MIM(Prisons) is a cell of revolutionaries serving the oppressed masses inside U.$. prisons, guided by the communist ideology of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism.
Under Lock & Key is a news service written by and for prisoners with a focus on what is going on behind bars throughout the United States. Under Lock & Key is available to U.S. prisoners for free through MIM(Prisons)'s Free Political Literature to Prisoners Program, by writing:
MIM(Prisons) PO Box 40799 San Francisco, CA 94140.
Gangster mentality can mean different things to many. A gang is a group
of people with a common goal. I must emphasize that all words/concepts
are subject to connotations that don’t necessarily have good intentions.
Gang/gangster therefore carry negative and positive connotations, like
other words like socialism, anarchism, communism, etc. It has been
MIM(Prisons)’s aim to educate us about these ideas through the proper
usage of science.
With this in mind, I consider myself a gangster. Since I believe in the
idea of working with others towards a common goal, to me it is not about
“defeating this gangster mentality,” it’s about embracing it and
re-directing it towards the “Shining Path.” We have a common enemy, and
resolving our minor contradictions doesn’t necessarily mean that we have
to defeat our gangster mentality. This kind of language is what causes
rejection from the lumpen organizations(L.O.s) in many cases. This is
the language that is used by state-financed organizations and Christian
groups/org.
I understand that MIM’s direction is different, but those who pick up
ULK and glance at it may see this language and will put
ULK down. My approach has, and will continue to be, one that
politicizes the gangster mentality. This is where you will find the most
dedicated comrades, and, because they are respected they find themselves
in a position to make real changes that erase that divide among
different gangs and further our struggle in the right direction. It is
about learning and teaching about our minor contradictions and working
to overcome these minor obstacles.
In ULK 67, USW 11 wrote about how the
state
of Washington is doing whatever it can to depoliticize prisoners,
and how among those places where you find the gangster mentality is
where you find the most resistance against the state.(1) When L.O.s
understand the power they have working collectively, things begin to
change and form. After all, gangs are in contrast with the
individualistic mentality in the United $tates, and are a response to
the socio-economic conditions we face in and out of prison. It’s a way
to survive, in a place where the capitalist and oppressive system
emphasizes individualism.
I’m writing about a problem that I’ve been dealing with for the last two
years of my incarceration. If you all have any information that will
help me, please send it or put me in touch with someone who can help.
Basically I had a normal life before I was incarcerated. Meaning I had
bills. Due to my incarceration I fell behind on all my bills, ruining my
credit.
I’ve found information in the library to run my credit report and
contact my debtors. But the mail room here will not allow me to send out
anything that has to do with finances. They advise me to appoint a power
of attorney.
My problem is this, how does DOC expect us to be “rehabilitated” while
incarcerated, but won’t allow us to do for ourselves? I’m going to be
released to society with terrible credit, no money and no means
(legally) to provide for myself. And I’m certainly not the only one.
This system is creating a cycle that turns DOC into a revolving door.
And does nothing but add to the paychecks for the state.
Everybody doesn’t have family out there to provide for them. So I
thought I could try to handle my own business but I’m being held back. I
read the policy and it basically states that as a prisoner we are not
allowed to sign financial contracts or start/conduct business via mail
or phone.
So I’m reaching out to see if any other prisoners are having this
problem. If so has there been a solution? Because I have several ideas
on how we can help ourselves to have the funds to start over once
released. But how do I implement them with the restrictions applied by
DOC? Hell I don’t even know if they’ll let me send this out asking for
help.
MIM(Prisons) responds: This comrade describes just one of many
problems releasees will face as soon as they hit the streets. Usually
thinking about your credit is not the first order of business for a
released prisoner. But this can have a big impact on your ability to
find housing and set up basic services (which require credit cards).
There are ways to rebuild your credit rating, but it’s slow and one more
problem to add to the difficulties of life on the streets with a prison
record. And as this writer points out, all this adds up to a revolving
door of recidivism.
We don’t have any easy ways to help fix this credit problem, or the
bigger question of how to set up businesses from behind bars. However,
we hope that our comrades with release dates or finite sentences will
start thinking about this well in advance. If you have someone on the
outside who can help square up your delinquent bills, it’s never too
early to ask for help. And if your prison allows you to send mail out to
those billers directly, you might be able to work something out with
them to defer the debt.
If anyone else has ideas to help folks hitting the streets to deal with
these sorts of financial challenges, write in to share them. We want to
help our comrades hitting the streets to ease their transition as much
as possible. This is critical to making it possible for releasees to
continue their political work on the streets. We need an army of former
prisoners building independent institutions of the oppressed, to support
new releasees.
Growing up in the internal semi-colonies (ie. Aztlán, New Afrika or the
reservations), one is confronted with a certain form of oppression. This
national oppression naturally compels our youth to come together and
unite for survival purposes. This phenomenon is mirrored anywhere in the
world where the contradictions exist between oppressor vs. oppressed
nations. This results in oppressed youth forming youth survival groups,
which the capitalist state calls “gangs.”
