There is a lot of talk about John McCain’s running mate Sarah Palin,
Governor of Alaska. A female on the Republican ticket does not mean any
more than a female on the Democratic ticket. We should not be fighting
for greater access for wimmin to positions of imperialist power in
Amerika. Some wimmin have already achieved these positions, but having
even more will not change the global situation of gender oppression or
imperialist oppression in any way.
Hillary Clinton is part of the imperialist government as Senator from
New York, and Sarah Palin as Governor of Alaska - wimmin in the Supreme
Court and in leadership positions in the Amerikan government have done
their part to further the militarist hegemony of Amerikan imperialism.
In spite of all this, it is interesting that the Republican’s will have
a woman on the ticket while the democrats will not when Hillary
Clinton’s candidacy played up the gender issue. This seems to be a clear
attempt to grab the vote of Clinton supporters who were in it just for
the question of gender.
Some people are calling Palin a “pro-life feminist”. The pro-life label
is great irony for any Amerikan who supports (and even promotes)
imperialist militarism. Countless people are killed by Amerikan
intervention (covert and overt) and the products of Amerikan foreign
policy. People who are truly pro-life fight Amerikan imperialism to stop
the mass global murder by imperialism. At the same time, the label of
“feminist” for Palin is as contradictory as the “pro-life” label.
Feminism should mean fighting for an end to gender oppression. Just
because she enjoys wealth and privilege doesn’t mean Palin can’t
participate in this battle, but her political line is definitely not
feminist. Palin is a part of the gender aristocracy in Amerika, and she
is a part of the fight for greater gender privileges for oppressor
nation men and wimmin, this is most definitely not feminism.
It’s important to recognize that gender privilege in Amerika is enjoyed
by oppressor nation biological wimmin as well as men. For years MIM has
put forward the clear line that gender oppression is not just a question
of biology. In imperialist Amerika, biological wimmin enjoy gender
privilege relative to Third World wimmin and men. We call this group the
gender aristocracy. This is not to say wimmin in Amerika are equal to
men. In fact there is still a differential in earnings, and certainly a
differential in representation in government in Amerika with only 16% of
congresspeople being wimmin. But this relative difference between white
nation biological wimmin and men is nothing compared to the differential
between the oppressed and oppressor nations. Overall gender oppression
is suffered by both men and wimmin of oppressed nations and gender
privilege is enjoyed by both men and wimmin of oppressor nations.
Amerika has a long history of gender oppression of Black men who were
lynched for rumors that they raped white wimmin (707 of the 2,060
lynchings in the u$ from 1882 to 1903 were for rape related
accusations).(1) The theory of gender aristocracy is also clearly
demonstrated when we think about contraceptive testing on Third World
wimmin and men, to benefit Amerikan wimmin. Access to new and better
contraceptives for Amerikans has repeatedly come at the expense of Third
World people.
And on this topic of contraception, much of the discussion of Palin
initially focused on her family and questions of so-called ethics.
Palin’s 17-year-old unwed daughter is pregnant, somewhat ironic as Palin
is a supporter of abstinence education rather than contraception.
Fortunately for Palin (who is staunchly anti-abortion), her daughter has
decided to keep the baby and marry the father. In reality, those in the
Republican party who say people should not talk about Palin’s children
are right - we have plenty of other more important topics to discuss. We
need to tackle imperialism as a system, and part of this is talking
about the hypocrisy of a womyn who fights to deny young people real
education about reproduction, a practice that has been demonstrated to
lead to more unwanted pregnancies.(2)
Palin has a lot of dumb Amerikan views about education, many which she
shares with others in the government. She wants to teach religious
creationism and so-called “intelligent design” alongside evolution in
Amerikan schools, presumably presenting fantasy as science. It is
fantasy that assumes we can teach youth about abstinence and ignore the
increasing pregnancy rates and spread of STDs, so maybe this position
should not be a surprise. In another fantasy, Palin also believes that
global warming is not a product of humyn activity (though at least she’s
ahead of some politicians in admitting that it exists).
In the end Palin is just another imperialist candidate for an
imperialist government who will perpetuate imperialist policies that
lead to oppression, exploitation and death of Third World peoples. The
difference with Palin is that she further demonstrates the power of the
gender aristocracy in Amerika.
Notes:
(1) Marable, Manning. How Capitalism Underdeveloped Black
America. Southend Press, 2000. p. 117.
(2) Contraception v Abstinence
Education, December 12, 2006 review of studies published at stats.org