MIM(Prisons) is a cell of revolutionaries serving the oppressed masses inside U.$. prisons, guided by the communist ideology of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism.
Under Lock & Key is a news service written by and for prisoners with a focus on what is going on behind bars throughout the United States. Under Lock & Key is available to U.S. prisoners for free through MIM(Prisons)'s Free Political Literature to Prisoners Program, by writing:
MIM(Prisons) PO Box 40799 San Francisco, CA 94140.
Click to download a PDF of the Oregon grievance petition
Mail the petition to your loved ones and comrades inside who are
experiencing issues with the grievance procedure. Send them extra copies
to share! For more info on this campaign, click
here.
Prisoners should send a copy of the signed petition to each of the
addresses below. Supporters should send letters on behalf of prisoners.
Director of the Oregon Department of Corrections (ODOC) 2575 Center
Street Salem, OR 97301
U.S. Department of Justice - Civil Rights Division Special Litigation
Section 950 Pennsylvania Ave, NW, PHB Washington DC 20530
Office of Inspector General HOTLINE PO Box 9778 Arlington, VA
22219
And send MIM(Prisons) copies of any responses you receive!
MIM(Prisons), USW PO Box 40799 San Francisco, CA 94140
PDF updated May 2012, July 2012, July 2014, and October 2017
In recent months it is becoming more common to read news stories about
the irreversible collapse of glaciers in Antartica and elsewhere around
the world, as a result of the rising temperature on earth. This
degradation of our global environment is driven by humyn emissions of
greenhouse gasses. As the reality of humyn destruction of Earth’s
natural systems becomes more apparent daily, and scientists provide more
clear and alarming evidence that we are at a point where the effects
cannot be reversed, we see a compelling case for communism as the only
economic system that has a chance of providing for the long-term
survival of humyns.
Maoists focus on combating the repression and brutality of humyns
against other humyns, which is an inherent element of capitalism. When
it comes to fighting for the survival of the most oppressed humyns in
the world, fighting for the life of the planet on which we all live has
become inextricably intertwined with our humynism. Without an
environment that can sustain humyn life, the fight against oppression of
groups of people becomes irrelevant. We see a strong reason for
communists to take up revolutionary environmentalism, and for unity
between environmental activists and those fighting oppression of people.
But we will not win the fight for the environment without first
liberating the world’s oppressed people and overthrowing imperialism.
Back in 1997 MIM published the MIM Theory magazine entitled
“Environment, Society, Revolution.” In it they wrote: “Our fundamental
goal is eradicating the oppression of people over people, and this goal
is also the most effective way to liberate the environment from human
aggression. We do not believe that socialism necessarily achieves
environmental salvation, but we do argue that only through
socialism do we have a chance at it.”(1)
Historically the worst devastation has been wreaked on the environment
as a result of oppression among people: wars, mass production using
exploited labor, and corporate land seizure. In war, herbicides and
chemical agents are used to deforest land and destroy crop production,
which have severe, longlasting impacts on not only the plants, but the
people and wildlife as well. Agent Orange, depleted uranium, napalm, and
white phosphorous are examples of this type of warfare. A bomb that
targets an “enemy” also destroys the environment in the surrounding
area. Capitalist production allows for the practically unregulated
dumping of waste into our rivers and oceans, including oil spills. When
commodities cannot be sold, they are literally dumped into the ocean or
incinerated, impacting ocean life and polluting the air.
Further, the imperialists target the Third World with
imperialist-country waste, locating dirty industries there and dumping
toxic waste in other people’s backyards.(1) And it is clear that the
countries that contribute least to climate change will be impacted the
most by it. Typhoons hitting Southeast Asia and India, droughts in
Africa, and islands that will soon disappear to rising sea levels are
all consequences that have already taken the lives of many people and
threaten to destroy even more. Where the imperialist countries will be
able to rebuild infrastructure and defend against the impacts of climate
change more easily due to their stolen wealth, residents in the Third
World do not have this privilege. At the same time, pollution and other
effects of humyn activities have reached a scale where it is harder for
the oppressor nations to isolate themselves from these problems. For
this reason, environmentalism may prove to be the most powerful material
force for building true internationalism.