Lumpen organizations, or lesser-organized youth survival groups, are a
reaction to living under an oppressor nation and although it is a good
alternative to assimilation or attempted assimilation to Amerikkka,
there is a need to develop more fully to political consciousness.
Political consciousness will be what leads to liberation of our nations.
In my own development, I realized how my varrio will always be my
varrio, my homies always my homies, my brothers always my brothers. But
in order to liberate Aztlán it will take more than being a rebel. I now
know if i truly love my people and community i should uplift their
consciousness, not turn my back on them. The goal is to bring my people
to the side of revolution. The goal is to have my people develop as did
the excellent example of the Young Lords Party. From a so-called “gang”
to a revolutionary organization. This can be accomplished via political
education. Each one teach one. Start with your cellmate, then neighbors,
then homies on the tier and branch out. Leaders should institute
political education and raise the consciousness of the org. This is when
real accomplishments will be gained. Rise!
Transforming the gangster mentality into a revolutionary one is possible
because they are two sides of a coin. As an intermediary class the
lumpen can act out both bourgeois ethics (in the form of gangsterism) or
proletarian ethics (as revolutionaries).
The lumpen implementation of bourgeois ethics is the gangster. The
gangster in many ways imitates the most ruthless aspects of bourgeois
behavior, allowing them to be potential tools of the imperialists. Yet
there are aspects of the collective identity, the discipline, and
perhaps most importantly the connection to an oppressed nation, that you
see in both the gangster and the revolutionary. This is what
distinguishes the lumpen organization (L.O.) from the criminal gangs
made up of correctional officers and police departments.
The lumpen implementation of proletarian ethics is the revolutionary.
The lumpen revolutionary may be more adventurous and tend more towards
left errors than the proletariat. Regardless, choosing the proletarian
road, means reforming oneself to take on proletarian morality. The
collective action and rebelliousness of the lumpen organization must
mature into pure dedication to the people and a strategic approach to
protracted peoples’ war against imperialism.
We discussed these two roads in our review of J. Sakai’s
“The
Dangerous Class and Revolutionary Theory”.(1) As we said then,
there are two roads today, the communist and the capitalist. The
capitalist is the old road, the decaying road.
So when comrades keep bringing up this question of “how do we overcome
the gangster mentality,” it is essentially a question of how do we move
the lumpen off the old capitalist road and into building the new
communist one.
Our critics might counter, “wait a minute, plenty of people give up a
violent gang life without becoming proletarian revolutionaries.” And
they are correct. But this also has not put a dent in the presence of
the gangster mentality in our society, has it? Individuals aging out of
gangs and integrating into bourgeois society does nothing to combat
gangsterism because the motivation, the causes are still there. Even
those who reach out to dissuade youth from taking the same path only
provide a band-aid. A class of people, excluded from the means of
production and distribution, living in an economic system driven by
profit, will keep reproducing the gangster mentality. Until we can
replace capitalism with a system where everyone has a productive role to
play and peoples’ needs drive our society, instead of profit, only then
can we truly overcome the gangster mentality.
A few years back, in ULK 51 a comrade summed up some
discussion around this topic among USW comrades:
“Today’s youth show the same apathy, indifference and nihilism as the
youth of 1955. It was the civil rights movement that awoke the youth of
that era. USW comrades struggled over what today can take the place of
the civil rights movement. War, environment and imperialist expansion
were three good starting points to organize around. We lumpen youth have
more stake in the future environment and it is us who fight the wars. It
helps to understand that those starving to death and suffering/dying
from preventable diseases are our people. We must fulfill our destiny or
betray it. All this nitpicking and betrayal between sets/sides
contributes to humankind suffering. We must overcome this flaw.
“The principal enemy we must defeat is the glamorization of gangsterism.
A revolutionary or a gangster? What are we? Can the two coexist in a
persyn and still be progressive? Gangsterism plants fear by oppression,
and revolutionaries are in struggle against oppression. This internecine
violence we perpetrate between sets is what the pigs want us to do. They
sold us this shit in Scarface and we’ve built on to it and made
it our own. Overcoming the glamorization of gangsterism will take
proletarian morality, conscious rap, exposing the downsides and ills of
gangsterism, the glamorization of revolution, revolutionary culture, and
possibly to redefine the word gangsta. Gangsters are parasites and
revolutionaries are humankind’s hope. It’s as simple as that. We need to
leave the lumpen mentality for a proletarian one. Many true
revolutionaries were once gangsters. Gangsterism is a stage, basically.
