Few things are more dangerous and detrimental to a revolutionary
movement than over- and underestimation, in particular underestimation.
Battles have been lost, tides and balances of struggles have ebbed and
flowed, and slide from one side to the other. And all because of this
simple mistake. Whenever we underestimate someone, group, or thing, we
commit this mistake of relegating that persyn, group, or thing to
unimportance. Or we ignore it or them as being trivial. This is
something no revolutionary can ever afford to do. Especially those in
the anti-imperialist, anti-capitalist movements.
Unfortunately, our movements, as so many others, can be plagued by
machismo, a particular form of male chauvinism. In revolutionary circles
this happens and wimmin are undervalued and most often underestimated.
Wimmin are a force without equal in any movement. In the fight against
capitalist and imperialist governments wimmin are an indispensable
resource. A clear example of their worth can be found in recent Cuban
history, the 26th of July movement.
Everyone knows of Fidel, Raúl, Frank País and Abel Santamaría. But their
fame and successes would have been unattainable save for the
revolucionarias, wimmin revolutionaries. While there were many wimmin
later in the movement, there were only two in key roles at the
beginning: Haydée Santamaría Cuadrado and Melba Hernández Rodríguez de
Rey. These two stood out as invaluable and the personifications of
wimmin to a revolutionary movement. Together they were key to printing
and distributing “History Will Absolve Me,” the famous Castro speech.
They also took up arms during the attack on the Moncada Barracks in
Santiago de Cuba. Although, triumph eluded them during the assault,
their efforts spread the movement from the eastern provinces throughout
all Cuba. Haydée and Melba were both imprisoned after the assault. But
their efforts never stopped and they even became more active in
overthrowing the U.$.-backed Batista regime. Their imprisonment,
isolation, and cruelty suffered at the hands of a proxy of U.$.
imperialism only served to strengthen their resolve and commitment. As
the movement spread, so did support which finished in the triumph of the
revolution in 1959. Without them the revolution may never have been
achieved.
Wimmin are often undervalued, underestimated and ignored. Let us not
commit such mistakes. While the capitalists and imperialists do, let us
recognize this fault and exploit it, using their fallacy for our
advantage to progress the movement. We need our wimmin to be involved
because they are the life blood of any movement and an invaluable
resource. As revolutionaries and persyns, wimmin are integral to the
success of our movement.
Let us take note of this history lesson and put it to good use. We need
wimmin, prisoners and captives, to exceed the examples of Haydée and
Melba, leading other compañeras from behind the walls as they did.
Directing others in constructive methods, organizing study groups and
educating other wimmin about the present struggle, as well as how to
champion it. Their efforts will give breath to our movement and once it
has spread, triumph will shortly follow.
MIM(Prisons) responds: This writer gives a good historical
example of wimmin who have overcome barriers of machismo to make
significant contributions to the liberation of their nation. There are
innumerable examples like this one that we can point to for anyone who
is hung up on their sexism so much that they think only “men” can
liberate the oppressed nations.
This author is advocating for a necessary first step: first, we must
accept that anyone is perfectly capable of being a strong theorist,
warrior, contributor, to the national struggles. We don’t see many
people writing in telling us wimmin are too weak or otherwise should be
excluded from revolutionary organizing, so while this sexist
indoctrination will ultimately affect how we approach organizing, at
least on a conscious level we might be already doing good on step 1. So
what’s next?
If we continue to see wimmin as a resource, even for revolutionary aims,
we are not going to get very far in resolving the gender contradictions
that plague our struggle for unity and liberation. Rather than asking
ourselves how can we mine this resource, we need to ask “what are the
contradictions inhibiting this growth of our movement?” and “what can we
do to help resolve these contradictions?” A study of dialectical
materialism, including Mao’s essay “On Contradiction” is imperative for
this discussion.
Similarly, we can’t fetishize organizing of any subgroup in our
movement, lest we lose direction for the sake of getting some wimmin on
board. That’s the mistake made by people who believe who is
saying it is more important than what is being said. It’s the
same trap that got Obama elected as a Black persyn, and Hilary
campaigning on the platform of being a female. Even if the tokenization
is of an oppressed group (queer/trans people of color appear to be the
token of the day), identity politics is always dangerous and an
antithesis to materialism.