In the United $tates the capitalists are attempting small reforms to
address the growing environmental problem, but these attempts show us
clearly why capitalism will fail to save the humyn race. The
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently proposed regulation of
power plant emissions, focusing on existing coal plants. In slow-moving
capitalism, the EPA will finalize their proposal some time in 2015, give
states a year to figure out how to implement the new regulations, fight
the lawsuits that states are threatening, and maybe see a few small
changes many years down the road. The EPA optimistically predicts the
proposal could cut carbon dioxide emissions from these plants by up to
30% by 2030.(2) The corporate media is already complaining about
emissions standards being “bad for business,” which under capitalism is
more important than humyn lives. And in true capitalist fashion, there
is talk of paying off the coal companies and compensating people who
have good high-paying union jobs that will be affected.(3) So for the
sake of the rich capitalists and the well-off First World workers, there
will be years of fighting over the possibility of making some small
changes, while people in the Third World are dying today from climate
change effects already happening.
Many well-meaning people think they can address environmental problems
with individualist solutions. They suggest that everyone needs to
recycle and drive electric cars, or perhaps not eat meat. It is true
that Amerikan diets, car culture and wasteful production must all be
dramatically changed in an ecologically sustainable system. But such
lifestyle politics are moving even slower than capitalist reforms in
terms of actually reducing the rates of pollution, resource depletion
and natural systems disruption. Social movement must be backed by
organization, structural changes and real power. The capitalists have
all these things, but lack the motivation for change. Setting up
independent institutions that actually change our systems of production
and consumption to be in line with the rest of the natural world needs
to happen. Whether this can be done prior to the seizure of state power
is something for revolutionary ecologists to explore. We do know that
the joint dictatorship of the proletariat of the oppressed nations will
be necessary to eventually enforce the changes needed at a global scale.
This is necessary because a significant portion of the oppressor nations
will not willingly reduce their consumption, and as long as there is the
potential to profit via short-sighted ecological practices, there will
be people who will try to do so. In the United $tates today the forces
which maintain the status quo are more organized than the forces to
impose sound ecological practices.
A third common approach to environmental problems is the pure technology
approach. While the science of ecology has advanced in recent decades,
it has been limited by the social structure enforced by capitalism.
First Worlders can build careers around working with small communities
to solve local problems, but these band-aids cannot heal the wound when
the knife of capitalist profiteering continues to twist and turn inside
it. Such academic ecologists can contribute to our knowledge, but their
efforts do nothing to challenge the capitalist model itself. It is far
more efficient and effective to make changes necessary for the survival
of humynity with centralized government acting in the interests of the
majority, rather than through the NGO or non-profit sector, or even via
the direct action method favored by anarchist camps. Communism unleashes
the creativity of all the masses in a way that pushes these projects
forward with immeasurable enthusiasm and breadth. (see our discussion of
China: Science Walks on Two Legs in
our
review of revolutionaryecology.com) We encourage ecologists with
global perspective to develop a strategy that will really make use of
their work globally, and we advocate communism as the best way to
accomplish their worthwhile goals. In the United $tates today, we have
far more lifestylists and reformists in the environmentalist camp. We
need more revolutionaries.
Socialism will put an end to “efficient” capitalist methods of making
profits. And with the land in the hands of the people, we can start to
make smarter decisions about balanced use for humyn survival without
environmental destruction. The majority of the world’s people do have an
interest in living on a healthy planet, but the capitalists with the
money and power are focused on profit. Since they have the power and the
guns, they do not have to answer to the majority. They waste resources
or even destroy them, if it serves their competitive interests. And they
do not care who or what dies in the process. Under capitalism we see how
government agencies and the government itself are beholden to the
wealthiest special interests, and incapable of implementing even modest
reforms. Only by overthrowing the capitalists and enforcing policies
that ensure the survival of humyns on Earth do we stand a chance of
reversing the destruction of the environment.
I read over
the
letter from our Polunsky comrades. This is what I recommend. Often
it helps to attach an I-60 with your Step 1 grievance and ask the
Grievance Officer for the processing number of your grievance. If you
have this number you will have a direct reference to track a grievance.
