MIM(Prisons) is a cell of revolutionaries serving the oppressed masses inside U.$. prisons, guided by the communist ideology of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism.
Under Lock & Key is a news service written by and for prisoners with a focus on what is going on behind bars throughout the United States. Under Lock & Key is available to U.S. prisoners for free through MIM(Prisons)'s Free Political Literature to Prisoners Program, by writing:
MIM(Prisons) PO Box 40799 San Francisco, CA 94140.
I am writing today because I just wrote you on August 8 and the very
next day I was called into the office where I was told that my letter
(to you) was of concern. The woman working in the office stated that a
number of the issues I mentioned they were currently in the process of
trying to fix. They have been saying this for the last year while I’ve
been here, and for at least four years according to many of the
long-time inmates here.
So like I said in the last letter, (“I’m sure to see some type of
retaliation for this letter”). I’ve been carefully documenting
everything that has been happening since I began: piss test, matrix
checks, compliance checks, etc. I ask for any books or other legal
material that may help with what I’m dealing with. There are no
resources to be had here and I do not want OCC to ship me out under the
false pretense of legal library issues. I have around sixteen months
left and want to spend my time trying to fix some of this BS that is
happening here.
MIM(Prisons) adds: The censorship of mail exposing what is going
on behind bars in the Amerikan criminal injustice system is one of the
most pressing problems that our movement must fight. Mail is our primary
method of communication between prisoners and the outside, and also
between prisoners in different institutions as our newsletters share
news from across the country. This is why we need legal fighters, both
behind bars and on the streets. Get in touch with us if you can help
take these censorship cases to court.
The Minister of Defense of the
New Afrikan Black
Panther Party (Prison Chapter) recently
stepped in(1) to defend
Turning
the Tide against our USW comrade’s critiques.(2) We can appreciate
the greater clarity and honesty in Rashid’s piece compared to
Michael
Novick’s, but still cannot forgive him for getting the first
question of importance to communists wrong: who are our friends and who
are our enemies? Like
Jose
Maria Sison and
Bob
Avakian, Rashid has long been exposed to MIM line and writing, and
many attempts to struggle with him have been made. It does great damage
to the International Communist Movement when these people become icons
of “Maoism” in many peoples’ eyes, while promoting chauvinistic lines on
the role of the oppressor nations under imperialism.
Rashid opens his piece with the most common strawpersyn argument of the
revisionists, that the MIM line is wrong because Marx and Lenin never
abandoned organizing among Europeans and Amerikans. Rashid needs to be
more specific if he’s claiming there are groups that are refusing to
work with white people or moving to the Third World to organize. While
our work mostly targets prisoners, we target prisoners of all
nationalities, and similarly our street work is not very
nation-specific. The question we would ask instead of “should we
organize Amerikans?”, is, “what is going to achieve communism faster,
organizing rich people around demands for more money, or organizing them
around ideas of collective responsibility for equal distribution of
humyn needs and ecological sustainability?”
Rashid’s third paragraph includes some numbers and math and at first
glance i thought it might have some concrete analysis. But alas, the
numbers appear just for show as they are a) made up numbers, and b)
reflecting the most simple calculation that Marx teaches us to define
surplus value. To counter Rashid’s empty numbers, let us repeat our most
basic math example here. If Amerikans are exploited, then to end
exploitation would mean they need to get paid more money. Dividing the
global GDP by the number of full-time laborers gives an
equitable
distribution of income of around $10,000 per persyn per year.(3) To
be fair, in Rashid’s article he addresses this and quotes Marx to say
that we cannot have an equitable distribution of income. In that quote
from Wages, Price and Profit Marx was writing about capitalism,
which is inherently exploitative. Our goal is communism, or “from each
according to her ability, to each according to her need.” But we’re not
there yet, Rashid might argue. OK fine, let’s take Rashid’s hypothetical
McDonald’s worker making $58 per 8 hour workday. If we assume 5 days a
week and 50 weeks a year we get $14,500 per year. According to the World
Bank, half of the world’s people make less than $1,225 per year.(4) That
report also showed that about 10% of Amerikans are in the world’s
richest 1% and that almost half of the richest 1% are Amerikans. So
Rashid wants to argue that under capitalism it is just that the lowest
paid Amerikans earn over 10 times more than half of the world’s
population because their labor is worth that much more? How is that?