“Self-respect, self-defense and self-determination define transitional
qualities of a revolutionary. Bunchy Carter, Mutulu Shakur and Tupac all
transcended the hood and grew into progressives. What we are seeking as
USW is opening up the spaces for gangsters of all walks of life to enter
the realm of anti-imperialism and begin a transformation of mind,
actions and habits to develop into the model of a revolutionary gangsta
with the capability of forwarding the cause of the people. We must
understand our potential. It is us, we reading these ULKs, that hold
imperialism in our fists. A real gangsta is one who has gone
revolutionary and has kicked off all the strings of social control -
mental illness, drugs, fantasy, despair, escapism, etc.”(2)
A program for overcoming the gangster mentality involves a multi-pronged
approach. We must expand and develop the membership of the vanguard
cadre organizations. Simultaneously we must organize the lumpen masses
around a minimal program of unity. As K.G. Supreme of USW stressed in an
article on this topic, it is revolutionary nationalism and
anti-imperialism that provides a viable group identity and movement to
rival that of the current L.O.s that dominate the terrain.
“Cultural Freedom is the best weapon for defeating the gangster
mentality. Cultural freedom that is geared in nationalist liberation of
oppressed nations, and exploiter nation suicide for members of the
euro-amerikan oppressor nation. As Marcus M. Garvey of the African
nationalist organization, UNIAACL said, ‘Power is the only argument that
satisfies man.’”
And as Pilli discusses in
“Love
Your Varrio by Liberating Your People,” we must embrace the
oppressed people, communities and organizations. And we must encourage
growth within them. Communists are not here to attack the gangsters or
the addicts, that is what the bourgeois state does. We are here to guide
others down the same path of education and growth that we have found.
United Struggle from Within has long put forth the slogan, “Unity from
the inside out.” This embodies the dialectical process of developing
unity within one’s own thinking so that one can better build unity with
others; that an organization must struggle within its membership to
build unity before it can unite with others in the nation; and that a
nation must build unity before it can properly unite in its own
interests with other oppressed nations.
“Unity-struggle-unity” is a related slogan that depicts how we should
approach building unity among the people, addressing contradictions
amongst the people. We can’t be all unity, we must challenge, question
and struggle. But we start and end with unity, so that we can grow in
that direction.
“Each one, teach one” is a slogan that stresses the role of education,
especially in these early stages. It also embodies the truth that we all
have things to learn from each other. Education and learning are a
central part of our program for building the cadre and the masses.
These slogans, and others, should be actively built around. Comrades
should study and popularize the 5 points of the United Front for Peace.
We should organize events and study programs around Black August, the
Commemoration of the Plan de San Diego and the September 9th Day of
Peace and Solidarity. MIM(Prisons)’s Free Books to Prisoners Program
offers study materials around all of these topics. We also offer
correspondence study courses, which all comrades wishing to work with
USW should join. We offer a wide array of revolutionary literature for
your own independent study and for prison-based study groups.
While uniting around study groups and education is important for
building cadre, most people will only be able to unite with us around
concrete battles. It is up to comrades on the ground to determine what
winnable battles exist where you are. What are the masses’ righteous
demands and how can we mobilize them to achieve them? How can we build
Serve the People programs locally by pooling resources and helping
others out? It is in these concrete battles that we gain mass support,
and we learn to organize, lead and challenge injustice.
We believe we have the correct theoretical basis and the framework of a
program for this stage of the prison movement. But there is much to be
done to experiment and learn from. As K.G. Supreme stresses, the lumpen
masses must get deep into the gangster mentality, understand it so as to
transform it.
“It is important, in defeating the gangster mentality, that those
serious about raising the consciousness of the subjects of gangsterism,
first come to terms with the mentality as a lifestyle from the vantage
point of inside the mind of a first world gangster. Approaching the
subject from any other angle would be an inferior method promised to
fail in producing any significant impact in the social behavior of those
that are the target. The investigation into this gangster mentality
should be led by those who are infected with the mentality. This isn’t
to say petit bourgeoisie nationalist groups cannot support the
leaderships of those struggling against the gangster mentality. It is to
say that the petit bourgeoisie nationalist must not seek to dictate the
leaderships that struggle to defeat the gangster mentality, as to not
contaminate the nationalist liberation objective, spreading culture
indifferent to the destructive culture, spread by the bourgeoisie.
“…As more and more ground level leaderships disconnect themselves with
the lifestyles that encourages behavior motivated by the gangster
mentality, there becomes a need to replace the un-natural behavior with
disciplines motivated by reconnection with natural lifestyles that are
in harmony with the growth and development of a parasite outkaste of
society, matured into a productive component of the internationalist
objective to end national oppression by the exploiting nations in
independent nations. Only culture that promotes national liberation
struggles, applying political methods in interest of the oppressed can
be relied on to replace the mentality of gangsterism… Emotions do not
dictate the course of action in gradual transformation from unconscious
behavior to conscious population. Instead the culture of educating
against defeatist mentality, borns the scientific approach of the
analytical prisoner, who in turn of reversing the gangsterism pop
culture for a popular culture of upliftment in nationalist liberation
objectives that free the available remedies of exploited and nationally
disadvantaged, free themselves. The key to defeating the gangster
mentality is investments in engineering techniques that make
anti-imperialist culture popular.”