This helps discourage grievances being “misplaced.” It’s also handy when
you write Administration Review & Risk Management (ARRM) about the
unit not addressing that particular grievance. For important and serious
grievances it is useful to start them like this:
I file this grievance to exhaust all administrative remedies as required
by the Prison Litigation Reform Act to bring forth action under section
1983 of Title 42 of the United States Code.
It basically says: I’m going to sue you! It’s not a guarantee but
such an intro may make the grievance officer take it more seriously.
In regards to the officers who confiscate personal property and then
destroy them, I’d like to direct our comrades to the
Texas
Grievance Guide, in particular the part concerning filing criminal
charges against officers. If an officer takes a prisoner’s property
without giving a confiscation form stating the reason for confiscation,
then that is legally theft. It is also a violation of your civil right
to due process (which is also a criminal offense). Of course you will
need some kind of proof that the item existed and was taken. Get
prisoners to write affidavits and reference any camera numbers (if there
are any). The criminal charges may not stick because pigs don’t eat
pork, but it may give them a wake up call and make them think twice.
I agree that our grievance petitions are having no effect with the
people we are currently sending them to. I feel it more beneficial to
send them to ACLU Texas or the DOJ. Our grievances and complaints are
systematically neglected and denied. It is an Orwellian system, a
labyrinth of closed loops, a facade. We need to push for the TDCJ
Independent Oversight Committee which will place our grievances before
an unaffiliated organization with the ability to monitor TDCJ to ensure
that it abides by statutory law and its own policy.
We shouldn’t hope sending the grievance petition alone to the DOJ or
ACLU is enough. We must promote and campaign this proposed bill to our
freeworld friends and family. I see no other way to break these closed
loops.
MIM(Prisons) responds: Write to us for a copy of the Texas
Grievance Guide. While we agree with this comrade that a TDCJ
Independent Oversight Committee would bring progress for Texas prisoners
in their fight against abuse and injustice, this too is not enough. We
must learn from history that reforms like this one are followed by DOJ
tricks and adjustments to work around the new policies and continue the
same old abuse and repression. While we should still fight for these
reforms, and use the battle to educate and unite people both behind the
bars and on the streets, we must do this in the context of the broader
struggle against the criminal injustice system. We should never mislead
people to think that one reform or one house bill will make the change
we need to see to create a true system of justice.
This memoir by Piper Kerman, describes the experience of a well-off
white womyn who served a year in a minimum-security Federal prison in
Danbury, Connecticut. Kernan was locked up for drug trafficking and
money laundering, crimes she committed 10 years before her conviction
and self-surrender. This is not a story of the typical imprisonment of
disadvantaged men and wimmin, disproportionately poor and from oppressed
nations, but rather a memoir of a woman with a solid future who took a
brief detour to prison and made a lot of money by writing a book about
it. Most prisoners face a life after release haunted by their conviction
which makes finding housing and jobs virtually impossible. While others
in prison on her charges are labeled drug dealers and face long
sentences, Kernan’s brief imprisonment is portrayed as the result of a
period of reckless experimentation and mistakes of her youth.
Ordinarily a book like this wouldn’t hold much interest for
MIM(Prisons), but it’s become quite a sensation after it was the basis
for a popular Netflix TV series by the same name. This reviewer has only
seen a few episodes of the TV show, but based on that i can say it’s
only loosely based on the book. For instance, where the book has
virtually no sex at all, the TV show is mostly sex and lots of
sensationalism. The reality of boredom and mundane prison life wouldn’t
make for a very interesting TV show.
On the positive side, Kernan humanizes the wimmin who she meets in
prison, and gives their lives voice by pointing out the unjust drug
sentences and devastating effects prison has on families. The TV show
also provides a human face to its characters, when they aren’t having
sex or acting in some stereotypical role, but given the general
portrayal of prisoners as evil and dangerous this is at least a small
improvement. Of course, none of those wimmin get book deals, and for the
most part they also don’t have jobs lined up, or homes in New York
bought by fiancées who visit religiously every week, along with hoards
of other people who visit and write throughout their imprisonment.
Kernan does admit her volume of mail greatly exceeds everyone else. And
she spends a few pages reflecting on the fact that some wimminn she
meets face lives on the outside just as difficult as their lives behind
bars.