What Marx was talking about in Wages, Price and Profit was
scientific: a strong persyn might be twice as productive as a weak one,
or a specially trained persyn might add more value than an unskilled
persyn. So Rashid wants to use this to justify paying anyone who was
birthed as a U.$. citizen 10 to 25 times, or more, the average global
rate of pay? We have no idea how Rashid justifies this disparity except
through crass Amerikan chauvinism.
This empty rhetoric is not Marxism. It is ironic how today people will
use this basic formulation for surplus value from Marx to claim people
of such vastly different living conditions are in the same class. No one
else in the world looks at the conditions in the United $tates and Haiti
and thinks, “these countries should really unite to address their common
plight.” It is only pseudo-Marxists and anarchists who read a little
Marx who can come up with such crap.
Rashid later establishes commonality across nations with the definition,
“The proletariat simply is one who must sell her labor power to survive,
which is as true for the Amerikan worker as it is for one in Haiti.” We
prefer Marx’s definition that the proletariat are those who have nothing
to lose but their chains. According to Rashid, we should determine
whether someone is exploited based on different measuring sticks
depending on what country they live in. Apparently, in the United $tates
you must have a $20,000 car, a $200,000 home and hand-held computers for
every family member over 5 in order “to survive.” Whereas in other
countries electricity and clean water are optional. More chauvinism.
Rashid continues discussing class definitions,
“For instance, if there’s no [Euro-Amerikan] (‘white’) proletariat in
the US, then there’s also no New Afrikan/Black one. If a EA working in
McDonalds isn’t a proletarian, then neither is one of color. If there’s
no New Afrikan proletariat, then there’s no New Afrikan lumpen
proletariat either (”lumpen” literally means “broken”–if they were never
of the proletariat, they could not become a ‘broken’ proletariat).”
Lumpen is usually translated as “rag.” Even in the United
$tates we have a population of people who live in rags, who have very
little to lose. However, we completely agree with Rashid’s logic here.
And that is why MIM(Prisons) started using the term “First World lumpen”
to distinguish from “lumpenproletariat.” There is little connection
between the lumpen in this country and a real proletariat, with the
exceptions being within migrant populations and some second generation
youth who form a bridge between Third World proletariat, First World
semi-proletariat and First World lumpen classes. Rashid continues,
“Yet the VLA [vulgar labor aristocracy] proponents recognize New Afrikan
prisoners as ‘lumpen’ who are potentially revolutionary. Which begs the
question, why aren’t they doing work within the oppressed New Afrikan
communities where they’re less apt to be censored, if indeed they
compose a lumpen sector?”
This is directed at us, so we will answer: historical experience and
limited resources. As our readers should know, we struggle to do the
things we do to support prisoner education programs and organizing work.
We do not have the resources right now to do any serious organizing
outside of prisons. And we made the conscious decision of how we can
best use our resources in no small part due to historical experience of
our movement. In other words we go where there is interest in
revolutionary politics. The margins, the weakest links in the system,
that is where you focus your energy. Within the lumpen class, the
imprisoned lumpen have a unique relationship to the system that results
in a strong contradiction with that system. The imprisoned population
could also be considered 100% lumpen, whereas less than 20% of the New
Afrikan nation is lumpen, the rest being among various bourgeois
classes, including the labor aristocracy.
“And if the lumpen can be redeemed, why not EA [Euro-Amerikan] workers?”
Again, look at history. Read
J.
Sakai’s Settlers and read about the
Black
Panther Party. Today, look at the growing prison system and the
regular murder of New Afrikan and other oppressed nation youth by the
pigs. Look at where the contradictions and oppression are.
The only really interesting thing about this piece is that Rashid has
further drawn a line between the MIM camp and the slew of anarchist and
crypto-Trotskyist organizations who are still confused about where
wealth comes from. They think people sitting at computers typing keys
are exploited, and Rashid accuses our line of requiring “surplus value
falling from the sky!” We already told you where the high wages in the
imperialist countries came from, Rashid, the Third World proletariat!
That is why the average Amerikan makes 25 times the average humyn, and
why all Amerikans are in the top 13% in income globally. As the
revisionists like to remind us, wealth disparity just keeps getting
greater and greater under capitalism. The labor aristocracy today is
like nothing that V.I. Lenin ever could have witnessed. We must learn
from the methods of Marx and Lenin, not dogmatically repeat their
analysis from previous eras to appease Amerikans.