“We find ourselves today forced into a re-examination of the whole
nature of black revolutionary consciousness and its relative standing
within a class society steeped in a form of racism so sensitized that it
extends itself even to the slightest variation in skin tone.” - Comrade
George (B.I.M.E.)
Almost 50 years after the assassinations of our comrades W. L., George,
Khata-Ri, etc, etc. and the enemy has totally disseminated our party and
reinforced their system to potentially negate our future revolutionary
movements! What do we do now?
Our demand for narcotics to temporarily numb the pain of half life in
capitalist U.$. is helping to fuel our distraction. Half of us sell dope
and the other half use it!! Killing our unity and revolutionary
potential! Now here we are, in capitalist U.$. torture chambers! Many of
us are addicts, chasing a high right now! Some of us “claim a set” and
from this identity cannot see being cool with the brotha of another
“set.” Some are lifers, who are weary of sacrificing themselves for the
reactionaries to benefit! Some have already fallen too far (i.e. KKKop
collaborators), and in turn, work covertly to undermine our movement!
Others are poltroons, and out of their fear(s), they knowingly sabotage
our progression as a U.$. disfavored minority. Many of us are “armchair
revolutionaries” in that our practice(s) never match our stated militant
goals. Others see control of the “underground economy” as being
revolutionary. I do not have the answers. I am simply a New Afrikan man
seeking community input as I continue to stride firmly. My questions
are:
How is the “revolutionary consciousness” developed in a time of
reactionary gangsterism?
At what point does this so called “revolutionary theorist” have
to put his theories into practice?
How can we ever trust a cat who has ever worked as an informant
or jail house rat? By his very obvious individualism he has demonstrated
his priority is ideal of “me first.” Which, to us, says that once the
pressure(s) of isolation, pig abuse(s), additional time, etc. comes into
play, he will tell again. Setting us back even further!
MIM(Prisons) responds: This comrade and eir questions posed was
one of the inspirations for the topic of this issue of ULK. And
we hope we have at least begun to provide some answers and guidance for
those of us struggling with these questions.
This comrade also mentions a serious side-effect of the current gangster
era, which is propped up by the drug economy. This reality serves as a
material incentive in the form of profits for the seller and in the form
of chemical triggers in the brain of the buyer. We addressed this
situation in more depth in ULK 59 where we recognized the
challenges in even questioning the drug economy in today’s prison
environment. It will require progress on other fronts to make a dent on
the struggle against the poisoning of oppressed communities.
So what is to be done today?
Build a Revolutionary Culture on the Streets
USW30: Recently I heard of my older brotha/comrade’s passing and
it has me wondering… how do the brothas/sistas, who’ve embraced
revolutionary consciousness inside, transition to outside struggles?
Taking into consideration that the lumpen are in a state of defeatism
and quite fratricidal!
I personally exited Federal Bureau Of Prisons after 17 calendars. I
jumped right into local progressive politics and organizational
volunteer work, serving the lumpen! Yet, seemingly at every outing one
was forced to repel some form of gang reactionary threat(s). Most of
which, stern chastisements sufficed. However, all B.S. aside, I guess
what I’m saying is, without a “progressive culture” in play within the
“hood” We are at risk of A) being victimized by our misguided lumpen,
conditioned by capitalism to fratricidal violence, B) or we ourselves
react to reactionary threats and in turn reinforce the lumpen’s
perceptions of us, “prison revolutionaries” that return to “gangster”
conduct once out.
In truth, the only communities I saw which had requisite support
systems; minimal threat of intra-national violence, and universal code
of community morality were Islamic. I continually read pieces in
ULK, where cats profess to be “materialist dialecticians” and as
such, against “spirituality.” What I suggest to those living in New
Afrikan areas in particular is to analyze the impact of Islam on it.
Contrast that with that of the so-called revolutionaries. We must figure
out more effective ways to bring unity, as we methodically strive to
bring Babylon down. Rather than spit unproductive rhetoric which
services interests of the pigs by dividing militants from one another.
Those who are truly analyzing the body of facts (i.e. U.$. history)
would have to acknowledge that those of Afrikan ancestry have always
held spiritual connections and/or beliefs in a higher power/creator.
Upwards of 40% of enslaved Afrikans were Muslim. Leading many slave
captors to recommend traffickers firstly “break” them (i.e. torture
Islam out of them) prior to bringing these known rebels to the United
$tates and England. My point being those who truly work to build
revolutionary culture must work with Muslims and in turn find common
ground to then gain traction in revolutionary culture building.
Materialists must dialectically look at U.$. history and correspond
tactics to today’s realities confronting historically oppressed peoples!