Part of humanizing the wimmin in Danbury’s Federal Correctional
Institution includes telling stories of their kindness towards fellow
prisoners. In this regard the TV show overplays violence and conflict
between the prisoners relative to the book. Kernan explains the deep
friendships and support the wimmin offer each other in this minimum
security prison, and overall she sees their humynity and does not try to
portray Amerikan prisons as a place that is offering any rehabilitation
or value for prisoners.
Both the book and the TV show condemn the prison guards for their
brutality and degradation of the prisoners. The reality of Kernan’s
experience in the book does describe some guards who clearly enjoy their
sadistic power, and overall she maintains a strong anti-pig position
even when someone is cutting her a break.
Overall this book doesn’t contribute much to those seeking to understand
the conditions in prison and fight the criminal injustice system. It
advances the finances and career of one well-off white womyn, and if
anything we learn that prisons are built to lock up poor people, mostly
from oppressed nations, and imprisonment of people like Kernan is a
fluke that rarely happens and registers little damage to their lives.
MIM(Prisons) conducted our annual congress in July to sum up our work
for the year, learn from our mistakes and build on our successes. We
affirmed our strategic direction and came away with some shifts in our
tactical work based on experiences over the past year and proposals from
our comrades. This report sums up the decisions of interest that can be
shared publicly.
Under Lock & Key (ULK) is our primary educational
and organizing tool, and the main way that we retain contact with our
readers behind bars. We will continue to lead theoretically through this
publication with expanded analysis of economic issues and international
content. This is important because we understand the value of
prison-based reporting and organizing information, but must not lose
sight of our role as a Maoist organization. Keeping the internationalist
orientation of our work, and providing analysis based in communist
theory, is critical to the goal of MIM(Prisons). We are working to
develop more writers behind bars who can also contribute at this level,
and we still value our field correspondents who report on what’s going
on in their prison or state.
In our focus to lead theoretically we have set a goal of finishing the
upcoming book on the Chican@ nation by the end of this year. Chican@
Power and the Struggle for Aztlán is a collaborative writing effort
representing several emerging Maoist voices in the Chican@ movement.
There is a need for Maoist literature and leadership in the hotly
contested struggle of Chican@s and migrants against Amerikan repression,
especially in the new context of multiculturalism and widespread wealth
throughout the United $tates. We aim to get the ball rolling on that
contemporary theory development with the release of this book. Prisoners
interested in receiving a copy should write now to request one.
Because we are a prison-focused cell, anti-censorship is a very
important battle for MIM(Prisons) and United Struggle from Within (USW).
Censorship is a primary and effective tool used by the criminal
injustice system to cut prisoners off from the broader anti-imperialist
struggle, and it is implemented illegally and arbitrarily against our
literature. Censorship can stop folks from receiving important
educational materials and in the extreme case it completely shuts down
our communication in states where all of our mail is stopped.
Last congress we decided to target certain states for anti-censorship
campaigning, and we had success with this tactic, especially in North
Carolina, California and Missouri. In the censorship chart you can see
what states had victories, bans in particular facilities, and overall
statewide bans. The chart may appear misleading in that a ban might only
directly impact a handful of subscribers. But still, even those few
subscribers could multiply into a movement if given half a chance. On
the flip side, there may be no censorship reported in a state that
actually does have censorship or a ban; we just don’t know about it yet.
Facilities where our mail was banned over the past year were Colorado
Territorial Correctional Facility, Federal Correctional Institution
(FCI) Elkton, FCI Talladega, U.S. Penitentiary Atwater, Rutledge State
Prison in Georgia, Sheridan Correctional Center in Illinois, Ely State
Prison in Nevada, Riverview Correctional Facility in New York, State
Correctional Institution (SCI) Fayette and SCI Waymart in Pennsylvania,
and Central Utah Correctional Facility. This is SCI Waymart’s second
year banning MIM material, and Central Utah Correctional Facility’s
third!
This year we made a number of commitments around censorship battles that
should improve our ability to respond quickly and resolve them from the
outside. We do not have the resources to fight every censorship
incident, so we prioritize assisting subscribers who are also engaging
in this battle from behind bars. You can request our guide to fighting
censorship if you don’t have it already. The basic advice is to appeal
all censorship, and appeal it to the highest level. Send us copies of
censorship notifications and inform us when any mail we’ve sent has been
rejected. Censorship battles are sometimes won on just the first appeal,
but others require much paperwork and persistence. Also tell us all the
mail you receive from us, whether it was censored initially or not.