I would just like to educate those who hope to be released from
SHU/Ad-Seg. STG kickouts are a sham! Rope to hang yourself is what it
should be called. I am validated and was excited to be given a “chance”
to go to mainline, but I lasted one week and am back in Ad-Seg. During
that 1 week staff and gang units harassed me, searched my cell 3 times,
and told me they would be back until they “catch me slipping” and could
lock me back in SHU again.
I was told socializing with gang members is a violation, yet I’m GP
(General Population) so of course I socialize with the fellas around me.
I received a letter from a friend on the street who is from the same
neighborhood as me, so he closed the letter with our street name. I was
told by gang units this was a violation and “promoting gangs”. Really?
So I must not speak to friends I grew up with because CDCR says so?
Anyway, myself and a few others did not last more than days and we are
now under investigation (for what? I’ve no clue). So for those of you
who are active as I am, I wish you luck if you can actually go to the
line without dropping out and not coming back. STG kickouts were not
designed for us actives.
MIM(Prisons) responds: We believe the program this prisoner
writes about is the same as the
new
STG Step Down program in California. We have reported from others
that this is a revolving door that will not really address the problem
of Security Threat Group validation, which locks prisoners up in
long-term isolation on flimsy “evidence” of membership in a lumpen
organization. The reality is, prisons target lumpen organizations out of
fear for what they represent. Organizations of the oppressed, many of
which get involved in some organizing against the criminal injustice
system, are a scary thing to the oppressors. And when these
organizations start coming together and building unity to fight broader
anti-imperialist battles, like has happened in California around the
July 8
hunger strike, this is even more dangerous for the system.
In 2001 at the Lynaugh Unit in Fort Stockton while at medical out in the
cage “outside waiting” a man came out of medical and turned around and
hit the door, then fell out. The guard kicked the man and told him to go
to his cell. Then the guard kicked him once more and told him once more
to go to his cell. The man was dead! He had gone to medical to complain
about chest pain. The doctor and nurse checked him out and told him that
nothing was wrong. This is due to the lack of real medical attention
given in prison.
MIM(Prisons) adds: Medical neglect is a serious problem in
Amerikan prisons. While the government reports deaths in custody, they
do not report how many of those were avoidable. Under Lock &
Key reports many deaths as well as cases of medical neglect that do
not immediately lead to death, but we only cover a small number of the
incidents. Exposing this abuse is a critical element in our fight
against the criminal injustice system. We need to share this information
both with other prisoners and with people on the streets, and urge them
to think about why we have a prison system that wants to let people die
of neglect. This is not a system trying to rehabilitate people, it is a
system of social control, serving imperialism.
by a North Carolina prisoner August 2013 permalink
On August 2nd my old cellmate had only been here 5 days and within those
5 days the pigs were really messing with him. Then on the 2nd they told
him they were moving him, just to move an inmate across the hall into
his cell. They were going to move him to the end of the hall in a sally
port with a prisoner who had feces smeared on his cell wall and old food
in his cell. Before the move he asked to see the Sgt/Lt, but was told
no, pack up or they would pack his stuff.
After moving he and I were at recreation call and we, along with one
other prisoner, refused to lock up until the Lt/Captain came down. When
she came I locked up. As she approached his sally port she asked what
the smell was. He explained. They got the prisoner out of his cell and
janitors bleached and removed all the items from the cell, and after the
weekend on 8/5 he was moved to another cell.
Had we not stood our ground that prisoner’s cell would still be covered
in feces. The pigs knew this and were doing nothing. All of the H-Con
staff here at Polk Incorrectional institution just didn’t care, and went
even further to harass a prisoner who they thought they could take
advantage of due to his health (he just had surgery on his foot to
reattach bones and replace a steel rod after PERT team pigs shattered it
during an assault using excessive use of force a few months back). We
need more times of unity like this in North Carolina prisons.
MIM(Prisons) adds: This is a small example of prisoners uniting
for common cause. And this is a good start to building the broader unity
that is necessary for the
United
Front for Peace that will build the power and strength of the
anti-imperialist movement behind bars.
I would like to respond to an article on page 8 of ULK33:
Rats
Undermine United Front. The brother who sent that in to you should
be on something other than what he spoke about. I feel he should’ve been
informing you about how these pigs down here continue to bring us cold
food in lockup. How they mistreat Muslims during Ramadan and all
throughout their stay here as far as how they are fed. It is so
ridiculous how they so blatantly give you cold half-cooked, sometimes
spoiled beans and a funky crusty peanut butter sandwich in place of a
“pork-free” meal. There’s a sign posted in all the chow halls that says
“drink at your own risk” when it comes to the juice. They put this
poison out on the tables knowing that the majority of the offender
population is more than likely going to drink it. We are not getting the
proper portions, or enough to eat.