Teach Christians examples of Nat Turner, Denmark Vesey, etc. Teach
Muslims about El Hajj Malik Shabazz (Malcolm X), etc. That even though
we may come from varying socio-cultural backgrounds, we have the very
same oppressors and system. That the Muslims, Christians, Buddhists,
Atheists, Communists, etc. who live within U.$. borders all share the
same injustices, inequalities, and pig brutalities on a daily basis. As
such, we must cast side the divisive rhetoric and build class unity or
die. As a Muslim of New Afrika, I am obligated to fight all oppressors.
Personally, I could care less if the askari at my side believes or not.
Long as he/she is committed to struggle…to death or death row. Does it
matter if I must make Salah, before we run towards our oppressors? Well,
that’s my take and regardless, I will continue fighting, organizing, and
striving! Peace.
MIM(Prisons) responds:We agree with this author’s point that
we should be working with the left wing of the Muslim movement, and
other religions. We addressed this question in depth in ULK 48.
As communists we embrace materialism and encourage scientific thinking
about the world. But this does not prevent us from uniting with all who
can be rallied against imperialism. And the rabid anti-Muslim sentiments
coming from the Amerikan imperialists creates fertile breeding ground
for anti-imperialism.
Although we cannot find evidence of such a high percentage of Muslims
among enslaved Africans. At the time that slaves were captured from
Africa indigenous religions were the most common practice. But
traffickers (and slave owners) attempted to break slaves of all their
practices that tied them to their homeland, regardless of what religion
or other cultural norms.
While we often talk about the imprisoned lumpen as being one of the most
revolutionary populations in the United $tates, it is also in a
backwards state of affairs. Meanwhile, the last time we saw a strong
revolutionary consciousness penetrate the prison population was when
there were strong vanguard organizations in the oppressed nations on the
streets. We must recognize that part of building a strong revolutionary
movement in prisons is building an even stronger one on the outside.
United Struggle from Within serves as a conduit for connecting the two,
via prisoners who are released. MIM(Prisons)’s Re-Lease on Life Program
attempts to provide support to those who are struggling with these
challenges after release. But we have a lot of work to do to build
strong revolutionary communities for comrades around the United $tates.
Revolutionary Theorists or Revolutionaries
USW30: Within the context of criticism-self-criticism, I am
wondering when we as revolutionary theorists on the inside, shall
righteously analyze the definition(s) of “revolution”/“revolutionary”?
And in turn, be honest with ourselves (within the New Afrikan community)
about if we are truly on that path that Col J (RIP), W.L. (RIP) etc.
strode. I am questioning myself as well?! As the
Kentucky
comrade pointed out on p. 8 of ULK 65.(1)
Many of us claim to be revolutionaries, but have yet to truly embrace
the reality of revolution! Or, shed the ethos of Gangsta. We create
plethora of revolutionary documents in prisons, only to return to
society and criminality. Recently a young New Afrikan referred to a
fellow rad as “homeless dopefiend!” This made me think back.
The economy of capitalism murders millions daily. We have seemingly been
co-opted by enemy cultural tenants! We have comrades embracing drug
dealing as acceptable conduct! Poisoning our communities, profiting off
of the destruction of our underklass citizenry! Then, returning to
prison in turn advocating for addicted rads to be cast aside! We have
rads claiming revolutionary authenticity, that have yet to stand against
the real enemy, yet take pride in shopping blood of their own! The
contradictions are glaring and I believe these are just a few of the
things which have a real progressive and revolutionary movement
stagnating!
Perhaps a retracing of steps is needed? As in… acknowledgement of
enemy’s defeat of the revolutionary movement in the 60s! That the “Black
Power” of the 70s was a reformist attempt(s) to somehow safeguard some
aspect of sociocultural pride, while rejecting the dominant amerikkkan
kapitalist culture! Which in turn, led to the 80s crack epidemic and
subsequent abandonment of all things revolution. For a “piece of the
pie!”
These cats coming into prison today… fratricidal, apolitical, and
addicted! Are the effects of our failures as leaders, in our
communities! How can he claim Col J (RIP), when our day to day conduct
is a reactionary affirmation of “Superfly” and “the Mack?” These youth
see the hypocrisies, and this is why we cannot gain their support! To
speak about revolution and yet not live a revolutionary example is
unacceptable! And fraudulent in the 1st degree! I am no longer going to
refer to myself as a revolutionary until I engage in revolution! Nor
will I reference Col J(RIP) as my “comrade,” until I follow his
examples!
I thank the Kentucky comrade for eir critiques in the last two
paragraphs, as they struck home for me! We must reform the “gangstas”
within our movement… or destroy them! As their overt materialistic
individualisms will destroy us… or, turn the progressives back into
elements of reaction!
MIM(Prisons) responds: There is a bit of an existential crisis
for the revolutionary in non-revolutionary times. We don’t take on the
term “revolutionary” as if we were superheroes, but merely to describe
our political goals and ideology. But, it does bring us back to question
2 above. And we’d say that a revolutionary must always be putting eir
theories into practice. And that includes not waging revolutionary war
in a non-revolutionary situation. That is a basic principle of the
guerilla.