We decided to push our anti-censorship work in support of the
W.L.
Nolen Mentorship Program (WLNMP), based out of Pelican Bay State
Prison in California. This mentorship program is committed to providing
one-on-one guidance to people on the outside who are interested in New
Afrikan liberation and fighting injustice. A comrade in MIM(Prisons)
attempted to participate in this program hself, but h participation was
squashed at the outset. Pelican Bay officials claim the WLNMP is a
Security Threat Group, related to the Black Guerilla Family. Since we’re
prevented from participating in the mentorship program directly, we’ve
decided to instead help fight censorship of the program. We will
continue reporting on the development of this program in ULK
and on our website.
United Struggle from Within (USW) is the MIM(Prisons)-led organization
for prisoners. This is the group through which we build campaigns and
educational programs behind bars. California and Texas are usually
heavily represented in USW membership, and this year we had an influx in
the Southeast and Midwest United $tates. In the coming year we will
expand our focus on states where we have active comrades, and help those
comrades build new campaigns relevant to their local conditions. In
practice this means that we have identified the most active states and
will be focusing our work there to bring together individuals from
different prisons with the goal of building unified campaigns and a
broader state-wide movement.
In addition to our focus on more active states, MIM(Prisons) is working
to improve the ways we engage people to make sure no lone comrades fall
through the cracks due to censorship or just from being locked up in a
relatively inactive state. We are going to pay special attention to
those who stay in touch and do work.
Alongside our commitment to develop prisoner leaders and activists, we
recognize the need to continue supporting our comrades once they are
released from prison. The MIM(Prisons) Re-Lease on Life program will be
focused on this year, in an effort to address some issues our released
comrades have struggled with. In the coming year we are going to
research the possibility of setting up a more intensive release program.
This is something that will take significant time and resources, and we
will only be able to offer it to those committed to a life of political
activism. As we develop the program we will reach out to eligible
individuals to work out a release plan. In the meantime, make sure we
know when you have a release date coming up in the next few years so we
can start planning now.
We considered a proposal from a USW comrade to use prisoner-created
revolutionary art for fundraising, and to spread revolutionary culture
in prisons and on the street. We are going to take up parts of the
proposal that are within our means at this time. In the coming months we
are going to initiate a project to create revolutionary greeting cards
for sale on the streets and for use behind bars. The proceeds of this
project will be used to fund the creation of a revolutionary prisoner
art zine, which we will distribute on the streets. Any profits from that
zine will be used to fund a culture project to be selected by the
contributing prisoner artists. Anyone can donate art to this project by
sending in your submissions to the address on page 1! Even if you aren’t
an artist yourself, you can help spread and build this cultural project
in your facility. Write in for more information.
We are pleased to report that our work has expanded in many ways over
the last year, and we expect additional expansion based on the plans and
resources we have in place for the coming year. In solidarity with all
genuine anti-imperialist forces world-wide, we continue moving forward!
Los Amerikanos deberían de condenar a su gobierno por estar involucrado
en lo que esta tomando lugar en el patio trasero de Rusia. Partidos
politikos con ambiciones nucleares en el bordo de Rusia es una receta de
muerte y gran desastre.(1) A incrementado el derramamiento de sangre y
todo es resultado de la maniobra imperialista por la cual docenas han
muerto en confrontaciones entre los protestores/fuerzas opuestas, y la
fuerzas de seguridad en Ukrania que son controladas por los partidos que
entraron en poder en el golpe de estado de Febrero (el segundo, de parte
de los EE UU en los últimos 10 años). Interesantemente no hemos
escuchado a John Kerry hacer un llamado de sanciones en contra del
gobierno nuevo de Ukrania como fue visto el pasado otoño cuando el
gobierno anterior asalto a los protestantes, una vez más exponemos su
hipocrecia (eso va sin disculparse por el ahora derrocado régimen de
Yanukovic, el cual después mato a docenas de protestantes en las calles
de Kiev). Los Europeos deberían de estar aun mas preocupados por la
violencia que se esta fomentando en Ukrania. Mientras la Unión Europea
espera beneficiarse del militarismo de los EE UU en forma de relaciones
de intercambios con Ukrania, les podría llegar guerra a su propia región
por ese mismo militarismo por el que tanto esperan ellos beneficiarse.