When you write a grievance and a step 2 followup, you get some type of
frivolous disposition back on it. I have several grievances from
different offices, all with the same disposition on them. It is as if
the employees are trained with what to write on the back on the
grievances. And they always side with the guilty officer.
Also, a female guard or nurse has power. Especially in these little hick
and country-ass towns, where they wish a muthafucka would get out of
line. Don’t matter what color you are. When they get thru beatin’ you
half to death, behind something some female said, you’ll more than
likely be beat blue. I’ve seen it at least fifty times. I even had a
woman lie on me and say that I had threatened her physically, from
behind two closed and locked doors. The warden looked at her like she
was crazy and let me make it. I was just blessed to be in the presence
of a warden who knows the game.
The article should have also talked about how we get charged $100 every
year for medical, but they don’t pay us for working or provide a way for
us to work the $100 off. Also, we only get $50 when we leave, and $50
when we go report. If you discharge they give you a whole hundred. Wow!
And the windbreakers they make us wear during the winter months, and
have the nerve to call it a coat. They work you in winter weather with
no thermal clothing, even though they have more than enough to issue
out.
Damn man, talk about the shit that’s really going on. The real shit. How
muthafukas came in gangsta-and-guerrilla, but leaving out like ginger
bread dolls. Yeah. And you all know who you are. You boys outta control
down here in the great state of Texas.
MIM(Prisons) responds: There are a few points in this letter that
need a response. First, we’re not sure exactly what issue the author is
taking with the original article in ULK where another prisoner
wrote about how rats working for the prison were undermining his United
Front work. It sounds like this prisoner thinks that’s not important,
but if we are going to fight these terrible conditions we need some
unity, and building a United Front across organizations is critical to
this battle. We can’t just write about the problems without also talking
about the solutions, or organizing successes and failures, and how to
build from there.
The point this writer raises about female prison staff is a good
demonstration of the gender oppression that happens in prison, that is
very different from what goes on on the streets. While biological men
generally have gender privilege relative to biological wimmin in
Amerika, there are some differences by nationality and also within
prison. In the prison situation, where most prisoners are men, female
prison workers can accuse those men of sexual misconduct and get them
beat or punished, without having to provide any proof. Further, numbers
from the Bureau of Justice Statistics demonstrate this power difference:
“Significantly, most perpetrators of staff sexual misconduct were female
and most victims were male: among male victims of staff sexual
misconduct, 69% of prisoners and 64% of jail inmates reported sexual
activity with female staff.”(1) Overall MIM(Prisons) sees gender
privilege as the norm for both men and wimmin in the First World,
relative to both men and wimmin in the Third World. But the abuse in
prisons should not be ignored.
On 8/13/2013 an offender who has severe breathing problems was pepper
sprayed in the face. I am sorry to say it took his life. On 8/14/2013 on
A3 in an isolation cell an offender had his hand in the door where the
hinges are. A guard, Mr. Wright, closed the door on his hand, cutting it
and breaking bones. I asked Mr. Wright about it and he said he did not
do it out of malicious intent. I was working as SSI all day and had to
clean up all the blood that was in the cell. A Sergeant came and told
Mr. Wright that he should be careful what he says in his report, and
ripped it up, and all morning the Sergeant helped him cover up the
incident.
From around 8am to 2:30pm I was out cleaning pod. I cleaned isolation
cells at 8am and again around 2pm on 8/14/2013. I heard them talk about
it all morning. They disrespect us, harm us, and when they do something
to us they high five each other. Their actions to fib on reports are
backed up by each other. How to ever catch them to tell the truth is a
major problem.
I am at a unit that violates multiple policies of its own. It hides its
actions and harms us in many ways. I started looking into the rules and
I am really not surprised at what I found. I have seen them handcuff and
beat one prisoner and they later on pepper sprayed another for having
his jacket on at pill call. I have filed multiple grievances and have
received no answer. We can’t defend ourselves at all without double
punishment due to the guards being one solid group that high five each
other after they beat us down. They do such mean things to us and get
away with it. These officials go out of their way to do mean things to
us. We are held in isolation for months even years even though we have
not broken any rules. How far must we bend before we get help from
outside?