As USW30 says, the youth can detect the phony revolutionaries who just
talk the rhetoric while acting out the negative aspects of the gangster
role. We can act as revolutionaries, as individuals, in our day-to-day
behavior in interacting with, serving, and standing up for the people.
There’s a reason we get letters regularly mentioning the comrades who
died in the struggle 50 years ago. Their legacy lives on because they
stood up as examples. And even if our names don’t become legendary, we
will inspire the youth and the masses around us through our correct
actions.
First we must begin with asking why do we have a gangster mentality? It
is because we know we are under attack, and the form of warfare is
oppression and prejudice. We act in a way of gangster mentality because
we know we must defend ourselves, and our minds from such attacks.
Therefore, we are defensive. That is where the mind frame stimulates
from.
We are active in battle on these streets because we are no fools, we
know survival is at stake. Although street and hoodlum affairs keep
every gangster blind to which war we should really be fighting; our
focus should not be going against a gangster’s mind, our focus should
remain on ending all attacks so that a gangster no longer has to pay any
mind.
The best way to begin re-defining toughness, is through understanding;
by first accepting every man for who he is, as he is. It isn’t the
gangster that needs to change, what needs to change are the threats
against us that have made us what we are.
MIM(Prisons) responds: This comrade raises a good point about the
system of oppression that breeds the gangster mentality. Understanding
where people’s mindset comes from is a good first step to changing that
mindset. And as this writer reminds us, we shouldn’t blame people for
the culture that created them. The next step is transforming this lumpen
outlook into a revolutionary outlook. And that’s the long-term struggle
that we’re taking on in prisons right now. Conscious comrades behind
bars can step up and build by educating others. We can focus on building
peace between lumpen organizations through the United Front for Peace in
Prisons. And through this peace we can turn our warfare on the real
enemy, the criminal injustice system.
The declining rate of profit is an unavoidable problem under capitalism,
and a move toward fascism among the imperialists is primarily a result
of this declining rate of profit. Some could interpret this to mean that
fascism is an inevitable outcome of late-stage imperialism. But fascism
isn’t actually in the interests of most imperialists, if they can avoid
it. And today, most are in denial that the declining rate of profit is
even a problem. In the 1930s such illusions were smashed by the
realities of the Great Depression. Since then, the imperialist countries
have managed to put off any comparable economic collapses at home.
Barring such extreme conditions, most imperialists don’t want fascism.
The protectionism and extreme militarism that come with fascism are bad
for most capitalists’ profits. Militarism is good for increasing demand
by destroying capital and infrastructure, and creating a market for very
expensive military hardware. And some imperialists are just
ideologically geared towards fascism for subjective reasons. But the
problem is, imperialism is also bad for profits in that the rate of
profit declines as capitalism advances. This is an inherent
contradiction in capitalism. Profits come only from the exploitation of
humyn labor. And so, as more efficient equipment is built, and worker
productivity is increased, and automation is expanded, profit margins
fall. Similarly, when the proletariat rises up, capitalist profits are
also impacted. Both of these contradictions can push the imperialists
towards fascism.
With the global markets entirely divided up under imperialism, there
isn’t any easy way for the capitalists to increase their individual
profits. Only with the destructiveness of world war and re-division of
territories can this be changed.
While most imperialists do not favor fascism in their own countries
under normal conditions, they do readily export it to the Third World to
maintain imperialist interests there. The United $tates is the main
force behind fascism in the Third World. These countries are not
imperialist so they can not be fascist independently. However, their
imperialist masters can and do impose fascism from the outside when they
deem it necessary to retain control. We have seen this over and over. In
Latin America, where the United $tates fears any sign of bourgeois
nationalism, there is a particularly brutal history. Just two examples
are seen in the coups to overthrow Allende in Chile and Arbenez in
Guatemala. After the coups, the U.$.-backed replacement governments
massacred supporters of the democratically-elected governments as well
as other activists and communists.
Here in California, the Agreement to End Hostilities has ushered in a
new era for all of us behind bars and on the streets. Prison yards in
California are a laboratory for society at large. If we can do it here
then so goes the rest of the country. It’s not easy to undo racial
antipathy, but we are doing it here in California. Every time we forge a
new friendship or business association with those of other races it is
one more bridge across what divides all of us.
“The pig system” has tactics to separate us so we are weak without
unity. But those of us with an open eye toward the future work to
minimize what can be used against us. I myself am nearly 50 years old
and have spent over 30 years as a serious hater as part of a well-known
street/prison gang. The 21st century will be one of great change for us
all. The best advice I can give my fellow humans is to let go of the
dogmatic ideology of the 20th century and evolve in a constructive
manner. Our fight is not between one another but between the “haves” and
“have nots.” We are the “have nots,” no one will give anything to us; we
will have to take what we need for our people.