Las declaraciones del presidente Vladimir Putin en Mayo 7 del 2014
indicaron que Rusia se la llevara calmado cuando se trate de este
conflicto, las platicas de que Ukrania se una a la Tratado Atlantico
Norte (NATO) es una gran amenaza a la seguridad de Rusia. Los Amerikanos
expertos en poliza extranjera, incluyendo a Henry Kissinger, han
condenado la idea de unir a Ukrania con nato. NATO fue formada al fin de
la segunda guerra mundial como un pacto militar entre paises opuestos a
los entonces comunistas de la Union Sovieta. Desde la disolución de la
Union Sovieta en 1991, poco a poco la OTAN ha estado entrando al este de
Europa dirijiendose hacia Rusia.
Las palabras calmadas que expresó Vladimir Putin indican que las muy
limitadas sanciones del Oeste han sido exitosos en no añadir mas flama a
la rivalidad del inter-imperialismo. Con atacar y enfocarse en
individuos, EE UU y Alemania previnieron los tipos de barreras
comerciales que terminaron en guerras abiertas entre países
imperialistas a principios del Siglo XX. Y aunque los mercados
financieros de Rusia han bajado frenta a esta amenaza, el golpe
permanece moderado.
Otra razón por la cual preocuparse es que el régimen - apoyado por los
estadounidenses tiene participación significante de partidos fascistas
de la ultra-derecha. Es irónico que hoy el fascismo encuentra gran
cantidad de apoyo con la gente que destruyo el fascismo en los 1940s.
Pero nuestro entendimiento del fascismo explica porque. Fascismo es
dirigido por una clase imperialista que siente que su existencia es
amenazada y/o aspira surgir y avanzar en contra de otros poderes
imperialistas. Su gran apoyo es el de los aristócratas laborales los
cuales quieren que su nación sea levantada y poder segar grandes
superganancias a costos de otros países (lee nuestro paquete de studio
del fascismo). Rusia permanece un poder imperialista con desigualdad al
oeste, que no puede proveer los mismos beneficios a su gente como por
ejemplo los EE UU y esos del oeste de Europa. Mientras que Ukrania no es
un país imperialista, hay una pequeña clase de financieros capitalistas
que apoyan el avance fascista dentro del régimen actual. Los fascistas
se están movilizando entre la guardia nacional y están detrás de las
recientes muertes de policías locales y civiles en el este donde la
oposición al nuevo régimen es fuerte.
Con toda la ayuda y préstamos ofrecidos a Ukrania departe del Oeste,
sabemos que gran parte del dinero dado en el pasado se ha hido a
diferentes partidos politikos, “reforma de elecciones” y avenidas de
información (2); algo que debemos tener en mente al tratar de entender
lo que sucede durante eventos politikos en estados clientes. El USAID,
constantemente comercializado por el gobierno como agencia humanitaria,
está detrás de esta campaña y fondos politikos. Los EE UU y Alemania se
alistan para la planeada elección presidencial que debe tomar lugar en
Mayo 25 mientras trabajan detrás del esenario para asegurar sus
resultados.
El militarismo Estado Unidense, el cual es definido por la economia
Amerikana dependiente de la guerra y producción militar, tiene que ser
llevado a un fin para parar todas esas muertes innecesarias como las
cometidas recientemente en Ukrania y en diferentes partes del mundo.
USAID tiene que ser expuesta y todos tenemos que estar en contra de
USAID por ser la herramienta que se opone a la auto-determinación de la
gente alrededor del mundo. Los sentimientos anti-Rusos que se levantan
entre Amerikanos y el apoyo que Putin esta recibiendo en Rusia no es una
buena mezcla para prevenir conflictos en el futuro si es que de
casualidad los imperialistas deciden subirle un nivel mas a todo este
problema. Esto es la advertencia que nos dice y grita que debemos
fortalecer el movimiento acontra el militarismo Estado Unidense.
Pigism has no color As we adjust they adapt So we must remain
abreast by choosing not-to-wait-to have-to-react.