One mailroom worker made sexual advances and I knew it was a setup so I
filed a grievance and sent a statement to the warden. A captain came and
I refused to be forced to write a statement for him so I wrote him up.
On the grievance response it stated that my verbal statement was
different than my written statement. But I gave no verbal statement. The
grievance investigator did not even investigate.
MIM(Prisons) responds: This prisoner is right that catching the
guards and exposing the truth is a major problem. This is part of the
important role played by Under Lock & Key: providing a
forum to expose guard brutality and abuse. By documenting these
incidents we can show that they are not just individual cases, but a
systematic part of the criminal injustice system, and something that we
must fight as a whole. Write to us with details about abuse in your
prison.
To help fight the grievance system, which denies prisoner’s an avenue to
appeal injustice and guard abuse, get involved in our
campaign to
demand grievances be addressed. There is already a petition for
Texas, and petitions exist for many other states as well. If we don’t
have a petition for your state we can send you a generic petition which
you can customize for your state.
19 August 2013 - Today, a federal court approved the force-feeding of
people who are on hunger strike in California prisons to protest torture
in the form of long-term isolation and group punishment. The
force-feeding itself is considered torture by many, including those who
have been on hunger strike in Guantanamo Bay since February and have
been suffering through force-feeding for months.
The decision in California came shortly after we posted a report from a
comrade who was
denied
liquid supplements and collapsed on July 21 in Corcoran State
Prison. Many others have collapsed since then, and the state’s
behavior has made it clear that the health of prisoners has not been a
concern of theirs. They apply very strict rules to how they count people
as being on “hunger strike,” knowing that strikers depend on the state
to report their numbers to the public, forcing them to abide by these
rules that don’t allow for any electrolytes.
The state has consistently used health care as a weapon to manipulate
prisoners into submission, rather than act as the custodians of health
and safety that they claim to be. Now that strikers are approaching
life-threatening conditions, the CDCR is acting to prevent them from
exercising one of the strongest forms of protest that they have from
within these isolation cells. The attention given to the situation
inside California prisons right now is already unprecedented and they
fear that if more prisoners die they may lose their power to torture
prisoners in the future. The torture is important to them because it is
what they believe to be their best tool to prevent the oppressed from
fighting their oppression (the injustice system’s true purpose). The
ongoing hunger strike, decades in the making, has begun to turn the
tables on that idea though.
This recent report asserts that 70 of 130 prisoners currently on hunger
strike have been going since July 8, 2013. There are a number of groups
of prisoners in California who are ready to restart hunger strike in
support of the 70 (or more) who are in it for the long haul as the
struggle heightens.
In the months leading up to July 8, there was some debate about the
return to the hunger strike tactic, particularly as previous attempts
were aborted prematurely without any changes from the state. But those
first two strikes resonated among the oppressed across the country, and
particularly in California where 30,000 prisoners stood up against
long-term isolation on July 8, 2013. As we approach 50 days on strike,
and repeated assertions from participants that they will not stop for
mere promises this time, this struggle is approaching a crucial point.
To date, control units have been a fairly effective tool of repression.
But if oppression breeds resistance, then even these tools of total
control can be overcome. At no other point have we been closer to that
goal than we are right now. Those who have and will give their lives for
this struggle must not die in vain. Those 30,000 plus prisoners who
supported this campaign must take every opportunity over the coming
months to build, educate and organize to prepare for the next phase of
this struggle. A failure to seize this moment in the prison movement
will mean much more suffering for the imprisoned lumpen in the decades
to come.
I’m writing to report on the hunger strike from Calipatria State Prison.
Everyone here on the facility showed their support. Not all of us agreed
on the tactics that some chose to pursue but nonetheless we all
participated. Some people refused to go to work while others chose only
not to accept food. Everyone who chose not to go to work received write
ups (CDCR 115) for refusing to work and participation in security threat
group (STG) activity. So now those people have STG points against them.
Some guys were trying to force everyone not to work but calmer heads
prevailed and they allowed people to make the choice themselves.
Out of the 850 prisoners on this yard, at least 700 participated. It
only lasted for a week. The staff passed out a flyer on what can happen
medically to a person who goes without food for long periods of time.
They sent the nurse from door to door asking if people were alright but
it didn’t get to the point where they had to start weighing people.
