstrate that Plaintiff has not filed
any grievance/grievance appeal regarding his being placed on ‘Grievance
Restriction.’”
Director Jones relied on an affidavit by Debbie Morton, which stated
that the Plaintiff had not appealed the February 7 grievance decision to
her office. Presumably, the Plaintiff did not appeal the decision
because the grievance coordinator has told him that the complaint was
not grievable.(1) Even at the time of the magistrate’s report and
recommendation, Director Jones still did not submit any evidence to
suggest that the complaint would have been grievable.
“The plain language of the [Prison Litigation Reform Act] requires that
prisoners exhaust only available remedies.” Tuckel v. Grover,
660 F. 3d 1249, 1252 (10th Cir. 2011) (quoting 42 U.S.C. 1997e(a)). The
Oklahoma Department of Corrections’s (ODOC’s) special report includes
excerpts from the grievance policy, but those portions do not identify
the matters that are grievable. The magistrate held “thus, Mr. Jones has
failed to satisfy his burden of demonstrating an available
administrative remedy to contest imposition of a grievance restriction
or punishment for disrespect to staff.”
In his conclusion, the magistrate stated as follows: “When the
Defendant’s evidence is reviewed favorably to [the Plaintiff] as
required, one can reasonably infer that there was no available
administrative remedy to contest his placement on a grievance
restriction or the punishment for disrespect to staff. As a result, the
court should reject Mr. Jones’ argument for dismissal or summary
judgement on the basis of exhaustion.”
As stated and shown above, my fellow comrades in Oklahoma prisons have
no available administrative remedy to contest a grievance restriction or
punishment for “disrespect to staff,” due to an erroneous establishment
of a grievance policy or disciplinary policy. The above outlined lawsuit
was filed on March 17 2011 against the Directory of the Oklahoma
Department of Corrections. If comrades in Oklahoma have been placed on
grievance restriction, follow the policy while on that restriction and
see to it that the oppressor is dealt with justly.
Further, if comrades are housed at private prisons, know that the ODOC
and private companies are in cahoots with each other in an effort to
deny you a Constitutional right permitting you to petition the
government for a redress of grievances.