Educate yourself in history, politics and economics. The United Front
for Peace in Prisons (UFPP) Statement of Principles is a good place to
start. Peace, Unity, Growth, Internationalism, Independence is a sound
formula for success. If you are reading this it is not by accident.
Mankind, in order to survive, will have to reach for the stars at some
point. But first we must refine ourselves in the furnace of evolution.
If we humans as a species can cooperate with each other, in time we will
cross the threshold. It starts with the man in the cell next to you or
across the way. Peace.
In Struggle, A reformed Nazi
MIM(Prisons) adds: We print this as a testament to the strength
of the AEH, the UFPP, and especially the anti-imperialist prison
movement that inspires those who’ve held all sorts of backwards lumpen
mentalities to become arbiters of revolutionary unity and change.
However, it is easier to win over those who have matured and learned the
errors of their ways over time. To be successful we need the
20-somethings, the youngsters, the up-and-comers to take the
revolutionary road. We must develop tactics to accelerate the education
and maturation of the young lumpen leaders and would-be leaders in our
midst.
We just got word that the Texas Department of Criminal inJustice (TDCJ)
has denied delivery of the TDCJ Offender Grievance Manual to one of our
subscribers in Texas. Not just at the unit level (we were not informed
of the censorship at the unit level by Polunsky Unit mailroom staff, in
direct
contradiction
to TDCJ’s own policies)(1), but the Director’s Review Committee even
upheld the censorship of the grievance manual. The Director.
Well, what could possibly be the reason given for censoring TDCJ’s own
manual which was written for “offenders”? Couldn’t tell you. All the
notice says is it was “received in contradiction with BP-03.91, Uniform
Offender Correspondence Rules.” Don’t forget, BP-03.91 doesn’t just say
that this item is denied delivery to this particular subscriber. It says
that this item is banned in the entire state for all time. Just like
Chican@ Power and the Struggle for Aztlán, our “Defend the Legacy
of the Black Panther Party” study pack, and multiple issues of Under
Lock & Key (at least including Nos. 63, 57, 54, 51, 45, 35, 32,
28, and 27).
You might be wondering why MIM Distributors is sending in the grievance
manual anyways. It’s a TDCJ document, after all. And according to the
Texas Board of Criminal Justice,
the
grievance manual ought to be available to prisoners.(2) Well, in
September 2014, a memo went out that
removed
the grievance manual from all TDCJ law libraries.(2) Why would they
do this? Don’t know, they didn’t say. TDCJ’s grievance system is
notoriously ineffective and deliberately obstructive. And Texas is
historically one of the worst states when it comes to brutal national
oppression. Seems to be part of those overall patterns.
We did have a “victory,” so minor that it’s even embarrassing to use
that word. The Director’s Review Committee Decision Form actually listed
the name of the item that they censored! Wow! We didn’t have to go
hunting around in the list of mail we sent to this subscriber, guessing
which item was censored based on the date we mailed it out. This is
often a very difficult detail to pin down, considering how much mail we
send in and the weeks- and months-long delays in the TDCJ censorship
procedures.
So, we’ve been protesting the ineffective grievance process in Texas for
almost ten years. The grievance manual was hidden almost 5 years ago.
And now we can’t even mail in the grievance manual. We do plan to appeal
this censorship to the Director’s Review Committee, but often our
letters to them go unanswered. In the short term, we need people (and
lawyers!) in Texas to put pressure on TDCJ to stop obstructing
prisoners’ access to the grievance system. Ultimately we need to
overthrow this totally bunk injustice system and the economic system it
protects.
The u.$. economy has succeeded in stabilizing itself, at least for the
near future. As reported previously (1,2), the majority of amerikans are
prospering; their pockets lined with the bribes of imperialism, the
labor aristocrats of the united $nakes are unlikely to support genuine
socialism any time soon.
In 2007, amerika faced an economic downturn. Excessive lending allowing
amerikans to buy overvalued houses, which led banks to the point of
collapse when debts could not be repaid. As the effects of the crisis
spread, stocks fell, jobs were lost and the economy began to contract.
The financial crisis has been rightly recognized as the worst to affect
the First World since the Great Depression. However, it has also been
rightly recognized as being of lesser severity, earning it the moniker
the Great Recession.
And since then? The state of the amerikan economy has been not that of
crisis but of recovery. Unemployment peaked in October 2009 at 10.0%.
After that, it steadily declined. In early 2019, almost a decade later,
unemployment now sits at 4.0%. In fact, by this measure the u.$. economy
is doing better than ever. Monthly unemployment figures in 2006, before
the crisis, were around 4.5%, 4.4% at the lowest. In 2018, they were
around 4.0%, with the highest being 4.1% in the beginning of the
year.(3) Labor force participation has decreased 2% since October 2009,
but is at an average value over the last 65 years.(4) Another indicator
of economic prosperity, the Dow Jones Industrial Average, has grown over
the past five years, surpassing 25,000 points and setting 15 all-time
record highs in 2018.(5) The bull market does not just enrich a few
bourgeoisie: with 55% of amerikans owning stocks, the majority of the
u.$. population is petty-bourgeois and benefits from rising stock
market. (6)
In 2017, Amerikans spent, on average, more than five hours a day
pursuing leisure, a number essentially constant over the preceding
decade.(7) Between 2009 and 2018, average wages increased by 23%, faster
than the rate of inflation.(8,9) As 2018 drew to a close, the average
hourly wage in amerika was $27.53 (median hourly wages have seen similar
steady increases to just over $23).