Pigs are Black! Wearing afros or hats to the back yelling
KAPTIVES! hands in the air! as they attack. Attack! Attack!
Pigs are white old “Raiders in the night” Imperialist goons with
guns (oink) Blue and grey uniforms (oink) forcing kaptives to LIE
DOWN! and conform conform conform. Imperialism is pigism and has
too easily become the accepted norm.
Somebody Sound the Alarm as we storm! Storm! Storm! and tear down
the norms and no longer conform to pigism
July 1, Murrieta, California - Residents of this southern California
town blocked three buses carrying about 140 detained migrants from
Central America from entering their town. The buses were diverted to
other border patrol facilities for processing and supervised release
pending appearance in immigration court. These flag waving Amerikans
spouted racist slogans about the destruction of Amerika brought by these
“illegal” additions to their precious white community as they attacked
the buses. The migrants crossed the border in Texas and were flown to
California to relieve the overcrowded processing facilities in Texas by
the Department of Homeland Security.
The protests were instigated by Murrieta Mayor Alan Long who called on
residents to oppose the federal government’s decision to move the
migrants to the facility in his city. He wants the federal government to
deport these migrants immediately. The Obama administration responded to
the outcry by promising to cut back on the “illegal” border crossings,
attempting to get $2 billion from Congress and authority to return
people home faster.(1)
Already this year Border Patrol agents have detained more than 52,000
unaccompanied minors crossing the U.$. border.(2) But in spite of the
media reports, this isn’t just about children migrants, and we do not
believe that activists should attempt to stir up public sympathy by
focusing on the children. The U.$. border is an artificial restriction,
put in place to protect imperialist wealth from those people who create
the wealth. Migrants cross the U.$. border to escape U.$.-backed militia
violence, capitalist-corporate economic devastation, brutal regimes and
devastating poverty. These are all conditions that secure cheap labor
for exploitation by imperialist corporations which bring the wealth home
to Amerika and protect it with militarized borders. The border crossers
of all ages deserve access to this wealth more than the well-off
residents of Murrieta. Anti-imperialists call for open borders, and
support the rights of indigenous people everywhere to enforce
immigration restrictions on the imperialists who invade and steal their
land and resources.
In today’s world we’re seeing the courts and media minimize the fact
that U.S. prisons are run by criminals worse than the so-called worst
confined within them. They have attempted, and have succeeded to a
degree, in demonizing the prisoners being tortured and thereby
desensitized the general public on that subject.
This is why it also seems the jury in the court of public opinion is
still out regarding what process is due, and how the experimental
implementation of political censorship known by its official misnomer
“Obscene Materials Regulations” is already in progress on San Quentin
State Prison’s (SQ) four death row Security Housing Units (SHUs). The
normalization of censorship in all its forms continues right before our
eyes in SQ and beyond.
Consider how an invasion force imposes their will upon their victims
preserved alive. One of the first things it does is knock out all means
of communication. After installing a puppet governing body it then
promotes its own agenda through the mass media. The San Quentin Antenna
Cable System (SQACS) can be described as a one-sided propaganda bomb
with a signal jamming warhead. It is a weapon of mass corruption in the
hands of terrorists embedded in the Calincarceration Corrupted Peace
Officers Association (CCPOA) and other affiliates using the CDCR as
their puppet to lord it over in the micro-societies of prison. Their fee
for this is deducted from your paycheck, education, and social services
for the disabled and elderly.
The SQACS (AKA SQTV) consists of expensive technology similar to that
used by cable providers. Most cable companies receive their programming
via satellite and then rebroadcast it on frequencies that boxes atop
your television can receive. SQTV also consists of 14 converter boxes
and several DVD players. As you may know, these devices require your TV
be on channel 3 or 4 to operate. However, the SQACS rebroadcasts each on
a different frequency. It even rebroadcasts free over-the-air digital
signals on different frequencies in QAM (cable mode) and the UHF band.
Not only are the 14 now obsolete converters a huge waste of electricity
(they’ve been on 24/7 nearly 5 years!) they also block free over-the-air
broadcasts on the VHF channels they’re rebroadcasted on. Contrary to
popular belief prisons don’t make money for the state. Only those
working at prisons make the money and since the SQACS wastes YOUR money
and not theirs, they don’t care - especially when it can be used to give
them job security.
