I recently received the level 2 study group. One question it asks is
“Does MIM(Prisons) recruit members from prison? Why or why not? Do you
agree? Explain.” My answer, in part, was “As prisoners we need
MIM(Prisons) to not be subjected to our oppression, which helps to
protect the integrity and Third World viewpoint of the MIM.” I realized
that what I was referring to was resistance to what I once read a
comrade call “bourgeois brainwashing.” I then set about to understand
the psycho-social dynamics of this bourgeois brainwashing and how we
must form resistance from within. I also examined the role played by
MIM(Prisons) and the tie to how we view the Third World.
Bourgeois brainwashing uses the psychological phenomenon of
dehumanization to facilitate the deconstruction of our value systems.
Used as a defense against painful or overwhelming emotions,
dehumanization entails a decrease in a person’s sense of his own
individuality and in his perception of the humanness of others. This
dehumanization of others allows for their maltreatment to be acquiesced
in with relative freedom from the restraints of conscience or feelings
of comradeship.
Dehumanization has two interrelated processes: self-directed
dehumanization, which relates to self-image and denotes the
deterioration of an individual’s sense of his own humanness, and
object-directed dehumanization, which refers to one’s perceiving others
as lacking in those attributes that are considered to be most human.
These two forms of dehumanization are mutually reinforcing: reduction in
the fullness of one’s feelings for other human beings diminishes one’s
own sense of self; any reduction of the humanness of one’s self-image
limits that person’s capacity for relating to others.
You see, the first step is for the pigs to beat down our self-worth and
self-respect. Once we lose sight of our own humanness, we cannot see it
in others. We then have complacence, even to the point of being helpful,
while the U.$. empire oppresses, occupies and exploits the Third World
nations. Why should I care? The Third World proletariat are less than
human anyway. I didn’t put them in the situation they are in, they put
themselves there, therefore, they deserve it!
Thus, oppression necessarily rests upon dehumanization, which diminishes
and morphs our value system. We can resist dehumanization by holding on
to our self-worth and self-respect, and our communistic value system
that brought us to participate in the MIM. This takes resistance from
within; from within the prison and from within our own selves.
There is a process of resistance called counter-socialization. To keep
our values insulated from the conformist bourgeois values shoved down
our throats while incarcerated is no easy task. It requires a
stabilizing point of reference and behavior patterns that harmonize, to
some degree, with our own values. These are two distinct aspects: a
supportive reference system or group, and behavior patterns that offer
protection against dehumanization of self and others. Our values or
attitudes may not be consistent with the behavior expected or even
forced upon us, which makes us vulnerable to a deep psychological
discord with accompanying stress and pull toward equilibrium to reduce
this mental discord and stress. Unless we are careful, our values may
subtly change to match our behavior, and the brainwashing has begun.
For us to keep our communistic values from dying or fading away, it
helps (it may even be essential) to have value sharers to whom we can
refer for guidance and support. This reference group or individual can
be other persons within the prison – a formal or informal counter-group.
Such a reference system has the advantage of being accessible, relevant
(everyone in the same location), and standing out in its interpretive
scheme. Our counter-values can also be sustained through contact with or
reference to people outside of the prison system. This support has the
advantage of not being caught up in the same dehumanizing process as us
and, therefore, may be more objective. Furthermore, their existence does
not depend on the prison system – a very important point if the going
gets rough and the pigs set about to silence our dissension.
To stay on guard, we should occasionally test the limits of the pigs’
tolerance for deviant behavior. If we have too much fear of disciplinary
action or retaliation we may too narrowly define the boundaries of
freedom and may mentally discard alternatives of action that could be
advantageously pursued. We can be guided by the experience of others,
but more can be gained from personal testing. Personal testing reaffirms
a commitment to resistance and nudges us out of complacency. It also
gives us a sense of freedom of action, thereby revitalizing our
self-determination. To keep from absorbing a new dehumanized value
system, we may find it useful from time to time to gut-react with
automatic responses. If we always think about consequences before we
express our true feelings, the feelings themselves may imperceptibly
change. Just as the pigs limit what they will tolerate by way of
opposition, we must also limit what we will tolerate by way of
co-optation.
One of the most intriguing questions from both a theoretical and
practical standpoint is: how long and under what conditions can a person
maintain dehumanizing conditions and discordant values without support
of any kind from others? Can internal fortitude based on some seemingly
distant reference system keep one’s brain from being washed, and if so,
how? One important aspect of value preservation under conditions of
deprivation and debasement is a sense of self-worth. We must hold on to
self-respect by preserving some fragment of the truth about ourselves
that we respect. Maintaining our integrity under repressive conditions
may also require some mental separation of the self from the conditions
the pigs force upon us. When we invoke the scientific stance of the
observer, in effect, we refuse to be co-opted into the machinery of
self-debasement. The preservation of the psyche is also facilitated by
exercising freedom of action, however restrictive the limits. This may
be as simple as the exercise of anticipating what is going to happen and
having predictions validated by future events. Pro-action, as opposed to
reaction, also gives us back some sense of control.
MIM(Prisons) offers the supportive reference system outside of the
prison system and strongly encourages us to start our own localized
study groups to support each other. They also offer support through the
formal group United Struggle from Within. This support is imperative in
combating the bourgeois brainwashing by allowing us to keep our
communistic values front and center by giving us a
criticism/self-criticism forum and correcting us when our values begin
to morph. MIM(Prisons) also supports us in action. They give us support
in testing the limits, in the grievance process, in organizing, and in
letting our voices be heard.
Comrades, we must not fall prey to the pigs’ dehumanization efforts,
communistic value diminishment, and subsequent bourgeois brainwashing.
It takes more than passively reading an article or book and agreeing
with the content – it takes action! When we start to think that our
oppression is our own fault, then we start to justify the oppression of
the Third World nations, by the U.$. empire, with some backward
bourgeois thought process. We must resist, and this must be resistance
from within!