A lot of questions are now being asked like what did that accomplish?
Although we had a high level of participation we had no one to actually
explain what the strike was for or what are the goals we are trying to
accomplish. Most guys just get involved because they were told to. The
people who are socially conscious and politically conscious didn’t want
to speak up for fear of being labeled as inciting the strike which will
land you in the SHU. A lot of guys who have been down for 30 years have
been broken and refuse to stand up to the administration.
All in all we here at Calipatria showed our support until next time.
MIM(Prisons) responds:First let us recognize what this comrade
said about prisoners receiving STG points against them for a peaceful
refusal to eat or go to work. This is what the CDCR is using to label
people a Security Threat Group member and put them in torture units for
years or even decades - the main thing that the strike is protesting in
the first place! Such outrageous injustice should fuel the struggle for
basic humyn rights in Calipatria.
Second, let’s acknowledge the amazing accomplishment of having 700 out
850 prisoners participate in a united action that was part of a planned
strategic approach towards change in the interests of all prisoners.
This is historic, and it is happening all over California!
That said, the masses are correct to ask, “What did this accomplish?”
This report exposes the importance of building political
consciousness and educating our comrades behind bars both before and
during protest actions. We must build leadership to ensure that the
political message of these protests is effectively conveyed, both to
those participating and to the target of our protests.
Of course, the application of leadership in such closely monitored
conditions should be done cautiously as the comrades in Calipatria did.
Materials like Under Lock & Key can be tools for spreading
education and providing leadership. But even then we face censorship,
and prisoners get written up just for possessing literature, which
presumably was given to them by prison mail staff in the first place.
The solutions to this are tactical questions that should be part of the
sum up of the experiences in California prisons this summer. As the
masses are struggling for answers, now is the time to step in and have
these discussions however you can in your locality. What is the opinion
of the actions? What do people think should have been done differently?
How did leadership fail, and how could you build differently in the
future? If you come up with universal conclusions send them to us to
share, however as conditions vary over time and place, most of these
conversations should be applied locally.
On the large scale we can make a few points. First, the strike was about
ending conditions of torture in California prisons, in particular in the
long-term isolation units (SHU, ASU, etc.). And the strike continues
with almost 300 people having not eaten for over 40 days according to
the CDCR, and an unknown number of others still participating who are
not being counted. So the struggle continues there.
If comrades in Calipatria are asking what their one-week actions
accomplished, we encourage them to look back at the agreement to end
hostilities and the United Front for Peace in Prisons statement on page
2 of Under Lock & Key that were used to form a basis for
the massive support seen this time around. The goals of these projects
are to unite prisoners around their mutual interests as prisoners and
prevent the state from pitting them against each other as a form of
social control. We hope that comrades in Calipatria were inspired by the
tremendous level of solidarity this author reports on. There are many
ways to build on this unity through things such as study groups, health
campaigns, literacy programs, and other forms of mutual support. In our
own work we model such programs after the Black Panthers and Chinese
Serve the People Programs, which had the purpose of providing for
survival needs pending revolution.
I will be fasting this September 9. I’ve been on lockup since 2011 but I
will refuse my trays from midnight to midnight Sept 9, 2013 to pay
homage to the fallen brothers of the cause in Attica and everywhere
else! And I will encourage other brothers to do so as well.
The pigs decided to give us showers today. They are walking each cell to
the shower individually. Three pigs for one inmate, one of which is
holding an assault rifle looking gun that shoots paintballs of mace.
Cowards!
MIM(Prisons) responds: We commend this comrade for stepping up to
the
United
Front for Peace in Prisons call for a solidarity demonstration on
September 9th after reading only one issue of Under Lock &
Key. We would not call the pigs cowards for their vast outnumbering
and assault weapon use with prisoners: this is realistic fear of the
power of the oppressed. Right now we don’t have the level of unity in
the prisons to present more than sporadic points of resistance, but the
very event this comrade mentions, the Attica uprising, demonstrates the
potential power of prisoners when acting in unity. This unity is built
through struggle and discussion, something that is much easier when
prisoners have contact with one another. And for this reason, this
active prisoner, and tens of thousands of others, are on lockup in
isolation cells, being kept from contact with others so that they can
not spread the dangerous ideology of unity and peace among prisoners.
We have received word from another comrade in Maryland that others are
participating in this 24 hour fast on September 9th to commemorate the
Attica brothers unity and organization.