Public broadcast stations KQED and KMTP are just two stations
multicasting from Sutro Tower that are currently being
blocked/restricted by the SQ administration under the guise of technical
difficulties. I argue it is actually intentional because these provide
programs such as World News, Democracy Now, and even documentaries
denouncing the horrific practice of long term torture by indefinite
solitary confinement in California prisons.
San Quentin is by no means the only California prison using this
technology to censor over-the-air broadcasts that don’t fit their
oligarchy’s agenda. Radio stations received via these systems at various
SHUs have reportedly cut out as the hunger strikers were being commended
for their peaceful protest. The broadcast was then turned back on when
the CDCR representative began demonizing it.
As stated in the essay “Free your mind; reversing the effects of prison
censorship” by S. Muhammad Hyland, “The bottom line is simple. The
institutional restrictions on revolutionary political material are in
place for a reason: to keep us from learning how to go about securing
our freedom, and destroying the system responsible for our lack of
success in Amerika.”
MIM(Prisons) adds: Unlike most U.$. prisons found in rural areas,
San Quentin is right in the Bay Area where, as this comrade points out,
there are many sources of progressive information on television and
radio. It is quite damning that the state finds it necessary to censor
these channels, which anyone just outside of the San Quentin compound
can watch and listen to just fine. It speaks to the truth that prisons
are all about social control. And it underscores the importance of not
just having control of our own independent media, but also fighting for
our First Amendment rights to distribute and share that media.
Distribution networks are constantly threatened by bourgeois interests,
from eliminating public bulletin boards, to the attempts to prioritize
corporate website traffic on the internet, to blocking television and
radio stations within prisons. Under Lock & Key is perhaps
the most censored news
source in the Amerikan Criminal Injustice System, and we are always
engagedin ongoing battles in many states. We need more jailhouse lawyers
and legal help on the streets to help with this fight.
I am writing to inform about the tier II program Georgia has started at
all level 5 security institutions. This program is suppose to be a
disciplinary management program, but in reality it is a cover up to keep
prisoners on lock down.
There are 13 criteria that identify prisoners to be placed into the
program, but since they’ve started this program there are prisoners who
do not qualify but who have been placed into the Tier II program. The
real reason the program was started is to keep certain organizations on
lock down. The majority of prisoners in this program (90%) are African
Americans. The other 10% are ones who have rebelled agains their system
somehow so they were placed into the program.
You can be in the program up to two years at one camp and even if you
complete it at one camp they’ll send you to another camp that has the
Tier II program and place you back on lock down.
At Hays State Prison inmates constitutional rights are being violated,
they are refusing us recreation, our procedural due process has been
violated, they are not feeding us 2800 calories a day, and they serve us
cold food at all meals. Recently Hays State Prison guards have started
carrying tasers. The officers let a prisoner kill himself, and if you
piss one off they’ll neglect feeding you or put something in your food.
In addition, the grievance system they have is bogus. Even if you word
your grievance correctly and you have them dead to wrong, their reply
will always be ‘your grievance has been denied due to the fact upon
investigation of this matter such and such say or nothing was found to
be out of order.’ When really no investigation was run, because they
never talk to your listed witnesses or talked to you personally.
This is one institution that needs to be closed down. There is so much
going on. The only reason certain things don’t take place for now is
because of the tactical squad that’s running the institution, but when
they leave it’s back to beating on prisoners and other such cruel and
unusual punishment.
The prisoners here are filing lawsuits but it’s a process that takes
time. Hays State Prison is practically starving prisoners and they
violate constitutional rights as well as standard operating procedures
of the Georgia Department of Corrections.
MIM(Prisons) responds: It’s important that our comrades report on
new programs like this Tier II system in Georgia because this is the
sneaky way that states are now renaming long term solitary confinement.
Also known as
control
units this isolation in and of itself is very harmful to people. As
this comrade reports, Georgia is taking the repression further by
restricting food and carrying out other abuses, and then denying
prisoners the ability to grieve these violations of law. Georgia does
not yet have a
grievance
campaign, but we hope that one of the many active comrades in that
state will soon take up the challenge to create a grievance petition
specific to this state so that we can push that campaign as another tool
in our fight in Georgia.