Contrast this state of affairs with China, where the hourly wage in
2016, adjusted for purchasing power parity, was $6.39. Or India where it
is $3.10.(10) In China, hourly pay is less than a quarter of that in the
u.$. In India, it is less than an eighth. It is clear that this wage
disparity can only exist because amerikans benefit from the exploited
surplus value of Third World labor.(11) So-called socialist groups in
amerika “fight for 15,” ignoring both the low wages paid in other parts
of the world and the fact that many workers inside u.$. borders are, by
virtue of nationalist immigration policies designed to preserve
amerikkkan wealth, considered “illegal” and unable to benefit from a
higher minimum wage.
Despite the fact that the numbers above have been adjusted for inflation
and geographical differences in purchasing power let’s entertain the
supposition that some aspect of the cost of living has not been
accounted for and that amerikan workers are still being exploited. If
amerikans were truly being exploited, then they would have little to no
property or wealth of their own. However, 64% of amerikans own a home,
about the same as in the mid 1990s.(12) This number is fairly stable;
since the 1960s, homeownership rates have fluctuated in a fairly narrow
range, peaking close to 70% in 2004 and never falling below 62.9% since
1964.(13) In 2018, the average u.$. home had an asking price of over
$200,000.(14) Many amerikans own their homes outright, while others may
have a mortgage and look forward to outright ownership in the future. An
amerikan with a 30-year mortgage, for example, expects that they will
pay off their home in 30 years and enjoy a comfortable retirement in it.
Ignoring issues of credit, interest and down payment that would
automatically exclude Third World workers, a Chinese worker attempting
to buy the same house with a quarter of the income would need to spread
out payments over 120 years, while an Indian worker would need to labor
for literal centuries. The average amerikan dwelling, leaving out
furniture, cars and other luxuries, already represents a greater
accumulation of wealth than the typical Third World worker could make in
eir lifetime.
And it is not a question of a vast economic divide within the U.$. Even
among amerikans with an income below the national median, over half
owned a home in 2018.(15) The majority of amerikans are therefore in
possession of considerable wealth, which they invest in assets and spend
on plush accommodations. The typical amerikan acts more like a member of
the bourgeoisie than of the proletariat.
There remain significant economic differences between the wealth of
whites and the wealth of New Afrikans and Chican@s within U.$. borders.
But even with that disparity, the vast majority of U.$. citizens are
profiting from the exploitation of the Third World, giving them a solid
economic interest in imperialism. In a future article we will provide an
update on the economic status of oppressed nations within U.$.
borders.
A Boom in False Consciousness
In the bourgeois media we’ve seen a recent uptick in pieces examining
the growing generational divide. Older commentators bemoan the laziness
and entitlement of millennial (born in 1981-1996), while younger
commentators decry the indulgence and thoughtlessness of baby boomers
(born 1946-1964) who have depleted the Earth’s resources and left no
economic opportunities for future generations. The former is the typical
“kids these days” grousing. Disproving the latter: homeownership among
people aged 35 and under has gone from 64.0% in 1994 to 64.4% in
2018.(16) In other words, economic opportunity has actually increased
for younger amerikans. Millennial wealth has more than doubled since
2007, with the other generations seeing either a net increase in wealth
or a partial recovery in the value of their sizable assets since the
financial crisis.(17)
Any discussion of a generational gap in economic opportunity is false
consciousness. Nothing could underscore this point further than the fact
that any generational disparity in wealth will be rendered moot when the
millennial children of bourgeois boomers receive their inheritances. In
fact, it will not even take that long. Just as aristocratic scions of
yore could remain resident in the family manor, or plantation, and not
have to worry about actually working for a living, young “professionals”
(i.e. those tasked with administrating the parasitic U.$. economy) can
buy large homes in expensive metropolitan areas because they receive
financial assistance from their parents.(18)
Amerikans, as a whole, enjoy high wages and a comfortable lifestyle not
available in the Third World. The majority of amerikans possess
considerable wealth in the form of houses and are closer to the
petty-bourgeois than the proletariat in their economic position. Because
of this economic interest, the Amerikan populace is unlikely to support
a genuine communist revolution. Without a solid internationalist
perspective, any talk of socialism within amerika will be a phony
national “socialism,” at best redistributing from one tier of the labor
aristocracy to another and at worst heightening the violence inherent to
international superexploitation.